| Date |
Text |
| 2021-01-05 15:05:59 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) SERVICE LETTERS FROM AT&T, FPU, FPL AND COMCAST |
| | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH |
| | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE |
| | PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES ARE REQUIRED. PLEASE REFER |
| | TO PAGE 7 OF THE 2021 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR |
| | CONTACT INFORMATION ON THE SERVICE PROVIDERS. |
| | |
| | 2.) RESPONSES TO SEC. 94-35(C) OF THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) IS MISSING FROM THE |
| | APPLICATION FILE. PLEASE PROVIDE AS THIS IS A REQUIRED |
| | COMPONENT OF THE INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS |
| | (REFERENCE PAGE 26 OF THE 2021 DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION). |
| | |
| | 3.) THE TPS APPROVAL LETTER ISSUED BY THE PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS - |
| | TRAFFIC DIVISION (ISSUED ON 2/19/2020) SHALL BE UPDATED |
| | TO REFLECT THE CHANGES IN THE BUILDING SIZE (5,426 SQ. |
| | FT.) TO ELIMINATE ANY POSSIBILITY OF GHOST TRIPS |
| | GENERATED BY THE PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 4.) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXISTING |
| | CURB CUT(S) TO THE PROPERTY FROM SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. A |
| | PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF |
| | TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) APPROVING THE PROPOSED |
| | MODIFICATION TO THE CURB CUT(S) IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| | THE ISSUANCE OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE SITE PLAN IS NOT |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE SURVEY. |
| | [3/9/2020 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED (SHEETS A000 |
| | AND A001). ALTHOUGH THE RESPONSE LETTER TO STAFF'S |
| | COMMENTS (DATED 12/14/2020) STATES THAT THE LEGAL |
| | DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN REVISED, IT IS STILL INCORRECT IN |
| | THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2.) LOT DIMENSIONS PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT |
| | MATCH THE LOT DIMENSIONS PROVIDED IN THE SURVEY. PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY (I.E. SHEETS A000 AND A001). |
| | |
| | 3.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE ZONING |
| | AND SITE CALCULATIONS TABULAR ON SHEET A001: A) THE |
| | PROVIDED LOT WIDTH IS 100.00' (PER THE SURVEY) AND NOT |
| | 93'. B) THE PROVIDED SIDE SETBACK IS 5'-7" (NOT 5'). C) |
| | THE REQUIRED/ALLOWED REAR SETBACK (ABUTTING A |
| | RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT) IS 15.0' (NOT 5.0'). D) |
| | THE PROVIDED BUILDING HEIGHT IS THE PROPOSED BUILDING |
| | HEIGHT AS PROVIDED IN THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS (NOT |
| | NONE AS PROVIDED IN THE TABULAR). |
| | |
| | 4.) A DESIGNATED BACKOUT/TURNAROUND SPACE SHALL BE |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE PARKING AREA LOCATED NORTH OF THE |
| | BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 5.) THE LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SHALL BE |
| | LOCATED AT LEAST A MINIMUM OF 5 FT. AND 15 FT. FROM THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE WHEN ABUTTING A RESIDENTIAL ZONING |
| | DISTRICT. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THAT THE ENCLOSURE IS |
| | ONLY SETBACK 4 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINE ON ONE SIDE. |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-145(2)] |
| | |
| | 6.) PLEASE CLARIFY IF THE "OPEN ENTRY GARDEN" IS A |
| | PEDESTRIAN SPACE. IF SO, IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO |
| | PROVIDE A BUFFER (I.E. LANDSCAPE) TO PROTECT |
| | PEDESTRIANS FROM VEHICLES AS THERE IS AN EXISTING CURB |
| | CUT FROM SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY TO THE SPACE. |
| | |
| | 7.) PLEASE CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE AND DELINEATE THE WIDTH |
| | OF THE PROPOSED CURB CUT(S) TO THE PROJECT, AND ANY |
| | PROPOSED NEW BUFFERS WITHIN THE PROJECT. IT IS |
| | IMPERATIVE TO PROVIDE SEPARATION BETWEEN PEDESTRIAN |
| | SPACES AND VEHICULAR CIRCULATION AREAS. |
| | |
| | 8.) A TWO-WAY DRIVE SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN 20 FT. |
| | WIDE AT THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS |
| | FOR ALL MODIFIED CURB CUTS TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY |
| | WITH THE ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-312(1)] |
| | |
| | 9.) ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM |
| | VEHICULAR USE AREAS BY NON-MOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURBING. |
| | IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE LANDSCAPE TERMINAL ISLAND |
| | LOCATED NEXT TO THE TWO-WAY DRIVE AISLE EXITING ONTO |
| | SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY IS OF THE REQUIRED CURBING. PLEASE |
| | IDENTIFY IN THE PLANS FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS. |
| | [ZLDR S.94-443(C)] |
| | |
| | 10.) THERE IS A FLOATING "SIGN" NOTATION IN THE PARKING |
| | AREA. PLEASE CLARIFY IN THE PLANS. IF THIS IS THE |
| | EXISTING SIGN AS DEPICTED IN THE SURVEY, THEN IT SHOULD |
| | BE ILLUSTRATED AND NOTED AS SUCH. IF A NEW SIGN IS |
| | PROPOSED WITHIN THE PROJECT, THEN ALL NEW INFORMATION |
| | ON THE SIGN (LOCATION IN THE SITE PLAN AND DETAILS OF |
| | THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE) SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 11.) THE TWO "STANDARD" PARKING SPACES LOCATED TOGETHER |
| | DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONS FOR A STANDARD |
| | PARKING STALL (TOTAL OF 17 FT. WIDE). PLEASE ADDRESS IN |
| | THE SITE PLAN. [ZLDR S.94-485] |
| | |
| | 12.) ALL H.C. PARKING SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE OF |
| | THE 2 FT. VEHICULAR OVERHANG TO ENSURE THERE WILL BE NO |
| | CONFLICT. |
| | |
| | 13.) THE PARKING STALL STRIPING DETAIL ON SHEET A002 |
| | ILLUSTRATES THE USE OF WHEEL STOPS; HOWEVER, THIS IS |
| | NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE SITE PLAN (I.E. 2 FT. CURB |
| | OVERHANG). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 14.) THE 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG FOR VEHICLES SHALL BE |
| | NOTED IN ALL PARKING AREAS WHERE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 15.) ELIMINATE THE DUPLICATION OF THE H.C. PARKING |
| | SYMBOL IN ONE OF THE PARKING STALLS. |
| | |
| | 16.) CLEARLY ILLUSTRATE THE LOADING ZONE IN THE SITE |
| | PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THERE WILL BE NO CONFLICT WITH |
| | THE PARKING ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA. APPROPRIATE |
| | TRUCK MANEUVERING TO AND FROM THE LOADING ZONE IS ALSO |
| | REQUIRED. PER THE ZLDRS THE USE WOULD REQUIRE ONE (1) |
| | 10 FT. X 25 FT. LOADING ZONE. [ZLDR S.94-485, TABLE |
| | XV-4] |
| | |
| | 17.) NEW LIGHT POLES ARE DETECTED IN THE PHOTOMETRIC |
| | PLAN; HOWEVER, THE LIGHT POLES ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE |
| | SITE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. ALSO NOTE |
| | THAT ALL NEW POLE FIXTURES MUST BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF |
| | 5 FT. AND A MINIMUM OF 15 FT. (WHEN ABUTTING A |
| | RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT) FROM THE PROPERTY LINES. |
| | SOME FIXTURES DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM SETBACK DISTANCE. |
| | [ZLDR S.94-145(2)] |
| | |
| | 18.) BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS HAVE NOT BEEN |
| | INCLUDED IN THE SITE DATA CALCULATIONS AS REQUESTED BY |
| | STAFF. [3/9/2020 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED.] |
| | |
| | 19.) PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING FOR THE PROJECT. THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE RACK SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE |
| | STANDARDS PROVIDED IN ZLDR SEC. 94-485(Q). [NOTE: THERE |
| | SEEMS TO BE A NOTE IN THE SITE PLAN INDICATING BICYCLE |
| | PARKING FOR TWO BICYCLES; HOWEVER, THE RACK MUST BE |
| | DEPICTED IN THE PLAN. ALSO, THE LOCATION IS |
| | INCONSISTENT WITH THE LOCATION STANDARDS FOR BICYCLE |
| | PARKING, PER THE CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES.] |
| | |
| | 20.) A DETAIL OF A BICYCLE RACK IS REQUIRED. THE RACK |
| | DETAIL MUST BE SITE SPECIFIC AND MUST ALSO BE |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING GUIDELINES. |
| | |
| | 21.) THE FENCE ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE SHALL BE |
| | NOTED IN THE SITE PLAN. IT IS REQUIRED THAT THE |
| | EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE BE REPLACED WITH AN OPAQUE |
| | WALL/FENCE TO PROVIDE SCREENING AND PROTECTION FROM THE |
| | ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT/USE. A MINIMUM 6 |
| | FT. HIGH WALL/FENCE IS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-443(A)] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS: |
| | |
| | 1.) A BAR FACILITY IS DEPICTED IN THE FLOOR PLAN ON |
| | SHEET A102. PLEASE NOTE THAT PER CHAPTER 6 OF THE |
| | CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES, ONLY RESTAURANTS HAVING |
| | 2,500 SQUARE FEET OF SERVICE AREA AND EQUIPPED TO SERVE |
| | 150 PERSONS FULL COURSE MEALS AT ONE TIME, AND DERIVING |
| | AT LEAST 51 PERCENT OF THEIR GROSS REVENUE FROM THE |
| | SALE OF FOOD AND NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES MAY BE EXEMPT |
| | FROM MEETING THE DISTANCE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | SERVING LIQUOR FOR CONSUMPTION ON PREMISE ONLY. IF THIS |
| | CANNOT BE MET, THE BAR FACILITY MUST BE REMOVED. |
| | OTHERWISE, PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS THAT DEMONSTRATE |
| | THAT THE PROPOSED BUSINESS QUALIFIES FOR SUCH |
| | EXEMPTION. [CODE OF ORDINANCES SEC. 6-2] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) PLEASE IDENTIFY WHICH LIGHT POLE FIXTURES ARE |
| | EXISTING AND NEW TO THE PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 2.) SHOW THE SETBACK DISTANCE FOR ALL NEW POLE FIXTURES |
| | TO THE PROPERTY LINE. PER ZLDR S.94-145, ALL NEW |
| | STRUCTURES SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 5 FT. AND 15 |
| | FT. (WHEN ABUTTING A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT) FROM |
| | THE PROPERTY LINES. SOME LIGHT POLE FIXTURES DO NOT |
| | MEET THE MINIMUM SETBACK DISTANCE REQUIRED BY THE |
| | ZLDRS. [ZLDR S.94-145(2)] |
| | |
| | 3.) PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NOTE IN THE PLAN: ALL OUTDOOR |
| | LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE AND SHALL BE |
| | ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM ALL |
| | ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT RESIDENCES, OR |
| | PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES. [ZLDR S.94-309(2)] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) CHECK OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS ON SHEET L-3. THE |
| | OPEN SPACE PERCENTAGE CALCULATION (40%) IS INCORRECT |
| | (STAFF HAS CALCULATED 80%). |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE |
| | (3) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 11 INCHES X |
| | 17 INCHES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS AND |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE |
| | ($200.00). |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| |
Print |
