| Date |
Text |
| 2020-02-13 08:46:59 | CASE NO. PB 1847 |
| | ESSEX COURT MAJOR SUBDIVISION |
| | 5200 & 5300 ESSEX COURT |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | FEBRUARY 28, 2020, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR |
| | THE APRIL 21, 2020 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY APRIL 13, 2020), |
| | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER |
| | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) COPIES OF THE PROPOSED PLAT WERE NOT SUBMITTED WITH |
| | THE APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 2) THE PUBLIC UTILITY (FPL, FPU, AT&T AND COMCAST) AND |
| | CITY UTILITY SERVICE AVAILABILITY/NO OBJECTION LETTERS |
| | WERE NOT PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 3) SECTION 94-44(E)(2)B OF THE ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR) REQUIRES THAT CONCRETE |
| | SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG BOTH SIDES OF ALL |
| | STREETS; EXCEPT, THAT IT SHALL BE WITHIN THE DISCRETION |
| | OF THE CITY COMMISSION, UPON SUFFICIENT CAUSE BEING |
| | SHOWN, TO WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT OF SIDEWALKS ON ONE |
| | SIDE OF THE STREET IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS. NO SIDEWALKS |
| | WERE PROVIDED ON THE PROPOSED PLANS. |
| | |
| | 4) SECTION 94-44(E)(2)F OF THE ZLDR REQUIRES THAT |
| | STREET LIGHTS SHALL BE SO LOCATED AS TO ILLUMINATE THE |
| | AREA ADEQUATELY DURING HOURS OF DARKNESS. NO STREET |
| | LIGHTS WERE PROVIDED ON THE PROPOSED PLANS. |
| | |
| | 5) SECTION 94-72(A)(1)D OF THE ZLDR REQUIRES THAT THE |
| | FLAGLER DRIVE FRONTAGE OF LOTS 4 AND 5 IS CONSIDERED |
| | THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE. THIS REQUIRES A 25 FOOT FRONT |
| | SETBACK ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE FOR THESE TWO LOTS, NOT 15 |
| | FEET AS SHOWN. PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE ARE DOUBLE |
| | FRONTAGE LOTS SO A 25 FOOT SETBACK IS ALSO REQUIRED |
| | FROM THE TERMINUS OF THE PROPOSED NEW RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | |
| | 6) AS DESIGNED, LOTS 3, 6 AND 8 ARE CORNER LOTS AND |
| | REQUIRE 12.5 FOOT SETBACKS FROM THE CORNER SIDE |
| | PROPERTY LINES IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-72(A)(2)B |
| | OF THE ZLDR.. |
| | |
| | 7) THE REAR SETBACKS FOR LOTS 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 AND 8 ARE |
| | ALL INCORRECTLY LISTED AS 15 FEET. THE REAR SETBACKS |
| | FOR THESE LOTS IS 10 PERCENT OF THE LOT DEPTH IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-72(A)(2)C OF THE ZLDR. |
| | |
| | 8) THE MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK FOR ALL OF THE LOTS IS 5 |
| | FEET (TOTAL OF 15 FEET) IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION |
| | 94-72(A)(2)D OF THE ZLDR. |
| | |
| | 9) PLEASE DO NOT INCLUDE THE SETBACK LINES ON THE PLAT. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, BE AWARE THAT THE CITY DOES NOT ENFORCE |
| | PRIVATE DEED RESTRICTIONS. |
| | |
| | 10) THE STRIP OF LAND ON THE EAST SIDE OF FLAGLER DRIVE |
| | IS SHOWN AS ONE 4,319 SQUARE FOOT PARCEL. DEFINE WHAT |
| | IS OCCURRING WITH THIS PARCEL. |
| | |
| | 11) SECTION 94-312(4)B OF THE ZLDR REQUIRES THAT ALL |
| | LOTS IN A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION HAVE |
| | FRONTAGE ON AND ACCESS FROM AN EXISTING STREET MEETING |
| | THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 94 OF THE ZLDR AND SECTION |
| | 94-342(A) OF THE ZLDR REQUIRES THAT THE WIDTH OF |
| | STREETS IN NEW SUBDIVISIONS SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN THE |
| | MINIMUM WIDTHS ESTABLISHED IN ARTICLE XI OF THE ZLDR. |
| | |
| | A. SECTION 94-342(B) OF THE ZLDR PROVIDES AS A MINIMUM |
| | REQUIREMENT FOR STREETS, AVENUES AND SIDEWALKS, THE |
| | PLAT SHALL DEDICATE A WIDTH OF AT LEAST 50 FEET, AT |
| | LEAST FIVE FEET THEREOF ON EACH SIDE FOR SIDEWALKS, AND |
| | AT LEAST 40 FEET INTERVENING BETWEEN SIDEWALKS; |
| | PROVIDED, THAT IN THE EVENT THAT THE CITY COMMISSION, |
| | UPON RECOMMENDATION BY THE CITY PLANNING BOARD, FINDS |
| | THAT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS |
| | SO DEMAND, A GREATER WIDTH MAY BE REQUIRED; AND EXCEPT |
| | THAT, DEAD-END STREETS NOT EXCEEDING 1,000 FEET IN |
| | LENGTH AND TERMINATION IN A TURNAROUND WITH A MINIMUM |
| | RADIUS OF 50 FEET MAY HAVE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 40 FEET. |
| | THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PLAN DOES NOT COMPLY WITH |
| | THESE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | B. SECTION 94-342(D) OF THE ZLDR PERMITS DEAD END |
| | STREETS IF THE TRACT OF LAND IS OF SUCH SIZE OR |
| | LOCATION TO PREVENT A LOT ARRANGEMENT DIRECTLY RELATED |
| | TO NORMAL STREET DESIGN. THE DEAD END STREET SHALL |
| | TERMINATE IN AN OPEN SPACE HAVING A MINIMUM 50 FOOT |
| | RADIUS. THE T TURNAROUND THAT IS PROPOSED DOES NOT HAVE |
| | A 50 FOOT RADIUS AND THUS DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE |
| | ZLDR. |
| | |
| | 12) THE SOUTH DIMENSION LINE FOR PROPOSED LOT 5 IS |
| | INCORRECT. |
| | |
| | 13) SECTION 94-342(G) OF THE ZLDR REQUIRES THAT THE |
| | CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT IS REVIEWED SO AS TO NOT |
| | DEPRECIATE THE CHARACTER OF ADJOINING PROPERTY. STAFF |
| | HAS PERFORMED A PARCEL ANALYSIS OF THE ESSEX LANE PLAT |
| | PARCELS AS WELL AS THE PARCELS TO THE IMMEDIATE NORTH |
| | OF THE SITE ALONG PLYMOUTH ROAD. THE PROPOSED LOTS, |
| | WHILE MEETING THE MINIMUM SIZE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SF7 |
| | ARE NOT OF A SIZE THAT IS IN CHARACTER WITH THE |
| | ADJACENT PARCELS OR CONTAINED WITHIN THE EXISTING ESSEX |
| | LANE PLAT. EIGHT PROPOSED LOTS WILL BECOME EVEN SMALLER |
| | IN ORDER TO MEET THE MINIMUM RIGHT-OF-WAY STANDARDS |
| | LISTED IN THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS, AND THUS LESS IN |
| | CHARACTER. |
| | |
| |
Print |
