| Date |
Text |
| 2019-10-09 16:37:24 | CASE NUMBER: PB 1842 & 1842A (Z19090014/5) |
| | PROJECT NAME: BROADSTONE LAKESIDE REZONING AND FUTURE |
| | LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT |
| | ADDRESS: 3600 VILLAGE BOULEVARD |
| | |
| | ---CONTACT PAUL GREILICH @ (561) 822-1443 OR JOHN ROACH |
| | @ 561-822-1448 |
| | ---PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | ---WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF |
| | ELEVEN (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN |
| | .PNG/.PDF FORMAT OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES |
| | ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF |
| | INFORMATION/PLANS TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | ---PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING (BY |
| | 7/8/19), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY |
| | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | ---PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION OF HOW THE APPLICATION AS |
| | PRESENTED MEETS THE INTENT OF SEC. 94-207(A)(1), |
| | INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES. |
| | |
| | 2) IT IS UNCLEAR WHERE THE EDGE OF THE PROPOSED |
| | LAKE/RETENTION POND IS BEING PROPOSED ALONG PERIMETER |
| | OF THE SITE. PLEASE CLEARLY LABEL THE EDGE OF WATER AND |
| | ANY ASSOCIATED EASEMENTS THROUGHOUT ON THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 3) THE 5-WAY INTERSECTION BEING PROPOSED TO THE |
| | NORTHWEST OF BUILDING 6 WILL LIKELY CREATE CONFUSION |
| | AND UNNECESSARY CONFLICTS. APPLICANT SHOULD EXPLORE THE |
| | INCLUSION OF A ROUNDABOUT IN THIS LOCATION IN THE EVENT |
| | THIS GENERAL DESIGN IS RETAINED. |
| | |
| | 4) ENHANCE INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND |
| | CONNECTIVITY THROUGHOUT THE SITE (DESIGNATED WALKS, |
| | STRATEGICALLY PLACED CROSSWALKS, ETC.). STAFF STRONGLY |
| | RECOMMENDS A MORE THOUGHTFUL CONSIDERATION OF THE SITE |
| | AND IMPROVED DESIGN THAT BETTER INTEGRATES PARKING |
| | AREAS, THE INCLUSION OF LOW COST AMENITIES SUCH AS |
| | SMALL PARKS AND GATHERING SPACE. |
| | |
| | 5) COMPLETE WALKING PATHS AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE |
| | SITE TO ENABLE RESIDENTS TO WALK IN A CIRCUIT AND REACH |
| | THE POOL AREA WITHOUT MEANDERING IF FRONT OF BUILDINGS. |
| | WHERE POSSIBLE, WALKING PATHS SHOULD BE WIDER THAN 5 |
| | FEET. |
| | |
| | 6) PROVIDE A DIRECT PEDESTRIAN PATH (SIDEWALK, STRIPING |
| | OR BOTH) TO THE DOG PARK TO ALLOW SAFE AND EFFICIENT |
| | ACCESS |
| | |
| | 7) DISTRIBUTE PARKING MORE CONVENIENTLY THROUGHOUT THE |
| | SITE TO MINIMIZE CONFLICTS BETWEEN PEDESTRIANS AND |
| | MOTORISTS AND REDUCE THE DISTANCE RESIDENTS WILL TRAVEL |
| | TO THEIR UNITS FROM THE PARKING AREAS. |
| | |
| | 8) LABEL DIMENSIONS OF PARKING SPACES, DRIVE AISLES, |
| | DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 9) PLEASE PROVIDE AN OVERALL SITE PLAN WHICH |
| | INCORPORATES THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AS PART OF THE |
| | APPLICATION SUBMITTED CONCURRENTLY, PB1841 & 1841A ? |
| | Z19090012/3. |
| | |
| | 10) CONSISTENT WITH RECENTLY APPROVED PROJECTS IN THE |
| | CITY, STAFF SUPPORTS NARROWING DRIVE AISLES (TO AS FEW |
| | AS 20 FEET). DOING SO WILL MINIMIZE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS |
| | SURFACE, INCREASE LANDSCAPING IN TERMINAL ISLANDS AND |
| | SLOW VEHICLES TO HELP MINIMIZE CONFLICTS AT PROPOSED |
| | INTERSECTIONS. |
| | |
| | 11) STAFF SUPPORTS REDUCING THE DEPTH OF PARKING SPACES |
| | BY INCLUDING A 2-FOOT GRASS OVERHANG. THE CURB WOULD |
| | FUNCTION AS WHEEL STOPS. ALSO CONSIDER THE INCLUSION OF |
| | SMALL CAR SPACES TO REDUCE OVERALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE |
| | AREA. |
| | |
| | 12) ADD REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AND DISTRIBUTE |
| | THROUGHOUT THE SITE AND INCLUDE CITY-STANDARD BIKE RACK |
| | DETAIL. |
| | |
| | 13) PURSUANT TO SEC. 94-207(5), ALL UTILITIES, |
| | INCLUDING TELEPHONE, CABLE TELEVISION, AND ELECTRICAL |
| | SERVICE SYSTEMS, SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND. |
| | |
| | 14) A REPLAT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 15) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM ALL OF THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT |
| | ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE |
| | WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU, FPL, |
| | AND COMCAST. |
| | |
| | 16) ALL PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, INCLUDING NEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION, OR THE RENOVATION OR IMPROVEMENT OF AN |
| | EXISTING BUILDING, WHERE THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS |
| | ARE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $750,000 IS SUBJECT TO THE |
| | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78, |
| | ARTICLE V, OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES. CONTACT |
| | SYBILLE WELTER @ 561-822-1521 OR [email protected] FOR |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | 17) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER |
| | FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION, VERIFYING |
| | THAT THE PROJECT MEETS THE TPS STANDARDS OF THE COUNTY |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 18) A SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD) |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 19) ADDITIONAL WAIVERS MAY NEED TO BE REQUESTED IN THE |
| | EVENT THAT PROVISIONS OF THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS CANNOT BE SATISFIED. |
| | SPECIFICALLY, LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AS PROPOSED DO NOT MEET |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIV. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
