| Date |
Text |
| 2020-10-08 08:20:41 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | (RESUBMITTAL) |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 10/07/2020 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z20030016 |
| | CASE NO.: ISPR 20-13 |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS WHICH WERE ISSUED PREVIOUSLY, AND HAVE |
| | NOT BEEN FULLY SATISFIED: |
| | |
| | 1. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED] ? CONTACT CAROLINE PUELL |
| | ADDRESSING COORDINATOR AT [email protected] TO ESTABLISH |
| | ADDRESSES FOR THE STRUCTURES. |
| | 2. ALL PROJECTS TOTALING OVER $750,000 WILL BE SUBJECT |
| | TO THE CITY OF WPB ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ORDINANCE. |
| | PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER AT [email protected] FOR |
| | MORE INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | [ NOT SATISFIED] ? |
| | 1. CONSIDER RENAMING THE COVER SHEET. ?AUSTRALIAN LAKES |
| | AVE? IS INCORRECT. |
| | 2. SHEET C-06 ? DETAIL 7: PARKING DETAIL DOES NOT MEET |
| | THE CITY?S REQUIRED STANDARD. |
| | 3. SHEET C-06 ? DETAIL 9: THE PROPOSED BICYCLE RACK |
| | (WAVE RACK) IS NOT ALLOWED IN THE CITY OF WEST PALM |
| | BEACH. PROVIDE REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING CONSISTENT WITH |
| | ALLOWED BIKE RACKS IN THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AND A |
| | STANDARD CITY DETAIL. |
| | 4. SHEET C-06 ? DETAIL 9: PROVIDE SPACING DIMENSIONS |
| | BETWEEN BIKE RACKS. |
| | 5. PROVIDE APPROVAL FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED DRIVEWAY CONNECTION TO PALM BEACH LAKES |
| | BOULEVARD |
| | 6. DRIVE AISLES WHERE THERE IS NO BACKING OF PARKING |
| | SPACES COULD BE NARROWED TO 20 FEET IN WIDTH FOR |
| | TWO-WAY TRAFFIC, SUBJECT TO SHOWING THAT THE TURNING |
| | RADIUS WORKS FOR DUMPSTER PICK-UP, DELIVERIES, ETC. |
| | 7. CONFIRM THAT THESE BUILDINGS ARE NOT PROPOSED TO BE |
| | DIVIDED INTO SEPARATE PARCELS (NOW OR IN THE FUTURE). |
| | 8. DRIVEWAYS ONTO 13TH STREET AND PALM BEACH LAKES |
| | BOULEVARD DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM SEPERATION DISTANCES |
| | REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-312.2. CONSIDER CONTACTING ALEX |
| | HANSEN ? COMPREHENSIVE PLANNER AT [email protected] FOR |
| | MORE INFORMATION. |
| | 9. PROVIDE THE ANGLE OF THE PARKING STALLS FOR BUILDING |
| | B TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH FIGURE XV-2 IN SECTION |
| | 94-485 |
| | 10. FOR THE ANGLED PARKING ON BUILDING B, CONSIDER |
| | REMOVAL OF THE WHEEL STOPS ?SAWTOOTH? THE CURB LINE. |
| | 11. THE BUILDING DIVISION WILL NEED TO CONFIRM THAT THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES MEET THE ADA |
| | REQUIREMENTS |
| | 12. CONFIRM THAT THE TURNING MOVEMENTS INTO AND OUT OF |
| | THE LOADING ZONE WILL BE IN COMPLIANCE. |
| | 13. THE FLOOR PLAN FOR BUILGIN C INDICATES AN OPTIONAL |
| | WALK-UP WINDOW, BUT THIS APPEARS TO BE INCONFLICT WITH |
| | THE LANDSCAPE PLANS THAT ARE BEING PROVIDED. IT IS NOT |
| | SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS. IS THE WALK-UP WINDOW BEING |
| | PROPOSED? IF SO, MODIFICATIONS TO THE ELEVATIONS, SITE |
| | AND LANDSCAPE PLANS WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | 14. ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT NEEDS TO BE SCREENED |
| | FROM VIEW (INCLUDING FROM THE NORTH). |
| | 15. BECAUSE THESE BUILDING HAVE FRONTAGE AND VISIBILITY |
| | FROM 13TH STREET, CONSIDERING RECONFIGURING THE |
| | DESIGN/SCREENING OF WHAT IS THE REAR OF THE BUILDING. |
| | 16. BUILDING B ? SHEET A4.0 ? KEY NOTE #17 IS POINTING |
| | TO WHAT APPEARS TO BE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, BUT THE |
| | LEGEND INDICATES THAT #17 IS THE SCUPPER, COLLECTOR, |
| | ETC. IT APPEARS SEVERAL NOTES ARE INCORRECT. |
| | 17. CONSIDER REVIEWING THE WALL SIGNS FOR COMPLIANCE TO |
| | SECTION 94-409 TABLE XIII-1. SIGNAGE IS NOT BEING |
| | REVIEWED AT THIS TIME AND IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AT THE |
| | TIME OF PERMITTING. |
| | 18. CONSIDER RECONFIGURING THE DRIVE AISLES AND DRIVE |
| | THRU TO THE NORTH OF BUILDINGS A, B AND C. CURRENTLY, |
| | NO MORE THAN APPROXIMATELY 3-4 CARS COULD STACK WITHOUT |
| | BLOCKING THE DRIVE AISLE. THIS WOULD BLOCK ANY ACCESS |
| | FROM THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY ON THE 13TH STREET, THE |
| | EXISTING SHARED DRIVEWAY ON 13TH STREET AS WELL AS THE |
| | INTERIOR DRIVE AISLES. PROVIDE A STUDY/EVALUATION TO |
| | DETERMINE THAT SUFFICIENT STACKING IS BEING PROPOSED |
| | WITHOUT IT BACKING UP INTO THE STREET. |
| | |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 6 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | RAFAELA THERMIDOR, ASSOCIATE PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | TTY: 800.955.8771 |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
