| Date |
Text |
| 2019-12-11 11:11:26 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 12.11.2019 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z19110010 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 791II |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. PLEASE CLARIFY THE METHODOLOGY REGARDING THE PARKING |
| | CALCULATION. A SHARED PARKING CALCULATION IS BEING |
| | USED, BUT A PARKING STUDY HAS ALSO BEEN PROVIDED TO |
| | JUSTIFY A FURTHER REDUCTION IN THE REQUIRED PARKING. AS |
| | SUCH, THE APPLICATION WOULD NEED TO BE AMENDED TO SHOW |
| | THAT A PARKING WAIVER IS BEING REQUESTED. PARKING |
| | WAIVERS WITHIN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| | SEC. 94-207(B)(13) OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE CLARIFICATION AS TO HOW THE CONFLICTS |
| | WITH FPL, AS STATED IN THEIR LETTER (NOVEMBER 5, 2019) |
| | WILL BE ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 3. SITE PLAN SHALL IDENTIFY THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE AT |
| | THE CORNER OF CENTREPARK BOULEVARD AND CENTREPARK DRIVE |
| | EAST. NO ENCROACHMENTS BETWEEN 18 INCHES AND EIGHT (8) |
| | FEET SHALL BE WITHIN THIS AREA. |
| | |
| | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE CLARIFICATION ON HOW TRASH WILL BE |
| | MANAGED AND PICKED UP. |
| | |
| | 5. PARKING DETAIL ON SHEET SP-1 IS INCORRECT. |
| | |
| | 5.1. THE NOTE INDICATES TWO (2) FEET TO THE BACK OF THE |
| | WHEEL STOP, BUT THE DIMENSION LINE INDICATES THREE (3) |
| | FEET. |
| | |
| | 5.2. THE LENGTH OF THE STALL IS DIMENSIONED AT 28 FEET; |
| | THIS SHOULD BE 18 FEET. |
| | |
| | 5.3. THE WIDTH OF THE HANDICAP STALL IS DIMENSIONED AT |
| | 19 FEET; THIS SHOULD BE 12 FEET. |
| | |
| | 5.4. THE WIDTH OF THE HANDICAP AISLE IS DIMENSIONED AT |
| | EIGHT (8) FEET; THIS SHOULD BE FIVE (5) FEET. |
| | |
| | 6. THE PARKING CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN |
| | DOES NOT MATCH THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. |
| | |
| | 7. THERE APPEARS TO BE A NUMBER OF LOCATIONS WHERE THE |
| | STRUCTURAL COLUMNS ARE ENCROACHING INTO THE PARKING |
| | STALL. THE COLUMNS SHALL BE CONTAINED ENTIRELY WITHIN |
| | THE DOUBLE-STRIPE AND NOT IMPEDE ON THE MINIMUM WIDTH |
| | OF THE STALL. A DETAIL MAY NEED TO BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 8. THE AMENITIES PROVIDED IN THE DETENTION AREA HAVE NO |
| | ACCESS TO RESIDENTS/PATRONS OF THE BUILDING. THE ONLY |
| | SIDEWALK THAT CONNECT TO THE PATHWAY IS THAT WHICH HAS |
| | ACCESS TO THE TRACH ROOM, FPL VAULT, FIRE PUMP, ETC. |
| | ACCESS SHALL BE PROVIDE TO THE PUBLIC WALKWAY, CAF? |
| | AND/OR LOBBY AND LEASING AREA. |
| | |
| | 9. TANDEM PARKING SPACES ONLY WORK IF THEY ARE ASSIGNED |
| | TO SPECIFIC UNITS. AS SUCH, THESE SPACES CANNOT BE |
| | CONSIDERED TOWARD THE SHARED PARKING CALCULATION AS |
| | THEY WOULD NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY MULTIPLE |
| | OWNERS/TENANTS. |
| | |
| | 10. TANDEM PARKING SPACES SHALL NOT HAVE WHEEL STOPS IN |
| | BETWEEN THE TWO SPACES. |
| | |
| | 11. THERE?S SOME CONCERN WITH REGARDING THE SINGLE |
| | PARKING SPACE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA |
| | ON THE FIRST LEVEL AS IT SEEMS THAT IT WOULD RESULT IN |
| | CONFLICTS IN INCOMING VEHICLES AS THE SPACE IS |
| | CONCEALED BEHIND THE WALL. |
| | |
| | 12. THERE APPEARS TO BE INSUFFICIENT BACK-OUT SPACE OF |
| | THE FIRST PARKING SPACE AS YOU ENTER THE GARAGE ON THE |
| | FIRST LEVEL (NORTH SIDE). |
| | |
| | 13. DIMENSIONS OF BALCONY ENCROACHMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED. BALCONIES SHALL NOT PROJECT MORE THAN THREE |
| | (3) FEET INTO ANY REQUIRED SETBACK. |
| | |
| | 14. STAFF DOESN?T QUITE UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF |
| | HAVING THE ?PLAZA? DESIGN IN FRONT OF THE GROUND FLOOR |
| | RESIDENTIAL UNITS ALONG CENTREPARK BLVD. WALK-UP UNIT |
| | DESIGNS SHOULD BE PROVIDED, BUT I BELIEVE SOME LEVEL OF |
| | PRIVACY NEEDS TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE DESIGN. |
| | |
| | 15. WHAT ARE THE ELEVATION DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE |
| | CENTREPARK BOULEVARD PLAZA AREA AND THE FINISHED FLOOR |
| | ELEVATION OF THE GROUND FLOOR UNITS/RETAIL? ARE STEPS |
| | NEEDED? ACCESSIBLE ROUTES? |
| | |
| | 16. THE LOCATION OF THE BIKE STORAGE AREAS IN THE |
| | GARAGE DO NOT SEEM CONDUCIVE FOR USE BY THE RESIDENTS. |
| | |
| | 17. SETBACKS SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE PROPERTY LINE |
| | TO THE CLOSEST POINT OF THE BUILDING. AS THE FITNESS |
| | ROOM EXTEND BEYOND THE WALL OF THE PARKING GARAGE, THE |
| | SETBACK SHALL BE MEASURED TO THE EXTERIOR WALL OF THE |
| | FITNESS ROOM. |
| | |
| | 18. THE FLOOR PLAN, SITE PLAN, AND ELEVATIONS DO NOT |
| | SEEM TO CORRESPOND, NOR SHOW ALL ELEMENTS OF THE |
| | BUILDING. THERE IS INCONSISTENCIES IN THE GROUND LEVEL |
| | FLOOR PLAN, DECORATIVE FA?ADE ELEMENTS, BALCONIES, |
| | STRUCTURAL COLUMNS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 19. DOES STAIR #1 NEED TO HAVE DIRECT EGRESS TO THE |
| | OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING? THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A DOOR |
| | EXITING THE STAIRWELL TO THE CENTREPARK BLVD. PLAZA, |
| | BUT THE FLOOR PLAN SHOWS THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER IN |
| | THIS LOCATION WITH EGRESS ONLY THROUGH THE LOBBY. |
| | |
| | 20. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS NEED TO BE MADE FOR THE |
| | FACADES OF THE GARAGE THAT FACE THE CANAL AND THE |
| | ADJACENT OFFICE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 21. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE |
| | CENTREPARK AFFORDABLE AND WORKFORCE HOUSING POLICY THAT |
| | WAS APPROVED WITH THE ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 98-17. |
| | AS REQUIRED BY THE POLICY, THE APPLICATION SHALL |
| | PROVIDE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION AS PART OF THE SITE |
| | PLAN APPLICATION IDENTIFYING WHICH UNITS WILL BE |
| | OFFERED AS WORKFORCE HOUSING UNITS. PLEASE REFER TO THE |
| | POLICY FOR ALL UNIT RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 22. PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 98-17, |
| | UPON OBTAINING SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT SHALL |
| | CONTRIBUTE $150/UNIT TO THE WORKFORCE HOUSING TRUST |
| | FUND, UNLESS THE CITY CHOOSES TO USE IT TOWARD THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT OF A TRANSIT PLAN TO PROVIDE CONNECTIVITY |
| | BETWEEN DOWNTOWN AND CENTREPARK. IF THIS OPTION IS |
| | CHOSEN, THEN THE APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY ON |
| | THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PLAN. |
| | |
| | 23. PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 5, CONDITION |
| | #11 OF RESOLUTION NO. 97-17, ALL IRRIGATION SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED UTILIZING THE LAKES (NO POTABLE WATER SHALL BE |
| | UTILIZED). PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLANS |
| | INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH PROVISION. |
| | |
| | 24. PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 5, CONDITION |
| | #13 OF RESOLUTION NO. 97-17, WATER-SAVING PLUMBING |
| | FIXTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLANS INDICATING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH PROVISION. |
| | |
| | 25. PLEASE PROVIDE A TURNING RADIUS ANALYSIS FOR THE |
| | UTILIZATION OF THE LOADING AREA AND DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR. |
| | |
| | 26. INTERNAL CONNECTION SHOULD BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE |
| | RESIDENTIAL LOBBY/LEASING AND THE PROPOSED CAF?/RETAIL. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE FEBRUARY 18, 2020, |
| | PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED |
| | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 27, 2019. |
| | |
| | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE FEBRUARY 18, 2020, PLANNING |
| | BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO |
| | LATER THAN FEBRUARY 3, 2020. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND |
| | BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH |
| | REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE. |
| | |
| | H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT |
| | DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE |
| | COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | TTY: 800.955.8771 |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
