Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z19120009
Project Number Z19120009
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2020-04-24 15:52:00NEW COMMENTS LISTED UNDER APRIL 24, 2020
 OLD COMMENTS MARKED AS ONGOING, NOT SATISFIED,
 PARTIALLY SATISFIED, OR SATISFIED.
 IF NOT SATISFIED, WILL HAVE NEW TEXT UNDER ORIGINAL
 COMMENT WITH EXPLANATION OF STATUS
  
 JANUARY 2, 2020:
  
 1. ONGOING. AREA ALL OF THE UNITS AFFORDABLE OR ARE
 SOME MARKET RATE? IF SOME ARE MARKET RATE, THE TOTAL
 INCENTIVE PERMITTED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND MARKET
 RATE IS CALCULATED USING THE CITY?S MOST RECENT VERSION
 OF THE PURCHASE AFFORDABILITY TABLE AS ADMINISTERED BY
 THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PER
 SECTION 94-134.
 CONTINUED CONVERSATION SHALL BE HAD WITH CITY STAFF
 FROM ZONING AND HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO
 ENSURE AFFORDABLE UNITS FOR INCENTIVE.
 2. ONGOING. THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT UTILIZE THE
 CRA PROPERTY, BUT IS DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE LAND THAT
 CONNECTS TO THE NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD. THE CRA IS
 WILLING TO INCENTIVIZE THIS PROJECT AS IT IS AN
 IMPORTANT PROPERTY FOR ENTERING INTO THE NORTHWEST
 NEIGHBORHOOD. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE CONVERSATION
 WITH THE CRA AND THE DEVELOPER TO APPROPRIATELY CONNECT
 THIS PROPERTY TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
 PLEASE CLEARLY DELINEATE BETWEEN DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY
 AND CRA PROPERTY. PLEASE PROVIDE SEPARATE SITE PLAN
 THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE CRA PROPERTY FOR DAC SUBMITTAL
 (AS MAIN SITE PLAN) AND INCLUDE SEPARATE PLAN THAT
 INCLUDES CRA PROPERTY (AND RENAME). PLEASE DO THE SAME
 FOR LANDSCAPE PLANS, CIVIL PLANS, ETC.
 3. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE EXISTING BLACK
 OLIVE TREES CANNOT BE PRESERVED. THE PRESERVATION OF
 THESE TREES WAS INTENDED THROUGH THE BANYAN BOULEVARD
 STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS.
 NO EXPLANATION PROVIDED- NEED NARRATIVE. SEE LANDSCAPE
 PLANNER COMMENTS. THIS SHALL BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO DAC.
 4. ONGOING. ZONING ATLAS IV ILLUSTRATES AN EXTENSION OF
 DOUGLAS AVENUE TO BE A ?NEW SECONDARY ROAD?. THIS IS
 FURTHER REFERENCED:
 A. SECTION 94-119 (A): ADDITIONALLY, THIS DISTRICT
 SHALL CREATE A STRONG CONNECTION WITH THE NORTHWEST
 NEIGHBORHOOD BY EXTENDING THE STREET GRID FROM BANYAN
 BOULEVARD TO 2 ND STREET.?
 B. SECTION 94-119(E): PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS UTILIZING
 ANY INCENTIVE PROGRAM SHALL ACCOMMODATE THE EXTENSION
 OF DIVISION AND DOUGLAS AVENUES NORTH OF BANYAN
 BOULEVARD PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-133 TO ENHANCE
 CONNECTIVITY TO THE NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD.
 THIS REQUIREMENT WILL NEED TO BE FURTHER ANALYZED AS
 THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY DOES
 NOT SATISFY THE INTENT OF THIS SECTION.
 THE PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY STILL REQUIRES
 SOME ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENT. THE LANDSCAPE PROVIDED IS
 NOT SUFFICIENT OR CONTINUOUS. THE BLANK FA?ADE AND
 PROPOSED GARAGE SCREENING DOES NOT CREATE AN ENHANCED
 PEDESTRIAN AREA. NO SEATING IS PROVIDED. THE
 ENHANCEMENT OF THIS AREA NEEDS TO BE DESIGNED TO
 ENHANCE CONNECTIVITY TO THE NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD.
 OPTIONS SHALL NEED TO BE EXPLORED AND A FINAL SUBMITTED
 PRIOR TO DAC MEETING.
 5. ONGOING. THE PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION DOES NOT
 PROVIDE SATISFACTORY CONNECTIVITY TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
 HOW WILL THIS AREA BE IMPROVED? THIS AREA IS ADJACENT
 TO BLANK WALL AND MECHANICAL ROOM AND DOES NOT PROVIDE
 ANY PUBLIC BENEFIT FOR ITS USERS. TREE GRATES DOES NOT
 EFFECTIVELY ENHANCE THE AREA.
 SEE RESPONSE TO NUMBER 4 ABOVE.
 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ACTIVE USES ARE REQUIRED ALONG
 THE SIDE INTERIOR LOT LINE (30%), AS ZONING ATLAS IV
 ILLUSTRATES A ?NEW SECONDARY ROAD? EXTENSION OF
 DOUGLASS AVENUE.
 BICYCLE STORAGE IS NOT AN ACTIVE USE. THE STORAGE NEEDS
 TO BE RELOCATED AND THIS AREA SHALL BE RESERVED FOR
 COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL OR OTHER ACTIVE USE PER THE
 DEFINITION OF ACTIVE USE. THIS SHALL BE ADDRESSED PRIOR
 TO DAC.
 7. SATISFIED
 8. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THERE ARE ACTIVE USE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR GROUND FLOOR AND ACTIVE USE LINER
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SECOND FLOOR. TAMARIND AVENUE IS A
 PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN STREET AND REQUIRES 65% ACTIVE USE
 ALONG THE GROUND FLOOR AND 60% ACTIVE USE LINER FOR
 FLOOR 2 (ALONG PARKING GARAGE USE). SEE DEFINITIONS OF
 ACTIVE USE AND ACTIVE USE LINER IN SECTION 94-109.
 THE RESIDENT STORAGE AREA ON THE 2ND FLOOR ALONG
 TAMARIND AVENUE IS NOT ACTIVE USE. THIS AREA NEEDS TO
 BE RESERVED FOR ANOTHER USE MEETING THE DEFINITION OF
 ACTIVE USE (TO A MIN. DEPTH OF 15 FEET FOR RESIDENTIAL
 USE OR 20 FEET FOR COMMERCIAL USE). THIS SHALL BE
 ADDRESSED PRIOR TO DAC SUBMITTAL.
  
 THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT IS SEPARATE FOR THE GROUND
 FLOOR (60%) AND SEPARATE FOR FLOORS 2-5 (60%). THE
 TOTAL ACTIVE USE PERCENTAGE IS NOT COMBINED. PLEASE
 AMEND THE ACTIVE USE DATA AND SEPARATE GROUND FLOOR
 PERCENTAGE TOTAL AND 2-5 FLOOR LINER PERCENTAGES.
  
 9. THE REQUIRED ACTIVE USE LINER DEPTH FOR RESIDENTIAL
 USE IS 15? FOR FLOOR 2. PLEASE COMPLY WITH ACTIVE USE
 LINER REQUIREMENT AND UPDATE REQUIREMENTS IN SITE DATA
 TABLE ON SHEET A-1.03 TO REFLECT CORRECT REQUIREMENT.
 THIS INCLUDES BANYAN BOULEVARD, TAMARIND AVENUE AND THE
 SIDE INTERIOR LOT LINE (NEW SECONDARY STREET).
  
 THE ACTIVE USE LINER REQUIREMENT OF 15? IS NOT MET.
 PLEASE INDICATE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE THROUGH VARIANCE
 TABLE. PLEASE RESPOND TO VARIANCE CRITERIA FOR EACH
 VARIANCE REQUESTED WITH DAC SUBMITTAL.
  
 THE ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT IS SEPARATE FOR THE GROUND
 FLOOR (60%) AND SEPARATE FOR FLOORS 2-5 (60%). THE
 TOTAL ACTIVE USE PERCENTAGE IS NOT COMBINED. PLEASE
 AMEND THE ACTIVE USE DATA AND SEPARATE GROUND FLOOR
 PERCENTAGE TOTAL AND 2-5 FLOOR LINER PERCENTAGES.
  
 PLEASE INCLUDE DATA IN THE DATA TABLE FOR THE ACTIVE
 USE ALONG THE SIDE INTERIOR LOT LINE (SECONDARY
 STREET).
  
 10. ONGOING. PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE LATEST BANYAN
 BOULEVARD STREETSCAPE DESIGN IS INCORPORATED INTO THE
 SITE PLAN AS THE REVIEW PROGRESSES.
 CONTINUE TO UPDATE AS NECESSARY AS DESIGN PROGRESSES.
 11. SATISFIED.
 12. NOT SATISFIED. ALL SETBACKS SHALL BE MEASURED FROM
 THE EXISTING CURB LINE. PLEASE INDICATE EXISTING CURB
 LINE AND PROPOSED CURB LINE CLEARLY ON ALL PLANS. THE
 BUILDING APPEARS TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM SETBACK OF 30?
 ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE ON THE GROUND FLOOR AND THE
 TOWER.
  
 PLEASE INCLUDE MAXIMUM SETBACKS IN THE SITE DATA TABLE.
  
 THE MINIMUM SETBACK ALONG BANYAN BOULEVARD SHALL BE
 MEASURED FROM THE EXISTING CURB LINE. THIS SHALL BE
 ADJUSTED TO MEET THE REQUIRED SETBACK. IF VARIANCE IS
 REQUESTED FOR REAR SETBACK, PLEASE INCLUDE IN VARIANCE
 TABLE AND ADDRESS VARIANCE CRITERIA FOR THE VARIANCE IN
 THE DAC APPLICATION.
  
 THE STRUCTURE EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM SETBACK OF 30 FEET
 FROM TAMARIND AT THE GROUND FLOOR AND UPPER LEVELS. THE
 SETBACK IS MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF CURB. PLEASE
 INCLUDE THE PROPOSED SETBACK LINE PARALLEL TO THE CURB
 ALONG THE ENTIRE BUILDING FRONTAGE ON THIS FACADE.
 PLEASE INCLUDE THE MAXIMUM PROVIDED SETBACK FROM
 TAMARIND AVENUE IN THE SITE DATA TABLE. IF REQUESTING
 VARIANCE FROM MAXIMUM SETBACK, PLEASE INCLUDE IN
 VARIANCE TABLE ON SITE PLAN AND RESPOND TO VARIANCE
 CRITERIA IN DAC APPLICATION.
  
 13. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE THE SETBACK
 DIMENSION TO THE UPPER FLOORS ON THE SITE PLAN SHEET
 SP-1.
 PLEASE INCLUDE ON SITE PLAN SHEET SP-1.
 14. SATISFIED.
 15. NOT SATIFISED. PLEASE INCLUDE A PROPOSED HARDSCAPE
 PLAN.
 DIDN?T RECEIVE WITH RESUBMITTAL.
 16. SATISFIED
 17. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. CONSIDER THE ROLLING OF
 DUMPSTERS TO THE BANYAN BOULEVARD CURB THROUGH THE
 IMPROVED PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY AREA, WITH A DUMPSTER
 HOLDING AREA ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF BANYAN BOULEVARD.
 NEED TO INCLUDE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IN DISCUSSION.
 THIS WILL ELIMINATE NEED FOR LARGE ROLLING DOOR WHICH
 NEGATIVELY IMPACTS THE BUILDING FA?ADE ALONG BANYAN
 BLVD.
 PLEASE CONTINUE TO COORDINATE. HOW WILL DUMPSTERS BE
 ROLLED OUT. A RESERVED HOLDING AREA WILL BE REQUIRED.
 PLEASE DISCUSS WITH PUBLIC WORKS REGARDING NEED FOR
 DROP CURB. NEEDS TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN
 APPROVAL.
 18. PARTIALY SATISFIED. THE ARCHITECTURE DOES NOT MEET
 THE INTENT OR REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN MASTER
 PLAN ZONING OR THE INTENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR
 ARCHITECTURAL COMPATIBILITY AND DESIGN. ON FACADES
 ENCLOSING ACTIVE USES (SEE SEC. 94-109 FOR DEFINITION
 OF ACTIVE USE), FENESTRATION SHALL COVER A MINIMUM OF
 15% OF THE FA?ADE AREA ? THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE PAINTED
 OR FAUX FENESTRATION. ON FACADES ENCLOSING NON-ACTIVE
 USES, ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED (SEE
 SECTION 94-109 FOR DEFINITION OF ARCH. TREATMENT). SEE
 TABLE IV-4: FA?ADE ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS AT THE END
 OF SECTION 94-109 FOR MORE DETAIL.
 THANK YOU FOR THE UPDATED DESIGN WHICH STAFF FEELS IS
 COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND FOR THE
 INCLUSION OF MORE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT. SEE NEW
 COMMENTS 60-70
 19. PARTIALY SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED ARCHITECTURE IS
 NOT COMPATIBLE OR APPROPRIATE FOR THIS LOCATION, WHICH
 SERVES AS AN IMPORTANT ENTRANCE INTO THE CITY FROM
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE, AS WELL AS A KEY ENTRANCE INTO THE
 HISTORIC NORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOOD. PLEASE EVALUATE THE
 SURROUNDING AREAS AND ARCHITECTURE FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL
 DESIGN THAT IS APPROPRIATE FOR THIS AREA.
 SEE NEW COMMENTS 60-70
  
 20. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 94-119(E), MAIN
 BUILDING ENTRANCES TO LOBBIES AND COMMON AREAS SHALL
 HAVE A HIGH QUALITY DESIGN ENTRANCE CANOPY
 SEE NEW COMMENT 70
 21. SATISFIED.
 22. PARTIALLY SATSFIED. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE REQUIRED BUILDING FOOTPRINT FOR LEVELS 2-8,
 WHICH CANNOT EXCEED 90% PER FLOOR. PLEASE SEE
 DEFINITION OF FOOTPRINT IN SECTION 94-109 WHICH
 EXCLUDES SOME AREAS INCLUDING ROOFTOP DECKS, AND POOLS,
 ETC.
 PLEASE INCLUDE PERCENTAGES PER FLOOR IN DATA. REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 23. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE FAR IS CALCULATED BASED ON
 GROSS BUILDING AREA AND DOES NOT INCLUDE MECHANICAL
 ROOMS, TRASH ROOMS, ETC. PER DEFINITION OF GROSS
 BUILDING AREA IN SECTION 94-109. PLEASE REVISE SHEET
 A-1.01 AND SITE PLAN DATA TO REFLECT.
 PLEASE UPDATE AS NECESSARY AS THINGS ARE ADJUSTED.
 NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL
  
 THE BIKE SHARING STATION AREA, WHETHER BICYCLE STORAGE
 OR CHANGED TO A COMMERCIAL/RETAIL USE (TO COUNT AS
 ACTIVE USE), WOULD BE COUNTED AS FAR.
  
 24. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SEPARATE BASE FAR
 PERMITTED AND FAR PERMITTED WITH INCENTIVE. PLEASE
 INDICATE TOTAL SF PERMITTED BY RIGHT AND SEPARATELY,
 THE SF PERMITTED WITH THE INCENTIVE. PLEASE INCLUDE
 TOTAL SF PROPOSED FOR INCENTIVE.
 PLEASE INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE PERMITTED BY RIGHT AND
 PERMITTED WITH INCENTIVE IN DATA TABLE. NEEDS TO BE
 ADJUSTED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 25. NOT SATISFIED. THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN GROSS
 SF LISTED ON SHEET A-1.01 AND SHEET SP-1. PLEASE
 CLARIFY.
 THERE IS STILL A DISCREPANCY, PLEASE CLARIFY PRIOR TO
 SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
 26. NOT SATIFIED. SHEET A 1.06 LISTS GROSS AREA;
 HOWEVER THE CITY?S DEFINITION OF GROSS AREA EXCLUDES
 MECHANICAL ROOMS, TRASH ROOMS, ETC. PLEASE RELABEL TO
 AVOID CONFUSION WITH SHEET A-1.01.
 PLEASE ADJUST AS REQUESTED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
 THIS EXHIBIT DOES NOT MATCH THE DEFINITION FOR GROSS
 BUILDING AREA.
  
 THE BIKE SHARING STATION, AS CURRENTLY PROPOSED, COUNTS
 AS GROSS BUILDING AREA. ANY ACTIVE USE IN THAT LOCATION
 WOULD ALSO COUNT AS GROSS BUILDING AREA.
 27. SATISFIED
 28. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE PROPOSED RECESSED
 STAIRWELL ALONG BANYAN BOULEVARD DOES NOT MEET THE
 INTENT OF A PLANAR BREAK PER THE DEFINITION. A PLANAR
 BREAK SHOULD RESULT IN AN OPEN SPACE OR EXTENSION OF
 THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK AT THE GROUND LEVEL.
 PLANAR BREAK REQUIREMENT ALONG GROUND FLOOR (FA?ADE M)
 NOT MET. EXCEEDS MAX. 60% FOR BUILDING FRONTAGE. ADJUST
 PRIOR TO DAC SUBMITTAL.
  
 PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANAR BREAKS FOR THIS FA?ADE IS
 MINIMUM CUMULATIVE LENGTH OF 20% OF THE ENTIRE FA?ADE.
  
 PLANAR BREAK IS MEASURED IN WIDTH, NOT SQUARE FOOTAGE.
 PLEASE UPDATE DATA.
  
 29. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. FA?ADE H DOES NOT MEET THE
 DEFINITION OF PLANAR BREAK AT THE GROUND LEVEL. PLANAR
 BREAKS ARE REQUIRED AT BOTH GROUND LEVEL AND TOWER
 LEVEL.
 FA?ADE M DOES NOT MEET DEFINITION. MUST NOT EXCEED 60%
 OF BUILDING FA?ADE WITHOUT PLANAR BREAK. PRIOR TO DAC
 SUBMITTAL.
  
 30. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PARKING SPACES SHALL BE DOUBLE
 STRIPED MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-485.
 PLEASE ADJUST ON SITE PLAN.
 PLEASE REMOVE HASH STRIPING AND INCLUDE DOUBLE STRIPE
 ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS TO MATCH SUBMITTED PARKING SPACE
 STRIPING DETAIL.
  BOTH PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
 31. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. TANDEM PARKING SPACES CAN ONLY
 COUNT AS TWO SPACES IF THE SPACES ARE DEDICATED TO THE
 SAME RESIDENTIAL UNIT, AND A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT SHALL
 BE RECORDED ON CITY APPROVED FORMS, AND RECORDED IN THE
 PUBLIC RECORDS. (SECTION 94-111(E)). THE SITE DATA
 CURRENTLY LISTS THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING AT 1 PER UNIT.
 THE NUMBER OF TANDEM SPACES THAT ARE LABELED AS
 RESERVED FOR 3-UNIT APARTMENTS EXCEEDS THE NUMBER OF
 3-UNIT APARTMENTS. PLEASE ADJUST. TANDEM SPACES CAN BE
 SHARED FOR 2-UNIT APARTMENTS BUT PLEASE ADJUST LABELS
 AS NECESSARY. MATCH WITH THE PARKING DATA TABLE ON SITE
 PLAN SP-1.
  
 THE PROVIDED PARKING NEEDS TO INDICATE THE EXACT NUMBER
 OF PARKING PROPOSED PER EACH TYPE OF UNIT. THERE NEEDS
 TO BE A MINIMUM OF 2 SPACES FOR 15 OF THE 2 OR 3
 BEDROOM UNITS AS THERE ARE 15 SETS OF TANDEM PARKING
 SPACES.
  
 PLEASE INCLUDE MAXIMUM REQUIRED PARKING FOR EACH OF THE
 SEPARATE USES IN ADDITION TO MINIMUM PARKING PER USE.
  
 NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 32. SATISFIED
 33. NOT SATISFIED. AN EQUIVALENT OF ONE PARKING SPACE
 SHALL BE PROVIDED AND STRIPED AT THE TERMINUS OF
 DEAD-END DRIVE AISLES FOR A TURN-AROUND SPACE.
 NEED TO INCLUDE TURN AROUND SPACE AT END OF DEAD-END
 DRIVE AISLE ON BOTH FLOORS. EXCEPTION IS IF EACH
 PARKING SPACE WILL BE RESERVED. TO BE MODIFIED PRIOR TO
 SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
 34. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE AREA IN FRONT OF THE
 ENTRANCE TO THE TENANT STORAGE AREA IN THE PARKING
 GARAGE SERVES ALSO AS A BACKUP AREA FOR VEHICLES IN THE
 END PARKING SPACE, WHICH IS A DANGEROUS SITUATION.
 PLEASE ADDRESS FOR SAFE ACCESS.
 INCLUDE BOLLARDS AT MINIMUM OF 3 FEET INTO HASH MARKED
 AREA TO PROTECT AREA WHILE STILL PROVIDING REQUIRED 3
 FOOT BACK UP AREA FOR CARS BACKING OUT OF DEAD END
 SPOT.
 35. ONGOING. PLEASE PROVIDE FIVE RESERVED SPACES FOR
 CAR SHARING STATION PARKING. ONCE PROJECT IS FINALIZED,
 STAFF CAN DETERMINE HOW MANY SPACES NEED TO BE OCCUPIED
 BY CAR SHARING AND HOW MANY CAN BE RESERVED FOR FUTURE
 CAR SHARE.
 ONGOING THROUGHOUT BUILDING PERMIT AND PRIOR TO CO
 36. NOT SATISFIED. MICROUNIT PROJECTS ARE REQUIRED TO
 PROVIDE A BIKE SHARING STATION ON SITE. THIS CAN BE
 RESERVED FOR A MICROMOBILITY SHARING STATION AS THE
 CITY IS GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS OF CONTRACTING A
 REPLACEMENT FOR SKYBIKE.
 PLEASE PROVIDE MICROMOBILITY STATION ON SITE. MOST
 LIKELY WITHIN PLAZA AREA ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE. THIS IS
 SEPARATE FROM BICYCLE RACKS. SHALL BE INCLUDED PRIOR TO
 SITE PLAN APPROVAL.
 37. ONGOING. PLEASE NOTE, A PROJECT WITH RESIDENTIAL
 MICRO-UNITS SHALL CONTRIBUTE A TROLLEY FEE PER UNIT PER
 MONTH TO SUPPORT THE OPERATION OF THE CITY?S TROLLEY
 SYSTEM, AS ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION.
 38. ONGOING. IN ADDITION TO MICRO-UNIT AND STANDARD
 UNIT BICYCLE RACKS, THE PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO INCLUDE
 BICYCLE RACKS FOR PUBLIC USE AT A RATE OF 1 PER 100
 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. THESE PUBLIC BICYCLE RACKS CAN
 BE LOCATED AT THE PROJECT?S ENTRANCE.
 MOST APPROPRIATE LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED THROUGH SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL OR BUILDING PERMIT.
 39. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE BICYCLE RACKS FOR MICRO
 AND STANDARD UNITS MUST ALL BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE
 BUILDING, UNDER COVER AND SECURE.
 PROPOSED LOCATION DOES NOT COUNT AS ACTIVE USE. CAN BE
 DISPERSED THROUGH PARKING GARAGE OR BEHIND REQUIRED
 15-20 FOOT ACTIVE USE LINER ON SECOND FLOOR ALONG
 TAMARIND AVENUE.
  
 GENERAL LOCATION SHALL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO DAC
 SUBMITTAL BUT EXACT DETAILS CAN BE REVIEWED THROUGH
 SITE PLAN APPROVAL OR BUILDING PERMIT.
  
 40. SATISFIED
  
 41. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES
 SHALL BE UNDERGROUNDED.
 THERE IS ONE LINE THAT LOOKS TO BE IN VERY CLOSE
 PROXIMITY TO THE REAR PROPERTY LINE. THIS LINE MAY BE
 TOO CLOSE IN PROXIMITY TO THE BUILDING, ESPECIALLY WITH
 THE ADJUSTED SETBACK. THIS WILL NEED TO BE CHECKED AND
 IF TOO CLOSE IN PROXIMITY, IT WOULD NEED TO RELOCATED,
 UNDERGROUNDED, OR REMOVED IF OBSOLETE (LOOKS TO END
 ABRUPTLY). PLEASE CONFIRM WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR
 REGULATIONS AND NECESSARY ACTIONS.
  
 42. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPOSED
 LOCATION OF THE EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE.
 CANNOT LOCATE ON SITE PLAN ? PLEASE INCLUDE WITH DAC
 SUBMITTAL.
 43. PARTIALLY SATIFSIED. PLEASE NOTE, ANY ROOF MOUNTED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED TO THE HEIGHT OF
 THE EQUIPMENT.
 PLEASE INCLUDE HEIGHT OF PARAPET ON BUILDING
 ELEVATIONS. PLEASE INCLUDE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF AC
 UNITS/MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. PARAPET MAY NEED TO BE
 ADJUSTED IF FURTHER SCREENING NEEDED. CAN BE ADJUSTED
 THROUGH SITE PLAN APPROVAL OR THROUGH BUILDING PERMIT
 REVIEW.
 44. SATISFIED
 45. ONGOING. UNDERSTANDING THE LOCATION MAY CHANGE AS
 THE PROCESS CONTINUES, PLEASE INDICATE PROPOSED
 LOCATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER ON PLANS. ALL GROUND
 MOUNTED UTILITIES SHALL BE SCREENED BY LANDSCAPING TO
 THE FULLEST EXTENT POSSIBLE. PLEASE INCLUDE ON
 LANDSCAPE PLANS.
 LOCATION TO BE FINALIZED THROUGHOUT SITE PLAN APPROVAL
 AND ENGINEERING/BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW. ZONING TO BE
 INCLUDED IN LOCATION SELECTION.
 46. ONGOING. PLEASE EVALUATE UTILIZING WALL MOUNTED
 FDC.
 LOCATION TO BE FINALIZED THROUGHOUT SITE PLAN APPROVAL
 AND ENGINEERING/BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW. ZONING TO BE
 INCLUDED IN LOCATION SELECTION.
 47. SATISFIED
 48. SATISFIED
 49. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS AND
 LOCATION OF PROPOSED LIGHT POLES ON THE ROW.
 SHALL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL OR
 THROUGH BUILDING PERMIT
 50. SATISFIED
 51. ONGOING. PLEASE NOTE, A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT SHALL
 BE REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT PER SECTION 94-113(7).
 TO BE DONE PRIOR TO CO
 52. ONGOING. FOR THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVE
 PROGRAM, PER SECTION 94-134, THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 SHALL OBTAIN CITY COMMISSION AUTHORIZATION FOR THE
 CONVEYANCE OF CITY-OWNED DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS AS A
 REQUIREMENT OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. PLEASE NOTE, IF THE
 SITE PLAN APPROVAL EXPIRES PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF
 CONSTRUCTION, THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS TRANSFERRED BY THE
 CITY AT NO COST ARE FORFEITED AND REVERT BACK TO THE
 CITY.
 TO BE DONE PRIOR TO CO
 53. ONGOING. PLEASE NOTE, ALL DEVELOPMENTS SEEKING TO
 UTILIZE THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVE SHALL ENTER
 INTO ENTER INTO AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
 AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY, ON CITY APPROVED FORMS WHICH
 INCLUDE THE CONDITIONS LISTED IN SECTION 94-134(F).
 TO BE DONE PRIOR TO CO
 54. SATISFIED
  
 NEW COMMENTS APRIL 24, 2020
 55. PLEASE NOTE, IF THE BANYAN BOULEVARD STREETSCAPE
 DOES NOT MOVE FORWARD, THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS ALONG
 BANYAN BOULEVARD
 56. PLEASE INCLUDE A VARIANCE TABLE FOR ALL REQUESTED
 VARIANCES WITH CODE SECTION, REQUIRED
 DIMENSION/PERCENTAGE/NUMBER, PROPOSED
 DIMENSION/PERCENTAGE/NUMBER, PERCENTAGE OF VARIANCE
 REQUESTED.
 57. PLEASE SUBMIT A DAC APPLICATION WITH RESPONSES FOR
 SPECIAL REVIEW, AND SEPARATE RESPONSES TO VARIANCE
 CRITERIA FOR EACH REQUESTED VARIANCE. FOR EXAMPLE,
 ACTIVE USE LINER REQUIREMENT ALONG BANYAN BOULEVARD
 (AVENUE DESIGNATION) IS SEPARATE FROM ACTIVE USE LINER
 REQUIREMENT ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE (PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN
 DESIGNATION).
 58. PLEASE CONSIDER MOVING THE GYM TO THE SECOND FLOOR
 AND RESERVING THE SPACE ALONG BANYAN BOULEVARD FOR
 OTHER ACTIVE USES THAT BETTER MEETS THE INTENT OF
 ACTIVE USE.
 59. PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE SIDEWALK AND BICYCLE LANE IS
 KEPT LEVEL AT THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TO THE PROJECT.
 60. PLEASE PROVIDE MATERIAL DETAIL FOR THE
 ARCHITECTURE. PLEASE PROVIDE ILLUSTRATION DETAIL OR
 PICTURE DETAIL FOR VARIOUS MATERIAL.
 61. ARE THE LIGHT POLES SHOWN IN RENDERINGS ALONG
 BANYAN BOULEVARD ACCURATE FOR THE BANYAN STREETSCAPE.
 PLEASE UPDATE IF NECESSARY.
 62. PLEASE EXPLORE REDUCING THE VERTICAL LENGTH OF THE
 ALUMINUM SCREENING PANELS ALONG THE SOUTHERN FA?ADE AND
 INCORPORATING A KNEE WALL SIMILAR TO THAT ON THE EAST
 AND NORTH FA?ADE TO REDUCE THE IMPACT OF PEDESTRIANS
 WALKING BY THE PARKING GARAGE/MECHANICAL ROOMS
 63. PLEASE EXPLORE THE INCORPORATION OF WINDOWS ALONG
 THE EASTERN FA?ADE WHERE THE PARKING GARAGE RAMP IS.
 PARKING RAMPS SHOULD BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW TO
 BEST EXTENT POSSIBLE.
 64. WITH REQUIRED MINIMUM SETBACK FROM BANYAN
 BOULEVARD, PLEASE COORDINATE WITH BUILDING DIVISION
 (ROBERT BROWN) AND ZONING FOR REQUIRED PARING GARAGE
 SCREENING AS THE BUILDING WILL BE CLOSER TO THE REAR
 PROPERTY LINE. DISCUSSIONS CAN BE HAD REGARDING THE
 LOCATION OF THE BUILDING PERMITTED TO BE CLOSER TO REAR
 PROPERTY LINE IS THE CRA PROPERTY IS NOT GOING TO BE
 UTILIZED OTHER THAN FOR OPEN SPACE.
 65. THE RENDERING OF THE WEST FA?ADE SHOWS A BUILDING
 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE CRA PROPERTY THAT DOESN?T
 MATCH THE EXISTING CONDITION. PLEASE UPDATE
 66. PLEASE UPDATE RENDERINGS PRIOR TO DAC WITH CORRECT
 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE WITHIN PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION ON EAST
 SIDE OF PROPERTY (SEE PRIOR COMMENTS AND COMMENTS FROM
 LANDSCAPE PLANNER R. CARANCI REGARDING CITY
 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCING LANDSCAPE WITHIN THIS
 AREA BEFORE UPDATING RENDERINGS- COORDINATE WITH
 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT).
 67. PLEASE CONSIDER THE INCORPORATION OF BALCONIES ON
 THE TOWER OF THE EAST FA?ADE TO ADD DEPTH TO FA?ADE AND
 TO PROVIDE TENANTS A VIEW OF POOL AMENITY AREA.
 68. PLEASE EXPLORE OPTIONS FOR THE HORIZONTAL ELEMENT
 ON TOP OF THE GROUND FLOOR TO BE VERTICALLY ENLARGED TO
 PROVIDE A STRONGER HORIZONTAL BASE?
 69. THE PROPOSED ALUMINUM PANEL ALONG THE
 ELEVATOR/STAIR ON DOES NOT SEEM NECESSARY COMPATIBLE
 WITH THE CONCRETE COLUMN DETAIL ? PLEASE EXPLORE
 KEEPING THIS AREA SAME AS REST OF FA?ADE OR ANOTHER
 MATERIAL.
 70. PLEASE EXPLORE WAYS OF HIGHLIGHTING CORNER OF
 TAMARIND AND BANYAN (TAMARIND SIDE) AS THIS CORNER IS
 AN IMPORTANT FOCAL POINT BOTH INTO THE NORTHWEST
 NEIGHBORHOOD AND ENTERING THE CITY FROM AUSTRALIAN
 AVENUE.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved