| Date |
Text |
| 2020-06-05 11:00:12 | CASE NO. PB 1069BB |
| | KEISER UNIVERSITY STADIUM EXPANSION |
| | 2600 NORTH MILITARY TRAIL |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE |
| | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG/.PDF |
| | FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | JUNE 26, 2020, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE |
| | AUGUST 18, 2020 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING (BY |
| | AUGUST 11, 2020), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED |
| | WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW |
| | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AS THE LIGHT MITIGATION |
| | STUDY IS JUST THE SPECIFICATION PAGES FOR THE SYSTEM |
| | THAT IS BEING INSTALLED. WHILE IT DOES INCLUDE |
| | PHOTOMETRIC AND CANDELA READINGS AT THE PROPERTY LINES, |
| | IT FAILS TO PROVIDE IN PLAIN TEXT HOW THE LIGHT OUTPUT |
| | AND GLARE DOES NOT CREATE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE |
| | SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. OR IF IT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO |
| | CREATE A NEGATIVE IMPACT, HOW THE IMPACT IS MITIGATED |
| | (EX. THE PLACEMENT OF THE TREES IN THE BUFFER BLOCKS |
| | THE SIGHT LINES FROM THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES). NOTE: |
| | WHILE PRESENTING A MATHEMATICAL METHODOLOGY, THE NOISE |
| | ANALYSIS PRESENTS THE CONDITIONS AND CONCLUSION IN SUCH |
| | A WAY THAT A LAY PERSON CAN UNDERSTAND THAT THERE WILL |
| | BE MINIMAL SOUND IMPACT FROM THE PROPOSED STADIUM |
| | EXPANSION. |
| | |
| | 2) THE SITE PLAN, SHEET C-1, SHOWS THE EASTERN FIELD |
| | LIGHT POLES IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION THAN THE PLANS |
| | INCLUDED WITH THE LIGHT MITIGATION STUDY. THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLAN, SHEET L-3, SEEMS TO SHOW THE FIELD LIGHT POLES IN |
| | BOTH THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN AND THE LIGHT |
| | MITIGATION STUDY. ALL PLANS MUST SHOW THE SAME, |
| | ACCURATE CONDITIONS. |
| | |
| | 3) THERE ARE SPELLING ERRORS AND STRAY LABELS ON THE |
| | MASTER PLAN. |
| | |
| | A. BUILDING MISSPELLED SOUTH OF NEW RESIDENCE HALL. |
| | B. EAST OF THE GUARDHOUSE THE EXISTING KEISER |
| | UNIVERSITY DRIVE INCLUDES A LABEL FOR FUTURE ROAD. THIS |
| | LABEL IS NOT NEEDED. |
| | |
| | 4) STAFF MENTIONED IN PREVIOUS CORRESPONDENCE THAT IN |
| | ORDER TO PERMIT FUTURE FLEXIBILITY FOR CAMPUS |
| | DEVELOPMENT, THAT A DEVELOPMENT REGULATION IS ADDED |
| | THAT PERMITS THE RELOCATION OR CHANGING THE FUTURE |
| | BUILDING LABELS TO BE DONE AS A MINOR PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AS LONG AS THERE ARE NO OTHER |
| | CHANGES OR WAIVERS REQUIRED BY THAT RELOCATION. |
| | CURRENTLY MODIFICATIONS TO THE MASTER PLAN REQUIRE CITY |
| | COMMISSION APPROVAL AS PART OF A MAJOR PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (THIS OCCURRED WITH THE NEW |
| | DORMS). YOU WOULD STILL NEED TO DO A FORMAL SITE PLAN |
| | FOR THE SPECIFIC BUILD OUT OF THE AREA. AS PART OF THIS |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATION, STAFF FEELS THERE WOULD NEED TO |
| | BE A MODIFICATION TO THE USES PERMITTED BY RESOLUTION |
| | NO. 201-19 REGULATION 18. THIS COMMENT IS UP FOR |
| | FURTHER DISCUSSION, BUT WOULD NOT DELAY THE CURRENT |
| | APPLICATION IF KEISER UNIVERSITY DOES NOT WANT TO MOVE |
| | FORWARD WITH IT. |
| | |
| | A. CHANGE TO "THE USES PERMITTED SHALL BE THOSE USES |
| | PERMITTED IN THE "CS" ZONING DISTRICT SO LONG AS THEY |
| | ARE OPERATED BY OR IN PARTNERSHIP WITH KEISER |
| | UNIVERSITY". FOR EXAMPLE: THIS WOULD PERMIT PHYSICAL |
| | THERAPY OFFICE TO BE ADDED TO THE MASTER PLAN AS A |
| | MINOR AMENDMENT; HOWEVER, THE PHYSICAL THERAPY OFFICE |
| | WOULD NEED TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE |
| | PROGRAM. |
| | |
| | B. CURRENTLY, THE PERMITTED USES INCLUDE RECREATION, |
| | OUTDOOR, HIGH INTENSITY USES OPERATED BY OR IN |
| | PARTNERSHIP WITH KEISER UNIVERSITY. THE FOLLOWING ARE |
| | OUTDOOR HIGH INTENSITY USES IN THE CITY'S ZONING AND |
| | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: |
| | |
| | AMUSEMENT PARKS. |
| | DRIVE-IN THEATERS. |
| | GO-CART AND OTHER VEHICULAR TRACKS. |
| | GOLF COURSES. |
| | MINIATURE GOLF COURSES. |
| | SPORTS PARKS: TRAMPOLINES, BATTING CAGES, ETC. |
| | SPORTS AND RECREATION CAMPS. |
| | WATER SLIDES. |
| | WAVE POOLS. |
| | |
| | STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS SCALING THIS BACK TO JUST |
| | THE SPECIFIC USES (SUCH AS SPORTS AND RECREATION CAMPS) |
| | THAT KEISER UNIVERSITY WOULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO |
| | HAVE. |
| | |
| | C. THERE HAD BEEN DISCUSSION ABOUT THE POTENTIAL OF A |
| | PROFESSIONAL SPORTS TEAM UTILIZING THE ON CAMPUS |
| | STADIUM. THIS WOULD REQUIRE A FUTURE MAJOR PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| |
Print |
