| Date |
Text |
| 2020-05-11 13:33:49 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC |
| | DIVISION, STATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE |
| | TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) OF THE COUNTY. |
| | |
| | 2.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR |
| | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE |
| | COLLECTION SERVICES. |
| | |
| | 3.) LETTERS FROM AT&T AND COMCAST, CONFIRMING THAT THE |
| | PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS |
| | OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR |
| | SERVICES IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 4.) STAFF DOES NOT AGREE THAT ALL THE SITE DESIGN |
| | QUALITATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS HAVE BEEN MET, |
| | PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-35(C) OF THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS); SPECIFICALLY, SEC. |
| | 94-35(C)(3), SCREENING AND BUFFERING, AS STAFF BELIEVES |
| | THAT CERTAIN SITE ELEMENTS, SUCH AS THE LOCATION OF THE |
| | PROPOSED LOADING ZONE AND REFUSE AND RECYCLING STAGING |
| | AREA IS MORE APPROPRIATE AT THE REAR OF THE BUILDING TO |
| | PROVIDE FOR BETTER SCREENING (AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF |
| | IN THE PRE-APPLICATION MEETING). THE CURRENT SITE |
| | DESIGN DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY SCREENING FOR THE LOADING |
| | AND STAGING AREA. ADDITIONALLY, PURSUANT TO ZLDR |
| | S.94-315, THE OUTDOOR STAGING AREA IS NOT PERMITTED |
| | UNLESS APPROPRIATE SCREENING IS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 5.) THE INGRESS/EGRESS POINT HAS BEEN MODIFIED IN THE |
| | PLAN. AS A RESULT, A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 6.) ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES SERVICE CONNECTIONS, INCLUDING |
| | TELEPHONE CABLE AND ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SERVICE, |
| | SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND ON ALL SITES LARGER THAN |
| | 30,000 SQ. FT. [ZLDR S.94-172(G)] |
| | |
| | 7.) IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE PARCEL IMMEDIATELY |
| | SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS A LAND LOCKED PARCEL. |
| | THE PARCELS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY WAS NOT |
| | SUBDIVIDED IN THIS MANNER (REFERENCE: RESOLUTION NO. |
| | 239-18/PB 1771). A RESOLUTION FOR THE LAND LOCKED |
| | PARCEL MUST BE RESOLVED. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE DESIGN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) AS DISCUSSED IN THE PREAPPLICATION MEETING, IT WAS |
| | RECOMMENDED THAT THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT BE PLACED |
| | CLOSED TO 45TH STREET TO PROVIDE FOR A STRONGER STREET |
| | PRESENCE. IT IS STILL HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THAT THE SITE |
| | BE REDESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE THIS. |
| | |
| | 2.) IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY AN EXFILTRATION TRENCH WAS NOT |
| | CONSIDERED IN THE CURRENT SITE DESIGN. AN EXFILTRATION |
| | TRENCH WOULD ALLOW THE BUILDING TO BE PLACED CLOSER TO |
| | THE STREET AND PROVIDE FOR IMPROVED INTERNAL SITE |
| | CIRCULATION AND SCREENING OF PARKING AND LOADING. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) NOT ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION IN THE SITE PLAN |
| | CHECKLIST (SEE PAGE 15 OF THE 2020 DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION) HAS BEEN PROVIDED IN THE PLAN. SOME OF THE |
| | MISSING DETAILS INCLUDE: THE DATA TABLE, STANDARD CITY |
| | DETAILS OF PARKING, ETC. |
| | |
| | 2.) NOTED SCALE IN THE SITE PLAN IS NOT THE CORRECT |
| | SCALE (MEASUREMENTS DO NOT ADD UP). PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 3.) ALL BUILDING SETBACKS SHALL BE ILLUSTRATED IN THE |
| | SITE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 4.) SHOW LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. |
| | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAY NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 4 FT. |
| | INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK; ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT SHALL BE |
| | SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW BY A PARAPET. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-305(B)(4)] |
| | |
| | 5.) THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY HAS BEEN MODIFIED. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT ANY MODIFIED DRIVEWAY SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM |
| | STANDARDS OF THE ZLDRS, AND THEREFORE, THE |
| | INGRESS/EGRESS POINT SHALL NOT EXCEED 24 FT. IN WIDTH. |
| | |
| | 6.) WHEEL STOPS SHALL NOT BE PROVIDED IN THE PROJECT IF |
| | THERE IS A 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG FOR VEHICLES. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, PARKING STALL DEPTH CAN BE REDUCED TO 16 |
| | FT. WHEREVER THERE IS A 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG. |
| | |
| | 7.) PARKING STALL PAINTING DETAIL IS REQUIRED IN THE |
| | PLAN. THE STALL PAINTING DETAIL SHALL BE CONSISTENT |
| | WITH THE REQUIREMENTS IN ZLDR S.94-485, FIGURE XV-2. |
| | |
| | 8.) COMPACT PARKING STALLS SHALL NOT BE CONCENTRATED IN |
| | ONE AREA OF THE PARKING LOT AND SHALL BE DISPERSED |
| | EQUALLY THROUGHOUT THE PARKING LOT. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-485(N)(1)] |
| | |
| | 9.) THE BICYCLE RACK SHALL BE LOCATED AS NEAR THE |
| | PRINCIPAL ENTRANCE AS PRACTICABLE. THE PROPOSED |
| | LOCATION IN THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT MEET THIS STANDARD. |
| | [ZLDR S.94-485(Q)(2)10.] |
| | |
| | 10.) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE BICYCLE RACK. THE RACK |
| | DETAIL SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE DESIGN STANDARDS OF |
| | THE CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | STAFF CAN PROVIDE A COPY OF THE BICYCLE PARKING |
| | GUIDELINES UPON REQUEST. |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) IT IS HIGHLY ENCOURAGED THAT THE BUILDING FACADES |
| | ARE IMPROVED WITH ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL |
| | FEATURES/FENESTRATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PHOTOMETRICS/LIGHTING: |
| | |
| | 1.) A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IS MISSING FROM THE APPLICATION |
| | SUBMITTAL. PLEASE PROVIDE FOR STAFF REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 2.) THE FOLLOWING NOTE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE |
| | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE |
| | SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO |
| | REFLECT FLIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES, |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 94-309(A) OF THE ZONING AND |
| | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE: |
| | |
| | 1.) PROVIDE INFORMATION ON PROJECT SIGNAGE. PLEASE NOTE |
| | THAT SETBACK DIMENSIONS, CONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE XIII, |
| | SIGN REGULATIONS, SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PLANS IF |
| | FREESTANDING SIGNAGE IS PROPOSED FOR THE SITE. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX |
| | (6) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X |
| | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND |
| | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY |
| | RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
