Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z20070016
Project Number Z20070016
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2021-03-22 17:03:47CASE NO. PB1060MM
 BJS @ BRANDSMART
 751 WEST EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446,
 [email protected]
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
 (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE
 SCHEDULED A PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MAY 22, 2020), THE
 PLANNING DIVISION MAY NOTIFY THE APPLICANT THAT THE
 CASE IS CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
 REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 INNOVATIVE FEATURES LISTED IN JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
  
 1) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WAIVERS ARE TO ENCOURAGE THE USE
 OF INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES
 TO CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN
 THE CITY. THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW ARE STATED AS THE
 INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES
 FROM THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND STAFF'S RESPONSE:
  
 A. PROPOSED INTERCONNECTIVITY TO THE ADJACENT SITE ****
 THE SITE PLAN DOES SHOW INTERCONNECTIVITY; HOWEVER, IT
 DOES NOT ALIGN WITH THE CARWASH NEXT DOOR. THIS WILL BE
 DISCUSSED IN MORE DEPTH LATER IN THE COMMENTS.
 B. SIGNIFICANTLY UPGRADING THE LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE
 **** THE LANDSCAPE AREA BEHIND BRANDSMART THAT IS
 REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE NO. 3122-98 IS PROPOSED TO HAVE
 ALL OF THE EXISTING MATURE TREES AND PALMS EITHER
 RELOCATED OR REMOVED. PLEASE NOTE THE LANDSCAPE COMMENT
 REQUIREMENT THAT YOU MUST PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS THAT
 YOU ARE INCREASING THE TREE CANOPY/MASS IN THIS AREA.
 THE PLAN REPLACES THE BERMED LANDSCAPE AREA WITH THE
 DETENTION AREA, WHICH PROVIDES LESS VISUAL BUFFERING.
 NOTE: ONCE STAFF HAS THIS ANALYSIS, IT CAN BE
 DETERMINED IF THERE IS AN UPGRADE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE
 SAME ANALYSIS FOR THE AREA IN FRONT OF THE PROPOSED
 BJS.
 C. OFFERING A NEW PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY PARK
 AREA/WALKABLE AMENITIES **** THIS NEEDS TO BE UPDATED
 TO REFLECT IS A BOARDWALK THROUGH A BIOSWALE AREA.
 THERE IS NO LONGER A SEAT WALL, BENCHES, A DECORATIVE
 CONCRETE PATH AND PAVER PLAZA. ADDITIONALLY, AS
 PROPOSED, THE BOARDWALKS THROUGH THE BIOSWALE AREA (IN
 ACTUALITY A STANDARD BAHIA GRASS DRY DETENTION AREA)
 DOES NOT MEET THE THRESHOLD OF INNOVATIVE LANDS
 PLANNING TO OFF SET DESIGN THAT IS PROPOSED AND THE
 WAIVERS REQUIRED BY THE DESIGN. IN ORDER TO COMPLY, THE
 BIOSWALE NEEDS TO BE TRULY DESIGNED (AND MAINTAINED) AS
 A BIOSWALE THAT PROVIDES BOTH NATURAL DRAINAGE
 FILTERING AND HABITAT. THE TWO PROPOSED BOARDWALKS NEED
 TO CONNECT PARALLEL TO EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE SO THAT
 USERS CAN TRAVERSE THE LENGTH OF THE BIOSWALE.
 D. INCLUDE OVERALL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR THE INFILL AND
 REDEVELOPMENT OF THE PCD **** TO REPEAT, THE CREATION
 OF DESIGN GUIDELINES THAT JUST INCLUDE THE WAIVERS IS
 NOT A JUSTIFICATION FOR THE WAIVERS REQUESTED AND ARE
 NOT JUSTIFICATION FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
 E. REDUCE THE IMPACT OF THE REQUESTED PCD WAIVERS BY
 NEW PROJECT DESIGN GUIDELINES **** TO REPEAT, DESIGN
 GUIDELINES THAT RESTATE THE WAIVERS DO NOT REDUCE THEIR
 IMPACT.
 F. CREATE A POA FOR THE OVERALL MAINTENANCE CARE AND
 UPKEEP OF THE NEW COMMON AREAS **** CREATING A POA FOR
 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE IS NOT INNOVATIVE AND SHOULD BE
 A GIVEN FOR ANY COMMERCIAL PROJECT.
 G. THE SITE'S REDEVELOPMENT WILL BRING ADDITIONAL AD
 VALOREM TAX BASE TO THE CITY **** ADDITIONAL AD VALOREM
 TAX BASE IS NOT AN INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING DEVELOPMENT
 TECHNIQUE AND DOES NOT RESULT IN DESIRABLE AND
 ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT.
 H. THE OVERALL PROJECT WILL BE AN ECONOMIC VALUE-ADDED
 ADDITION TO THE CITY'S CONTINUED ECONOMIC SUCCESS ****
 AN ECONOMIC VALUE-ADDED PROJECT NOT AN INNOVATIVE LAND
 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUE AND DOES NOT RESULT IN
 DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED SITE DESIGN DOES NOT
 INCLUDE THE USE OF SUFFICIENT INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING
 AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES TO CREATE A DESIRABLE AND
 ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT TO JUSTIFY THE GRANTING OF THE
 REQUESTED WAIVERS. WHILE THE REVISED DESIGN ALONG
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE HAS STARTED TO HEAD IN THE RIGHT
 DIRECTION, THE TWO DETENTION AREAS SURROUNDED BY TREES
 NEED TO BE ENHANCED AND TURNED INTO TRUE BIOSWALES WITH
 THE LARGER ONE (IN FRONT OF BRANDSMART) HAVING THE
 BOARDWALK TRAVERSING ITS LENGTH TO APPROACH THE IN
 INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES TO
 CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN THE
 CITY. YOU WILL ALSO SEE THE ENHANCEMENTS TO THE BJS
 FA?ADE THAT WILL RESULT IN A MORE ATTRACTIVE PEDESTRIAN
 EXPERIENCE.
  
 WAIVERS
  
 3) STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE WAIVERS LISTED IN THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AS WELL AS WHAT STAFF HAS
 IDENTIFIED BASED ON THE PLANS AND HAS PROVIDED THEM
 BELOW WITH COMMENTARY.
  
 A. WAIVER REQUESTED FOR NUMBER OF ON SITE PARKING
 SPACES REQUIRED - PLANNING STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
 PARKING STUDY AND IS AWAITING INPUT FROM TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING FOR FINAL COMMENTS.
  
 B. INTERIOR LOT LINE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS - STAFF WOULD
 ACCEPT THE WAIVER REQUEST; HOWEVER, SINCE THERE ARE
 LOCATIONS ALONG THE EXTERIOR BUFFERS THAT DO NOT
 MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, STAFF CANNOT
 JUSTIFY THAT THE INTENT OF THE INTERNAL LANDSCAPE
 BUFFERS ARE BEING MET BY THE PROVISION OF THE EXTERNAL
 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS. IF EXTERNAL BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ARE
 MET, THE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT
 BASED ON THE PROVISION OF A TRUE BIOSWALE WITH FULL
 BOARDWALK CAN OFFSET THIS WAIVER REQUEST.
  
 C. MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS - NEED HEIGHT OF
 BRANDSMART TO VERIFY THE REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK (10
 FEET) TO SEE IF A WAIVER IS REQUIRED. IF NEEDED, THE
 MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE
 PROVISION OF A TRUE BIOSWALE WITH FULL BOARDWALK CAN
 OFFSET THIS WAIVER REQUEST.
  
 D. THERE IS NO MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IN A GENERAL
 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT SO THE LISTED WAIVER TO BUILDING
 HEIGHT DOES NOT APPLY AND NEEDS TO BE REMOVED. NOTE:
 TALLER BUILDINGS REQUIRE GREATER SETBACKS, BUT THAT, IF
 REQUIRED, IS COVERED BY COMMENT #3C.
  
 E. NUMBER OF SIGNS ON THE BJS - 3 PERMITTED, 6
 PROPOSED. MEETS SF ALLOWANCE. THE MORE DESIRABLE AND
 ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT BASED ON THE PROVISION OF A TRUE
 BIOSWALE WITH FULL BOARDWALK CAN OFFSET THIS WAIVER
 REQUEST.
  
 F. NUMBER OF SIGNS ON THE FUEL CANOPY - 3 PERMITTED, 4
 PROPOSED. THE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT
 BASED ON THE PROVISION OF A TRUE BIOSWALE WITH FULL
 BOARDWALK CAN OFFSET THIS WAIVER REQUEST.
  
 G. SIGNS ON THE SHORT END OF THE FUEL CANOPY EXCEED
 REQUIRED SIGNAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWANCE. STAFF IS NOT
 PREPARED TO AGREE TO THIS WAIVER.
  
 H. LISTED WAIVER FOR BACKING INTO A STREET DOES NOT
 APPLY AND NEEDS TO BE REMOVED.
  
 I. LISTED WAIVER OF 18 SPACES IN A ROW DOES NOT APPLY
 AND NEEDS TO BE REMOVED. REGARDLESS, STAFF WILL NOT
 SUPPORT THIS WAIVER SINCE THE SITE IS ALREADY
 REQUESTING TO HAVE NO LANDSCAPE BUFFER BETWEEN THE TWO
 PARCELS AND THE PARCEL LINES ARE IN THE PARKING AREAS.
 THIS WAIVER WOULD REDUCE PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE.
  
 J. NOT PLANTING TREES IN THE BUFFER ALONG I-95 IN FRONT
 OF THE SIGNS. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REDUCTIONS IN THE
 PLACEMENT OF BUFFER LANDSCAPE, ESPECIALLY FOR SIGNS.
  
 K. NOT PLANTING ALONG A PORTION OF THE SITE ADJACENT TO
 FUTURE CARWASH DUE TO EASEMENT. STAFF HAS COVERED THIS
 IN THE EASEMENT SECTION OF THE COMMENTS.
  
 4) THE SITE REQUIRES A MINOR SUBDIVISION, BUT NO PLAT
 WAS PROVIDED FOR REVIEW.
  
 5) THE FAR TABLE ON SHEET C101.0 IS INCORRECT. THE
 MAXIMUM FAR FOR THE SITE IS 1.0, NOT 2.0. WHILE THE
 SITE COMPLIES, THE TABLE NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED.
  
 PARKING
  
 6) THE PLANS NOW IDENTIFY COMPACT SPACES, WHICH ARE ALL
 DESIGNATED AS EMPLOYEE PARKING SPACES. WHERE DO
 EMPLOYEES WITH NON-COMPACT CARS PARK?
  
 7) THE BRANDSMART EMPLOYEE COMPACT SPACES MUST BE
 LABELED ON THE PLAN.
  
 8) THE EMPLOYEE PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO THE 0.34
 ACRE DRY DETENTION AREA SHOULD HAVE THE CURB AT 14 FEET
 WITH A TWO FOOT OVERHANG AND REMOVE THE WHEEL STOPS
 (NOT BOTH A CURB AND WHEEL STOPS). NOTE: THERE MUST BE
 A MINIMUM OF 16 FEET FROM THE END OF THE PARKING SPACE
 TO THE EMPLOYEE PARKING SIGN POST OR THE PARKING SPACE
 IS NONCOMPLIANT.
  
 9) THE SIGN POSTS BETWEEN THE FACING EMPLOYEE PARKING
 SPACES ARE ONE FOOT IN DIAMETER, WHICH ENCROACH INTO
 THE PARKING SPACES AND MAKE THE 16 FOOT DEEP COMPACT
 PARKING SPACES NONCOMPLIANT.
  
 10) THE SIGN POSTS BETWEEN THE FACING TIRE CENTER
 PARKING SPACES ARE ONE FOOT IN DIAMETER, WHICH ENCROACH
 INTO THE PARKING SPACES MAKING THE SPACES NO LONGER
 CODE COMPLIANT AS THEY ARE NO LONGER 18 FEET DEEP.
  
 11) THE SIGN POSTS BETWEEN THE FACING MEMBER WITH
 INFANT PARKING SPACES ARE ONE FOOT IN DIAMETER, WHICH
 ENCROACH INTO THE PARKING SPACES MAKING THE SPACES NO
 LONGER CODE COMPLIANT AS THEY ARE NO LONGER 18 FEET
 DEEP.
  
 12) THE LIGHT POSTS IN THE PARKING ROWS ON THE EASTERN
 PARKING AREA MUST BE LOCATED IN THE CORNER WHERE THE
 FOUR SPACES MEET, NOT IN THE MIDDLE AS SHOWN AS THIS
 RENDERS THE PARKING SPACES NON-COMPLIANT BASED ON THE
 PARKING SPACE NO LONGER BEING 18 FEET DEEP.
  
 13) UPDATED COMMENT: WHERE THERE IS NOT PLANNED TO BE A
 VEHICLE OVERHANG AT THE FRONT OF THE PARKING SPACES,
 WHEEL STOPS MUST BE PROVIDED AND SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
 YOU SHOULD NOT BE INSTALLING WHEEL STOPS AND CURBS. YOU
 THE CURB SHOULD BE PULLED BACK TO THE WHEEL STOP LINE
 WITH THE OVERHANG PROVIDED.
  
 14) PARKING PROVIDED ? VERIFIED AFTER THE LANDSCAPE
 CORRECTIONS ARE MADE.
  
 15) REPEAT COMMENT: NO BICYCLE PARKING WAS PROVIDED.
 CODE COMPLIANT BICYCLE PARKING, BASED ON THE NUMBER OF
 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED, IS REQUIRED.
  
 SITE CIRCULATION
  
 16) THE CROSS ACCESS POINT DOES NOT ALIGN WITH THE
 LOCATION SHOWN ON THE RECENTLY SUBMITTED CARWASH
 REDEVELOPMENT ON THE OLD CHINESE RESTAURANT PARCEL.
 BRIAN CHEGUIS STATED THAT HE HAD COORDINATED WITH THE
 KIMLEY HORN TEAM TO ALIGN THE CROSS ACCESS. THE CROSS
 ACCESS POINT IS FURTHER TO THE WEST FROM WHERE IT IS
 SHOWN ON YOUR PLAN, WHICH CREATES A SAFER SITUATION
 THAN THE LOCATION THAT YOU SHOW CLOSER TO EXECUTIVE
 CENTER DRIVE. PLEASE SHOW ALIGN YOUR PLANS WITH THE
 CARWASH CROSS ACCESS LOCATION.
  
 17) THE CARWASH APPLICANT PROVIDED A COPY OF THE
 EASEMENT WITH COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS COVERING THE
 CROSS ACCESS AREA. IT INDICATES THAT BEST BUY HAS AN
 INTEREST IN THE CROSS ACCESS, SPECIFICALLY A DRIVE TO
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE. PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION
 THAT BEST BUY HAS RELEASED THEIR INTEREST IN THE
 EASEMENT. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS LANDSCAPING OBSTRUCTING
 BEST BUY FROM UTILIZING THE EASEMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT
 REGARDLESS OF WHAT IS STATED IN THE EASEMENT, BEST BUY
 HAS NO RIGHTS TO THE INSTALLATION OF AN OFF PREMISE
 SIGN, WHICH WOULD BE IN VIOLATION OF THE ZONING AND
 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
  
 SIGNAGE
  
 18) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ISLAND WITH THE EXISTING
 BRANDSMART SIGN IS AN INTERIOR PARKING ISLAND AND IS
 THUS REQUIRED TO CONTAIN A CODE COMPLIANT TREE.
  
 19) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE WHAT THE BJS FUEL STATION
 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS WILL LOOK LIKE. PLEASE NOTE THAT IF
 THE SIGNS ARE PROPOSED TO INCLUDE BJS COPY, THEN THEY
 ARE CONSIDERED FREE STANDING SIGNS AND ARE REQUIRED TO
 COMPLY WITH THE FREESTANDING SIGN REQUIREMENTS. **** NO
 DETAILS OF THESE SIGNS WERE PROVIDED. IF THE REQUEST IS
 APPROVED WITHOUT SIGN DETAILS, THEN THERE MAY BE NO
 DEVIATION FROM THE SIGN REGULATIONS WHEN THESE ARE
 SUBMITTED. THIS INCLUDES NO BJS LOGO BEING PERMITTED.
  
 20) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A GRAPHIC SHOWING THE SIZE
 AND HEIGHT OF THE EXISTING MONUMENT SIGNS THAT ARE
 PROPOSED TO BE RELOCATED ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE.
  
 21) UPDATED COMMENT: PROVIDE THE SIZE OF THE MONUMENT
 SIGNS ALONG I-95, BOTH THE EXISTING AND THE PROPOSED
 SIGN. **** THE COMMENT RESPONSE STATES THAT A SIGN
 PACKAGE WAS SUBMITTED. THE ONLY SIGN PACKAGE SUBMITTED
 WAS FOR THE WALL SIGNS.
  
 22) THE SIGN REGULATIONS ONLY PERMIT ONE WALL SIGN PER
 BUSINESS PLUS TWO ADDITIONAL SIGNS. THE BJS ELEVATIONS
 (BOTH STORE AND FUEL CANOPY) SHOW THAT THIS IS
 EXCEEDED, WHICH REQUIRES WAIVERS.
  
 23) THE SIZE OF THE SIGNS ON THE SHORT SIDES OF THE
 FUEL CANOPY EXCEED THE PERMITTED SIGNAGE ALLOWANCE.
 THESE MUST EITHER BE REMOVED, REDUCE OR A WAIVER
 APPROVED.
  
 ELEVATIONS
  
 24) THE DIMENSIONS ON THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS DO NOT
 MEET THE LISTED SCALE. PROVIDE THE BUILDING LENGTH
 DIMENSIONS, SO STAFF IS UNABLE TO VERIFY THE ELEVATIONS
 MEET THE SITE PLAN BUILDING SIZE. DUE TO THE INCORRECT
 SCALE, STAFF IS UNABLE TO EVEN SCALE THE DRAWINGS TO
 DETERMINE THE DIMENSION.
  
 25) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE BJS ELEVATION DRAWING
 WITH THE LANDSCAPE SUPERIMPOSED ON IT. THIS VERIFIES
 THAT THE PEDESTRIAN LEVEL OF THE ELEVATION ALONG
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE NEEDS TO BE IMPROVED. THIS CAN
 BE DONE WITH STUCCO BANDING/DESIGNS OR OTHER WALL
 APPLICATIONS WITHIN THE RED ROCK PAINTED CONCRETE WALL
 PANELS TO CREATE PEDESTRIAN LEVEL VISUAL INTEREST.
  
 26) THE BJS ELEVATION PLAN INCLUDES A NOTE STATING,
 "TOWER ELEVATION SUBJECT TO ADJUSTMENT TO ENABLE N/S
 VISIBILITY FROM HIGHWAY I-95". THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS
 NEED TO SHOW THE ACCURATE CONDITIONS THAT ARE BEING
 APPROVED BY THE CITY.
  
 27) THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW THE GENERATOR
 ENCLOSURE WALLS.
  
 28) THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE ROOF OF THE FUEL
 STATION KIOSK NEEDS TO BE FULLY SCREENED. THE PROPOSED
 SCREENING IS INSUFFICIENT.
  
 29) IN ORDER TO VERIFY THE PROPOSED SETBACKS AND IF
 SETBACK WAIVERS ARE REQUIRED, PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE
 BRANDSMART (ELEVATION DRAWING REQUIRED) AND BJS
 BUILDINGS ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. THE HEIGHT
 MEASUREMENT SHALL CONFORM TO THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT CODE METHODOLOGY AS FOLLOWS, "THE HEIGHT
 SHALL BE MEASURED AS THE VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE
 AVERAGE ELEVATION OF THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE BUILDING
 TO THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE TOP OF THE STRUCTURE OF A
 FLAT ROOF, OR TO THE DECK LINE OF A MANSARD ROOF, OR TO
 THE MEAN HEIGHT LEVEL BETWEEN EAVES AND RIDGE FOR
 GABLE, HIP, AND GAMBREL ROOFS." NOTE: WHILE THE HEIGHT
 IS NOT SHOWN CORRECTLY ON THE BJS ELEVATION DRAWING,
 THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING SHOWN AT 65 FEET
 MEETS THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL SETBACK REQUIRED OF 21
 FEET FROM THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE.
  
 LANDSCAPE
  
 30) REPEAT COMMENT: THERE ARE INSTANCES WHERE TREES ARE
 FAILED TO BE PROVIDED WITHIN LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AS
 REQUIRED BY THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 31) YOU MAY NOT HAVE 140+ GAPS OF NO BUFFER TREES ALONG
 I-95.
  
 32) THE TWO DETENTION AREAS ALONG EXECUTIVE CENTER
 DRIVE ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AS A BIOSWALE AND NOT JUST
 A STANDARD DEPRESSION WITH BAHIA GRASS IN ORDER TO
 PROVIDE THE ENHANCED THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE ALONG
 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE THAT HAS BEEN PART OF THE
 ORIGINAL BRANDSMART CPD APPROVAL.
  
 33) THE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 BRANDSMART BUILDING MUST PROVIDE A SOLID SCREEN TO SIX
 (6) FEET IN HEIGHT IN LIEU OF PROVIDING ARCHITECTURAL
 ENHANCEMENTS TO THE FACADE.
  
 34) YOUR RECENT SURVEY SHOWS THAT THE STORMWATER LINE
 FROM BEST BUY IS NOT WITHIN THE PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE
 EASEMENT SHOWN ON THE BRANDSMART SITE. YOU NEED TO
 CONFIRM WHAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS
 ON THE BRANDSMART SITE (IF DIFFERENT FROM THE SURVEY)?
 THE NON-EXCLUSIVE OUTFALL DRAINAGE EASEMENT RECORDED IN
 ORB 11870 PG 300 INCLUDES PROVISIONS FOR TERMINATION OF
 THE EASEMENTS OF PORTIONS OF EASEMENTS THAT ARE NO
 LONGER NEEDED. IF NOTHING IS LOCATED WITHIN THE
 EASEMENT, THIS SHOULD BE PURSUED IN ORDER FOR YOU TO
 INSTALL THE CODE COMPLIANT BUFFER LANDSCAPE.
  
 LIGHTING
  
 35) THANK YOU FOR EXTENDING THE PHOTOMETIC CALCULATIONS
 TO THE PROPERTY LINE. THE PLAN SHOWS THAT THERE ARE
 STILL AREAS WHERE THEY EXCEED ONE FOOTCANDLE PAST THE
 PROPERTY LINE, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED AND MUST BE
 CORRECTED.
  
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT PROPOSED INDIVIDUAL PARCEL
 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
  
 36) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT PROPOSES THE
 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SIMILAR TO WHAT WAS DISCUSSED ON
 THE PREVIOUS APPLICATION WHICH HAD FIVE PARCELS AND AN
 INTERNAL ROADWAY. NOW THAT THE PROPOSAL IS TWO PARCELS
 WHICH COMPLY WITH MOST OF THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL
 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, A LIST OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
 IS NOT NECESSARY. THE FEW WAIVERS WILL BE COVERED BY A
 WAIVER TABLE.
  
 CONDITION - PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION, THE FPL MUST
 PROVIDE A RELEASE OF THE EASEMENTS WHICH CONFLICT WITH
 THE PROPOSED BJS BUILDING.
  
 CONDITION - ALL TRANSFORMERS MUST BE SCREENED.
  
 CONDITION - ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MUST BE
 SCREENED TO THE FULL HEIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT.
  
 CONDITION - CROSS UTILITY AGREEMENTS/EASEMENTS WILL BE
 REQUIRED.
  
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved