| Date |
Text |
| 2019-09-11 11:17:49 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 09.11.2019 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z19080016 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 1420J |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. AN APPROVED TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION SHALL |
| | BE PROVIDED FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY. |
| | |
| | 2. THERE SHOULD ONLY BE ONE SITE PLAN FOR THE OVERALL |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, WHICH SHOULD CONTAIN ALL OF THE |
| | REQUIRED INFORMATION AS STATED IN THE SITE PLAN |
| | CHECKLIST AND WHICH WAS SHOWN ON THE PREVIOUSLY |
| | APPROVED SITE PLAN. THE PREVIOUS PLAN SIMPLY SHOULD |
| | HAVE BEEN UPDATED TO REFLECT THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT AND |
| | NEW CONSTRUCTION?AND THERE IS NO NEED TO DISTINGUISH |
| | EXISTING VS. PROPOSED (DO NOT SHOW EXISTING IN LIGHT |
| | GREY). THE SAME HOLDS TRUE FOR THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 3. THE SITE PLAN SHALL INDICATE THE SETBACK PROVIDED |
| | FOR THE BUILDING, AS MEASURED AT THE CLOSEST POINT |
| | BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND ALL SURROUNDING PROPERTY |
| | LINES. |
| | |
| | 4. WHY THE RAILING ALONG PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD? |
| | STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS OPTIONS TO SEE IF THERE IS |
| | A WAY TO REMOVE THIS WHILE STILL MEETING ALL CODE |
| | REQUIREMENTS. WORST CASE, IF THE RAILING DOES HAVE TO |
| | REMAIN, A DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED INDICATING STYLE, |
| | DIMENSIONS, ETC. |
| | |
| | 5. WOULDN?T IT BE MORE EFFECTIVE TO HAVE THE ALL (OR |
| | SOME) OF THE HANDICAP PARKING ON THE SOUTH END OF THE |
| | BUILDING, CLOSER TO THE MEDICAL OFFICE, SO THAT USERS |
| | ARE NOT REQUIRED TO CROSS THE DRIVE AISLE? |
| | |
| | 6. AFTER DISCUSSIONS WITH THE CITY?S SURVEYOR, |
| | SUBDIVISION OF THE PROPERTY WILL REQUIRE THAT IT BE |
| | REPLATTED. THIS WOULD STILL GO THROUGH THE ?MINOR? |
| | PROCESS, BUT WOULD REQUIRE THE PREPARATION OF A NEW |
| | PLAT. |
| | |
| | 7. AS THE PARKING SPACES ACROSS THE DRIVE AISLE ARE |
| | ONLY 16.5 FEET IN LENGTH, THERE IS SUPPOSED TO BE A |
| | 2-FOOT OVERHANG OVER THE SIDEWALK THAT NEEDS TO REMAIN |
| | UNOBSTRUCTED. IT APPEARS THAT THE PROPOSED ADA SIGNS |
| | ENCROACH INTO THIS OVERHANG. |
| | |
| | 8. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE LOADING ZONE BE SHIFTED |
| | SOUTHEAST TO ALLOW FOR A LANDSCAPE ISLAND BETWEEN THE |
| | LOADING ZONE AND THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK; THE ADJACENT |
| | PARKING SPACE CAN BE ELIMINATED AS THE OVERALL SITE |
| | EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM # OF SPACES REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 9. ADDRESS LIST AND RADIUS MAP SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR |
| | ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE ENTIRE |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. THIS INFORMATION IS TO BE OBTAINED |
| | FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER?S OFFICE. |
| | UPON SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DIVISION, THE LIST AND |
| | MAP SHALL BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE MAILING LIST AFFIDAVIT, |
| | LOCATED ON PAGE 18 OF THE CITY?S DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 9.1. IF THERE ARE MORE THAN 50 PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN |
| | 500 FEET, THE MAILER WILL BE SUPPLIED TO THE APPLICANT |
| | PRIOR TO PLANNING BOARD AND IT WILL BE THE APPLICANT?S |
| | RESPONSIBILITY TO SEND THEM OUT BEFORE THE APPLICABLE |
| | DEADLINE, AS WELL AS PROVIDE THE MAILER AFFIDAVIT |
| | LOCATED ON PAGE 12 OF THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 10. UTILITY LETTERS PROVIDED ONLY INDICATE THEIR |
| | AVAILABILITY TO SERVE THE PROJECT. AS INDICATED IN THE |
| | CITY?S DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, UTILITY LETTERS ARE TO |
| | INDICATE THAT ?THE PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR |
| | EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF |
| | THEIR SERVICES?. |
| | |
| | 11. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY LINE |
| | ON THE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS. |
| | |
| | 12. DETAIL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE DUMPSTER |
| | ENCLOSURE. DIMENSIONS AND SCREENING SHALL CONFORM TO |
| | THE CITY?S MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE CONTACT ME FOR |
| | A COPY OF THE APPROVED DETAIL. |
| | |
| | 13. BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED. THE STYLE OF THE |
| | RACK AS WELL AS THE LOCATION AND SPACING SHALL CONFORM |
| | TO THE CITY?S MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE CONTACT ME |
| | FOR A COPY OF THE APPROVED DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS. |
| | |
| | 14. A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN |
| | THE PARKING SPACE ADJACENT TO THE LOADING ZONE AND THE |
| | OUTERMOST BOUNDARY OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | 15. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A DISCUSSION REGARDING THE |
| | CONFIGURATION OF THE PARKING, LOADING, ETC. NORTH OF |
| | THE RESTAURANT. |
| | |
| | 16. ACCORDING TO THE FLOOR PLAN, NOT ALL INGRESS/EGRESS |
| | POINTS INTO THE RESTAURANT SPACE ARE SHOWN ON THE SITE |
| | PLAN. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS MATCH. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE NOVEMBER 19, 2019, |
| | PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE |
| | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED |
| | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 27, 2019. |
| | |
| | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE NOVEMBER 19, 2019, PLANNING |
| | BOARD AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO |
| | LATER THAN NOVEMBER 4, 2019. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM, AND |
| | BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SUCH |
| | REQUIREMENTS ARE ALSO PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED ABOVE. |
| | |
| | H) IF AFTER THE CASE HAS BEEN ADVERTISED THE APPLICANT |
| | DESIRES TO REQUEST A CONTINUANCE, A FEE OF $50 PLUS THE |
| | COST OF ADVERTISING WILL BE CHARGED. |
| | ________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | TTY: 800.955.8771 |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
