| Date |
Text |
| 2019-12-20 11:23:46 | COMMENTS SHALL BE LABELED ?SATISFIED?, ?NOT SATISFIED?, |
| | ?PARTIALLY SATISFIED?, OR ?ONGOING? |
| | ANY NEW COMMENTS OR FURTHER EXPLANATION OF OLD COMMENTS |
| | SHALL BE BOLDED. |
| | |
| | 1. SATISFIED. |
| | 2. SATISFIED. |
| | 3. SATISFIED. |
| | 4. ONGOING. PER SECTION 94-54(A)(3), FORMAL SITE PLAN |
| | APPROVALS INVOLVING THE TDR PROGRAM SHALL BE APPROVED |
| | BY DAC AND THE CERTIFICATE OF TRANSFER SHALL BE |
| | OBTAINED PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THE SITE PLAN |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL SHALL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO |
| | EXPIRATION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. |
| | 5. SATISFIED. |
| | 6. SATISFIED. |
| | 7. SATISFIED. |
| | 8. SATISFIED. |
| | 9. ONGOING. IF VALET IS PROPOSING UTILIZING EXISTING OR |
| | PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING FOR VALET, THE APPLICANT |
| | SHALL PAY FOR THE USE OF THOSE OCCUPIED SPACES IN |
| | AMOUNT AS ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY AND IN LOCATIONS |
| | APPROVED BY THE CITY PARKING ADMINISTRATOR. THIS WOULD |
| | UTILIZE EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES AND NOT |
| | INTERFERE WITH SIDEWALK CONNECTIVITY. |
| | APPLICANT TO WORK WITH PARKING ADMINISTRATION ON |
| | PARKING SPACES. WILL NOT HOLD UP PROJECT SITE PLAN |
| | REVIEW (WILL BE CONDITION OF APPROVAL) |
| | 10. SATISFIED. |
| | 11. SATISFIED. |
| | 12. SATISFIED. |
| | 13. ONGOING. PALM TRAN HAS PERMITTED THE USE OF THE |
| | BROADSTONE BUS SHELTER, BUT IT WILL NEED A BACK |
| | INSTALLED. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE SOME |
| | ARCHITECTURAL RENDERINGS OF PROPOSED BACKING TO BE |
| | REVIEWED BY CITY STAFF, OR THE APPLICANT SHALL PAY IN |
| | LIEU. CAN BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR SITE PLAN. THE |
| | NEW BUS SHELTER WILL NEED TO BE IN OPERATION PRIOR TO |
| | CLOSING THE QUADRILLE SIDEWALK FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION. |
| | 14. SATISFIED. |
| | 15. SATISFIED. |
| | 16. SATISFIED. |
| | 17. SATISFIED. |
| | 18. SATISFIED. |
| | 19. ONGOING. IN ORDER TO COUNT TANDEM PARKING SPACES AS |
| | TWO SPACES, A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT SHALL BE REQUIRED |
| | FOR CONFIRMATION OF A VALET ATTENDANT IN CHARGE OF THE |
| | OPERATION OF THE PARKING FACILITY DURING ALL OPERATING |
| | HOURS. |
| | APPLICANT SHALL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH CITY LEGAL |
| | DEPARTMENT ON RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR VALET PARKING. |
| | THIS SHALL BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR SITE PLAN. |
| | 20. SATISFIED. |
| | 21. SATISFIED. |
| | 22. SATISFIED. |
| | 23. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE DATA ON BUILDING |
| | FOOTPRINT MAXIMUM IN SITE TABLE PER TABLE IV-50 |
| | 24. SATISFIED. |
| | 25. SATISFIED. |
| | 26. SATISFIED. |
| | 27. SATISFIED. |
| | 28. SATISFIED. |
| | 29. ONGOING. PLEASE PRESERVE THE EXISTING CEMENT CANOPY |
| | ON SITE, PER CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER. THIS |
| | COULD BE MAINTAINED WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE. |
| | CONVERSATION ONGOING WITH HISTORIC PRESERVATION |
| | DIVISION. SHALL BE A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 12/18/19: SEE NEW COMMENT # 104 |
| | 30. SATISFIED. |
| | 31. SATISFIED. |
| | 32. SATISFIED. |
| | 33. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL |
| | DETAIL OF ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT MATERIALS ON BUILDING |
| | ON ELEVATION PLANS. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL OF THE ALUMINUM FRAME |
| | ON THE PARKING GARAGE ? IS IT FULLY OPEN? ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL SCREENING BEHIND THE FRAME? EXAMPLE WOULD BE |
| | BENEFICIAL. PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXAMPLE OF THE BRICK |
| | ACCENT, FIXED DECORATIVE SHUTTERS, DECORATIVE BRACKETS, |
| | ETC. |
| | |
| | 12/18/19: SEE NEW COMMENT # 102 |
| | 34. SATISFIED. |
| | 35. SATISFIED. |
| | 36. SATISFIED. |
| | 37. SATISFIED. |
| | 38. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A HARDSCAPE PLAN WITH |
| | DETAILS OF PAVERS, SEATING, ETC. |
| | SOME HARDSCAPE DETAILS ARE NEEDED FOR DAC REVIEW OF |
| | PAVERS, SEATING, LANDSCAPE BED AREAS (ALONG DATURA |
| | STREET APPEARS TO HAVE BENCHES AROUND LANDSCAPE AREA), |
| | ETC. PLEASE PROVIDE WHAT YOU CAN; STAFF AND THE DAC |
| | MEMBERS REALIZE THESE MAY CHANGE WITH PERMITTING AND |
| | CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | 12/18/19: SEE NEW COMMENT #99 |
| | |
| | 39. SATISFIED. PLEASE SEE TABLE IV-7 FOR OPEN SPACE |
| | STANDARDS. CURRENTLY THE PASSAGEWAY PUBLIC OPEN TYPE IS |
| | REQUIRED. STAFF IS CURRENTLY REVIEWING THIS REQUIREMENT |
| | FOR APPLICABILITY FOR THIS SITE. |
| | CODE AMENDMENT UNDERWAY THAT WILL PERMIT UPGRADING |
| | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TO PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IN SOME CASES |
| | WITHIN THE DMP. |
| | |
| | 40. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADDRESS SPECIFIC PRIVATE AND |
| | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS PER TABLE IV-6 AND TABLE |
| | IV-7, INCLUDING TYPE OF OPEN SPACE (COURTYARD GARDEN, |
| | TERRACE, ETC.) FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AND SEE THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOR VEGETATED SPACE, SEATING, ETC. |
| | CODE AMENDMENT UNDERWAY THAT WILL PERMIT UPGRADING |
| | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE TO PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IN SOME CASES |
| | WITHIN THE DMP. SATISFIED. |
| | 41. SATISFIED. |
| | 42. SATISFIED. |
| | 43. SATISFIED. |
| | 44. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PER SECTION 93-113, BICYCLE |
| | PARKING FOR THE PUBLIC SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM |
| | OF ONE SPACE PER EVERY 100 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. THE |
| | POST AND LOOP RACK IS RECOMMENDED FOR THE PUBLIC ROW. |
| | PLEASE INDICATE EXACT BICYCLE RACK DETAIL ON PLANS. |
| | THE SITE PLAN SHEET SP-1 SHOWS A DIFFERENT TYPE OF |
| | BICYCLE RACK, PLEASE AMEND. |
| | 45. SATISFIED. |
| | 46. ONGOING. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED |
| | UTILITIES INCLUDING THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER, FDC |
| | CONNECTION, FPL TRANSFORMER, ETC. STAFF RECOMMENDS |
| | LOCATING THE UTILITIES WITHIN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT |
| | AND PROVIDING ACCESS TO UTILITY COMPANIES, TO KEEP OFF |
| | THE PUBLIC ROW. ALTERNATIVELY, UTILITIES CAN BE LOCATED |
| | ALONG THE ALLEY SIDE OF THE BUILDING. SUFFICIENT |
| | LANDSCAPE SCREENING IS REQUIRED WHEN UTILITIES ARE |
| | LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING AND WITHIN THE ROW. A |
| | MINIMUM OF 5 FOOT SIDEWALK CLEARANCE MUST BE MAINTAINED |
| | AT ALL LOCATIONS. |
| | SEE COMMENT 94. PLACEMENT OF UTILITIES SHALL BE ONGOING |
| | THROUGH PLANNING AND PERMIT PROCESS, SUBJECT TO REVIEW |
| | BY ZONING, LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AND BUILDING DEPARTMENTS. |
| | THIS SHALL BE A SITE PLAN CONDITION OF APPROVAL. |
| | 47. SATISFIED. |
| | 48. NOT SATISFIED. THE MINIMUM FOOTCANDLE, AS MEASURED |
| | AT THE BACK EDGE OF THE CURB AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE |
| | SIDEWALK IS 0.6 AND THE MAXIMUM IS 1.0 FOOTCANDLE. |
| | PLEASE ADJUST PHOTOMETRICS EXTENDING TO THE ROADWAY |
| | CENTERLINES AND PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED LIGHT |
| | FIXTURES AS NECESSARY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE |
| | ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO USE THE CITY APPROVED LIGHT |
| | FIXTURE. A SPECIFIC FIXTURE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL ROW. |
| | THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN OR |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN. THERE IS A LIGHT POLE PROPOSED WHERE A |
| | TREE IS PROPOSED ON THE CORNER OF DATURA AND QUADRILLE |
| | ON THE DATURA SIDE. PLEASE RELOCATE THE PROPOSED LIGHT |
| | POLE THAT IS IN THE CENTER OF THE SIDEWALK AT THE |
| | CORNER OF DATURA AND DIXIE. THE PLAN SHOWS A LIGHT POLE |
| | PROPOSED IN THE ON STREET PARKING ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. |
| | |
| | 12/18/19: SEE NEW COMMENT # 109 |
| | |
| | 49. SATISFIED. |
| | 50. SATISFIED. |
| | 51. ONGOING. APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. CONTACT SYBILLE |
| | WELTER AT [email protected] FOR MORE INFORMATION. |
| | 12/18/19: STAFF RECOMMENDS CONTACTING AIPP COORDINATOR |
| | AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO GET PROCESS MOVING. AIPP WILL |
| | HOLD UP C.O. IF REQUIREMENT NOT COMPLETED. |
| | 52. SATISFIED. |
| | |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS SEPTEMBER 9, 2019: |
| | 53. SATISFIED. |
| | 54. SATISFIED |
| | 55. SATISFIED |
| | 56. SATISFIED |
| | 57. SATISFIED |
| | 58. SATISFIED |
| | 59. SATISFIED. |
| | 60. SATISFIED |
| | 61. SATISFIED |
| | 62. SATISFIED |
| | 63. SATISFIED |
| | 64. SATISFIED |
| | 65. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE UPDATE THE ELEVATIONS |
| | TO INCLUDE LANDSCAPE PLANS. PLEASE INCLUDE ADDITIONAL |
| | ARCHITECTURAL MATERIAL LABELS INCLUDING GLASS, FAUX |
| | GLASS, STUCCO, ETC. |
| | PLEASE INCLUDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
| | |
| | 12/18/19: SEE NEW COMMENT # 102 |
| | 66. SATISFIED |
| | 67. SATISFIED |
| | 68. SATISFIED. |
| | 69. SATISFIED |
| | 70. SATISFIED |
| | 71. SATISFIED |
| | 72. SATISFIED |
| | 73. SATISFIED |
| | 74. SATISFIED |
| | 75. SATISFIED |
| | 76. SATISFIED. |
| | NEW COMMENTS NOVEMBER 5, 2019 |
| | 77. SATISFIED. |
| | 78. SATISFIED. |
| | 79. SATISFIED. |
| | 80. NOT SATISFIED: PLEASE CONSIDER THE ADDITION OF |
| | ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT ON THE STAIRWAYS TO ALLEVIATE |
| | THE ACTIVE USE LINER VARIANCE. |
| | 12/18/19: SIGNAGE CANNOT COUNT TOWARDS ARCHITECTURAL |
| | TREATMENT. PER DAC CONDITION, PLEASE INCLUDE ADDITIONAL |
| | ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT AS APPROPRIATE FOR THE FA?ADE |
| | TO BREAK UP THE BLANK WALL. |
| | 81. SATISFIED. |
| | 82. SATISFIED. |
| | 83. NOT SATISFIED: TRUNCATED DOME FOR ADA COMPLIANCE IS |
| | NOT APPARENT ON ANY PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY INTERSECTION |
| | CROSSWALK CONNECTIVITY |
| | |
| | 12/18/19: TRUNCATED DOMES ARE NOT ILLUSTRATED ON PLANS. |
| | PLEASE INCLUDE. |
| | |
| | 84. SATISFIED. |
| | 85. ONGOING. PLEASE ADJUST THE DROP OFF AREA ON DATURA |
| | STREET TO THE SIZE OF A PARALLEL PARKING SPACE (22 |
| | FEET) TO ACCOMMODATE THE REQUIRED SHADE TREE PER EVERY |
| | 30 FEET |
| | SEE NEW COMMENT # 98 |
| | |
| | 86. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD A SHADE TREE TO THE SOUTH |
| | SIDE OF DIXIE HIGHWAY NEAR THE DIXIE AND DATURA |
| | INTERSECTION (REMOVE HOLLY TREES PER LANDSCAPE COMMENTS |
| | AND REPLACE WITH OAK TREES) |
| | 12/18/19: COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 87. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE LOW WALL |
| | FROM THE BISTRO OUTDOOR AREA AS THIS AREA IS BEING |
| | CONSIDERED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE (IN TIME FOR DAC SUBMITTAL |
| | ? ON PLANS SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN 11/27) |
| | 12/18/19: WALL REMOVED, BUT STAFF HAS QUESTION ABOUT |
| | PLANTER BED. SEE NEW COMMENT # 100 |
| | |
| | 88. SATISFIED. |
| | 89. SATISFIED. |
| | 90. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THERE IS AN AREA ADJACENT TO |
| | THE INTERIOR BICYCLE RACKS THAT IS SHOWN DIFFERENTLY ON |
| | THE SITE PLAN COMPARED TO CIVIL PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY |
| | 12/18/19: BICYCLE RACK LOCATION STILL SHOWN IN OLD |
| | LOCATION ON SHEET SP-1. |
| | |
| | 91. SATISFIED. |
| | 92. ONGOING. PLEASE ADDRESS THE EXITING TRAFFIC POLE |
| | BOXES AT PROPERTY?S SOUTHEAST CORNER. PLEASE |
| | INCORPORATE INTO LANDSCAPE BED. |
| | |
| | 12/18/19: PLEASE ADDRESS PER DAC CONDITION OF APPROVAL. |
| | PLEASE LOOK AT ALL EXISTING BOXES AND PROVIDE DESIGNS |
| | TO INCORPORATE INTO A LANDSCAPE BED. THE PEDESTRIAN |
| | PATH OF TRAVEL CANNOT BE IMPEDED OR REDIRECTED AROUND |
| | BOXES. MAY NEED TO BE RELOCATED IF ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION |
| | CANNOT BE FOUND AND AGREED UPON BY STAFF. |
| | |
| | 93. C.O.A.: PLEASE INDICATE PROPOSED LOCATION OF |
| | BACKFLOW PREVENTER. PLEASE PLAN TO LOCATE WITHIN |
| | LANDSCAPE BED. |
| | 12/18/19: APPLICANT SHALL MAKE SURE THAT UTILITY IS |
| | SCREENED WHEN INSTALLED |
| | |
| | 94. C.O.A.: PLEASE ENSURE THAT GROUND MOUNTED FDC IS |
| | WITHIN A LANDSCAPE BED OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOUNT ON WALL. |
| | 12/18/19: ALL FDC SHALL BE SCREENED BY LANDSCAPE AND/OR |
| | PAINTED TO MATCH BUILDING FA?ADE. |
| | |
| | 95. ONGOING. PLEASE PROVIDE GROUND LEVEL 3D RENDERINGS |
| | FOR DAC APPLICATION (NO LATER THAN 11/27) ? INCLUDE |
| | LANDSCAPE AT PLANTING LEVEL. PLEASE INCLUDE DAY TIME |
| | RENDERING. |
| | ADDITIONAL RENDERINGS NEEDED: FOR EXAMPLE FOR DATURA |
| | STREET, QUADRILLE/ALLEY CORNER, FULL HEIGHT FROM GROUND |
| | OF DIXIE/ALLEY CORNER |
| | |
| | 96. ONGOING: PLEASE NOTE, NEXT SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL |
| | WILL HAVE A REQUIRED RESUBMITTAL FEE OF $300 |
| | (RESUBMITTAL FEE, CHARGED AFTER 1ST RESUBMITTAL) |
| | 12/18/19: RESUBMITTAL FEE OF $300 REQUIRED FOR NEXT |
| | RESUBMITTAL |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS DEC. 18, 2019 |
| | 97. PLEASE PROVIDE EXAMPLE OF RAISED DECORATIVE PANEL. |
| | PAINTED THE SAME COLOR, WITH A DEPTH OF ONLY 2? AT THE |
| | 8TH FLOOR, WOULD THIS FEATURE BE NOTICEABLE? PERHAPS AN |
| | ALTERNATIVE FEATURE SHOULD BE USED IF THIS WON?T BE |
| | APPARENT AT THE GROUND LEVEL. |
| | 98. STAFF RECOMMENDS A COMPROMISE TO THE PROPOSED |
| | CANOPY, TO PROVIDE SHADE TREES EVERY 35? TO ACCOMMODATE |
| | DAC RECOMMENDATION WITH REQUIREMENT FOR SHADE TREES. |
| | 99. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL ON THE BANDED FEATURE WITHIN |
| | THE PLAZA AT THE PROJECT?S SOUTHEAST CORNER. ARE THESE |
| | STEPS? |
| | 100. IS THERE A PLANTER BED PROPOSED AROUND THE BISTRO |
| | AREA? PLEASE PROVIDE THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF PLANTING |
| | SURROUNDING THE AREA. THE PATIO AREA CANNOT BE TREATED |
| | AS A PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AREA AS IT IS INCLUDED IN THE |
| | PUBLIC OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS. THE COVER SHEET |
| | ELEVATION STILL SHOWS A LOW WALL, PLEASE AMEND. |
| | 101. SIGNAGE CANNOT BE CONSIDERED ARCHITECTURAL |
| | TREATMENT. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE CHECK REQUIREMENT FOR |
| | VERTICAL SIGNS IN SECTION 94-110. SIGN BANDS CANNOT BE |
| | UTILIZED IF A VERTICAL SIGN IS USED. |
| | 102. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MATERIAL (IMAGES AND |
| | EXAMPLES) OF THE BRICK ACCENT, GARAGE SCREENING, FIXED |
| | DECORATIVE SHUTTER, |
| | 103. LANDSCAPE IS ILLUSTRATED ON THE PROPOSED RENDERING |
| | AT QUADRILLE/DATURA STREET ABOVE THE 3RD STORY. THE |
| | FLOOR PLANS SHOW THIS AREA TO BE UNPLANTED, BUT STAFF |
| | RECOMMENDS KEEPING THIS LANDSCAPE AREA TO ENHANCE THAT |
| | CORNER, ESPECIALLY IN LIEU OF ACTIVE USE LINER. |
| | 104. THERE CAN BE MODIFICATIONS TO THE DESIGN OF THE |
| | FIVE PARKING SPACES OFF THE ALLEY TO ACCOMMODATE THE |
| | CONCRETE COLUMNS FOR THE CONCRETE CANOPY (FOR EXAMPLE, |
| | A 3? WIDE LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH THE CONCRETE COLUMN |
| | BASE). |
| | 105. PLEASE INCLUDE A NOTE STATING THAT ALL ROOFTOP |
| | EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED TO THE HEIGHT OF THE |
| | EQUIPMENT AND/OR PAINTED TO MATCH THE BUILDING FA?ADE |
| | COLOR. PLEASE INCLUDE A NOTE ON THE ELEVATIONS THAT ALL |
| | WALL-MOUNTED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PAINTED TO |
| | MATCH THE BUILDING COLOR. THESE TYPES OF ITEMS COULD |
| | HOLD UP ZONING SIGN OFF AT TIME OF CO. |
| | 106. THERE APPEARS TO BE SOME DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE |
| | WIDTH OF PORTIONS OF THE WALL (FOR EXAMPLE, WIDTH |
| | BETWEEN WALL ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY TO FIRST WINDOW AND |
| | THE LINE OF VERTICAL WINDOWS CLOSEST TO THE ALLEY ALONG |
| | THE DIXIE ELEVATION ) WHEN COMPARING THE ELEVATIONS TO |
| | THE FLOOR PLAN. PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE PROPOSED |
| | ELEVATIONS FULLY ALIGN WITH PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS. |
| | 107. ALONG FACADES WHERE THERE ARE VERTICAL ALIGNMENT |
| | OF WINDOWS, THERE ARE SOME FLOORS WHERE THE WINDOWS ARE |
| | NOT CONTINUED. PLEASE REORIENTATE THE UNITS TO INCLUDE |
| | WINDOWS TO CONTINUE THE RHYTHM OF FENESTRATION, OR LOOK |
| | AT OPTIONS FOR FAUX WINDOWS TO PREVENT GAPS AND BLANK |
| | STUCCO PORTIONS. (EXAMPLES: DIXIE/DATURA CORNER- |
| | WINDOWS ON FLOORS 5-8, NOT ON FLOOR 3 AND 4. |
| | DIXIE/ALLEY (ALLEY SIDE)- WINDOWS ON FLOOR 5-8, NOT ON |
| | 3 AND 4. DIXIE FA?ADE ? NO WINDOWS FLOOR 3 AND 4). |
| | 108. PLEASE INCLUDE PROPOSED BICYCLE RACK WITH THE |
| | REFERENCE TO THE BUS SHELTER, AS REQUIRED BY PALM TRAN. |
| | 109. PLEASE SHIFT THE LIGHT POLE FROM THE CENTER OF THE |
| | PROPOSED PLAZA AT THE DATURA/DIXIE CORNER TO ALIGN WITH |
| | THE LIGHT POLES PROPOSED ALONG DATURA STREET. PLEASE |
| | SHIFT THE PROPOSED SOUTHERNMOST POLE ALONG QUADRILLE |
| | BOULEVARD FROM WITHIN THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO THE |
| | CROSSWALK. |
| | 110. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH LANDSCAPE PLANNER AND |
| | STORMWATER ON LOCATION OF EXFILTRATION TRENCH PIPES. |
| | PREVIOUS LANDSCAPE COMMENT FOR RELOCATING FROM UNDER |
| | TREES WAS NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
