Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z19070006
Project Number Z19070006
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2020-03-02 15:57:57COMMENT RESULTS, NEW COMMENTS AND FURTHER CLARIFICATION
 IN BOLD.
 1. SATSIFIED.
 2. SATSIFIED.
 3. SATSIFIED. EXISTING STREET LIGHT POLES SHALL BE
 REPLACED WITH THE CITY APPROVED LIGHT POLE, PER CITY
 ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS.
 LIGHT POLES TO BE REVIEWED THROUGH PERMITTING.
 4. ONGOING. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE SITE
 AND ROW MEETING REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 94-113(B).
 PLEASE INCLUDE LIGHT POLE DETAILS FOR BOTH INTERNAL AND
 ROW LIGHT POLES.
 SEE NEW COMMENT #101
 5. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. SIDEWALK MUST BE AT GRADE
 INCLUDING ACROSS PARKING INGRESS/EGRESS AREAS. IT
 APPEARS THERE ARE ISSUES AT THE GARAGE ENTRANCES THAT
 REQUIRE CURBING AND STAIRS. THIS WILL NEED TO BE
 ADJUSTED TO KEEP THE GRADE LEVEL.
 REPEAT COMMENT: THE DESIGN OF THE CURB CUT OFF OF
 TRINITY PLACE INTO THE PARKING GARAGE DOES NOT ALLOW
 FOR CONTINUOUS PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL. PLEASE REMOVE CURBING
 AS NECESSARY TO PERMIT FOR CONTINUOUS PATH OF TRAVEL
 FROM THE WESTERN BOUNDARY ALONG TRINITY PLACE. PLEASE
 REFLECT DESIGN WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
 6. SATSIFIED.
 7. SATSIFIED.
 8. SATSIFIED.
 9. SATSIFIED.
 10. SATSIFIED.
 11. SATSIFIED.
 12. SATSIFIED.
 13. SATSIFIED.
 14. SATSIFIED.
 15. ONGOING. PLEASE SHOW PROPOSED LOCATION OF BACKFLOW
 PREVENTER AND TRANSFORMER AND OTHER ABOVE GROUND
 UTILITIES. PLEASE NOTE, LOCATION OF THESE UTILITIES
 SHALL REQUIRE COORDINATION WITH ENGINEERING, PUBLIC
 UTILITIES, AND PLANNING AND ZONING TO ENSURE LOCATION
 THAT DOES NOT IMPEDE THE PUBLIC REALM AND THAT ALL
 UTILITIES ARE PROPERLY SCREENED.
  
 3/2/20: COORDINATE WITH CITY ENGINEERING FOR PLACEMENT
 WITHIN INTERIOR OF PARKING GARAGE IF AT ALL POSSIBLE TO
 KEEP UTILITIES OFF OF PUBLIC ROW . SEE NEW COMMENT #94
 16. SATSIFIED.
 17. SATSIFIED.
 18. SATSIFIED.
 19. SATSIFIED.
 20. SATSIFIED.
 21. SATSIFIED.
  
 22. SATSIFIED.
 23. SATSIFIED.
 24. SATSIFIED.
 25. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. THE CALCULATION FOR REQUIRED
 PARKING FOR MICRO-UNITS, STANDARD UNITS, AND
 RETAIL/COMMERCIAL ARE INCORRECT. THE PERMITTED PARKING
 FOR MICROUNITS IS 102 SPACES FOR UNITS AND 10 SPACES
 FOR GUESTS FOR A TOTAL OF 112 SPACES (ADJUST IN
 REQUIRED COLUMN). THE PERMITTED PARKING FOR STANDARD
 SPACES IS MIN. 14 AND MAX. 28 PLUS 1 SPACE FOR GUEST
 FOR A TOTAL OF 29 SPACES. THE PERMITTED PARKING FOR
 RETAIL IS MIN. 12 AND MAX. 24 (ROUNDED DOWN). PLEASE
 AMEND ACCORDINGLY AND NOTE THAT ANY PARKING SPACES
 ABOVE MAXIMUM PARKING SHALL COUNT TOWARDS FAR. THE
 NUMBER OF SPACES ARE ONLY ROUNDED UP IF DECIMAL POINT
 IS EQUAL TO OR ABOVE 0.5.
  
 3/2/20: SEE NEW COMMENT # 87
 26. SATSIFIED.
 27. SATSIFIED.
 28. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION
 OF THE BIKE SHARE STATION ON THE SITE PLAN. EFFORTS CAN
 BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY?S CURRENT BIKE SHARE
 PROGRAM. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DOCKS REQUIRED WILL BE
 DETERMINED BY THE PROXIMITY OF OTHER BIKE SHARING
 STATIONS ALREADY INSTALLED WITHIN 500 FEET FROM THE
 SUBJECT PROJECT.
  
 3/2/20: COORDINATE WITH KIMLEY-HORN ON LOCATION OF
 MICROMOBILITY STATION
 29. SATSIFIED.
 30. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PER SECTION 94-106(8A), THE
 REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING FOR THE RESIDENTIAL
 MICRO-UNITS SHALL BE 0.5 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PER
 MICRO-UNIT, WHICH WOULD BE 102 SPACES FOR THIS PROJECT.
 PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY. THIS SHALL REQUIRE A COVERED
 AND ENCLOSED BICYCLE STORAGE AREA.
  
 3/2/20: BICYCLE RACK POST SHALL BE MIN. 3 FEET AWAY
 FROM PERPENDICULAR WALL AND 2 FEET FROM PARALLEL WALL.
 30? MINIMUM BETWEEN TWO RACK POSTS. PLEASE ADJUST AS
 NECESSARY ? THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR INSTALLATION
  
 31. SATSIFIED.
 32. SATSIFIED.
 33. SATSIFIED.
 34. SATSIFIED.
 35. SATSIFIED.
 36. SATSIFIED.
 37. SATSIFIED.
 38. SATSIFIED.
 39. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SPECIFIC
 ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL INCLUDING ALL MATERIALS AND
 INCLUDE REFERENCE IMAGES. STAFF HAS CONCERN OVER THE
 MATERIAL FOR THE GARAGE SCREENING AND NEEDS TO SEE MORE
 DETAIL OF THE SPACING OF THE FEATURES, PROPOSED
 MATERIAL, ETC.
 WAITING FOR UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
 40. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE CONSIDER ARCHITECTURAL
 FEATURES OTHER THAN GARAGE SCREENING ON THE PARKING
 GARAGE FA?ADE TO BETTER BLEND THE OBVIOUS FACADE OF
 PARKING GARAGE SCREENING AS SEEN FROM THE PUBLIC VIEW,
 ESPECIALLY FROM OLIVE AVENUE AND TRINITY PLACE, WHILE
 KEEPING THE MASSING DIFFERENT INTACT.
 WAITING FOR UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
 41. SATSIFIED.
 42. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. THE PARKING GARAGE RAMPS SHALL
 BE COVERED WITH ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT. BLANK WALLS
 ARE NOT PERMITTED PER SECTION 94-109. NON-ACTIVE USES
 SHALL BE TREATED WITH ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT PER TABLE
 IV-4.
 WAITING FOR UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
 43. SATSIFIED.
 44. SATSIFIED. PLEASE EXTEND ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT
 ALONG THE FA?ADE AREA ADJACENT TO THE PARKING GARAGE
 ALONG OLIVE STREET TO ALLEVIATE THE BLANK WALL.
 45. ONGOING. PLEASE NOTE, PER RESOLUTION 211-17,
 PROJECTS WITH RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL CONTRIBUTE
 A TROLLEY FEE AT $10 PER MICRO-UNIT PER MONTH.
 SHALL BE CONDITION OF APPROVAL
 46. SATISFIED.
 47. SATISFIED.
 48. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SUBMIT STREET LEVEL
 RENDERINGS WITH RESUBMITTAL
 PLEASE INCLUDE THE CORRECT LIGHT POLE DESIGN, REMOVE
 THE LARGE TREE IF NOT BEING RELOCATED AND REPLACE WITH
 IMAGE OF PROPOSED TREE AT PLANTING HEIGHT. PLEASE
 ILLUSTRATE THE LANDSCAPE AT PLANTING HEIGHT.
 NEW COMMENTS DECEMBER 11, 2019:
 49. ONGOING. PLEASE UPDATE THE RENDERING IF THE OAK
 TREE IS NOT BEING RELOCATED.
 50. SATISFIED.
 51. SATISFIED
 52. ONGOING. PLEASE INDICATE WHAT MATERIAL WILL BE
 BEHIND THE BAMBOO SCREENING (IF ANY)
 WAITING FOR UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SHOWING
 CMU WALL
 53. SATISFIED.
 54. ONGOING. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL
 MATERIAL DETAIL
 WAITING FOR UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS
 55. ONGOING. STAFF OVERALL FEELS THAT THERE IS A NEED
 FOR ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL FENESTRATION AND TREATMENT
 ALONG THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST FA?ADE. ALTHOUGH SOME
 PORTIONS ARE INTERIOR LOT LINES, THE FACADES ARE BEHIND
 PARKING LOTS AND THE FA?ADE IS HIGHLY VISIBLE FROM THE
 STREET. LANDSCAPE MATERIAL AND PAINT CANNOT BE
 CONSIDERED AS TREATMENT FOR COVERING BLANK WALLS. THE
 TREATMENT ALONG THE NORTH PORTION OF THE EAST FA?ADE
 (THE PORTION WITH THE MESH GARAGE SCREENING) HAS
 ACCOMPLISHED THE CONTINUATION OF THE FEATURES
 THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE FA?ADE, EFFICIENTLY BLENDING THE
 PORTION OF THE PARKING GARAGE INTO THE RESIDENTIAL
 UNITS IN THE UPPER FLOORS (GARAGE OPENINGS SAME SIZE AS
 WINDOWS ON UPPER FLOORS). THE PORTIONS OF PARKING
 GARAGE ALONG THE OTHER FACADES HAS DIFFERENT PATTERN
 THAN THE UPPER FLOORS, AND DOES NOT TREAT THE PARKING
 GARAGE PORTION AS EFFICIENTLY. PLEASE CONSIDER THE
 PATTERN OF PARKING GARAGE SCREENING OPENINGS AND
 CONSIDER INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL
 TREATMENT ALONG NON-ACTIVE USES AND FENESTRATION ALONG
 ACTIVE USES (SEE TABLE IV-4). CAN OTHER MATERIAL
 BESIDES STUCCO BE USED ALONG FACADES?
 WAITING FOR UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS
 56. ONGOING.PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE
 PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE MESH SCREENING INCLUDING THE
 DISTANCE SEPARATION BETWEEN THE MESH FRAMES. IS THERE
 AN ALTERNATIVE SCREENING THAT CAN BE USED THAT BETTER
 SERVES AS FAUX WINDOWS OR CONTINUATION?
 WAITING FOR UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS
 57. SATISFIED.
 58. SATISFIED.
 59. ONGOING.PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR THE ROOF
 MOUNTED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE MAKE NOTE ON THE
 PLANS THAT THE ELEVATOR SHAFTS AND ALL PROJECTING
 OBJECTS ON THE ROOF WILL NEED TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH
 THE BUILDING FA?ADE COLORS OR OTHERWISE PROPERLY
 SCREENED.
 WAITING FOR UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS
 60. SATISFIED.
 61. NOT SATISFIED. THE PORTION OF THE GROUND FLOOR OPEN
 SPACE THAT IS BEING COUNTED TOWARDS THE REQUIRED
 PERCENTAGE OF PRIVATE OPEN SPACE MUST BE TREATED AS A
 SPECIFIC TYPE OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE THAT IS PERMITTED IN
 THIS ZONING DISTRICT (SEE TABLE IV-6), NOT AS A
 SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. SPECIFIC DETAILS ON THE PUBLIC
 OPEN SPACE TYPE MUST BE INCLUDED (SEE TABLE IV-7).
 MUST BE PUBLIC, NOT SEMI PUBLIC AND MEETING THE
 REQUIREMENTS FOR VEGETATION AND TREE CANOPY (MINIMUM
 SIZE DOES NOT HAVE TO BE MET)
 62. SATISFIED.
 63. SATISFIED.
 64. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE AMEND THE TRUNCATED DOME AND
 ADA RAMP AT THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SOUTH ACROSS
 TRINITY PLACE AND TANGLEWOOD COURT TO PROVIDE STRAIGHT
 ACCESS ACROSS TRINITY AND OLIVE STREET.
 PER MEETING WITH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ADA CROSSING
 SHALL FACE DIRECTLY SOUTH.
 65. SATISFIED.
 66. ONGOING. PLEASE UPDATE THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEET
 A1-01 TO MATCH THE UPDATED SITE PLAN DATA
 SEE NEW COMMENTS REGARDING PARKING DATA
 67. SATISFIED
 68. SATISFIED
 69. SATISFIED
 70. SATISFIED
 71. SATISFIED
 72. SATISFIED
 73. SATISFIED
 74. NOT SATISFIED. STAFF RECOMMENDS INCORPORATING ANTI
 SKATEBOARD BARRIERS ON THE SEATS IN THE OPEN SPACE-
 MAKE NOTES ON THE PLANS IF ADDING
 COMMENT WAS NOT ACCURATELY RESPONDED TO IN COMMENT
 RESPONSE MEMO
 75. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CONTEXTUAL ELEVATIONS
 NEED CONTEXTUAL ELEVATIONS NOT RENDERINGS
 76. ONGOING. PLEASE EVALUATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO
 INCORPORATE THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER INTO FOUNDATION
 LANDSCAPE BED, CLOSER TO THE BUILDING. ALTERNATIVELY,
 ANY SOLUTION WHICH ALLOWS IT TO BE SCREENED ON AT LEAST
 THREE SIDES BY LANDSCAPE. PLEASE INDICATE PROPOSED
 SCREENING ON LANDSCAPE PLANS.
 CONVERSATION ONGOING WITH CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
 AND KIMLEY HORN TO LOCATE WITHIN PARKING GARAGE
 INTERIOR IF POSSIBLE
 77. SATISFIED.
 78. NOT SATISFIED. THE NUMBER OF MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM
 STANDARD PARKING SPACES FOR RETAIL, RESTAURANT OR
 COMMERCIAL SHOULD BE 17 AND 35 PLEASE AMEND
 PROVIDED COMMERCIAL PARKING SPACES EXCEED MAXIMUM
 REQUIRED. SEE NEW COMMENT #87
 79. SATISFIED
 80. SATISFIED
 81. SATISFIED
 82. SATISFIED
 83. SATISFIED
 84. SATISFIED
 NEW COMMENTS MARCH 2, 2020:
 85. RESTROOM AREAS ON LEVEL 4 ARE COUNTED TOWARDS FAR.
 PLEASE ADJUST FAR SHEET PZ-01 ? THIS WILL PUT THE
 PROJECT OVER THE PERMITTED FAR ? NEED TO ADJUST
 ELSEWHERE TO REMAIN UNDER MAXIMUM FAR
 86. FOR THE MAINTENANCE OFFICE AND POOL EQUIPMENT ROOM,
 PLEASE ADD A NOTE THAT ?ROOM SHALL BE NOT UNDER AC?
 87. THE PROVIDED COMMERCIAL SPACES EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
 SPACES REQUIRED. ANY PARKING SPACES ABOVE THE MAXIMUM
 SHALL BE COUNTED TOWARDS FAR.
 88. ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MUST BE SCREENED ? PLEASE
 RAISE PARAPET TO COVER
 89. COORDINATE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS WITH KIMLEY-HORN
 PLANS FOR MICRO MOBILITY SPACE
 90. INCLUDE DOUBLE STRIPING WITHIN PARKING GARAGE
 MEETING STRIPING DETAIL REQUIREMENTS OF CITY OF WPB.
 91. IN REGARD TO THE COMPACT PARKING SPACES THAT ARE
 AGAINST THE WEST WALL, SOUTH OF THE BICYCLE RACK ROOM:
 AS THIS IS A DEAD-END, ONE OF THE SPACES NEED TO BE A
 TURNAROUND SPACE (DIAGONALLY STRIPED) WITH A MINIMUM 3
 FOOT BACKUP SPACE.
 92. APPEARS TO BE BOLLARDS UP AGAINST THE TRASH ROOM
 AND DOOR TO THE BICYCLE RACK ROOM ON THE FIRST LEVEL OF
 PARKING GARAGE: THESE BLOCK ACCESS TO THE NORTHERN
 PARKING SPACE AND DON?T ALLOW FOR SUFFICIENT BACK UP
 SPACE. THE PARKING SPACES THAT ARE UP AGAINST THE
 SOUTHERN WALL ON THE BUILDING RAMPS ON THE OTHER FLOORS
 HAVE THE SAME ISSUE. THE VEHICLES PULLING OUT OF THIS
 SPACE WOULD HAVE TO PACK UP STRAIGHT INTO THE OPPOSITE
 TURN LANE, UP THE RAMP IN ORDER TO GET OUT OF THE
 SPACE. THESE WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED
 APPROPRIATELY
 93. COORDINATION FOR SIDEWALK ALONG TRINITY PLACE
 ONGOING WITH CITY ENGINEERING AND KIMLEY HORN TO ALLOW
 FOR CONTINUOUS PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY ALONG SIDEWALK.
 94. LOCATE WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTER WITHIN
 PARKING GARAGE IF POSSIBLE ? COORDINATE WITH CITY
 ENGINEERING
 95. THE PARKING SPACES THAT ARE UP AGAINST THE SOUTHERN
 WALL ON THE BUILDING RAMPS DO NOT WORK. THE VEHICLES
 PULLING OUT OF THIS SPACE WOULD HAVE TO PACK UP
 STRAIGHT INTO THE OPPOSITE TURN LANE, UP THE RAMP IN
 ORDER TO GET OUT OF THE SPACE. PLEASE ADJUST AS
 NECESSARY
 96. PLEASE LOCATE EXHAUST FAN TO FACE WEST IF POSSIBLE
 RATHER THAN SOUTH TO TRINITY PLACE. PLEASE SHOW ON
 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS
 97. PLEASE CLARIFY USE OF STORAGE CASES WITHIN PARKING
 GARAGE THAT STILL HAVE COMPACT PARKING SPACES WITHIN?
 98. PLEASE NOTE, STAFF WILL REQUEST AN UPDATED
 RENDERING WITH THE PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE SCREENING
 DURING THE PERMITTING PROCESS, OR IF ARTIST AND DESIGN
 IS PICKED AFTER THE PERMIT PROCESS, THIS SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED PRIOR TO CO AS A PERMIT REVISION.
 99. THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED CAR SHARING IS BASED ON
 MICRO-UNITS NOT STANDARD UNITS, SO 15 CAR SHARING
 SPACES ARE REQUIRED. THE CAR SHARING REDUCTION IS 7 NOT
 8. THIS RESULTS IN A MAXIMUM OF 184 PARKING SPACES.
 PLEASE ADJUST NUMBERS ACCORDINGLY IN PARKING TABLE.
 100. PLEASE MATCH KIMLEY-HORN PLANS TO ARCHITECTURAL
 PLANS IN REGARD TO BICYCLE RACK ALONG THE ROWS.
 101. STREET LIGHTING TO BE REVIEWED AT TIME OF
 PERMITTING. PHOTOMETRICS NEED TO INCLUDE PUBLIC OPEN
 SPACE AREA ALONG OLIVE AVENUE. LIGHT POLES ARE MISSING
 FROM TRINITY PLACE.
 102. A FEE OF $300 IS REQUIRED FOR ANY RESUBMITTAL
 BEYOND THE SECOND SUBMITTAL. PLEASE SUBMIT A CHECK FOR
 $300 WITH RESUBMITTAL.
  
 STAFF RESERVES THE RIGHT FOR FURTHER COMMENT AS THE
 REVIEW PROGRESSES.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved