| Date |
Text |
| 2020-02-28 13:45:57 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 |
| | PROJECT: MORSELIFE Z19090009 |
| | FEBRUARY 28, 2020 |
| | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND |
| | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. THIS COMMENT WAS MISTAKENLY MARKED AS SATISFIED ON |
| | THE LAST REVIEW. NOT SATISFIED. THE EXISTING TREE PLAN |
| | AND DISPOSITION LIST ON SHEET L102B IS OUTDATED AND |
| | DOES NOT REFLECT WHAT CURRENTLY EXISTS ON SITE. SUPPLY |
| | A CURRENT PLAN AND IDENTIFY THE TREES WITHIN THE |
| | AFFECTED AREA ON THE TREE DISPOSITION TABULAR LIST TO |
| | DISCERN THEM FROM THE REST OF THE AREAS. |
| | THE LAST APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN MUST BE THE BASE FOR |
| | THE TREE LOCATIONS, AND THEN THE TREES THAT ARE TO BE |
| | REMOVED OR RELOCATED ARE TO BE IDENTIFIED. THE APPROVED |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE NORTH PROPERTY SHOULD BE USED TO |
| | SHOW THE BUFFER TREES, AND THE ONES IDENTIFIED THAT ARE |
| | TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. GENERATOR SIDEWALK APPEARS |
| | TO CONFLICT WITH SM#2. |
| | |
| | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A CLEAR LOCATION OF |
| | WHERE ANY RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS WILL BE PLACED ON |
| | THE SITE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. |
| | SOME OF THE LABELED RELOCATIONS AND REPLACEMENTS ARE |
| | NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE LABELS ON THE EXISTING TREE |
| | PLAN. QV#1 AND QV#2 MUST BE SHOWN ON THE EXISTING TREE |
| | PLAN, AND REPLACEMENT LOCATIONS SHOULD ONLY BE SHOWN ON |
| | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. QV3 IS SHOWN TWICE. |
| | ALL FINAL LOCATIONS FOR TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDING FOR THE NORTH PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 3. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE |
| | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR |
| | RELOCATED. LIVE OAK TREES #5 AND #6 ARE LISTED FOR |
| | REMOVAL, BUT CONDITION WAS NOT SUPPLIED. |
| | EXPLANATION OF ADJUSTMENT TO AVOID GOOD TREES PROVIDED, |
| | BUT CONDITION MUST BE LISTED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION |
| | FOR ALL REMOVALS AND RELOCATIONS. |
| | |
| | 4. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR |
| | THE PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVEWAY AND SHOW ANY REMOVAL OR |
| | REPLACEMENT OF TREES OR SHRUBS, INCLUDING THE NORTH |
| | PROPERTY. |
| | PLAN SUPPLIED FOR SOUTH PROPERTY, BUT NOTHING IS SHOWN |
| | FOR THE EXISTING BUFFER TREES ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTY |
| | TO THE NORTH. IF THIS IS TO BE SHOWN ON THE MAJOR |
| | AMENDMENT PLAN, INDICATE THIS ON THE SUBMITTED PLAN. |
| | CODE REQUIRES THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES WITHIN 10 |
| | FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE TO BE SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED |
| | PLAN PER SECTION 94-442(B)(2)Q. |
| | APPROVED AND EXISTING TREES FOR THE NORTH PROPERTY HAVE |
| | NOT BEEN SHOWN. |
| | |
| | 5. SATISFIED. THE GENERATOR LOCATION DOES NOT SHOW |
| | DETAIL FOR THE LOCATION OF THE WALL DESCRIBED IN THE |
| | NARRATIVE. LOCATION OF ACCESS DOORS NEEDS TO BE SHOWN, |
| | AND THE HEDGE AND TREES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE |
| | ENCLOSURE NEED TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. |
| | GENERATOR ENCLOSURE IS SHOWN CROSSING OVER THE PARCEL |
| | LINE, SEE COMMENT#4. |
| | |
| | 6. SATISFIED. STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVAL OF THE |
| | MATURE BUFFER TREES ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE THAT |
| | ARE PROVIDING SHADE FOR THE EXISTING PARKING AND |
| | PROVIDE ALL THE BENEFITS OF A MATURE TREE CANOPY. THE |
| | APPLICANT SHOULD LOOK AT ADJUSTING THE LOCATION OF THE |
| | GENERATOR TO MINIMIZE THE NEED TO RELOCATE TREES AND |
| | PRESERVE THE EXISTING TREES TO MEET THE INTENT OF |
| | SECTION 94-448. |
| | 7. SATISFIED. INDICATE ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANT LIST |
| | WITH CLOUDING AND INDICATE THE LIMITS OF THE AFFECTED |
| | AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL |
| | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON |
| | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| |
Print |
