| Date |
Text |
| 2020-02-13 11:43:24 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 02.13.2020 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z20010016, Z20010015, AND Z20010017 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 878O, PB 1849, AND PB 1849A |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. THE JUSTIFICATION IS UNCLEAR. IS THE APPLICANT |
| | PROPOSING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY TO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT (RPD)? IN A FEW LOCATIONS, THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION ONLY TALKS ABOUT MF32, BUT IN OTHER DOES |
| | REFERENCED RPD. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE REZONING TO |
| | AN RPD WITH THE PROVISION OF A SITE PLAN, LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANS, ELEVATIONS, ETC. STAFF CERTAINLY CANNOT CONSIDER |
| | WAIVER REQUESTS WITHOUT THESE ITEMS AS THEIR IMPACT, |
| | JUSTIFICATION, AND COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS CANNOT BE |
| | DETERMINED OR VERIFIED. |
| | |
| | 2. STAFF DOES HAVE SOME CONCERNS REGARDING THE |
| | CONVERSATION OF A SINGLE COMMERCIAL PARCEL, WITHIN AN |
| | EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, AT THE END OF |
| | CUL-DE-SAC, ON A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE. ESPECIALLY IF A |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IS BEING PURSUED, SIGNIFICANT |
| | JUSTIFICATION NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED ON HOW THE PROJECT |
| | MEETS THE REQUIRED STANDARDS FOR A PD AND ANY REQUESTED |
| | WAIVERS. |
| | |
| | 3. MINOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION WILL BE REQUIRED TO |
| | SPLIT THE LAKE PARCEL INTO TWO (2) SEPARATE PARCELS. |
| | |
| | 4. REVISED MASTER PLAN FOR METROCENTRE SHOULD INCLUDE |
| | THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS (AS SPECIFIED IN THE |
| | DECLARATION) IN THE DATA TABLE. |
| | |
| | 5. THE LOT #S REFERENCED IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY SHOULD |
| | CORRESPOND WITH THE LOT #S ASSIGNED IN THE DATA |
| | TABLE/PLAT. |
| | |
| | 6. THE TRAFFIC STUDY SHOULD COMPARE THE MAXIMUM |
| | DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL (NOT EXISTING USES) IN THE CPD |
| | PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF LOT 10 AND COMPARE IT TO THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL AFTER THE REMOVAL OF LOT 10, PLUS |
| | THE IMPACT OF THE RPD. |
| | |
| | 7. RESPONSES FROM UTILITY COMPANIES SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 8. MULTIPLE PAGES WITHIN THE ?MAP SERIES? ARE |
| | DISPLAYING INCORRECT INFORMATION. FOR EXAMPLE, MULTIPLE |
| | PARCELS ARE BEING SHOWN AS HAVING A COMMERCIAL MARINE |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CMPD) ZONING DESIGNATION WHEN THEY |
| | ARE ACTUALLY COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD). |
| | ENSURE THAT ALL DOCUMENTS, MAPS, PLANS, ETC. ARE |
| | COMPLETE AND ACCURATE. |
| | |
| | 9. A COMPLETED SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY |
| | DETERMINATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT |
| | OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE CITY SHALL BE PROVIDED A COPY |
| | OF THEIR DETERMINATION UPON COMPLETION. |
| | |
| | 10. PLEASE NOTE THAT UPON SUBMITTAL OF THE |
| | ABOVE-REFERENCED SITE PLANS, ETC. STAFF RESERVES THE |
| | RIGHT TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AT THAT TIME. AS |
| | THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED |
| | WITHIN AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A |
| | SIGNIFICANT THOROUGHFARE, SPECIAL ATTENTION SHOULD BE |
| | MADE TO SAFE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION TO/FROM SURROUNDING |
| | SCHOOLS, ETC. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE APRIL 21, 2020, |
| | PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED |
| | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 28, |
| | 2020. |
| | |
| | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE APRIL 21, 2020, PLANNING BOARD |
| | AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER |
| | THAN APRIL 6, 2020. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND BE |
| | INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S |
| | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH |
| | REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE. |
| | |
| | H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT |
| | DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE |
| | COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | TTY: 800.955.8771 |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
