| Date |
Text |
| 2019-11-01 13:28:38 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PROVIDE AUTO TURN DIAGRAM FOR LOADING AND UNLOADING |
| | TRUCKS FOR BOTH BUILDINGS. NOTE: THE JUSTIFICATION |
| | STATEMENT STATES AN AUTO TURN DIAGRAM HAS BEEN |
| | PROVIDED; HOWEVER, IT SEEMS TO BE MISSING FROM THE |
| | SUBMITTALS. |
| | |
| | 2.) AMEND THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT TO ADDRESS THE |
| | FOLLOWING: WILL THERE BE VALET PARKING ATTENDANT AT ALL |
| | TIMES? IF SO, THIS MUST BE NOTED IN THE STATEMENT, AS |
| | VALET PARKING MUST HAVE AN ATTENDANT; PER ZLDR |
| | S.94-207(B)(1), THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SHALL |
| | COMPLY WITH S.94-33, ARTICLE XII AND ARTICLE XVII. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE RESPONSES FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 3.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE CITY'S PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR |
| | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE |
| | COLLECTION SERVICES. ALSO, PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE |
| | FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED |
| | PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR |
| | OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE PROVISION OF THEIR |
| | SERVICES: AT&T, FPU AND FPL. NOTE: LETTERS MUST |
| | REFERENCE ALL APPLICABLE PARCELS OF THE PROJECT. |
| | [9/24/19 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 4.) A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA |
| | DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) IS REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED CHANGES ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY [6/11/19 AND |
| | 9/24/19 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) AS DISCUSSED AT THE MEETING HELD ON 11/1/2019 WITH |
| | STAFF AND THE AGENT, THE FAR CALCULATIONS MUST BE |
| | REVISED, TO ACCURATELY REFLECT FAR AND NON-FAR SPACES. |
| | |
| | 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA |
| | TABULAR AND/OR WAIVER CHART: THERE IS AN ASTERISK BY |
| | THE WORD "OTHER." PLEASE DEFINE; CORRECT THE |
| | RESIDENTIAL DENSITY TO 32.15 DU/AC (NOT 32 DU/AC, AS |
| | THIS IMPLIES THAT THE DENSITY IS 32 DU/AC WHICH IS NOT |
| | ACCURATE; CHECK PARKING CALCULATIONS, AS THEY SEEM TO |
| | BE INCORRECT; ALSO NOTE THAT THE CALCULATIONS FOR GUEST |
| | PARKING IS BASED ON THE OVERALL UNIT COUNT FOR THE |
| | PROJECT; SETBACK CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT - PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 3.) ARE THE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR |
| | IMPROVEMENT PLAN? PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF THE |
| | CORRESPONDANCE WITH FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF |
| | TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) STATING THAT THERE ARE NO ISSUES |
| | WITH THE PROPOSED CHANGES ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. |
| | |
| | 4.) IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO SEE THE EXTENT OF THE |
| | PROPOSED 8 FT. HIGH WALL ALONG THE REAR PROPERTY LINES |
| | OF BOTH PARCELS (EL FLAMINGO AND EL CORDOVA). PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS. [9/24/19 REVISED COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 5.) SETBACK DISTANCE OF ALL PROJECTIONS (I.E. |
| | BALCONIES) MUST BE DIMENSIONED IN THE SITE PLAN. NOT |
| | ALL PROJECTIONS (I.E. BALCONY) AND/OR SETBACK |
| | DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 6.) BICYCLE RACK DOES NOT MATCH BICYCLE RACK DETAIL ON |
| | SHEET SP-2. |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL (FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS): |
| | |
| | 1.) ON SHEET A-0CV, THE FAR AND UNIT CALCULATIONS ARE |
| | INCORRECT. ALSO, THE FAR SPACE CALCULATIONS WILL NEED |
| | TO BE ADJUSTED FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 2.) ARE THE ADJACENT BUILDINGS SCALED IN THE SITE |
| | SECTIONS (SHEET A-800)? IF NOT, PLEASE SCALE, AS THIS |
| | WAS REQUESTED IN PAST COMMENTS AND DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN |
| | STAFF AND THE APPLICANT. |
| | |
| | 5.) THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING |
| | SPACES WITHIN THE UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE REQUIRES |
| | APPROVAL FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION THAT THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT HAS |
| | REVIEWED AND AND HAS APPROVED THE LOCATIONS OF THE |
| | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. [6/11/19 AND 924/19 REPEAT |
| | COMMENT]. |
| | |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) AT MINIMUM, A NOTE SHALL BE ADDED TO ALL PLAN |
| | SHEETS WITH SIGNAGE INDICATING THAT ALL PROPOSED |
| | SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE SIGNAGE REGULATIONS OF |
| | THE UNDERLYING ZONING DISTRICT. [9/24/19 REVISED |
| | COMMENT] |
| | |
| | |
| | PHOTOMETRIC/LIGHTING PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) ANY SOURCE OF ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN A |
| | COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) DISTRICT SHALL NOT |
| | EXCEED ONE-FOOT CANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF |
| | THE SUCH DEVELOPMENT. THE PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH |
| | THIS REQUIREMENT. [9/24/19 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 2.) ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE |
| | GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE |
| | AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT |
| | RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE. [9/24/19 REPEAT |
| | COMMENT - ALTHOUGH A NOTE HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE |
| | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN, THE NOTE IS INCOMPLETE AND DOES NOT |
| | ADDRESS THE FULL EXTENT OF THE ZLDR REQUIREMENT.] |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * INCLUDE THE REVISION DATE TO ANY REVISED SHEETS TO |
| | KEEP TRACK OF ALL CHANGES MADE TO THE PROJECT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF |
| | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 |
| | INCHES X 11 INCHES, AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 |
| | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600.00). |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
