| Date |
Text |
| 2019-06-11 20:02:49 | SEE REVIEW NO. 2 FOR BUILDING CODE COMMENTS RELATED TO |
| | THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL. THE COMMENTS ENTER UNDER THIS |
| | REVIEW WERE ENTERED UNDER THE WRONG DISCIPLINE BY THE |
| | PLANNER AND ARE NOT RELATED TO BUILDING CODE |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| 2019-06-10 17:00:44 | 1. THE PROJECT CANNOT PROCEED TO DOWNTOWN ACTION |
| | COMMITTEE UNTIL THE DETAILS OF THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT |
| | AND AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (JULY 19, |
| | 2004) ARE RESOLVED. PRELIMINARY REVIEW OF THE |
| | DOCUMENTS, SUBJECT TO LEGAL INTERPRETATION, IDENTIFY |
| | THE FOLLOWING: |
| | A. CONSTRUCTION OF FOR-SALE RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM |
| | UNITS ON ALL FLOORS ABOVE THE GROUND FLOOR OF THE |
| | PROJECT. |
| | B. ANY BUILDING CONSTRUCTED ON THE PROPERTY SHALL |
| | CONTAIN A FULL SERVICE PHARMACY ON THE GROUND FLOOR NO |
| | LESS THAN 1500 GROSS SF IN SIZE FOR A TERM OF 3 YEARS. |
| | C. DEVELOPER SHALL CONSTRUCT 100 PUBLIC PARKING SPACES |
| | TO BE LOCATED ON LOWER 2 FLOORS OF PROJECT, SEPARATED |
| | FROM THE PARKING SERVING OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PROJECT |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE INTENT OF THE APPLICANT IN REGARDS |
| | TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AND |
| | DEVELOPER AGREEMENT IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT UPON |
| | RESUBMITTAL. |
| | 2. THE PROJECT SHALL OBTAIN DAC APPROVAL OF A CLASS B |
| | LICENSE FOR A TYPE III GROUP HOMES . |
| | 3. FOR GROUP HOMES PERMITTED AS A CLASS B SPECIAL USE, |
| | A GROUP HOME FACILITY SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF |
| | 1,200 FEET FROM ANOTHER SUCH FACILITY. A VARIANCE FROM |
| | THIS PROVISION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS LOCATION. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FROM VARIANCE IN |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. |
| | 4. PER SECTION 94-54(A)(3), FORMAL SITE PLAN APPROVALS |
| | INVOLVING THE TDR PROGRAM SHALL BE APPROVED BY DAC AND |
| | THE CERTIFICATE OF TRANSFER SHALL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO |
| | THE EXPIRATION OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL. |
| | 5. PLEASE INCLUDE THE AMOUNT OF TDRS NEEDED FOR THE |
| | SITE (SQUARE FEET) AND THE AMOUNT OF SF GRANTED BY |
| | RIGHT IN THE PROJECT DATA TABLE. |
| | 6. PROJECT SHALL REQUIRE DAC SPECIAL REVIEW AND |
| | VARIANCE REVIEW. WITH SUBMITTAL FOR VARIANCE REVIEW, |
| | PLEASE RESPOND TO THE CRITERIA FOR VARIANCE REQUESTS |
| | FOR EACH REQUESTED VARIANCE, SEPARATELY, AS ESTABLISHED |
| | IN SECTION 94-38(D)(6). |
| | 7. PLEASE CONDENSE THE TWO SEPARATE SITE PLANS SHEET |
| | SP-1 AND SP.1 INTO ONE SITE PLAN. PLEASE SHOW GROUND |
| | FLOOR USES, WITH THE OUTLINE OF UPPER LEVELS, SETBACK |
| | DIMENSIONS, EXISTING CURB LINE, ALL APPLICABLE |
| | DIMENSIONS, AND OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION. PLEASE |
| | ILLUSTRATE ADJACENT BUILDING FRONTAGES AND CURB LINES |
| | ACROSS DIXIE HIGHWAY, DATURA STREET AND THE ALLEYWAY. |
| | 8. THE PROPOSED DROP-OFF DOES NOT MEET THE FOLLOWING |
| | REQUIREMENTS: |
| | A. DESIGNATED PASSENGER LOADING AND DROP-OFF AREAS |
| | SHALL OCCUR WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF THE BUILDING |
| | ENVELOPE AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY |
| | TRAFFIC ENGINEER. |
| | B. CURB CUTS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS SHALL BE NO MORE |
| | THAN 25 FEET, MEASURED AT THE CURB LINE. |
| | C. CAR QUEUING SHALL OCCUR INTERNAL TO THE LOT AND |
| | SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ON A |
| | PUBLIC SIDEWALK. THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE DROP OFF |
| | INTERFERES WITH PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION. |
| | D. FOR REFERENCE, ?TYPE A? PORTE COCHERES SHALL BE |
| | ALLOWED FOR HOTELS IN THIS DISTRICT. |
| | STAFF RECOMMENDS CONSIDERING UTILIZING THE EXISTING |
| | GARAGE ENTRANCE OFF OF THE ALLEYWAY FOR COVERED DROP |
| | OFF. |
| | 9. IF VALET IS PROPOSING UTILIZING EXISTING OR PROPOSED |
| | ON-STREET PARKING FOR VALET, THE APPLICANT SHALL PAY |
| | FOR THE USE OF THOSE OCCUPIED SPACES IN AMOUNT AS |
| | ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY AND IN LOCATIONS APPROVED BY |
| | THE CITY PARKING ADMINISTRATOR. THIS WOULD UTILIZE |
| | EXISTING ON-STREET PARKING SPACES AND NOT INTERFERE |
| | WITH SIDEWALK CONNECTIVITY. |
| | 10. PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPOSED DIRECTION OF THE |
| | ALLEY. MANY BUSINESSES ON CLEMATIS STREET USE THIS |
| | ALLEY FOR PARKING AND GARBAGE COLLECTION, WHICH WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED IN THE DESIGN INTENT. |
| | 11. THE APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH PUBLIC WORKS |
| | REGARDING THE EXISTING DUMPSTER THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN |
| | THE PROPERTY AND USED BY BUSINESSES ON THE 400 BLOCK OF |
| | CLEMATIS STREET. |
| | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE TURN MOVEMENTS FOR ENTERING AND |
| | EXITING THE PARKING GARAGE TO ENSURE THE TURNS CAN WORK |
| | SAFELY. |
| | 13. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT PALM TRAN FOR PROPOSAL TO |
| | REMOVE/RELOCATE OF BUS SHELTER. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE |
| | USE OF THE EXISTING SHELTER LOCATED SOUTH OF THE |
| | PROPERTY AT 499 EVERNIA STREET (BROADSTONE). IF PALM |
| | TRAN DOES NOT PERMIT RELOCATION OF BUS STOP TO THIS |
| | LOCATION, THE APPLICANT SHALL REPLACE WITH A NEW BUS |
| | SHELTER, MEETING PALM TRAN STANDARDS. |
| | 14. APPLICANT SHALL REQUIRE FDOT APPROVAL FOR ANY WORK |
| | DONE ON QUADRILLE BOULEVARD. |
| | 15. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE CITY ENGINEERING |
| | DEPARTMENT ON THE PROPOSED DATURA STREET REDESIGN THAT |
| | IS CURRENTLY IN INITIAL DESIGN PHASE. |
| | 16. THE PROPOSED UNDER COVER AREA ON THE GROUND FLOOR |
| | DOES NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OF COLONNADE FOR THE DMP |
| | AREA AND DOES NOT FIT INTO THE CONTEXT OF THE DIRECT |
| | AREA. STAFF RECOMMENDS ELIMINATION OF THE COLONNADE AS |
| | IT DOES NOT ACTIVATE THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT AND |
| | DOES NOT IMPROVE ACTIVE USE OR TRANSPARENCY ALONG THE |
| | SIDEWALK. |
| | 17. ARE ALL USES ON THE GROUND FLOOR PRIVATE? PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY WHICH USES ARE OPEN TO PUBLIC, IF ANY OR |
| | ACCESSIBLE FROM THE STREET. |
| | 18. STAFF HAS CONCERN WITH THE SETBACK OF THE GROUND |
| | FLOOR USES ON THE WEST SIDE OF DATURA STREET, AS IT |
| | DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR ACTIVATED PEDESTRIAN SPACE AND |
| | INTERACTION WITH THE STREET AS OTHER RESIDENTIAL |
| | BUILDINGS DO WITHIN THE DMP AREA. |
| | 19. IN ORDER TO COUNT TANDEM PARKING SPACES AS TWO |
| | SPACES, A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR |
| | CONFIRMATION OF A VALET ATTENDANT IN CHARGE OF THE |
| | OPERATION OF THE PARKING FACILITY DURING ALL OPERATING |
| | HOURS. |
| | 20. PLEASE NOTE, THE PARKING REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | INDEPENDENT LIVING UNITS MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR |
| | RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN THE DMP WHICH IS MINIMUM 1 PER |
| | UNIT PLUS 1 PER 20 UNITS FOR GUEST PARKING, MAXIMUM 2 |
| | PER UNIT PLUS 1 PER 20 UNITS FOR GUEST PARKING. PLEASE |
| | SEPARATE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING |
| | FROM ASSISTED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE AND DETERMINE |
| | NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUESTED FOR THE WAIVER. THE |
| | WAIVER CANNOT EXCEED 50% OF THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR |
| | THE PROJECT. |
| | 21. PER SECTION 94-481(F): |
| | A. TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR THE SENIOR HOUSING PARKING |
| | WAIVER, CRITERIA MUST BE MET. PLEASE RESPOND TO THE |
| | CRITERIA. |
| | B. IF THE PARKING WAIVER IS GRANTED, A RESTRICTIVE |
| | COVENANT RESTRICTING THE USE OF THE PROPERTY TO SERVING |
| | PERSONS WHO ARE 55 YEARS AND OLDER FOR A PERIOD OF NOT |
| | LESS THAN 15 YEARS SHALL BE EXECUTED AND RECORDED. |
| | 22. PLEASE SUBMIT PLANS ILLUSTRATING THE TRANSPARENCY |
| | REQUIREMENTS PER TABLE IV-50: BUILDING REQUIREMENTS- |
| | CWD 10-12 STORY RECEIVING SITES (SECTION 94-134). |
| | 23. PLEASE PROVIDE DATA ON BUILDING FOOTPRINT MAXIMUM |
| | IN SITE TABLE PER TABLE IV-50. |
| | 24. THE PROJECT DOES NOT MEET ACTIVE USE LINER |
| | REQUIREMENTS ALONG QUADRILLE BOULEVARD AND DATURA |
| | STREET. PLEASE ADDRESS VARIANCE CRITERIA IN THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. |
| | 25. CONSIDERING THE PROPOSED VARIANCES, PLEASE EVALUATE |
| | THE USE OF ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL MATERIALS, CONSIDER |
| | THE PROPORTIONS OF THE BUILDING, ESPECIALLY REFINING |
| | THE PARKING GARAGE DESIGN. PLEASE TAKE INTO |
| | CONSIDERATION THE REDESIGN BASED ON REMOVAL OF THE |
| | ARCADE PORTIONS (SEE COMMENT #16). |
| | 26. THE SUBMITTED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES THAT |
| | THE PROPOSED PLAN ADHERES TO ALL SETBACK REQUIREMENTS; |
| | HOWEVER THE REQUIRED PARKING SETBACK FOR 2 AND 3 STORY |
| | ALONG DATURA STREET IS NOT MET. PLEASE ADJUST TO MEET |
| | SETBACK REQUIREMENT. |
| | 27. FOR SETBACK MEASUREMENTS, WHERE A CURB LOCATION |
| | VARIES ALONG A PROPERTY, THE BACK OF CURB SHALL BE |
| | DEFINED AS THE PREDOMINANT BACK OF CURB LINE FURTHEST |
| | FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE ROAD. PLEASE ADJUST SETBACK |
| | MEASUREMENTS ALONG SOUTH DIXIE HIGHWAY TO REFLECT THIS. |
| | 28. THE PROPOSED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE USE ALONG QUADRILLE |
| | BOULEVARD IS NOT AN EFFECTIVE USE OF OPEN SPACE. STAFF |
| | RECOMMENDS SHIFTING THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT TO THE WEST |
| | TO BETTER ALIGN WITH THE FOOTPRINT OF THE ADJACENT |
| | BROADSTONE BUILDING AND UTILIZE MORE OPEN SPACE ALONG |
| | DIXIE HIGHWAY, TO INCREASE PEDESTRIAN ACTIVE SPACE. |
| | 29. PLEASE PRESERVE THE EXISTING CEMENT CANOPY ON SITE, |
| | PER CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER. THIS COULD BE |
| | MAINTAINED WITHIN THE OPEN SPACE. |
| | 30. THE PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE ALONG DATURA STREET |
| | CANNOT COUNT AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, PER THE DEFINITION |
| | OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE. STAFF RECOMMENDS UTILIZING SOME |
| | SPACE ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY. |
| | 31. THE PROPOSED CANOPY EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL |
| | PROJECTION FOR CANOPIES. PER SECTION TABLE IV-5, THE |
| | MAXIMUM PROJECTION FOR CANOPIES IS 20 FEET WITH A 12 |
| | FOOT MAXIMUM ENCROACHMENT INTO THE ROW. PLEASE INDICATE |
| | THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE CANOPY, THE MINIMUM HEIGHT |
| | FROM SIDEWALK GRADE IS 10 FEET. |
| | 32. THE QUADRILLE BOULEVARD ELEVATION DOES NOT |
| | ILLUSTRATE THE EXTENT OF THE PROPOSED CANOPY. PLEASE |
| | ADD TO SHOW ADJUSTED CANOPY SIZE PER COMMENT #31. |
| | 33. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAIL OF ARCHITECTURAL |
| | TREATMENT MATERIALS ON BUILDING ON ELEVATION PLANS. |
| | 34. TREE GRATES ARE NOT NECESSARY WHERE THERE IS |
| | SUFFICIENT SIDEWALK WIDTH ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED |
| | TREE. PLEASE REMOVE TREE GRATES AND USE PLANTING BEDS |
| | (CONSIDER 6X4 BEDS) WHERE GRATES ARE PROPOSED. |
| | 35. PLEASE PROVIDE OAK TREES OR SIMILAR SHADE TREES AT |
| | CORNER OF QUADRILLE AND DATURA AND DIXIE AND DATURA AS |
| | THIS IS WHERE PEDESTRIANS WAIT FOR STREET CROSSINGS. |
| | 36. PLEASE CHECK CRITERIA FOR FDOT SIGHT TRIANGLE FOR |
| | PROPOSED TREES AT STREET CORNERS. |
| | 37. THE PROPOSED EXFILTRATION TRENCH RUNS WHERE TREES |
| | ARE PROPOSED. PLEASE REVIEW AND ADJUST AS NECESSARY. |
| | 38. PLEASE PROVIDE A HARDSCAPE PLAN WITH DETAILS OF |
| | PAVERS, SEATING, ETC. |
| | 39. PLEASE SEE TABLE IV-7 FOR OPEN SPACE STANDARDS. |
| | CURRENTLY THE PASSAGEWAY PUBLIC OPEN TYPEIS REQUIRED. |
| | STAFF IS CURRENTLY REVIEWING THIS REQUIREMENT FOR |
| | APPLICABILITY FOR THIS SITE. |
| | 40. PLEASE ADDRESS SPECIFIC PRIVATE AND PUBLIC OPEN |
| | SPACE REQUIREMENTS PER TABLE IV-6 AND TABLE IV-7, |
| | INCLUDING TYPE OF OPEN SPACE (COURTYARD GARDEN, |
| | TERRACE, ETC.) FOR EACH OPEN SPACE AND SEE THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOR VEGETATED SPACE, SEATING, ETC. |
| | 41. PLEASE PROVIDE ILLUSTRATIONS SHOWING PLANAR BREAK |
| | REQUIREMENTS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE IV-4: FA?ADE |
| | ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS. |
| | 42. PER SECTION 94-111: PARKING AND LOADING |
| | REQUIREMENTS, A MINIMUM THREE-FOOT BACK UP AREA SHALL |
| | BE PROVIDED AT THE TERMINUS OF ANY DEAD-END DRIVE AISLE |
| | TO ALLOW FOR VEHICLES TO SAFELY PULL OUT OF THE END |
| | PARKING SPACES. IN ADDITION, THE EQUIVALENT OF ONE |
| | PARKING SPACE AT THE TERMINUS OF A DEAD-END AISLE SHALL |
| | BE STRIPED AS DEDICATED PULL-IN AREA FOR TURNING |
| | AROUND. |
| | 43. PLEASE PROVIDE TYPICAL PARKING SPACE AND AISLE |
| | WIDTH DIMENSIONS ON EACH FLOOR. PLEASE NOTE, IN THOSE |
| | CASES WHERE THE SIDE OF ANY STALL IS ADJACENT TO A WALL |
| | OR COLUMN, THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE INCREASED BY A |
| | MINIMUM OF ONE FOOT. WHERE THERE IS AN OBSTRUCTION ON |
| | BOTH SIDES OF THE STALL THE STALL WIDTHS SHALL BE |
| | INCREASE BY A MINIMUM OF TWO FEET. PLEASE DIMENSION |
| | THIS ADDITIONAL ONE/TWO FOOT. |
| | 44. PER SECTION 94-111, ONE BICYCLE PARKING SPACE SHALL |
| | BE PROVIDED PER EVERY 15 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, IN A |
| | SECURE AREA, COVERED FROM THE ELEMENTS. |
| | 45. PER SECTION 93-113, BICYCLE PARKING FOR THE PUBLIC |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A MINIMUM OF ONE SPACE PER EVERY |
| | 100 FEET OF STREET FRONTAGE. THE POST AND LOOP RACK IS |
| | RECOMMENDED FOR THE PUBLIC ROW. PLEASE INDICATE EXACT |
| | BICYCLE RACK DETAIL ON PLANS. |
| | 46. PLEASE INCLUDE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS OF BICYCLE |
| | RACKS ON THE SITE PLAN. THE POLE SHALL BE NO FURTHER |
| | THAN THREE FEET FROM THE EDGE OF CURB MAINTAINING A |
| | MINIMUM FIVE FOOT CLEARANCE FOR PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION. |
| | 47. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES |
| | INCLUDING THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER, FDC CONNECTION, FPL |
| | TRANSFORMER, ETC. STAFF RECOMMENDS LOCATING THE |
| | UTILITIES WITHIN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND PROVIDING |
| | ACCESS TO UTILITY COMPANIES, TO KEEP OFF THE PUBLIC |
| | ROW. ALTERNATIVELY, UTILITIES CAN BE LOCATED ALONG THE |
| | ALLEY SIDE OF THE BUILDING. SUFFICIENT LANDSCAPE |
| | SCREENING IS REQUIRED WHEN UTILITIES ARE LOCATED |
| | OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING AND WITHIN THE ROW. A MINIMUM |
| | OF 5 FOOT SIDEWALK CLEARANCE MUST BE MAINTAINED AT ALL |
| | LOCATIONS. |
| | 48. THE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS SHOW PARKING SPACES |
| | THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ADJUST |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | 49. THE MINIMUM FOOTCANDLE, AS MEASURED AT THE BACK |
| | EDGE OF THE CURB AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE SIDEWALK IS 0.6 |
| | AND THE MAXIMUM IS 1.0 FOOTCANDLE. PLEASE ADJUST |
| | PHOTOMETRICS EXTENDING TO THE ROADWAY CENTERLINES AND |
| | PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURES AS |
| | NECESSARY. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH THE ENGINEERING |
| | DEPARTMENT TO USE THE CITY APPROVED LIGHT FIXTURE. A |
| | SPECIFIC FIXTURE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL ROW. |
| | 50. PLEASE PROVIDE PROPOSED PHOTOMETRICS FOR THE |
| | PARKING GARAGE, MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 86-294. |
| | 51. EACH ENTRANCE SHOULD HAVE ITS OWN ADDRESS WHICH IS |
| | USED BY 911 EMERGENCY SERVICES. THE EXISTING PRIMARY |
| | ADDRESS WHICH WILL BE RETIRED WHEN THE PROJECT IS |
| | COMPLETE. THERE WILL SEPARATE ADDRESSES FOR THE MAIN |
| | LOBBY AND FOR THE MEMORY CARE LOBBY. THE OWNER CAN PICK |
| | WHICH WILL BE THE PRIMARY ADDRESS SEEN ON PAPA. CONTACT |
| | MICHAEL ORIO AT [email protected] WITH ANY QUESTIONS. |
| | 52. APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER AT |
| | [email protected] FOR MORE INFORMATION. |
| | 53. PLEASE BE ADVISED, APPLICANTS ARE NOW REQUIRED TO |
| | PRESENT THEIR CASE TO THE BOARDS INCLUDING DAC AND |
| | INCLUDE RESPONSES TO CRITERIA FOR SPECIAL REVIEW, |
| | VARIANCES, ETC. STAFF WILL PROVIDE COMMENT FOR ITEMS |
| | NOT ADDRESSED BY THE APPLICANT. PRESENTATIONS ARE TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED TO STAFF THE MONDAY PRIOR TO THE DAC MEETING |
| | BY MEANS OF ELECTRONIC OR FLASH DRIVE DELIVERY. |
| | |
| | |
| | LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-822-1426 |
| |
Print |
