| Date |
Text |
| 2019-09-24 14:27:50 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) A SIGNED OWNER'S CONSENT FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER IS |
| | REQUIRED. THE SUBMITTED OWNER'S CONSENT DOES NOT |
| | ADDRESS BOTH CORPORATIONS. PLEASE ADDRESS. [6/11/2019 |
| | REVISED COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 2.) PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION LETTER (DATED |
| | 5/14/2019) TO ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING INCONSISTENCIES: |
| | THIS HISTORY SECTION ON PAGES 2 AND 3 DOES NOT SEEM TO |
| | REFLECT THE CORRECT OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT (OVERALL |
| | BUILDING HEIGHT IS NOT 69 FT. AS NOTED); UNIT MIX |
| | THROUGHOUT THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS MULTIFAMILY |
| | APARTMENTS AND TOWNHOUSES - JUSTIFICATION KEEPS |
| | REFERRING TO APARTMENTS. THIS MUST BE CLARIFIED. ALSO, |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY IF ALL 58 UNITS (INCLUDING THE |
| | TOWNHOUSES) WILL BE RENTALS; IN THE CPD AND SITE PLAN |
| | SECTION ON PAGES 7 AND 8: PLEASE ENSURE TOWNHOUSES ARE |
| | ALSO PROPOSED IN THE DEVELOPMENT (VERBIAGE SEEMS TO |
| | IMPLY ONLY APARTMENT UNITS); CHECK THE BREAKDOWN OF THE |
| | PROPOSED INTENSITY ON PAGE 8 (I.E. TABULATION FOR |
| | PARKING DOES NOT MATCH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE |
| | SITE PLAN); IN THE PARKING AND CIRCULATION SECTION ON |
| | PAGES 8 AND 9: PARKING NUMBERS DO NOT MATCH THE NUMBERS |
| | PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE CHECK CALCULATIONS. |
| | MORE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED FOR PARKING CIRCULATION |
| | AND HOW THAT FUNCTIONS WITH THE VALET PARKING. IT |
| | STATES IN THE LETTER THAT PARKING WILL BE OPEN TO THE |
| | NON-COMMERCIAL PUBLIC. WHAT ARE THE ASSURANCES THAT THE |
| | PROJECT WILL ALWAYS MAINTAIN SUFFICIENT PARKING FOR THE |
| | USES WITHIN AND HAVING THE ABILITY TO PROVIDE |
| | ADDITIONAL PARKING FOR OTHERS; PER ZLDR S.94-207(B)(1), |
| | THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| | S.94-35(C), S.94-33, ARTICLE XII AND ARTICLE XVII. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE RESPONSES FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE |
| | ZLDRS; IN THE COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) |
| | STANDARDS ON PAGES 11 AND 12, #8 MAKES REFERENCES TO AN |
| | INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. PLEASE |
| | CORRECT; THE WAIVERS SECTION ON PAGES 12-17 DOES NOT |
| | PROVIDE MUCH INFORMATION ON THE MITIGATION MEASURES FOR |
| | EACH WAIVER REQUEST. STAFF NEEDS TO KNOW WHAT MEASURES |
| | ARE BEING MADE TO REDUCE THE IMPACT(S) OF EACH WAIVER |
| | REQUEST. [NOTE: ALTHOUGH SOME OTHER COMMENTS MAY HAVE |
| | BEEN ADDRESS, STAFF WOULD NEED TO VERIFY THE |
| | INFORMATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANS. NO PLANS WERE |
| | SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE 8/2/2019 RESUBMITTAL.] |
| | |
| | 3.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW LETTER |
| | FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION IS |
| | REQUIRED. THE LETTER SHALL STATE THAT THE PROPOSED |
| | PROJECT MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OF THE |
| | COUNTY, PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE PROJECT FOR A PUBLIC |
| | HEARING. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 4.) PROVIDE WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE CITY'S PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL FOR |
| | WATER, SEWAGE TREATMENT, STORM DRAINAGE AND GARBAGE |
| | COLLECTION SERVICES. [NOTE: A LETTER FROM THE CITY'S |
| | PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED; HOWEVER, |
| | IT DOES NOT REFERENCE ALL PARCELS IN THE SCOPE OF THE |
| | PROJECT. PLEASE ADDRESS.] |
| | |
| | 5.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC UTILITIES |
| | CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH |
| | INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE |
| | PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES: AT&T, FPU AND FPL. [NOTE: |
| | THE LETTERS FROM AT&T, FPU AND FPL DOES NOT REFERENCE |
| | ALL PARCELS IN THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS.] |
| | |
| | 6.) A MASSING STUDY AS WELL AS CROSS SECTIONS OF THE |
| | PROPOSED PROJECT IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE |
| | IMMEDIATE/SURROUNDING AREAS/BUILDINGS IS REQUIRED. |
| | [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 7.) A PREDETERMINATION LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA |
| | DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) IS REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED CHANGES ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY. [6/11/2019 |
| | REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 8.) PLANS HAVE A LARGE AMOUNT OF DATA AND NEEDS TO BE |
| | MADE CLEAR BY AVOIDING ANY TEXT OVERLAP, ETC. |
| | [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT - NO PLANS PROVIDED WITH THIS |
| | RESUBMITTAL] |
| | |
| | 9.) PLEASE BE SURE TO INCLUDE THE REVISION DATE TO THE |
| | REVISED SHEETS TO KEEP TRACK OF ALL CHANGES TO THE |
| | PROJECT. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT - NO PLANS PROVIDED |
| | WITH THIS RESUBMITTAL] |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) PER ZLDR SECTION 94-145(11), THE FAR INCLUDES |
| | AIR-CONDITIONED OR FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE SPACES, |
| | ENCLOSED AREAS ON THE ROOFTOP SUCH AS BATHROOMS AND |
| | LOBBIES, STAIRS AND ELEVATOR AREAS, AND EXTERNAL |
| | UNENCLOSED CIRCULATION AREAS. THE FLOOR AREA RATIO |
| | (FAR) CALCULATION FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT APPEARS TO |
| | BE INCORRECT, AS CERTAIN SPACES (I.E. STAIRS, |
| | ELEVATORS, ETC.) HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE FAR (AS |
| | PROVIDED IN THE SITE DATA NOTES). THE FAR CANNOT EXCEED |
| | 1.5. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-243, TABLE VIII-3] |
| | [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 2.) WHAT IS THE SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE EXTENT OF THE |
| | UNDERGROUND GARAGE TO THE PROPERTY LINE? THE |
| | UNDERGROUND GARAGE SEEMS TO EXTEND CLOSER TO THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE THAN THE ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES FOR BOTH |
| | BUILDINGS AND NO DIMENSIONS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS |
| | SETBACK. THE UNDERGROUND STRUCTURE IS A PART OF THE |
| | BUILDING AND THEREFORE, THE SETBACKS SHALL BE MEASURED |
| | FROM THE EXTENT OF THE UNDERGROUND GARAGE (CLOSEST |
| | POINT) TO THE PROPERTY LINES. [6/11/2019 REPEAT |
| | COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 3.) PARKING/LOADING CONFIGURATION WHICH REQUIRE BACKING |
| | DIRECTLY ONTO A STREET FROM A PARKING OR LOADING SPACE |
| | FOR MORE THAN TWO (2) RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND ALL |
| | NON-RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL BE PROHIBITED IN ALL |
| | RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. THE |
| | LOADING AREA WITHIN THE EL FLAMINGO BUILDING SEEM TO |
| | REQUIRE VEHICLES TO BACK OUT INTO THESE PROHIBITED |
| | ZONES. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR S.94-485(J)(1)] [6/11/2019 |
| | REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 4.) ARE THE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR |
| | IMPROVEMENT PLAN? PLEASE MEET WITH THE CITY'S |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO COORDINATE AND |
| | ADDRESS. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 5.) STAFF IS REQUESTING THE APPLICANT ACCOMMODATE AN 8 |
| | FT. HIGH CONCRETE WALL ALONG THE REAR PROPERTY LINES OF |
| | BOTH PARCELS (EL FLAMINGO AND EL CORDOVA) TO HELP |
| | MITIGATE THE IMPACT OF THE PROJECT NEXT TO THE EXISTING |
| | RESIDENTIAL USES. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 6.) THE PROPOSED VALET BULLPEN SEEMS TO BE IN CONFLICT |
| | WITH THE DESIGNATED LANES FOR INTERNAL CIRCULATION. |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 7.) THE CIVIL PLAN SHOWS THE LOCATION OF WATER METERS |
| | NEAR THE ACCESS/EXIT POINTS OF THE BUILDINGS. PLEASE |
| | SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE WATER METERS IN THE PLAN AND |
| | PROVIDE A DETAIL. THE DETAIL IS REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT |
| | THE METER(S) WILL NOT IMPACT VISIBILITY AND APPROPRIATE |
| | SCREENING MEASURES ARE IMPLEMENTED. [6/11/2019 REPEAT |
| | COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 8.) HOW FAR DO THE BALCONIES EXTEND INTO THE |
| | SETBACK(S)? BALCONIES CANNOT ENCROACH MORE THAN 3 FT. |
| | INTO ANY SETBACK. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO |
| | DEMONSTRATE CONSISTENCY. [ZLDR S.94-305(B)(2)] |
| | [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 9.) ALL ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (I.E. HVAC |
| | EQUIPMENT) SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION/ILLUSTRATION TO HOW THE PROJECT |
| | WILL COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. [6/11/2019 REPEAT |
| | COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 10.) THE EXISTING USE WEST OF THE EL FLAMINGO BUILDING |
| | IS A PRIVATE SCHOOL (NOT AUTO SALES, AS SPECIFIED IN |
| | THE PLAN). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR ACCURACY. [6/11/2019 |
| | REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 11.) THE EXISTING USES WEST OF THE EL CORDOVA BUILDING |
| | SEEMS TO BE AN ART GALLERY AND RESTAURANT, AND PARKING |
| | LOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE GREENE SCHOOL. PLEASE ADDRESS |
| | FOR ACCURACY. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 12.) PLEASE LABEL ALL BUILDING SETBACKS IN THE PLAN. |
| | [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 13.) A STALL STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE |
| | PLAN. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 14.) BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO ZLDR |
| | S.94-485(9). PLEASE ADDRESS. A BICYCLE PARKING DETAIL |
| | IS ALSO REQUIRED IN THE PLAN. [6/11/2019 REPEAT |
| | COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 15.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA |
| | TABULAR: APPLICATION NUMBER: PB 1712C/Z19050024; |
| | RECALCULATION OF FAR REQUIRED; PROPOSED NUMBER OF |
| | DWELLING UNITS FOR THE PROJECT IS 58 (NOT 56); |
| | RECALCULATION OF REQUIRED AND PROPOSED PARKING |
| | REQUIRED. THE PARKING CALCULATIONS SEEM TO BE |
| | INCORRECT. ADDITIONALLY, THE PARKING COUNT DOES NOT |
| | MATCH THE PARKING CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS; PROPOSED PARKING SHOULD INCLUDE |
| | THE VALET PARKING CALCULATIONS (SINCE IT WILL NOT COUNT |
| | TOWARDS REQUIRED PARKING); PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING FOR |
| | THE PROJECT; PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE/PERVIOUS SURFACE |
| | AREA CALCULATION (REQUIRED AND PROPOSED) IN SQUARE |
| | FEET; RECALCULATE LOADING SPACE REQUIREMENT. SEEMS TO |
| | BE INCORRECT; CHECK THE NUMBER OF BUILDING STORIES |
| | PROVIDED IN THE TABULAR (TABLE INDICATE 7 STORIES. |
| | HOWEVER, PLANS SEEM TO SHOW 4 STORIES ABOVE GROUND). |
| | [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 16.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS TABULAR: PER ZLDR ARTICLE VIII, THE MINIMUM |
| | IMPERVIOUS SURFACE REQUIREMENT IS 85% (NOT 80%). THIS |
| | MAY IMPACT THE WAIVER REQUEST FOR THE IMPERVIOUS |
| | SURFACE REQUIREMENT; THE LANGUAGE IN THE NOTE AT THE |
| | BOTTOM OF THE TABLE IS NOT CONSISTENT. [6/11/2019 |
| | REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 17.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE |
| | SETBACKS/SEPARATIONS TABULAR: REQUIRED SETBACK |
| | CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT. THIS NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED |
| | AS IT WILL IMPACT THE WAIVER REQUESTS TO THE REQUIRED |
| | SETBACKS; IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A LEGEND TO |
| | IDENTIFY WHAT "N" AND "S" MEANS. [6/11/2019 REPEAT |
| | COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 18.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE WAIVER CHART: |
| | REQUIRED SETBACKS ARE INCORRECT AND WILL NEED TO BE |
| | CORRECTED AS IT WILL IMPACT THE WAIVERS REQUESTED; THE |
| | REQUIRED MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA IS 85% (NOT |
| | 80%). CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY. |
| | [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 19.) THE SITE DATA TABULAR INDICATES A TOTAL OF THREE |
| | (3) LOADING ZONES PROVIDED; HOWEVER, ONLY TWO (2) HAVE |
| | BEEN COUNTED IN THE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS. [6/11/2019 |
| | REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 20.) SHOW THE WIDTH OF THE ROADWAY FOR ALL PUBLIC |
| | STREETS IN THE PLAN (I.E. FLAMINGO, BARCELONA, CORDOVA, |
| | ETC.) [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL (FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS): |
| | |
| | 1.) PROVIDE PLANS ILLUSTRATING WHAT SPACES IN THE |
| | PROPOSED BUILDINGS ARE COUNTED IN THE FAR CALCULATIONS |
| | (I.E. USE SHADING/HATCHING, ETC.); ALSO PROVIDE THE |
| | DETAILED CALCULATIONS FOR EACH FLOOR. [6/11/2019 REPEAT |
| | COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 2.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE PARKING GARAGE |
| | PLANS (SHEETS A-1.07 AND A-1.08): PARKING CALCULATIONS |
| | SEEM TO BE INCORRECT; DIMENSION OUT THE STALLS, AISLES, |
| | WALKWAYS AND DRIVE AISLES; THERE SEEMS TO BE MORE |
| | COMPACT PARKING SPACES COUNTED THEN NOTED IN THE PLANS; |
| | DIMENSION OUT THE 2 FT. CURB OVERHANG; ARE WHEEL STOPS |
| | PROVIDED FOR THE STALLS? IF SO, PLEASE ILLUSTRATE; PER |
| | ZLDR S.94-485(O), ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE |
| | LOCATED SO THAT USERS ARE NOT COMPELLED TO WALK OR |
| | OTHERWISE MOVE BEHIND A PARKED VEHICLE. THE LOCATION OF |
| | THE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WITHIN THE |
| | UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE REQUIRES APPROVAL FROM THE |
| | BUILDING DEPARTMENT. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 3.) A DETAILED EXPLANATION IS NEEDED ON HOW THE PARKING |
| | GARAGE WILL FUNCTION FOR THE RESIDENTS AND |
| | NON-RESIDENTS OF THE PROJECT, SPECIFICALLY: THERE ARE A |
| | NUMBER OF TANDEM PARKING SPACES WHICH SEEM ONLY |
| | REASONABLE FOR THE OCCUPANTS OF THE BUILDING(S) TO |
| | UTILIZE. HOW WILL THESE SPACES BE RESERVED/IDENTIFIED |
| | FOR RESIDENTIAL PARKING ONLY, ETC.; PLEASE ENSURE THAT |
| | THERE IS SUFFICIENT PARKING FOR EACH USE (I.E. THEATRE, |
| | RETAIL, RESTAURANT) THAT WILL BE ACCESSIBLE TO THE |
| | PATRONS/GENERAL PUBLIC (I.E. EXCESS TO THE TANDEM |
| | PARKING). STAFF?S PARKING CALCULATION SEEM TO INDICATE |
| | THAT THERE IS INSUFFICIENT PARKING FOR THE COMMERCIAL |
| | USES. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 4.) WHAT IS THE OVERALL BUILDING HEIGHT FOR THE EL |
| | CORDOVA BUILDING? THERE SEEMS TO BE A DISCREPANCY |
| | WITHIN THE PLANS (I.E. IS IT 64.67 FT. PER SHEET A-2.01 |
| | OR IS IT 68.67 FT. PER SHEET A-3.01). PLEASE CLARIFY AS |
| | THE BUILDING HEIGHT MAY IMPACT THE REQUIRED SETBACKS |
| | FOR THE BUILDING. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 5.) WHAT IS THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED DECORATIVE |
| | FINIALS. DECORATIVE FEATURES MAY NOT EXCEED THE |
| | DISTRICT HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS BY 10%. [ZLDR S.94-306] |
| | [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 6.) PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY ARCHITECTURAL PLANS MOVING |
| | FORWARD TO A PUBLIC HEARING SHALL BE SIGNED, DATED AND |
| | SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | |
| | SIGNAGE COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) NO INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON SIGNAGE. PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW SIGNAGE WILL BE HANDLED FOR |
| | THE PROJECT (I.E. SIGNAGE PROGRAM, ETC.). [6/11/2019 |
| | REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | |
| | PHOTOMETRICS/LIGHTING PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) ANY SOURCE OF ILLUMINATION LOCATED WITHIN A |
| | COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) DISTRICT SHALL NOT |
| | EXCEED ONE-FOOT CANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES OF |
| | SUCH DEVELOPMENT. THE PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS |
| | REQUIREMENT. [ZLDR S.94-209(D)(8)] [6/11/2019 REPEAT |
| | COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 2.) THE PHOTOMETRICS HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED ALONG ALL |
| | BOUNDARIES (INSIDE AND OUT) OF THE PROJECT. PLEASE |
| | ADDRESS SO THAT STAFF CAN EVALUATE THE ILLUMINATION FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY WITH THE ZLDRS. [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | 3.) ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE |
| | GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE |
| | AWAY FROM ALL ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, ADJACENT |
| | RESIDENCES, OR PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE. PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | INFORMATION HOW THIS REQUIREMENT WILL BE ADDRESSED. |
| | [ZLDR S.94-309(A)] [6/11/2019 REPEAT COMMENT] |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF |
| | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 |
| | INCHES X 11 INCHES, AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 |
| | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600.00). |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
