| Date |
Text |
| 2021-07-12 15:07:34 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 07.12.2021 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z19090032 |
| | CASE NO.: FSPR 19-06 |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PURSUANT TO THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED: |
| | |
| | 1.1. [ SATISFIED ] - TWO (2) COPIES OF AN APPROVED |
| | TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION FROM PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS ? |
| | TRAFFIC DIVISION INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT |
| | MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OF PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY. |
| | |
| | 1.2. [ SATISFIED ] - A JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT |
| | PROVIDING A GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST, RELATED |
| | BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE PROJECT AND SITE, AND |
| | JUSTIFICATION, SPECIAL REASONS, OR BASIS FOR THE |
| | REQUEST. |
| | |
| | 1.3. [ SATISFIED ] - LANDSCAPE PLANS CONTAINING ALL |
| | INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECKLIST |
| | (PAGE 15 OF THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). |
| | |
| | 1.4. [ SATISFIED ] - ELECTRONIC COPIES OF ALL |
| | DOCUMENTS, PLANS, ETC. SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 1.5. [ SATISFIED ] - A COPY OF THE WARRANTY DEED FOR |
| | THE PROPERTY SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 1.6. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED FROM ALL UTILITY COMPANIES (SEE PAGES 6-7 OF |
| | THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). |
| | |
| | 1.7. [ SATISFIED ] - RESPONSES TO THE STANDARDS FOR |
| | CODE COMPLIANCE (SEE PAGE 30 OF THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION). |
| | |
| | 1.8. [ SATISFIED ] - A CURRENT AND ACCURATE SURVEY |
| | PROVING ALL ITEMS LISTED ON PAGES 5-6 OF THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE SITE PLAN SHALL |
| | CONTAIN ALL OF THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THE SITE |
| | PLAN CHECKLIST, AS LISTED ON PAGE 14 OF THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 2.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - FOR THE SITE DATA TABLE, |
| | PERCENTAGES ASSOCIATED WITH IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA, |
| | OPEN SPACE, BUILDING COVERAGE, ETC. SHOULD BE REFLECTED |
| | AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE OVERALL SITE AREA. |
| | |
| | 2.2. [ NEW COMMENT ] - PER SEC. 94-232(C)(4) OF THE |
| | CITY'S ZLDRS, THE MAXIMUM FAR ALLOWED IS 0.75 - THE |
| | SITE DATA TABLE INDICATES ONLY 0.2 IS PERMITTED. PLEASE |
| | ADJUST ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 2.3. [ NEW COMMENT ] - PER SEC 94-232(B) OF THE CITY'S |
| | ZLDRS, THE MAXIMUM BUIDLING PERMITTED IS 30 FEET - THE |
| | SITE DATA TABLE INDICATES 40 FEET. PLEASE ADJUST |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 3. [ SATISFIED ] - OWNER?S CONSENT FORM SHALL BE SIGNED |
| | BY THE MAYOR, NOT STAFF. |
| | |
| | 4. [ SATISFIED ] - THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON SHEET |
| | A0.0 IS INCORRECT: |
| | |
| | 4.1. [ SATISFIED ] - NAME OF MAYOR |
| | |
| | 4.2. [ SATISFIED ] - SPELLING OF COMMISSIONER SHOAF?S |
| | NAME |
| | |
| | 4.3. [ SATISFIED ] - SPELLING OF COMMISSIONER NEERING?S |
| | NAME |
| | |
| | 4.4. [ SATISFIED ] - NAME OF DISTRICT 3 COMMISSIONER |
| | |
| | 4.5. [ SATISFIED ] - NAME OF DISTRICT 4 COMMISSIONER |
| | |
| | 4.6. [ SATISFIED ] - ZONING DISTRICT IN THE PROJECT |
| | DATA |
| | |
| | 5. [ SATISFIED ] - THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON ERDMAN |
| | ANTHONY COVER SHEET IS INCORRECT: |
| | |
| | 5.1. [ SATISFIED ] - NAME OF MAYOR |
| | |
| | 5.2. [ SATISFIED ] - NAME OF DISTRICT 3 COMMISSIONER |
| | |
| | 5.3. [ SATISFIED ] - NAME OF DISTRICT 4 COMMISSIONER |
| | |
| | 5.4. [ SATISFIED ] - NAME OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR |
| | |
| | 6. [ SATISFIED ] - THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY LINE, |
| | SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN, DOES NOT APPEAR TO MATCH THAT |
| | WHICH IS SHOWN ON THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY. AS |
| | STATE ABOVE, A CURRENT AND ACCURATE SURVEY SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED AND SHALL BE THE BASIS FOR ALL SITE PLANS, |
| | ETC. |
| | |
| | 7. [ SATISFIED ] - WINDOW DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | SHOWING THAT ALL WINDOWS WILL BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF |
| | TWO (2) INCHES, AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 94-222(H)(6) OF THE |
| | CITY?S ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 8. [ SATISFIED ] - ELEVATIONS SHALL INDICATE THE |
| | OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING, AS DEFINED BY THE |
| | CITY?S ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | 9. [ SATISFIED ] - PLEASE PROVIDE THE INFORMATION ON |
| | THE PLANS NECESSARY TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XV |
| | (PARKING) OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | ON-STREET PARKING IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT |
| | PROPERTY CAN BE COUNTED TOWARD THE PARKING |
| | REQUIREMENTS, HOWEVER, PLEASE PROVIDE CONFIRMATION FROM |
| | THE CITY?S TRAFFIC ENGINEER INDICATING THAT ON-STREET |
| | PARKING IS ALLOWED ON SUCH STREETS, AND PROVIDE THE |
| | NUMBER OF SPACES THAT CAN BE ACCOMMODATED. |
| | |
| | 10. [ SATISFIED ] - THE SITE PLAN INDICATES THAT THERE |
| | ARE EIGHT (8) SPACES WITHIN THE EXISTING PARKING LOT, |
| | HOWEVER, IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE MAY BE NINE (9) OR |
| | TEN (10) SPACES. VERIFY WITH THE SURVEY AND ADJUST THE |
| | SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | 11. [ SATISFIED ] - BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 94-485(Q) OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS. |
| | ENSURE THAT SUFFICIENT BICYCLE PARKING IS PROVIDED FOR |
| | THE NEW GYMNASIUM, AS WELL AS THE EXISTING COMMUNITY |
| | CENTER. |
| | |
| | 12. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE |
| | PROJECT HAS BEEN PRESENTED TO THE COLEMAN PARK |
| | NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND THAT RESIDENT FEEDBACK HAS |
| | BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THE PLAN. A PRESENTATION SHALL |
| | ALSO BE MADE TO THE COLEMAN PARK TASK FORCE (PLEASE |
| | CONTACT ME FOR UPCOMING MEETING DATES). |
| | |
| | 12.1. [ NEW COMMENT ] - PLANNING STAFF WILL CONFIRM |
| | WITH THE TAKS FORCE IN THEIR UPCOMING MEETING THAT THIS |
| | PRESENTATION WAS MADE AND THAT ALL FEEDBACK HAS BEEN |
| | INCORPORATED INOT THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 13. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - PROVIDE INFORMATION |
| | INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT WILL COMPLY WITH SEC. |
| | 255.2575, FLORIDA STATUTES, REGARDING CONSTRUCTION OF |
| | AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT AND SUSTAINABLE BUILDING. VERIFY |
| | WHETHER OR NOT SIMILAR PROVISIONS ARE CONTAINED IN THE |
| | CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES. |
| | |
| | 13.1 [ NEW COMMENT ] - PLANNING STAFF IS CONFIRMING |
| | WHAT "RATING SYSTEM" OR "GREEN BUILDING CODE" NEEDS TO |
| | BE ADHERED TO, AND AT WHAT LEVEL. ADDITIONAL |
| | INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 14. [ NEW COMMENT ] - THE A/C EQUIPMENT PADS/AREA NEEDS |
| | TO BE SCREENED FROM VIEW WITH A WALL OR OPAQUE FENCE |
| | CONSISTING OF BRICK, DECORATIVE CONCRETE, OTHER |
| | DECORATIVE MASONRY, OR COMPARABLY DURABLE WOOD/STEEL. |
| | LANDSCAPING WITH SHRUBS/HEDGES SHALL ALSO BE PROVIDED. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) ELECTRONIC COPY (PDF) OF ALL REVISED PLANS/DOCUMENTS |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | TTY: 800.955.8771 |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
