Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z19070006
Project Number Z19070006
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2019-12-12 14:15:411. SATSIFIED.
 2. SATSIFIED.
 3. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. EXISTING STREET LIGHT POLES
 SHALL BE REPLACED WITH THE CITY APPROVED LIGHT POLE,
 PER CITY ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS.
 PLEASE INCLUDE SIMILAR LIGHT POLES ON THE RENDERINGS.
 4. NOT SATSIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE
 SITE AND ROW MEETING REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 94-113(B).
 PLEASE INCLUDE LIGHT POLE DETAILS FOR BOTH INTERNAL AND
 ROW LIGHT POLES.
 5. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. SIDEWALK MUST BE AT GRADE
 INCLUDING ACROSS PARKING INGRESS/EGRESS AREAS. IT
 APPEARS THERE ARE ISSUES AT THE GARAGE ENTRANCES THAT
 REQUIRE CURBING AND STAIRS. THIS WILL NEED TO BE
 ADJUSTED TO KEEP THE GRADE LEVEL.
 THE DESIGN OF THE CURB CUT OFF OF TRINITY PLACE INTO
 THE PARKING GARAGE DOES NOT ALLOW FOR CONTINUOUS
 PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL. PLEASE REMOVE CURBING AS NECESSARY
 TO PERMIT FOR CONTINUOUS PATH OF TRAVEL FROM THE
 WESTERN BOUNDARY ALONG TRINITY PLACE. PLEASE REFLECT
 DESIGN WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, WHICH CURRENTLY DOES
 NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN.
 6. SATSIFIED.
 7. SATSIFIED.
 8. SATSIFIED.
 9. SATSIFIED.
 10. SATSIFIED.
 11. SATSIFIED.
 12. SATSIFIED.
 13. SATSIFIED.
 14. SATSIFIED.
 15. ONGOING. PLEASE SHOW PROPOSED LOCATION OF BACKFLOW
 PREVENTER AND TRANSFORMER AND OTHER ABOVE GROUND
 UTILITIES. PLEASE NOTE, LOCATION OF THESE UTILITIES
 SHALL REQUIRE COORDINATION WITH ENGINEERING, PUBLIC
 UTILITIES, AND PLANNING AND ZONING TO ENSURE LOCATION
 THAT DOES NOT IMPEDE THE PUBLIC REALM AND THAT ALL
 UTILITIES ARE PROPERLY SCREENED.
 SEE NEW COMMENT # 77
 16. SATSIFIED.
 17. SATSIFIED.
 18. SATSIFIED.
 19. SATSIFIED.
 20. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE
 SHEET INDICATING THE LOCATION OF ACTIVE USE AND
 PERCENTAGE ALONG THE FACADES. STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN
 EXAMPLE.
 SEE NEW COMMENT #62
 21. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE
 SHEET INDICATING THE LOCATION OF REQUIRED TRANSPARENCY
 PERCENTAGE ALONG THE FACADES. TRANSPARENCY IS DEFINED
 IN SECTION 94-109. STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE.
 SEE NEW COMMENT # 62
  
 22. SATSIFIED.
 23. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE
 SHEET INDICATING THE REQUIRED PLANAR BREAKS FOR TABLE
 IV-4 ALONG THE FACADES. STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE.
 THE INDICATED PLANAR BREAK ALONG THE NORTH FA?ADE ON
 LEVEL 4 MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS, BUT THE DIMENSIONS
 APPEAR TO BE LABELED INCORRECTLY (93? 1 1?8? SECTION
 SHOULD BE SPLIT INTO TWO SECTIONS BASED ON ILLUSTRATED
 BREAK). PLEASE AMEND
 24. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE
 SHEET INDICATING THE REQUIRED HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS
 FOR TABLE IV-4 ALONG THE FACADES. STAFF CAN PROVIDE AN
 EXAMPLE.
 SEE NEW COMMENT # 53
 25. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. THE CALCULATION FOR REQUIRED
 PARKING FOR MICRO-UNITS, STANDARD UNITS, AND
 RETAIL/COMMERCIAL ARE INCORRECT. THE PERMITTED PARKING
 FOR MICROUNITS IS 102 SPACES FOR UNITS AND 10 SPACES
 FOR GUESTS FOR A TOTAL OF 112 SPACES (ADJUST IN
 REQUIRED COLUMN). THE PERMITTED PARKING FOR STANDARD
 SPACES IS MIN. 14 AND MAX. 28 PLUS 1 SPACE FOR GUEST
 FOR A TOTAL OF 29 SPACES. THE PERMITTED PARKING FOR
 RETAIL IS MIN. 12 AND MAX. 24 (ROUNDED DOWN). PLEASE
 AMEND ACCORDINGLY AND NOTE THAT ANY PARKING SPACES
 ABOVE MAXIMUM PARKING SHALL COUNT TOWARDS FAR. THE
 NUMBER OF SPACES ARE ONLY ROUNDED UP IF DECIMAL POINT
 IS EQUAL TO OR ABOVE 0.5.
 SEE NEW COMMENT # 78 & 79
 26. SATSIFIED.
 27. SATSIFIED.
 28. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION
 OF THE BIKE SHARE STATION ON THE SITE PLAN. EFFORTS CAN
 BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY?S CURRENT BIKE SHARE
 PROGRAM. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF DOCKS REQUIRED WILL BE
 DETERMINED BY THE PROXIMITY OF OTHER BIKE SHARING
 STATIONS ALREADY INSTALLED WITHIN 500 FEET FROM THE
 SUBJECT PROJECT.
 FROM CONVERSATIONS WITH APPLICANT, IT APPEARS THAT THE
 BIKE SHARE STATION MAY BE RELOCATED. THE BEST LOCATION
 IN TERMS OF CONVENIENCE IS OLIVE AVENUE. STAFF IS
 DISCUSSING INTERNALLY AND WITH THE BIKE SHARE COMPANY
 ON THE NUMBER OF RACKS NEEDED AT THIS LOCATION, THE
 SIZE NEEDED AND THE BEST LOCATION. CONVERSATION TO BE
 CONTINUED
  
 29. SATSIFIED.
 30. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PER SECTION 94-106(8A), THE
 REQUIRED BICYCLE PARKING FOR THE RESIDENTIAL
 MICRO-UNITS SHALL BE 0.5 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PER
 MICRO-UNIT, WHICH WOULD BE 102 SPACES FOR THIS PROJECT.
 PLEASE REVISE ACCORDINGLY. THIS SHALL REQUIRE A COVERED
 AND ENCLOSED BICYCLE STORAGE AREA.
 PLEASE SHOW THE PROPOSED LOCATION AND LAYOUT OF THE
 INTERIOR BICYCLE SPACES WITHIN THE PARKING GARAGE.
 31. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. THE CALCULATION FOR REQUIRED
 CAR SHARE IS INCORRECT. THE CALCULATION SHALL BE A
 RATIO OF ONE CAR SHARE SPACE PER EVERY 13 UNITS,
 REDUCED BY ONE CAR SHARE SPACE PER EVERY 13 ON-SITE
 MICRO-UNIT PARKING SPACES PROVIDED. THIS WOULD RESULT
 IN 8 CAR SHARE SPACES. PLEASE PROVIDE 2 SPACES ON SITE,
 AND HAVE THE REMAINING 6 TO BE SAVED FOR CAR SHARE FOR
 A FUTURE DATE BASED ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF 94-106(8A).
 PLEASE AMEND TO SHOW THE REQUIRED 2 SPACES PLUS 6
 RESERVED SPACES (WHICH CAN BE USED FOR GUEST PARKING
 NOW) IN THE PROJECT DATA TABLE AND SHOW LOCATION OF CAR
 SHARE SPACES ON THE SITE PLANS. APPLICANT SHALL
 COORDINATE WITH CAR SHARE PROVIDER WITH THE ASSISTANCE
 OF THE CITY.
 TWO SPACES SHOULD BE RESERVED FOR CAR SHARE SPACES, NOT
 ?FUTURE CAR SHARE?.
 32. SATSIFIED.
 33. SATSIFIED.
 34. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE COORDINATE TRASH PICKUP
 AND REMOVAL WITH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. HOW WOULD
 PICKUP WORK FOR THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE ENCLOSURE?
 PLEASE COORDINATE WITH MATT HEJAZI. 561-822-2045
 [email protected]
 THERE IS A LIGHT POLE PROPOSED WITHIN THE COMPACTOR
 HOLDING ZONE, PLEASE ADJUST.
 35. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. IS THERE ACCESS TO THE RETAIL
 FROM THE PARKING GARAGE? HOW WILL ACCESS WORK? PLEASE
 LABEL PARKING SPACES FOR RETAIL ON THE SITE PLAN.
 THERE ARE RETAIL PARKING SPACES PROPOSED BEYOND THE
 ACCESS GATE. WOULD THESE BE RESERVED FOR THOSE WITH
 ACCESS? MAY NEED TO BE REVISED
 36. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PUBLIC BICYCLE PARKING SHALL
 BE PROVIDED AT ONE SPACE PER 100 FEET OF STREET
 FRONTAGE. THIS WOULD BE THE TOTAL OF ALL THREE STREET
 FRONTAGES FOR A TOTAL OF 6 BICYCLE SPACES (SECTION
 93-113)
 THE PROPOSED LOCATION INTERFERES WITH THE PEDESTRIAN
 PATHWAY ALONG OLIVE AVENUE. PLEASE ADJUST TO A LOCATION
 OUT OF THE DIRECT PATH OF TRAVEL, PERHAPS WITHIN THE
 PLAZA AREA ADJACENT TO THE STRUCTURE. ALTERNATIVELY,
 BICYCLE RACKS CAN BE DISPERSED AROUND THE PROJECT.
 37. SATSIFIED.
 38. SATSIFIED.
 39. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SPECIFIC
 ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL INCLUDING ALL MATERIALS AND
 INCLUDE REFERENCE IMAGES. STAFF HAS CONCERN OVER THE
 MATERIAL FOR THE GARAGE SCREENING AND NEEDS TO SEE MORE
 DETAIL OF THE SPACING OF THE FEATURES, PROPOSED
 MATERIAL, ETC.
 SEE NEW COMMENT # 55
 40. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE CONSIDER ARCHITECTURAL
 FEATURES OTHER THAN GARAGE SCREENING ON THE PARKING
 GARAGE FA?ADE TO BETTER BLEND THE OBVIOUS FACADE OF
 PARKING GARAGE SCREENING AS SEEN FROM THE PUBLIC VIEW,
 ESPECIALLY FROM OLIVE AVENUE AND TRINITY PLACE, WHILE
 KEEPING THE MASSING DIFFERENT INTACT.
 SEE NEW COMMENT # 55
 41. SATSIFIED.
 42. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. THE PARKING GARAGE RAMPS SHALL
 BE COVERED WITH ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT. BLANK WALLS
 ARE NOT PERMITTED PER SECTION 94-109. NON-ACTIVE USES
 SHALL BE TREATED WITH ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT PER TABLE
 IV-4.
 SEE NEW COMMENT # 55
 43. SATSIFIED.
 44. PARTIALLY SATSIFIED. PLEASE EXTEND ARCHITECTURAL
 TREATMENT ALONG THE FA?ADE AREA ADJACENT TO THE PARKING
 GARAGE ALONG OLIVE STREET TO ALLEVIATE THE BLANK WALL.
 SEE NEW COMMENT # 55
 45. ONGOING. PLEASE NOTE, PER RESOLUTION 211-17,
 PROJECTS WITH RESIDENTIAL MICRO-UNITS SHALL CONTRIBUTE
 A TROLLEY FEE AT $10 PER MICRO-UNIT PER MONTH.
 46. SATISFIED.
 47. SATISFIED.
 48. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SUBMIT STREET LEVEL
 RENDERINGS WITH RESUBMITTAL
 PLEASE INCLUDE THE CORRECT LIGHT POLE DESIGN, REMOVE
 THE LARGE TREE IF NOT BEING RELOCATED AND REPLACE WITH
 IMAGE OF PROPOSED TREE AT PLANTING HEIGHT. PLEASE
 ILLUSTRATE THE LANDSCAPE AT PLANTING HEIGHT.
  
  
 NEW COMMENTS DECEMBER 11, 2019:
 49. PLEASE UPDATE THE RENDERING IF THE OAK TREE IS NOT
 BEING RELOCATED.
 50. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MATERIAL INFORMATION AND
 DETAIL ON THE PROPOSED ?BAMBOO? GARAGE SCREENING,
 INCLUDING PROPOSED SPACING. THE RENDERING SHOWS LARGER
 SPACING BETWEEN THE ?BAMBOO? PARKING GARAGE SCREENING
 ALONG THE EAST FA?ADE, WITHIN THE PUBLIC PLAZA AREA. IS
 THE SPACING DIFFERENT HERE THAN ELSEWHERE?
 51. PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE BAMBOO SCREENING IS
 ILLUSTRATED IN BLACK AND WHITE COLOR ON SHEET A4-01 OF
 COLOR ELEVATIONS ? DIFFERENT THAN RENDERING
 52. PLEASE INDICATE WHAT MATERIAL WILL BE BEHIND THE
 BAMBOO SCREENING (IF ANY)
 53. PER TABLE IV-4: FA?ADE ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS,
 AT THE GROUND FLOOR, HORIZONTAL PROJECTS THAT HAVE A
 MINIMUM CUMULATIVE HORIZONTAL LENGTH OF 50% OF THE
 BUILDING FRONTAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED (NOT INCLUDING
 RECESSED PROJECTIONS FROM REQUIRED SETBACKS). IT
 APPEARS THAT THE EAST ELEVATION MAY NOT MEET THIS
 REQUIREMENT. PLEASE INCLUDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR
 INCLUDE ADDITIONAL HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS ALONG THIS
 FA?ADE AS NECESSARY.
 54. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL MATERIAL
 DETAIL
 55. STAFF OVERALL FEELS THAT THERE IS A NEED FOR
 ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL FENESTRATION AND TREATMENT
 ALONG THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST FA?ADE. ALTHOUGH SOME
 PORTIONS ARE INTERIOR LOT LINES, THE FACADES ARE BEHIND
 PARKING LOTS AND THE FA?ADE IS HIGHLY VISIBLE FROM THE
 STREET. LANDSCAPE MATERIAL AND PAINT CANNOT BE
 CONSIDERED AS TREATMENT FOR COVERING BLANK WALLS. THE
 TREATMENT ALONG THE NORTH PORTION OF THE EAST FA?ADE
 (THE PORTION WITH THE MESH GARAGE SCREENING) HAS
 ACCOMPLISHED THE CONTINUATION OF THE FEATURES
 THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE FA?ADE, EFFICIENTLY BLENDING THE
 PORTION OF THE PARKING GARAGE INTO THE RESIDENTIAL
 UNITS IN THE UPPER FLOORS (GARAGE OPENINGS SAME SIZE AS
 WINDOWS ON UPPER FLOORS). THE PORTIONS OF PARKING
 GARAGE ALONG THE OTHER FACADES HAS DIFFERENT PATTERN
 THAN THE UPPER FLOORS, AND DOES NOT TREAT THE PARKING
 GARAGE PORTION AS EFFICIENTLY. PLEASE CONSIDER THE
 PATTERN OF PARKING GARAGE SCREENING OPENINGS AND
 CONSIDER INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL
 TREATMENT ALONG NON-ACTIVE USES AND FENESTRATION ALONG
 ACTIVE USES (SEE TABLE IV-4). CAN OTHER MATERIAL
 BESIDES STUCCO BE USED ALONG FACADES?
 56. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSED
 PARKING GARAGE MESH SCREENING INCLUDING THE DISTANCE
 SEPARATION BETWEEN THE MESH FRAMES. IS THERE AN
 ALTERNATIVE SCREENING THAT CAN BE USED THAT BETTER
 SERVES AS FAUX WINDOWS OR CONTINUATION?
 57. THE GATE ALONG THE EAST ELEVATION TO THE AMENITY
 DECK CANNOT SWING OUT INTO THE SIDEWALK PEDESTRIAN PATH
 OF TRAVEL. PLEASE SET THE GATE BACK SO THE DOOR DOES
 NOT SWING DIRECTLY INTO THE SIDEWALK.
 58. THE ENTRANCES TO THE RETAIL AREAS ON THE OLIVE
 AVENUE FRONTAGE WILL NEED TO BE RECESSED TO PREVENT THE
 DOORS FROM OPENING DIRECTLY ONTO THE SIDEWALK.
 59. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR THE ROOF MOUNTED
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE MAKE NOTE ON THE PLANS
 THAT THE ELEVATOR SHAFTS AND ALL PROJECTING OBJECTS ON
 THE ROOF WILL NEED TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE BUILDING
 FA?ADE COLORS OR OTHERWISE PROPERLY SCREENED.
 60. PLEASE NOTE THAT PARKING GARAGES ENTRANCES SHALL BE
 REQUIRED TO BE TREATED (WALLS AND CEILINGS) TO A DEPTH
 OF AT LEAST 20 FEET.
 61. THE PORTION OF THE GROUND FLOOR OPEN SPACE THAT IS
 BEING COUNTED TOWARDS THE REQUIRED PERCENTAGE OF
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE MUST BE TREATED AS A SPECIFIC TYPE
 OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE THAT IS PERMITTED IN THIS ZONING
 DISTRICT (SEE TABLE IV-6), NOT AS A SEMI-PUBLIC OPEN
 SPACE. SPECIFIC DETAILS ON THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TYPE
 MUST BE INCLUDED (SEE TABLE IV-7).
 62. PLEASE REMOVE THE STAIRWAY ALONG THE NORTH FA?ADE
 FROM THE CALCULATION FOR ACTIVE USE AND TRANSPARENCY AS
 IT DOES NOT COUNT TOWARDS ACTIVE USE. PLEASE UPDATE
 ACTIVE USE CALCULATION IN DATA TABLES TO REFLECT
 63. THE TRENCH DRAIN AT THE PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE OFF
 TRINITY PLACE IS ILLUSTRATED WITH A DIFFERENT DIMENSION
 ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND CIVIL PLANS. PLEASE
 CLARIFY.
 64. PLEASE AMEND THE TRUNCATED DOME AND ADA RAMP AT THE
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SOUTH ACROSS TRINITY PLACE AND
 TANGLEWOOD COURT TO PROVIDE STRAIGHT ACCESS ACROSS
 TRINITY AND OLIVE STREET.
 65. THERE ARE ISSUES WITH THE PROPOSED LIGHT POLE
 LOCATIONS (WITHIN PARKING SPACES, TRASH COMPACTOR
 HOLDING SPACE, SAME LOCATION AS TREES, FIRE HYDRANT,
 ETC.). PLEASE RELOCATE APPROPRIATELY
 66. PLEASE UPDATE THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEET A1-01 TO
 MATCH THE UPDATED SITE PLAN DATA
 67. PLEASE REMOVE THE REFERENCE FOR THE TRASH CHUTE
 FROM THE ROOF ON SHEET A1-09
 68. THERE ARE NOTES ON SHEET C2.00 FOR EXISTING TREE
 GRATES TO REMAIN. PLEASE NOTE THAT THESE WILL NEED TO
 BE EVALUATED INDIVIDUALLY FOR THEIR EXISTING CONDITION
 AND MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED ? CONVERSATION WITH
 PLANNING AND LANDSCAPE PLANNER WILL BE REQUIRED TO
 DETERMINE CONDITION
 69. PLEASE INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL 1 FOOT OF SPACE NEXT
 TO ANY WALLS OR PHYSICAL OBSTRUCTION ADJACENT TO
 PARKING SPACES (SECTION 94-111(C)(1).
 70. PLEASE MAKE NOTE ON THE PLANS THAT ANY WALL MOUNTED
 FDC OR OTHER UTILITIES SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE
 BUILDING FA?ADE COLOR
 71. A SPECIFIC BICYCLE RACK DETAIL WILL NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL, PLEASE
 PROVIDE WHEN CHOSEN
 72. THE BICYCLE RACK LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN DO NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE AMEND
 73. HAS FENCING OR OTHER METHODS BEEN CONSIDERED FOR
 THE LANDSCAPE AREA ALONG THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE FROM
 TANGLEWOOD COURT? WHAT ARE THE SECURITY MEASURES
 PROPOSED FOR THIS AREA, AS IT COULD PROVIDE SPACE FOR
 LOITERING?
 74. STAFF RECOMMENDS INCORPORATING ANTI SKATEBOARD
 BARRIERS ON THE SEATS IN THE OPEN SPACE- MAKE NOTES ON
 THE PLANS IF ADDING
 75. PLEASE PROVIDE CONTEXTUAL ELEVATIONS
 76. PLEASE EVALUATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO INCORPORATE THE
 BACKFLOW PREVENTER INTO FOUNDATION LANDSCAPE BED,
 CLOSER TO THE BUILDING. ALTERNATIVELY, ANY SOLUTION
 WHICH ALLOWS IT TO BE SCREENED ON AT LEAST THREE SIDES
 BY LANDSCAPE. PLEASE INDICATE PROPOSED SCREENING ON
 LANDSCAPE PLANS.
 77. THE CALCULATION FOR MAXIMUM STANDARD PARKING SPACES
 FOR THE MICRO-UNITS SHOULD BE 98 SPACES (ONLY CALCULATE
 USING NUMBER OF MICRO UNITS). PLEASE AMEND
 78. THE NUMBER OF MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM STANDARD PARKING
 SPACES FOR RETAIL, RESTAURANT OR COMMERCIAL SHOULD BE
 17 AND 35 PLEASE AMEND
 79. THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED MICROUNIT BICYCLE PARKING
 SPACES IS ONLY PER MICROUNIT, NOT STANDARD UNIT,
 RESULTING IN A REQUIREMENT OF 98 SPACES. THE STANDARD
 UNITS ALSO REQUIRE BICYCLES AT 1 RACK PER EVERY 15
 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES (1 SPACE). PLEASE PROVIDE A
 SEPARATE ROW IN THE DATA TABLE FOR 98 REQUIRED BICYCLE
 RACKS FOR MICROUNITS AND 1 REQUIRED FOR STANDARD UNITS.
 THIS IS IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIRED FOR COMMERCIAL
 BICYCLE PARKING.
 80. PLEASE CONSIDER AN ADDITIONAL TREE AT THE PROJECT?S
 SOUTHEAST CORNER, ALONG TRINITY PLACE NEAR THE CROSSING
 TO PROVIDE SHADE FOR PEDESTRIANS WAITING AT THE
 CROSSWALK
 81. PLEASE ADD AN ADDITIONAL TREE IN A TREE GRATE
 ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHERNMOST PARALLEL PARKING SPACE
 ALONG OLIVE AVENUE
 82. THERE APPEARS TO BE SOME ELEVATED FEATURES ALONG
 THE SIDEWALK BETWEEN THE ELEVATOR LOBBY ENTRANCE AND
 THE STAIRWELL ENTRANCE ILLUSTRATED ON THE NORTH
 ELEVATION ON SHEET PZ-02A. WHAT ARE THESE OBJECTS?
 83. MAY WANT TO CONSIDER THE ONE-WAY PAVEMENT STRIPING
 ALONG TRINITY PLACE AND TANGLEWOOD COURT TO BE DIRECTLY
 IN FRONT OF THE PARKING GARAGE EXIT. SUGGEST CONFIRMING
 WITH CITY ENGINEERING ABOUT PROPER PLACEMENT.
 84. A FEE OF $300 IS REQUIRED FOR ANY RESUBMITTAL
 BEYOND THE SECOND SUBMITTAL. PLEASE SUBMIT A CHECK FOR
 $300 WITH RESUBMITTAL.
  
 STAFF RESERVES THE RIGHT FOR FURTHER COMMENT AS THE
 REVIEW PROGRESSES.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved