| Date |
Text |
| 2020-06-08 13:37:03 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 06.08.2020 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z20050017 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 1617B |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THE JUSTIFICATION |
| | STATEMENT IS DATED FEBRUARY 2, 2020, BUT THE HARD COPY |
| | INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL IS MAY 15, 2020. ALL |
| | DOCUMENTS (HARD COPY AND ELECTRONIC) NEED TO BE |
| | CONSISTENT. |
| | |
| | 2. THE VARIANCE AND WAIVER TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN |
| | SHOULD BE MODIFIED TO SHOW WHAT IS REQUIRED, WHAT WAS |
| | APPROVED BY THE ZBA (ZBA CASE NO. 3285), AND WHAT IS |
| | PROPOSED WITH THE CURRENT SUBMITTAL. THE VARIANCE TABLE |
| | SHOULD REFERENCE THE ZBA CASE NO., NOT THE RESOLUTION. |
| | |
| | 3. THE VARIANCE AND WAIVER TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN NEEDS |
| | TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT THE VARIANCES/WAIVERS THAT |
| | WERE ACTUALLY GRANTED BY THE ZBA. THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN |
| | CORRECTED WITH THE ORIGINAL APPROVALS. |
| | |
| | 4. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE PROPOSED REPLACEMENT OF |
| | THE GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITH RESIDENTIAL |
| | STORAGE AND MECHANICAL ROOMS. AND WHY DOES RESIDENT |
| | STORAGE AREAS NEED BATHROOMS? |
| | |
| | 5. THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE ELEVATIONS HAS COMPLETELY |
| | BEEN MODIFIED FROM THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL. THESE CHANGES |
| | ARE NOT MENTIONED IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, AND |
| | STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE NEW DESIGN. |
| | |
| | 6. GLAZING CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH |
| | STREET FA?ADE. THE ENTIRE FA?ADE SHALL BE BETWEEN 25-45 |
| | PERCENT. |
| | |
| | 7. STOREFRONT GLAZING IS ONLY PERMITTED AT RETAIL |
| | FRONTAGE LOCATIONS. ALL OTHER WINDOWS SHALL BE |
| | OPERABLE. |
| | |
| | 8. THE BOLD LINE ON THE SITE PLAN (IDENTIFYING THE |
| | BUILDING FOOTPRINT) DOES NOT MATCH THAT WHICH IS SHOWN |
| | ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS; SPECIFICALLY, THE AREA IN |
| | THE NORTHWEST CORNER, AND THE SOUTH SIDE, OF THE |
| | BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 9. DIMENSIONS OF THE GROUND FLOOR SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | FROM FINISHED FLOOR TO FINISHED CEILING. |
| | |
| | 10. SETBACK FROM THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED FOR THE GROUND FLOOR (NO INCLUDING THE OPEN |
| | STAIRCASE). |
| | |
| | 11. ONLY ONE (1) SITE PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED; PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY THE NEED FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 12. WINDOW DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH WINDOW |
| | TYPE, CONFIRMING THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | 12.1. ALL WINDOWS, EXCEPTED PERMITTED STOREFRONTS, |
| | SHALL BE OPERABLE. |
| | |
| | 12.2. ALL WINDOWS SHALL BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF TWO |
| | (2) INCHES FROM THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE FA?ADE. |
| | |
| | 13. IS THE ENTRY DRIVE PROPOSED TO BE GATED? NOTHING IS |
| | LABELED BUT GATES APPEAR TO BE SHOWN. IF GATED, STAFF |
| | HAS THE SAME CONCERNS THAT WERE PRESENTED PREVIOUSLY. |
| | NO CALL BOX IS SHOWN AND WHAT PLANS ARE IN PLACE |
| | REGARDING GUEST ACCESS? |
| | |
| | 14. HOW IS THE SOUTH SETBACK THE SAME AS WHAT WAS |
| | PROPOSED PREVIOUSLY, BUT THE BUILDING SEPARATION HAS |
| | INCREASED BY ONE (1) FOOT? THE DIMENSION LINE SEEMS TO |
| | BE GOING INSIDE OF THE BUILDING FA?ADE LINE THAT IS |
| | SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 15. DIMENSION OF BALCONY ENCROACHMENT INTO THE SETBACK |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 16. OVERHANGS SHALL NOT ENCROACH MORE THAN THREE (3) |
| | FEET INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACK. |
| | 17. DIMENSION SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE WEST PROPERTY |
| | LINE TO THE EASTERN CORNER OF THE ROW OF PARKING. THIS |
| | DIMENSION SHALL BE AT LEAST 18 FEET 1 INCH. |
| | |
| | 18. LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SHALL |
| | BE A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) FEET. |
| | |
| | 19. IS A WALL PROPOSED ON THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE, |
| | EXTENDING ALL THE WAY TO THE EAST PROPERTY LINE? IT IS |
| | RECOMMENDED THAT THIS WALL STOP AND TIE INTO THE |
| | SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 20. DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED OF THE PROPOSED SIX (6) |
| | FOOT FENCE THAT IS JUST EAST OF THE ANGLED PARKING |
| | SPACES. |
| | |
| | 21. LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE NORTH AND |
| | SOUTH ENDS OF THE UNCOVERED PARKING ROW. |
| | |
| | 22. LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE WEST END |
| | OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING ROW. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) FOUR (4) SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY |
| | (11IN X 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | TTY: 800.955.8771 |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
