| Date |
Text |
| 2020-10-21 19:14:31 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE |
| | 10/5/2020 SUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | 1. [NOT SATISFIED] THE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN DOES NOT |
| | MATCH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN OR ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 2. [SATISFIED] SHOW THE PROPOSED UTILITIES ON THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 3. [SATISFIED] CONSIDER ROOT BARRIER BETWEEN TREES AND |
| | UTILITIES. |
| | |
| | 4. [NOT SATISFIED] IF PARKING STALLS ARE REDUCED IN |
| | LENGTH BY TWO FEET, SHOW THE 2' OVERHANG IN THE |
| | LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS. IF THE PARKING |
| | STALLS ARE NOT REDUCED BY TWO FEET, THEN CONSIDER |
| | REDUCING THEM AND PROVIDING ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE AREA. |
| | |
| | 5. [SATISFIED] THE NORTH PARKING STALLS IN THE SOUTH |
| | PARKING LOT DO NOT HAVE WHEEL STOPS. CURBING USED AT |
| | END OF THE PARKING STALLS. |
| | |
| | 6. [TO BE CONFIRMED DURING ENGINEERING PERMIT REVIEW] |
| | IT APPEARS THERE ARE TWO SEPARATE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS |
| | (OUTFALLS) ONE FOR THE SOUTH ROADWAY/ACCESS EASEMENT |
| | AND ONE FOR THE PARKING LOTS/BUILDINGS. MAINTAIN |
| | EXISTING DRAINAGE AREAS OR DEMONSTRATE BOTH SYSTEMS |
| | PROVIDES THE REQUIRED STORMWATER QUALITY TREATMENT |
| | VOLUMES FOR ITS TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA WITH THE |
| | ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. SUBMIT DRAINAGE |
| | CALCULATIONS WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 7. [SATISFIED] SHOW ON AN AERIAL MAP WHERE THE TWO |
| | OUTFALL PIPES DISCHARGE INTO THE MASTER DRAINAGE |
| | SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | 8. [TO BE CONFIRMED WITH SFWMD ERP MODIFICATION] |
| | STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED TO MEET |
| | SFWMD ERP CRITERIA INCLUDING WATER QUALITY TREATMENT, |
| | PEAK FLOW ATTENUATION, C-51 BASIN FILL ENCROACHMENT, |
| | PERIMETER GRADING, ETC. SUBMIT A DRAINAGE REPORT WITH |
| | THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 9. [SATISFIED] LIST THE VERTICAL DATUM ON EVERY SHEET |
| | WITH ELEVATION INFORMATION. IF THE VERTICAL DATUM USED |
| | IN NOT NGVD1929 THEN PROVIDE THE CONVERSION EQUATION TO |
| | CALCULATE THE ELEVATIONS IN NGVD1929. |
| | |
| | 10. [SATISFIED] THERE APPEARS TO BE A BERM ALONG THE |
| | SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. WHERE DOES THE RUNOFF FROM THE |
| | PARKING STALLS AT THE WEST END OF THE SOUTH PARKING |
| | AREA DRAIN TO? FLOW ARROWS INDICATE TOWARD THE BERM. |
| | |
| | 11. [SATISFIED] WHAT MEASURES ARE BEING IMPLEMENTED TO |
| | PREVENT RUNOFF FROM THE SERVICE BAY/WAREHOUSE FROM |
| | FLOWING INTO THE DRAIANGE SYSTEM? |
| | |
| | 12. [SATISFIED] CONNECT ROOF DRAINS TO THE DRAINAGE |
| | SYSTEM OR DIRECT THE DISCHARGE TO PERVIOUS AREAS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 13. CORRECT THE YEAR TYPO IN THE SURVEYOR'S NOTE #14 ON |
| | THE SURVEY - "14. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON |
| | THE NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (N.G.V.D. |
| | 1929) ..." |
| | |
| | 14. SECTION A-A SHOWS A CURB ON THE RIGHT SIDE (EAST) |
| | SIDE OF THE DRIVE AISLE. THIS CURB DOES NOT APPEAR ON |
| | THE PLAN VIEW. |
| | |
| | 15. CORRECT THE HATCHING AND SPOT GRADE PLACEMENT OF |
| | THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS. |
| | |
| | 16. PROVIDE A PRB DETAIL. |
| | |
| | 17. BOTH THE PRB AND WEIR DETAILS SHOULD SHOW GASKET |
| | SEAL. |
| | |
| | 18. SUGGEST SPECIFYING MINIMUM LBR FOR THE SUBGRADE FOR |
| | PAVEMENT SECTIONS. |
| | |
| | 19. THE MODIFIED EXFILTRATION TRENCH EQUATION TO BE |
| | USED TO CALCULATE TRENCH STORAGE SINCE THE TRENCH WIDTH |
| | IS MORE THAN TWICE THE TRENCH DEPTH. |
| | |
| | TRACY WARD, P.E. |
| | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-494-1120 (O) |
| | 561-351-0510 (M) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
