Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z19110020
Project Number Z19110020
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2020-10-27 16:38:291. ON SHEET A-01 PLEASE CREATE A SITE DATA TABLE THAT
 INCLUDES THE THREE DIFFERENT ZONING DESIGNATION ON
 SITE, THE AREA OF EACH, THE CORRESPONDING BASE FAR AND
 RESULTING GBA ALLOWED BY RIGHT, AND THE ADDITIONAL FAR
 AND GBA ALLOWED WITH INCENTIVES FOR EACH BASE ZONING.
 THIS TABLE WILL LIST THE MAXIMUM GBA ALLOWED ON SITE BY
 RIGHT AND INCENTIVES. TABLE ALSO NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE
 PROPOSED GSF AND THE AMOUNT OF TDRS NEEDED FOR THE
 PROJECT.
 2. SURVEY AND CIVIL DRAWING SHALL INDICATE THE EXISTING
 CURB ACROSS STREET AND DIMENSION THE EXISTING TRAVEL
 LANES AFTER CHANGES.
 3. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING CURB
 AND THE PROPOSED LOCATION, IF CHANGED.
 4. WHAT IS THE WIDTH OF THE TRAVEL LANES ON 2ND STREET?
 IS IT CHANGE FROM CURRENT?
 5. SIDEWALK ON EAST SIDE OF 3RD STREET SHALL FOLLOW THE
 CURB ALIGNMENT.
 6. PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING ALONG ROSEMARY WILL NOT
 BE POSSIBLE, PLEASE REMOVE PROPOSED STRIPING.
 7. PLEASE PREPARE SOME CROSS SECTIONS FOR 2ND STREET
 AND 3RD STREET.
 8. IF POSSIBLE FDC SHALL BE WALL MOUNTED.
 9. DCDA INDICATED ON 2ND STREET EAST OF THE PARKING
 GARAGE IS LISTED TO BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND. VAULT WILL
 NOT BE PERMITTED BY THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT.
 NEW DCDA LOCATION SHALL BE BEHIND THE MINIMUM SETBACK
 AND SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPE.
 10. PROPOSED EXFILTRATION TRENCH WILL CONFLICT WITH THE
 REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL FOR THE STREET TREE. PLEASE
 DISCUSS WITH LANDSCAPE PLANNER IF THE CONTINUOUS
 PLANTING AREA WILL BE SUFFICIENT FOR TREES AND THERE IS
 NO NEED FOR STRUCTURAL SOIL.
 11. PLEASE CORRECT THE MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT TABLE
 TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE REQUIREMENT FOR PROPERTIES
 LARGER THAN 80,000SF.
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE A GRAPHIC TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH
 ACTIVE USE REQUIREMENT AS LISTED IN TABLE WITHIN SHEET
 A-01.
 13. CODE REQUIRES AN AVERAGE UNIT SIZE OF 800SF.
 PROJECT PROPOSED AVERAGE UNIT SIZE OF 765SF. A VARIANCE
 WILL BE NECESSARY IF NOT ADJUSTED TO MEET REQUIREMENT.
 14. SQUARE FOOTAGE TABLE LISTS TRASH WITHIN THE
 NON-LEASABLE AREA. THE TRASH CHUTE CAN BE EXCLUDED FROM
 GBA BUT THE ROOM WHERE THE TRASH CHUTE IS LOCATED
 WITHIN EACH FLOOR SHALL BE COUNTED AS GBA.
 15. PLEASE ADJUST THE TRANSPARENCY CALCULATION GRAPHIC
 IN SHEET A-03 TO INDICATE THE 10 FEET MARK AND CONFIRM
 THE CALCULATION IS BASED ON THAT DIMENSION.
 TRANSPARENCY IS ONLY REQUIRED FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL
 ACTIVE USES (LOBBY AND COMMERCIAL SPACE).
 16. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE
 WITH ALL THE ELEMENTS REQUIRED BY TABLE IV-4 FA?ADE
 ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS.
 17. FURTHER STUDY IS NECESSARY FOR THE WEST ELEVATION
 AS IT WILL BE HIGHLY VISIBLE FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE
 PARKING GARAGE FACADES NEED ADDITIONAL WORK TO COMPLY
 WITH THE REQUIREMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT OF
 NON-ACTIVE USES. THE WEST STAIR CAN INCORPORATE SOME
 WINDOWS OR TREATMENT TO IMPROVE THE FA?ADE. THE PARKING
 GARAGE NORTH ELEVATION WILL BE ALSO VISIBLE AND NEED
 SOME IMPROVEMENTS.
 18. PLEASE INDICATE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED GROUND SETBACK
 ON ALL FLOOR PLANS AND THE CONDITIONAL SETBACK LINE ON
 EACH OF THE REQUIRED LEVELS. ALSO CLEARLY INCLUDE THE
 PROPERTY LINE IN ALL DRAWINGS, INCLUDING CIVILS AND
 LANDSCAPE.
 19. IN SHEET A-02 PLEASE REFER TO MAXIMUM PROPOSED GBA,
 NOT FAR.
 20. PLEASE PROVIDE A SIDE INTERIOR SETBACK FOR THE EAST
 PROPERTY LINE.
 21. PLEASE LIST THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES
 REQUIRED BY CODE, AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF BIKE SPACES
 REQUIRED BY CODE (WITHIN THE BUILDING FOR BUILDING
 TENANTS AT 1/15 PARKING SPACES, AND ALONG THE STREET
 FRONTAGE 1/100 LINEAR FEET OF FRONTAGE). THE TABLE
 LISTING THE REQUIRED PARKING BY CODE IS NOT ACCURATE.
 PLEASE USE PROVISIONS IN SEC 94-111 OF THE ZLDRS.
 22. PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE IN THE PARKING GARAGE THE
 LOCATION OF THE GUEST PARKING AND THE PARKING FOR THE
 COMMERCIAL USE. THESE SPACES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED
 BEHIND ANY CONTROL GATE.
 23. WHAT IS THE BACK OUT SPACE AT THE GROUND LEVEL
 PARKING GARAGE?
 24. PLEASE LOCATE THE EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN THE
 BLOCK THAT ARE NOT PART OF THE PROJECT FOR REFERENCE.
 25. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THE POSSIBLE RE-DESIGN
 OF THE RETAIL SPACE ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE. ARCADES DO
 NOT HAVE A RECORD OF SUCCESS FOR COMMERCIAL SPACES.
 26. WALK UP UNIT DOORS SHALL BE DESIGNED LIKE FRONT
 DOORS AND NOT SLIDERS.
 27. GARAGE HAS BIG BLANK WALL ALONG 2ND STREET. OPTION
 COULD BE TO MOVE THE BIKE STORAGE THERE.
 28. GARAGE ELEVATION ALONG 2ND STREET SHALL INCLUDE
 ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT.
 28A STAFF RECOMMENDS THE SECONDARY ENTRANCE ON 2ND
 STREET TO BE HIGHLIGHTED TO BREAK THE CONTINUITY OF THE
 RESIDENTIALL UNITS.
 29. THE WEST ELEVATION OF THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
 SHALL BE ENHANCED TO PROJECT A GOOD FA?ADE TOWARDS THE
 RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. THE WEST HALLWAY FA?ADE SHALL
 INCORPORATE WINDOWS.
 30. STREETSCAPE DESIGN ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL
 FOLLOW THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DANCE INTO THE SUNSET
 STREETSCAPE DESIGN.
 31. PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE DECORATIVE STREET
 LIGHT ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGE TO MEET THE MINIMUM 0.6
 FOOT-CANDLES REQUIRED. LIGHT FIXTURE SHALL MATCH CITY
 STANDARD.
 32. A PORTION OF THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE
 HISTORIC DISTRICT, THEREFORE HPB APPROVAL FOR A COA
 WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT FRIEDERIKE MITTNER AT
 561-822-1457 TO DISCUSS REQUIREMENTS FOR SUCH
 APPLICATION. THE COA SHALL BE OBTAINED BEFORE
 PROCEEDING TO DAC FOR SPECIAL REVIEW.
 33. DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS ON SITE CANNOT
 OCCUR UNTIL BUILDING PERMIT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION HAS
 BEEN APPROVED.
 34. A PROPERTY RE-PLAT WILL BE REQUIRED.
 35. AN APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE ALLEY
 ABANDONMENT. THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT REQUIRES THAT A
 PUBLIC OPEN SPACE EQUIVALENT TO THE AREA OF THE
 ABANDONED ALLEY BE ALLOCATED ON SITE. ALLEY AREA = 15
 X500=7,500SF. PLEASE INDICATE IF A PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
 EQUAL TO 7,500 SF CAN BE LOCATED ON SITE. IF NOT, A
 WAIVER OF SUCH PROVISION SHALL BE REQUESTED TO THE CITY
 COMMISSION AS PART OF THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT PROCESS. IS
 THERE ANY POSSIBILITY TO PROVIDE ANY PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
 ON SITE TO COMPLY WITH THE ALLEY ABANDONMENT PROVISION?
 SMALLER THAN THE REQUIRED?
 36. HAS THE PROPERTY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY
 (NOT PART OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT) CONFIRMED SUPPORT
 FOR ALLEY ABANDONMENT?
 37. THE PROJECT REQUIRES DAC APPROVAL FOR SPECIAL
 REVIEW. IN PREPARATION FOR THE DAC, PLEASE PROVIDE
 COLORED ELEVATIONS IN CONTEXT FOR DAC SPECIAL REVIEW,
 MORE DETAILED COLORED ELEVATIONS WITH CALL OUT
 MATERIALS AND PICTURES OF PROPOSED MATERIALS, AND
 STREET LEVEL RENDERS.
 38. PROJECT WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A SIDEWALK
 ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THE SIDEWALK LOCATED ON PRIVATE
 PROPERTY.
 39. PROJECT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF
 ALL HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE INSTALLED WITHIN THE ROW AS
 PART OF THIS PROJECT. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT SHALL BE
 SIGNED BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPER BEFORE FINAL
 CO.
 FOR RESUBMITTAL PLEASE PROVIDE ONE COPY OF THE
 DRAWINGS, RESPONSE LETTER AND ANY OTHER REQUIRED
 SUPPORTED DOCUMENTATION, AND ONE CD WITH ELECTRONIC
 COPIES OF ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved