| Date |
Text |
| 2021-03-30 19:57:25 | TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS: |
| | 1. SATISFIED. QUEUE LENGTHS AND AVAILABLE STORAGE |
| | SUMMARY TABLE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE REPORT. PLEASE |
| | IDENTIFY TABLE NUMBER AND/OR REPORT PAGE SHOWCASING IT. |
| | 1A. NOTE: TRAFFIC STUDY SHOWS SIGNIFICANT QUEUING FOR |
| | THE EASTBOUND-LEFT AND SOUTHBOUND-RIGHT TURNING |
| | MOVEMENTS AT THE BANYAN BLVD AND ROSEMARY AVE |
| | INTERSECTION. APPLICANT TO DISCUSS WITH CITY AND ADOPT |
| | TDM STRATEGIES TO MITIGATE TRAFFIC CONGESTION. |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE AUTOTURN PATH FOR |
| | SERVICE AND DELIVERY VEHICLES. THE CITY CODE PROHIBITS |
| | VEHICLES FROM BACKING INTO AND OUT OF PUBLIC |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY. SHEET EX-1 WAS NOT IN THE SUBMITTED |
| | MATERIAL. PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | 2A. PROVIDE DESIGN VEHICLES' MODEL DIMENSIONS |
| | 2B. PROVIDE ANALYSIS SHOWCASING VEHICLE'S DYNAMIC |
| | ENVELOPE. VEHICLE PATH LINES SHOULD BE COLORED OR |
| | DIFFERENT WEIGHT/PATTERN FROM SURROUNDING FEATURES |
| | 2C. PROVIDE SEPARATE OUTPUT FOR EACH VEHICLE MANEUVER |
| | (I.E. MANEUVER IN AND OUT) |
| | 3. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE AT THE |
| | DEAD-END ON THE 5TH FLOOR OR TOP FLOOR OF THE PARKING |
| | GARAGE PER CITY CODE REQUIREMENT. AUTOTURN ANALYSIS |
| | NEEDED TO VERIFY AND VALIDATE. SHEET A-2.6 SHOWS |
| | VEHICLE'S DYNAMIC ENVELOPE ENCROACHMENT WITH PARKING |
| | SPACE NUMBER 391. PLEASE REMOVE THE AFFECTED PARKING |
| | STALL AND UPDATE FINAL SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 3A. RESUBMISSION SHOWS QUESTIONABLE VEHICLE?S POSITION |
| | WITH RESPECT TO ITS TRAJECTORY. PLEASE REVISE ACCORDING |
| | TO PREVIOUS COMMENT GUIDELINES. |
| | 4. NOT SATISFIED. CONSIDER RELOCATING THE MIDBLOCK |
| | CROSSWALK ON 3RD STREET TO ALIGN WITH PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT WALKWAY. PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION |
| | SHOWCASING APPLICABLE SAFETY AND VISIBILITY |
| | REQUIREMENTS DISQUALIFYING SUCH RELOCATION. LATEST |
| | COMMENT SET SHOWS: "BIZI". PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | 4A. APPLICANT HAS NOT DISCUSSED WITH THE CITY |
| | 5. NOT SATISFIED. COORDINATE WITH CITY STAFF FOR |
| | FURTHER TDM STRATEGIES. PLEASE PROVIDE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
| | OF SUCH ITEM OR LIST OF AGREED TDM STRATEGIES. |
| | 5A. APPLICANT HAS NOT DISCUSSED WITH THE CITY |
| | 6. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. MINIMUM TRAVEL LANE WIDTH IS 9 |
| | FEET, NOT INCLUDING GUTTER. PLEASE REVISE SITE PLAN TO |
| | SHOWCASE WIDTH OF GUTTER AND TRAVEL LANES SEPARATELY ON |
| | 2ND AND 3RD ST |
| | 6A. PROVIDE TRAVEL LANE DIMENSIONS EXCLUDING CURB AND |
| | GUTTER. NOTE: MINIMUM ROADWAY WIDTH ALONG 2ND ST SHOULD |
| | BE 12 FEET PER CITY CODE SEC. 94-485 FIGURE XV-2 AND |
| | PARALLEL PARKING STALL MANEUVERABILITY REQUIREMENTS. |
| | 6B. NO DIMENSIONS PROVIDED FOR 3RD ST. PLEASE REVISE. |
| | NOTE: ACCORDING TO FDOT GREENBOOK STANDARDS, THE |
| | MINIMUM WIDTH OF A TWO-WAY RESIDENTIAL ROADWAY SHOULD |
| | BE 20 FEET FROM EDGE-OF-PAVEMENT TO EDGE-OF-PAVEMENT |
| | (EXCLUDING CURBS AND GUTTERS). |
| | NOTED COMMENTS: |
| | - EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PORTION OF SIDEWALK |
| | OUTSIDE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | - ALLEY ABANDONMENT SHOULD COMPLY WITH CITY CODE SEC. |
| | 94-112, INCLUDE THE APPLICABLE ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE |
| | REQUIREMENT. DEAD-END ALLEY IS PROHIBITED. PROVIDE |
| | RESULT OF THE ALLY ABANDONMENT APPLICATION ONCE |
| | COMPLETED. |
| | |
| |
Print |
