| Date |
Text |
| 2019-11-27 17:08:46 | FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMMENTS: |
| | 1. IN TABLE 6, SOME OF THE YEAR 2019 TRAFFIC VOLUMES DO |
| | NOT APPEAR TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE VOLUMES INCLUDED |
| | IN THE APPENDIX, E.G. VOLUMES ON VILLAGE BOULEVARD |
| | BETWEEN CUMBERLAND DRIVE AND SHILOH DRIVE. PLEASE |
| | VERIFY AND REVISE. |
| | 2. CONSISTENT WITH THE FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS, |
| | THE PROPOSED FLU AMENDMENT SHALL BE LIMITED IN |
| | INTENSITIES WHICH WOULD NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON |
| | 45TH STREET UNLESS THE IMPROVEMENT TO WIDEN 45TH STREET |
| | BETWEEN VILLAGE BOULEVARD AND I-95 FROM 6 LANES TO 8 |
| | LANES IS IN PLACE OR IS INCLUDED IN THE PALM BEACH |
| | TPA?S LRTP COST-FEASIBLE PLAN, 5-YEAR TRANSPORTATION |
| | IMPROVEMENT PLAN OR FDOT?S 5-YEAR WORK PROGRAM. |
| | TRAFFIC ANALYSIS COMMENTS: |
| | 3. PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. |
| | 4. IN TABLE 3A, SOME OF THE YEAR 2019 TRAFFIC VOLUMES |
| | DO NOT APPEAR TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE VOLUMES |
| | INCLUDED IN THE APPENDIX, E.G. VOLUMES ON VILLAGE |
| | BOULEVARD BETWEEN CUMBERLAND DRIVE AND SHILOH DRIVE. |
| | PLEASE VERIFY AND REVISE. |
| | 5. PLEASE USE HCM 6TH METHODOLOGY INSTEAD OF HCM 2000 |
| | METHODOLOGY IN THE SYNCHRO ANALYSIS. |
| | 6. PLEASE VERIFY THE CONFIGURATIONS AT SOME |
| | INTERSECTIONS, E.G. VILLAGE BOULEVARD/COMMUNITY DRIVE |
| | IS MISSING A RIGHT-TURN OVERLAP IN THE SYNCHRO |
| | ANALYSIS, THE COORDINATION MODE (FREE OR COORDINATED) |
| | AND CYCLE LENGTHS (IF COORDINATED) AT VILLAGE |
| | BOULEVARD/SHILOH DRIVE AND VILLAGE BOULEVARD/COMMUNITY |
| | DRIVE. PLEASE ATTACH SIGNAL TIMING SHEETS. |
| | 7. PER CITY CODE SECTION 94-32(A), A PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT (PD) IS REQUIRED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL |
| | ELEMENTS OF THE CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE CITY?S |
| | COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT POLICY |
| | 2.1.1(A) ADOPTS A VEHICULAR LOS E STANDARD ON CITY |
| | STREETS. WHILE THE COST OF MITIGATING TRANSPORTATION |
| | DEFICIENT WITHOUT THE PROJECT TRAFFIC UNDER REVIEW IS |
| | NOT OBLIGED BY THE DEVELOPMENT PER FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | 163.3180, THE F.S. DOES NOT EXEMPT THE DEVELOPMENT FROM |
| | MITIGATING THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT GENERATED FROM THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT, NOR DOES IT EXEMPT THE DEVELOPMENT FROM |
| | MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCE. |
| | PLEASE PROPOSE MITIGATION MEASURES, OR THE PROPOSED |
| | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE LIMITED IN INTENSITIES WHICH WOULD |
| | NOT CAUSE SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON 45TH STREET UNLESS THE |
| | IMPROVEMENT TO WIDEN 45TH STREET BETWEEN VILLAGE |
| | BOULEVARD AND I-95 FROM 6 LANES TO 8 LANES IS IN PLACE |
| | OR IS INCLUDED IN THE PALM BEACH TPA?S 5-YEAR |
| | TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN OR FDOT?S 5-YEAR WORK |
| | PROGRAM. |
| | 8. PLEASE CONSIDER MITIGATION MEASURES SUCH AS |
| | ENCOURAGING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE MODES ON VILLAGE |
| | BOULEVARD BY PROVIDING MULTI-USE TRAILS, REDUCING |
| | VEHICULAR TRAVEL SPEED AND IMPROVING SAFETY ON VILLAGE |
| | BOULEVARD, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF TRANSPORTATION DEMAND |
| | MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS, E.G. COMMUNITY SHUTTLE SERVICE. |
| | 9. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED WHEN THE TRAFFIC |
| | ANALYSIS IS REVISED. |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | 10. PROVIDE DIAGONAL HATCHING ON THE PORTION OF INBOUND |
| | LANE NOT NEEDED BY PASSENGER CARS AT THE SOUTHERN |
| | ENTRANCE. |
| | 11. PROVIDE TURNAROUND SPACE FOR THE DEAD-END PARKING |
| | AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE. |
| | 12. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD) IS INTENDED FOR |
| | DEVELOPMENTS WITH INNOVATIVE DESIGNS AND IS REQUIRED TO |
| | BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL ELEMENTS OF CITY?S COMPREHENSIVE |
| | PLAN. PLEASE IDENTIFY INNOVATIVE DESIGN ELEMENTS |
| | ASSOCIATED WITH THIS RPD. |
| | 13. CLARIFY IF THE 8-FOOT WATERFRONT WALKWAY AND |
| | OVERLOOK AREAS ARE OPEN FOR PUBLIC USE. |
| | 14. CONSTRUCT 12-FOOT SIDEWALK WITH 6-FOOT LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFER AND SHADE TREES ON VILLAGE BOULEVARD ALONG SITE |
| | FRONTAGE. IT APPEARS THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED |
| | RELOCATED SHADE TREES ARE SET BACK APPROXIMATELY 22 |
| | FEET FROM THE CURB. ALSO, CONSIDER CONSTRUCTING THE |
| | SIDEWALK AROUND THE SHADE TREES AND UTILITIES AS IT |
| | APPEARS THERE ARE 24 FEET OF SPACE BETWEEN THE PARKING |
| | SPACES AND SHADE TREES. |
| | CONDITIONS: |
| | 1. THE FLU AMENDMENT WILL BE VOLUNTARILY RESTRICTED TO |
| | A MAXIMUM OF 30.5 DWELLING UNIT PER ACRE PER THE FLU |
| | AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OR AS REVISED BASED ON THE |
| | REVISED FLU AMENDMENT TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. |
| | |
| | |
| | SHING TSOI |
| | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT |
| | 561-494-1141 |
| | [email protected] |
| | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
| |
Print |
