| Date |
Text |
| 2019-11-07 14:33:15 | *** COMMENTS PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO ZONING REVIEW |
| | DATED 9/10/19 *** |
| | |
| | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SURVEY (DATED |
| | 7/15/19). THE SURVEY HAS BEEN DEEMED INADEQUATE: |
| | ABSTRACTED SURVEY IS REQUIRED; LOT SIZE CALCULATION |
| | DOES NOT ADD UP; NO LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 2.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER |
| | FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING - |
| | TRAFFIC DIVISION, INDICATING THAT THE PROJECT MEETS THE |
| | TPS STANDARDS OF THE COUNTY IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3.) ANY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT REQUIRES A SCHOOL CAPACITY |
| | AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD) LETTER FROM THE |
| | SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. PLEASE PROVIDE. |
| | |
| | 4.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR |
| | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE |
| | COLLECTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AT (561) 494-1040. |
| | |
| | 5.) A LETTER FROM COMCAST CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED |
| | PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR |
| | OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THEIR |
| | SERVICES IS STILL MISSING. PLEASE PROVIDE. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) DIMENSIONS OF THE PARCEL (PER THE SURVEY) SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 2.) EXISTING STRUCTURES IDENTIFIED IN THE SUBMITTED |
| | SURVEY DOES NOT MATCH THE EXACT LOCATION PROVIDED IN |
| | THE SITE PLAN (I.E. EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURES, ETC.). |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 3.) SURVEY IDENTIFIES OVERHEAD LINES RUNNING THROUGH |
| | THE PROPERTY; HOWEVER, THE LINES ARE NOT DEPICTED IN |
| | THE SITE PLAN. IF THE LINES ARE TO BE RELOCATED, THEN |
| | THE PLAN MUST BE NOTATED AS SUCH. |
| | |
| | 4.) FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS IN THE PROJECT DATA TABULAR |
| | REQUIRED: PARCEL SIZE INFORMATION IS INCONSISTENT WITH |
| | THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SURVEY; LEGAL |
| | DESCRIPTION SEEMS TO BE INCORRECT; CURRENT LAND USE IS |
| | MIXED USE (NOT MULTIFAMILY); CHECK LOT COVERAGE |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR CONSISTENCY; PROVIDE BUILDING FRONTAGE |
| | CALCULATIONS THAT SHOW THAT THE BUILDINGS MEET THE |
| | MINIMUM 80% FRONTAGE REQUIREMENT ALONG BROADWAY [ZLDR |
| | S.94-220(B)(1)]; SHOW THAT THE MAXIMUM FRONT SETBACK |
| | ALONG BROADWAY IS 5 FT. (NOT 4 FT.); CLARIFY THAT THE |
| | REAR SETBACK IS A MINIMUM OF 15 FT.; WHERE DID THE |
| | REQUIRED SIDE SETBACK INFORMATION COME FROM? |
| | |
| | 5.) ANY CHANGES TO THE PROJECT DATA TABLE (SHEET A1.0) |
| | SHALL BE MADE CONSISTENT WITH THE CHANGES TO THE |
| | PROJECT DATA TABLE ON THE COVER SHEET AND IN THE TABLES |
| | IN THE PHASING SITE PLAN (SHEET A1.1). |
| | |
| | 6.) SHOW REAR BUILDING SETBACK TO THE PROPERTY LINE TO |
| | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR S.94-220(B)(4) AND |
| | CONSISTENCY WITH THE PROJECT DATA TABLE. |
| | |
| | 7.) OPEN-AIR PORCHES AND STOOPS, STAIRS AND RAMPS MAY |
| | ENCROACH INTO ANY REQUIRED SETBACK TO A POINT NOT |
| | CLOSER THAN 3 FT. TO THE PROPERTY LINE. THE PROJECT |
| | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE STANDARD. PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | [ZLDR S.94-220(B)(5)] |
| | |
| | 8.) SIDEWALKS ALONG BROADWAY SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 8 |
| | FT. IN CLEAR WIDTH. THE PROPOSED PLAN DOES NOT HAVE AN |
| | 8 FT. CLEARANCE FOR THE SIDEWALK ALONG BROADWAY. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-220(B)(6)] |
| | |
| | 9.) HEIGHT INFORMATION OF THE PROPOSED PERIMETER FENCE |
| | (NORTH, EAST AND SOUTH) SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE SITE |
| | PLAN FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 10.) PLEASE INCLUDE A DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED FENCE(S) |
| | AND GATE(S) TO DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY WITH THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS OF ZLDR S.94-220(D)(2). |
| | |
| | 11.) PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, |
| | INCLUDING DIMENSIONS AND MATERIAL USED FOR THE |
| | ENCLOSURE. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE |
| | SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL OF THE |
| | BUILDING. [ZLDR S.94-220(D)(9)] |
| | |
| | 12.) SURFACE PARKING AREA SHALL BE CONCEALED WITH A |
| | STREET WALL ALONG ALL STREET FRONTAGES. [ZLDR |
| | S.94-220(F)(3)] |
| | |
| | 13.) LIGHT POLE FIXTURES SHALL BE SETBACK AT LEAST 5 |
| | FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS |
| | TO ILLUSTRATE COMPLIANCE. [ZLDR S.94-304(B)] |
| | |
| | 14.) BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED. INCLUDE A DETAIL OF THE |
| | RACK. [ZLDR S.94-485(Q)] |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL (FLOOR PLAN AND ELEVATIONS) COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-220(D)(5), BUILDINGS SHALL |
| | HAVE CLEAR GLAZED AREAS AND OPENINGS EQUAL TO 25 TO 45 |
| | PERCENT OF THE FACADE AREA. THE FENESTRATION |
| | CALCULATIONS PROVIDED ON SHEET A5.1 SHOWS THAT THE |
| | SOUTH FA?ADE IS INCONSISTENT WITH THIS ARCHITECTURAL |
| | STANDARD. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE CLARIFY IF THE |
| | FENESTRATION CALCULATIONS ADDRESS EACH BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS OR PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NOTES FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS OF BMUD |
| | BUILDING TYPE I: ALL EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE HINGED; |
| | WINDOWS SHALL BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF 2-INCHES FROM |
| | THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE FA?ADE. |
| | |
| | 3.) A NOTE AND/OR ILLUSTRATION, DEMONSTRATING THAT ALL |
| | ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (AS PROVIDED ON SHEET |
| | A2.1) SHALL BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR |
| | S.94-220(D)(7) SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 4.) FLAT ROOFS SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A PARAPET NO LESS |
| | THAN 42 INCHES IN HEIGHT. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE |
| | BY PROVIDING DIMENSIONS IN THE ELEVATIONAL DRAWINGS. |
| | [ZLDR S.94-220(D)(9)] |
| | |
| | 5.) ARE THE RESIDENTS GOING TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE |
| | ROOFTOP AND IF SO, WHAT WILL THE COMMON ROOFTOP SPACE |
| | BE UTILIZED FOR? PLEASE CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 6.) HOW HIGH IS THE ENTRANCE GATE/WALL ALONG BROADWAY? |
| | |
| | 7.) BUILDING FACADE ALONG BROADWAY CAN BE ENHANCED BY |
| | PROVIDING ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES (I.E. BROWS |
| | ABOVE THE FRONT DOORS, ETC.) |
| | |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) ELEVATION DRAWINGS (SHEET A5.1) SHOW PROPOSED |
| | SIGNAGE ALONG THE WEST BUILDING FRONTAGE. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE. SIGN DETAIL |
| | MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ZLDR S.94-220(E). |
| | |
| | |
| | PHOTOMETRIC COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) SHOW SETBACK DISTANCE OF ALL LIGHT POLE FIXTURES IN |
| | THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 2.) THE FOLLOWING NOTE SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PLAN: |
| | ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE GLARE |
| | AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY |
| | FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT |
| | RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES. [ZLDR S.94-309] |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TWELVE |
| | (12) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 INCHES X |
| | 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 INCHES, AND |
| | AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY |
| | RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE |
| | ($200.00). |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
