| Date |
Text |
| 2020-05-19 13:23:03 | CASE NO. PB 950UUUUU 1ST RESUBMITTAL REVIEW |
| | OKEECHOBEE SIDEWALK |
| | 700 S. ROSEMARY |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446, |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWO |
| | (2) PAPER COPIES (MAY BE MAILED/FEDEX) AND AN |
| | ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE |
| | SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS |
| | MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY JUNE 14, 2020), THE CASE |
| | SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL |
| | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF |
| | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED |
| | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | ENTIRE PROJECT LENGTH |
| | |
| | 1) UPDATED COMMENT: STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE SIGHT LINE |
| | DRAWINGS PROVIDED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL AND NOTED THAT |
| | THE LOCATIONS FOR THE CARS USED TO DELINEATE THE SIGHT |
| | LINES ARE NOT 1) IN THE CORRECT LANE AT SAPODILLA; 2) |
| | USING THE CORRECT STREET DESIGN AT SAPODILLA; AND 3) |
| | SHOWN AT ALL ON THE SOUTH ROSEMARY SECTION. REGARDLESS |
| | OF THE PRECEDING STATEMENT, STAFF RECOGNIZES THAT |
| | MOVING CARS BACK TO THE STOP BAR LOCATIONS WILL |
| | CONTINUE TO HAVE THE SAME GENERAL SIGHT LINES THAT ARE |
| | SHOWN WITH THE CURRENT CONFIGURATION. THE RESPONSE |
| | STATES THAT THE DESIGN IS THE SAME AS THE KRAVIS CENTER |
| | WHERE THEY WERE UNABLE TO INSTALL ROYAL PALM TREES IN |
| | THE LANDSCAPE STRIP BETWEEN THE ROADWAY AND THE |
| | SIDEWALK DUE TO THE SIGHT LINE ISSUES. IN ORDER TO |
| | COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S ROADWAY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, |
| | THE KRAVIS CENTER INSTALLED CANOPY TREES ON THE NORTH |
| | SIDE OF THE SIDEWALK TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED SHADING. |
| | YOU HAVE TWO OPTIONS: |
| | |
| | A. INSTALL CANOPY TREES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE |
| | SIDEWALK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY?S LANDSCAPE |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | B. USE ROYAL PALM TREES TO PROVIDE SHADE. WHILE THE |
| | MOST APPROPRIATE LOCATION FOR ROYAL PALM TREES TO |
| | PROVIDE SHADE FOR THE OKEECHOBEE SIDEWALK IS ON BOTH |
| | SIDES OF THE SIDEWALK, DUE TO THE SIGHT LINE |
| | CONSTRAINTS, STAFF WILL ACCEPT ROYAL PALMS AS OUTLINED |
| | IN THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS. |
| | |
| | RUTH CHRIS SECTION - UPDATED COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 2) THE TREE CANOPY ALONG THE SIDEWALK HAS BEEN REDUCED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMENTS FOR CORRECTIVE |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE USE OF ROYAL PALMS. |
| | |
| | 3) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE BICYCLE RACK PAD ON |
| | SHEET L.3.00. |
| | |
| | VALET PARKING LOT SECTION - DESIGN APPROVED |
| | |
| | 4) THE PROPOSED ROYAL PALM CONFIGURATION ON THE NORTH |
| | SIDE OF THE SIDEWALK, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PARKING |
| | LOT ROYAL PALM TREES MEETS THE SIDEWALK SHADE AND THE |
| | STAGGERED ROWS OF ROYAL PALM TREE AESTHETIC ALONG |
| | OKEECHOBEE. |
| | |
| | LUCID SECTION - UPDATED COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 5) THE TREE CANOPY ALONG THE SIDEWALK HAS BEEN REDUCED. |
| | PLEASE SEE THE LANDSCAPE REVIEW COMMENTS FOR CORRECTIVE |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE USE OF ROYAL PALMS. |
| | |
| | 6) THE USE OF ROYAL PALM TREES NEEDS TO INCLUDE TWO OR |
| | MORE ROWS OF ROYAL PALM TREES TO CONTINUE THE EXISTING |
| | DESIGN AESTHETIC. THE PROPOSED PLAN ONLY SHOWS ONE ROW |
| | OF ROYAL PALMS TREES. IF THE DOUBLE ROW OF ROYAL PALM |
| | TREES IS NOT ABLE TO BE INSTALLED IN THE PLANTING BED |
| | ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK (GRADE |
| | CONCERNS WERE MENTIONED IN AN EARLIER MEETING) ROYAL |
| | THEN ONE OPTION IS TO INSTALL ROYAL PALM TREES IN |
| | PLANTING BEDS IN THE PLAZA AREA (SIMILAR TO THE |
| | EXISTING CONDITIONS). ANOTHER OPTION IS TO INSTALL THE |
| | FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE BICYCLE PATH ALONG THE CURB |
| | (LOCATION OF EXISTING SIDEWALK) AND INSTALL A FIVE (5) |
| | FOOT WIDE PLANTING AREA FOR THE ROYAL PALMS BETWEEN THE |
| | BICYCLE PATH AND A NOW SIX (6) FOOT WIDE PEDESTRIAN |
| | SIDEWALK. NOTE: THE STREET SIGNS WOULD BE INSTALLED |
| | WITHIN THE PLANTING AREA. |
| | |
| | 7) IN THE PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS FOR THE USE OF THE |
| | SPACE AS A MOTOR VEHICLE SALES ESTABLISHMENT, IT WAS |
| | CONVEYED THAT THE PARKING OF MOTOR VEHICLES ON THE |
| | OUTDOOR PLAZA AREA IS NOT PERMITTED. SHEET L3.01 |
| | INCLUDES A NOTE THAT STATES CARS WILL BE PARKED FOR |
| | DISPLAY IN THE PLAZA. |
| | |
| | 8) ADDITIONALLY, IT WAS STATED THAT A BARRIER AT THE |
| | LIMITS OF THE ROOFED OUTDOOR AREA WOULD NEED TO REMAIN |
| | IN ORDER TO DELINEATE THE LIMITS OF THE SHOWROOM AREA. |
| | THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW A BARRIER. NOTE: THE EXISTING |
| | WALKWAY IS AT LEAST 10 FEET WIDE FOR ITS ENTIRE LENGTH. |
| | THE PLANS NEED TO SHOW THAT AT NO POINT IS THE |
| | PEDESTRIAN PATH LESS THAN 10 FEET IN WIDTH ON THE |
| | PATIO. THE PROPOSED PLANS SHOW IT AT 8.25 FEET AT THE |
| | NARROWEST POINT. |
| | |
| | APPROVAL CONDITIONS |
| | |
| | 9) AMEND THE MMOA FOR OKEECHOBEE TO INCLUDE THE NEW |
| | WORK. |
| | |
| | 10) CITYPLACE RETAIL WILL NEED TO SIGN A MAINTENANCE |
| | AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY FOR THE AREA COVERED BY THE |
| | MMOA. |
| | |
| | 11) RECORD EASEMENTS FOR THE SIDEWALKS AND THE SIGNS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
