| Date |
Text |
| 2021-03-17 16:31:44 | COMMENTS FOR RESUBMITTAL DATED 2-19-21 |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT 14, 15, 16 AND 30 WOULD NEED A |
| | VARIANCE REQUEST TO THE DAC. |
| | 1. PLEASE LIST BIKE RACKS REQUIRED ON ROW IN SITE PLAN. |
| | I BIKE RACK PER EVERY 150 FEET OF FRONTAGE REQUIRED. |
| | 2. PLEASE INCLUDE A PROJECT INFOR TABLE IN THE SITE |
| | PLAN SHEET INCLUDING SITE AREA, MAXIMUM GROSS BUILDING |
| | AREA PERMITTED, AND PROPOSED. NUMBER OF ROOMS PROPOSED, |
| | RESTAURANT AND MEETING ROOMS PROPOSED, AND PARKING |
| | CALCULATION. |
| | 3. PLEASE CONFIRM THE CALCUALTION FOR THE GROSS |
| | BUILIDING AREA IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEFINITION IN |
| | SECTION 94-109 OF THE ZLDRS. IN THE SUBMITTED SHEE |
| | A0.01 AND A0.02 PLEASE CLARIFY THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN |
| | FAR AND GROSS. PLEASE USE THE DEFINITION IN SEC 94-109 |
| | FOR GROSS BUILDING AREA. |
| | 4. PORTE COCHERE SHALL COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR |
| | PORTE COCHERE IN SEC 94-109 AND FIGURE IV-22. |
| | 5. PLEASE EXPLORE IF THE PARAPET WALL OF THE TOP LEVEL |
| | OF THE GARAGE CAN BE REDUCED. |
| | 5. SIGNS SHOWN IN ELEVATIONS EXCEED THE MAXIMUM NUMBER |
| | ALLOWED FOR IDENTITY SIGNS. SIGNS WOULD NOT BE INCLUDED |
| | IN THE SITE PLAN APROVAL. |
| | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOS OF THE WOOD-LOOK STUCCO |
| | PROPOSED ON THE FACADE. |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL: |
| | 1. PROJECT SHALL PAY FOR FOUR ON-STREET PARKING SPACES |
| | REMOVED. |
| | 2. DEVELOPER SHALL ENTER INTO A LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE |
| | MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY FOR ELEMENTS |
| | INSTALLED WITHIN THE ROW. |
| | 3. PROPOSED CANOPY OVER ALLEY SHALL BE DETAILED FOR |
| | SEPARATE REVIEW. A SEPARATE AGREEMENT WILL BE NEEDED. |
| | 4. A ROW AERIAL ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WILL BE NEEDED |
| | FOR THE CANOPY ENCROACHING OVER DIXIE HWAY ROW. A |
| | SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION WILL BE NEEDED. |
| | |
| | FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | - PLEASE INCLUDE A COPY OF THE SURVEY WITH EVERY |
| | RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE. |
| | - PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH OF |
| | THE COMMENTS. IDENTIFY THE SHEETS WHERE THE COMMENT IS |
| | ADDRESS. |
| | - PLEASE SUBMIT 1 LARGE SET MAXIMUM 24" BY 36", AND A |
| | DIGITAL COPY OF ALL THE DRAWINGS, RESPONSE LETTER AND |
| | SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION. |
| | - PLEASE UTILIZE THE GUIDELINES FOR RESUBMITTAL. A |
| | MEETING WITH STAFF IS RECOMMENDED TO DISCUSS THE |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | AS THE PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO GO TO DAC FOR THE |
| | APPROVAL OF 4 VARIANCES, PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION |
| | FOR DAC ONCE THE COMMENTS FROM PPRC HAVE BEEN |
| | ADDRESSES. |
| | |
| | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA |
| | APONTE AT 561-822-1439. |
| | |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FOR RESUBMITTAL DATED 4-14-20 |
| | COMMENTS ARE LISTED AS SATISFIED OR NOT SATISFIED. |
| | ADDITIONAL NOTES ARE ADDED TO CLARIFY THE COMMENT. |
| | SENTENCE AFTER * IS THE OLD COMMENT. |
| | 1. SATISFIED-PLEASE PROVIDE A CURRENT SURVEY, NO MORE |
| | THAN 1 YEAR OLD. PLEASE INCLUDE THE DIMENSION OF THE |
| | EXISTING SIDEWALK IN SURVEY, AND IMPROVEMENTS ALONG |
| | NORTH SIDE OF GARDENIA STREET. |
| | 2. SATISFIED-PLEASE ADJUST THE SITE AREA IN SHEET A1.01 |
| | TO REFLECT LOT SIZE AS INDICATED IN SURVEY. SITE IS |
| | 32,522SF. PROJECT FACT SHEET ALSO HAS A DIFFERENT SITE |
| | AREA (32,527SF). |
| | 3. SATISFIED AT 2-19-21- NOT SATISFIED - TO CLEARLY |
| | INDICATE THE AREAS COUNTED AS FAR PLEASE PROVIDE A |
| | COLOR CODER FLOOR PLAN FOR EACH LEVEL INDICATING AREAS |
| | COUNTED AND NOT COUNTED. ANY FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE |
| | AREAS SHALL BE COUNTED AS FAR.*PLEASE PROVIDE A |
| | DETAILED ANALYSIS OF THE AREAS IDENTIFIED AS GROSS |
| | BUILDING AREA (GBA) ACCORDING TO THE DEFINITION IN |
| | SECTION 94-109 OF THE ZLDR. |
| | 4. SATISFIED AT 2-19-21-NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE INDICATE |
| | PROPERTY LINES AND MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACK LINES IN |
| | ALL FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. |
| | 5. SATISFIED AT 2-19- 21- NOT SATISFIED- PROPOSED CURB |
| | CUTS ARE 17' IN WIDTH. PLEASE STUDY THE POSSIBILITY TO |
| | REDUCE THE WIDTH OF THE CURB CUT TO AT LEAST 12' IN |
| | WIDTH EACH.*DROP-OFF CURB CUT SHALL BE REDUCED TO A |
| | MAXIMUM 12 FEET IN WIDTH, LESS IF POSSIBLE TO MINIMIZE |
| | THE PEDESTRIAN IMPACT. |
| | 6. SATISFIED -PLEASE COORDINATE THE PROJECT DATA IN THE |
| | DIFFERENT SHEETS. PROJECT FACT SHEET INDICATES 128 |
| | HOTEL ROOMS AND DOES NOT MENTION ANY RESIDENTIAL UNIT. |
| | SP-1 LIST 152 HOTEL ROOMS AND DOES NOT LIST ANY |
| | RESIDENTIAL UNIT, BUT SHEET A1.05 LIST 128 HOTEL ROOMS |
| | AND 4,084 SF APARTMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE A CONSOLIDATED |
| | PROJECT DATA IN THE SITE PLAN SHEET. |
| | 7. SATISFIED AT 2-19-21- NOT SATISFIED- PARKING |
| | CALCULATION IN SITE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE THE REQUIRED |
| | PARKING FOR PROPOSED RETAIL AND MEETING AREAS.PLEASE |
| | INCLUDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED BIKE PARKING AT 1/15 |
| | PARKING SPACES PROVIDED (16 REQUIRED) + PUBLIC BIKE |
| | RACKS AT 1/100 LINEAR FEET OF FRONTAGE (4 REQUIRED ON |
| | SIDEWALK).* PARKING CALCULATION SHALL ACCOUNT FOR THE |
| | REQUIRED PARKING ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXISTING MARRIOTT |
| | RESIDENCE INN (42 PARKING SPACES). A RESTRICTIVE |
| | COVENANT SHALL BE RECORDED ENSURING THE 42 SPACES ARE |
| | PROVIDED FOR THE EXISTING MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN. |
| | 8. SATISFIED AT 2-19-21-NOT SATISFIED- PLEASE INCLUDE A |
| | NOTE IN THE CIVIL DRAWINGS STATING THAT THE SIDEWALK |
| | ELEVATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED ACROSS THE CURB |
| | CUT.*SIDEWALK ELEVATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED ACROSS CURB |
| | CUTS. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSING |
| | THAT REQUIREMENT. |
| | 9. NOTED- NOT SATISFIED- PLEASE INCLUDE THE APPROVED |
| | COSMOPOLITAN SITE PLAN WITH YOUR SITE PLAN TO ENSURE |
| | THE PROPOSED STREET DESIGN AND ON-STREET PARKING WORKS. |
| | ENGINEERING NEEDS TO CONFIRM ON-STREET PARKING ON BOTH |
| | SIDES OF GARDENIA IS VIABLE. *SITE PLAN INDICATES THE |
| | REMOVAL OF THE 8 EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES. IS |
| | THE PROJECT RELOCATING THE EXISTING CURB? PLEASE |
| | INDICATE HOW THE PROPOSED CURB RELOCATION AFFECTS THE |
| | WEST SIDE OF THE PROJECT AND THE EXISTING SECTION. |
| | CONSIDER THE NEW PROJECT CURRENTLY APPROVED ALONG THE |
| | NORTH SIDE OF GARDENIA STREET. INCORPORATE THAT PROJECT |
| | IN THE SITE PLAN FOR CONTEXT PURPOSES. |
| | 10. SATISFIED- A PAYMENT FOR THE FOUR SPACES REMOVED |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED. *IF ON-STREET PARKING IS REMOVED, |
| | PROJECT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PARKING METER |
| | REMOVAL FEE. |
| | 11. SATISFIED AT 2-19-21-PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAILS ON THE PROPOSED FABRIC SAILS |
| | TO COVER GARAGE AND INCLUDE A CALCULATION OF THE |
| | PERCENTAGE COVERED BY THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE TO CONFIRM |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH 30% COVERAGE. *EXPOSED PARKING DECK |
| | REQUIRES 10% OF GROUND FLOOR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. TWO |
| | PROPOSED OPEN SPACES AT GROUND LEVEL DO NOT COMPLY WITH |
| | THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS. MINIMUM SIZE IS |
| | 900SF, MINIMUM ACTIVE USE ABUTMENT IS REQUIRED, AND IT |
| | SHALL BE OPEN TO THE SKY. PLEASE SEE SEC 94-109 AND |
| | TABLE IV-7. |
| | 12. SATISFIED -* REFLECTIVE GLASS IS NOT ALLOWED AT THE |
| | GROUND LEVEL, IT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH TRANSPARENCY |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | 13. SATISFIED - * PARKING ENTRANCE CEILING SHALL BE |
| | FINISHED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 20 FEET. UTILITIES SHALL |
| | NOT BE EXPOSED. |
| | 14. NOT SATISFIED- *VARIANCE REQUEST FOR THE SETBACK |
| | ABOVE 3RD FLOOR PARKING REQUIRES DAC APPROVAL. |
| | 15. NOT SATISFIED -* VARIANCE REQUEST REGARDING THE |
| | AISLE WIDTH REQUIRES ENGINEERING REVIEW BEFORE IT CAN |
| | BE PRESENTED TO DAC FOR APPROVAL.PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | INFORMATION TO JUSTIFY THE REQUEST AND PROVE THAT |
| | PARKNG CIRCULATION STILL FUNCTIONS. |
| | 16. NOT SATISFIED- PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE PLANAR BREAK |
| | REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE MET. |
| | 17. NOT SATISFIED- PLEASE IDENTIFY OTHER ALTERNATIVES |
| | TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED DEPTH FOR THE PLANAR BREAK. IN |
| | ADDITION, THE WEST ELEVATION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE |
| | BLANK WALL REGULATION, AND SOUTH ELEVATION (FACADE |
| | CLOSEST TO DIXIE) SEEMS NOT TO COMPLY WITH THE BLANK |
| | WALL REGULATION EITHER. THE PORTION OF THE SOUTH |
| | ELEVATION CLOSEST TO DIXIE HWAY IS HIGHLY VISIBLE FROM |
| | THE STREET AND NEEDS TO BE TREATED AS A STREET FACADE, |
| | NOT AS AN ALLEY FACADE. FENESTRATION CAN BE PROVIDED. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | TABLE IV-4 REGARDING ALL ELEMENTS LISTED. BLANK WALLS |
| | ARE NOT ALLOWED. PROVIDE GRAPHIC INFORMATION TO CONFIRM |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | 18. SATISFIED PLEASE CLARIFY LOCATION OF PROPOSED |
| | CANOPY OVER ALLEY. PROPOSED CANOPY OVER ALLEY REQUIRES |
| | AN AERIAL EASEMENT FROM THE CITY. |
| | 19. NOT SATISFIED- DUE TO THE VARIANCE REQUEST PROJECT |
| | IS REQUIRED TO GO TO THE DAC FOR APPROVAL OF REQUESTED |
| | VARIANCES. |
| | 20. SATISFIED - PLEASE PROVIDE SECTIONS OF THE PROJECT. |
| | 21. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE PROVIDE CONTEXT |
| | ELEVATIONS *PLEASE PROVIDE CONTEXT COLORED ELEVATIONS |
| | INCLUDING CALL OUT MATERIALS, INCLUDING PICTURES OF |
| | PROPOSED MATERIALS. |
| | 22. SATISFIED -PLEASE EXPLAIN GARBAGE COLLECTION |
| | OPERATION. |
| | 23. SATISFIED- PEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH BIKE PARKING REQUIREMENTS ALONG THE |
| | STREET FRONTAGE (1 SPACE/ 100 FEET OF FRONTAGE, AND |
| | INSIDE THE PROJECT SITE (1 BIKE SPACE/15 SPACES |
| | PROVIDED). |
| | 24. SATISFIED AT 2-19-21 -PARTIALLY SATISFIED - PLEASE |
| | INCLUDE A NOT TO CONFIRM THE POLE AND FIXTURE ARE COLOR |
| | BLACK. *PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE LIGHTING ALONG |
| | STREET FRONTAGE WITH MINIMUM 0.6 FOOTCANDLES. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS AND DETAILS OF REQUIRED STREET |
| | LIGHTING TO FOLLOW CITY STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO RESUBMITTAL 4-14-20 |
| | 25. NOTSATISFIED- PLEASE ADJUST THE PARKING STALLS TO |
| | MEET THE MINIMUM 8-6" AND ALLOW THE ADDITONAL SPACE (1 |
| | FOOT) FOR THOSE SPACES THAT HAVE COLUMNS OR WALLS AT |
| | ONE SIDE OF THE STALL. *PLEASE UPDATE PARKING STRIPING |
| | DETAIL TO REFLECT CITY STANDARD. |
| | 26. SATISFIED- HANDICAP SPACES NEED TO MEET THE ADA |
| | REQUIREDMENTS (12' IN WIDTH WITH A 5' ACCESS AISLE). |
| | 27. SATISFIED- PLEASE DIMENSIONED ALL PARKING SPACES. |
| | 28. SATISFIED- PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF ENTRANCE |
| | CANOPY IN THE FLOOR PLAN. AN AERIAL EASEMENT WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | 29. PARTIALLY SATISFIED- PLEASE CONFIRM THE PROPOSED |
| | DOORS CAN SWING INSIDE DUE TO FIRE REQUIREMENTS. IF NOT |
| | PERMITTED A RECESSES AREA SHALL BE CREATED FOR THE |
| | DOOR. *DOORS OPENING TO THE SIDEWALK CANNOT ENCROACH |
| | INTO THE SIDEWALK PATH OF TRAVEL AND SHALL BE RECESSED. |
| | PROPOSED RETAIL ON GARDENIA SHALL HAVE A DOOR FROM THE |
| | STREET. |
| | 30. NOT SATISFIED - PLEASE EVALUATE IF THE SOUTHERN |
| | PORTION OF THE 8TH FLOOR CORRIDOR CAN BE DIRECTED INTO |
| | THE STAIR, RESULTING IN ONLY A DOUBLE HIGH SPACE |
| | ENCROACHING INTO THE CONDITIONAL SETBACK. * NEW EVENT |
| | SPACE ON 7TH FLOOR IS DOUBLE HEIGHT AND THEREFORE IT IS |
| | ENCROACHING INTO THE MINIMUM CONDITIONAL SETBACK |
| | REQUIRED ALONG DIXIE HWAY. |
| | 31. SATISFIED * PROPOSED PALMS AT THE ENTRACE ON DIXIE |
| | HWAY SHALL BE REPLACED WITH LIVE OAKS TO MAINTAIN THE |
| | SHADE CANOPY |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
