| Date |
Text |
| 2019-09-18 17:22:08 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 |
| | PROJECT: 575 ROSEMARY (MACY?S) Z19050019 |
| | SEPTEMBER 18, 2019 |
| | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND |
| | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS TO THE TREE |
| | DISPOSITION PLAN: |
| | ? SATISFIED. THE WASHINGTONIA PALMS ARE CATEGORY 4, |
| | CANOPY VALUE IS 50 SQ FT. |
| | ? PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE |
| | OF MITIGATION FOR ALL TREES AND PALMS PROPOSED TO BE |
| | REMOVED. |
| | OAKS ON GARDENIA NEED TO BE INCLUDED, AS THEY ARE IN |
| | THE AREA OF STREETSCAPE REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED WITH |
| | THIS SITE. |
| | ? SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE MITIGATION VALUES BY CATEGORY |
| | FOR THE PROPOSED STREETSCAPE TREES AND PALMS. |
| | |
| | 2. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. THE STREETSCAPE CAN BE IMPROVED |
| | TO ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE CODE SECTION 94-113. |
| | THE COCONUT PALMS AND DATE PALMS MAY BE USED, BUT NOT |
| | AS COUNTING TOWARD THE TREE REQUIREMENT AT THE MAXIMUM |
| | 30 FOOT SPACING. THERE ARE ALSO CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED |
| | AWNING AND STREET TREES. |
| | PLANNING STAFF HAS NOT REVIEWED OR APPROVED THE |
| | STREETSCAPE PLANS FOR THE AREAS ADJACENT TO THIS |
| | PROJECT. PROVIDE THE 100% PLANS FOR REVIEW. |
| | A COURTESY REVIEW WAS CONDUCTED ON THE PLAN COPY |
| | DELIVERED BY THE APPLICANT. A FORMAL SUBMITTAL WITH THE |
| | PLANS INCORPORATED INTO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THIS |
| | SITE IS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL. AREAS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL |
| | MUST BE SHOWN ON ROSEMARY SECTION. |
| | |
| | 3. SATISFIED. REQUIRED STREET TREES MUST MEET THE 20 |
| | FOOT HEIGHT REQUIREMENT AT INSTALLATION. LIST OVERALL |
| | HEIGHT ON PLANT LIST. |
| | PLANNING STAFF HAS NOT REVIEWED OR APPROVED THE |
| | STREETSCAPE PLANS FOR THE AREAS ADJACENT TO THIS |
| | PROJECT. PROVIDE THE 100% PLANS FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 4. SATISFIED. SECTION 94-448 (D)(3) REQUIRES NATIVE |
| | TREES IN GOOD CONDITION TO BE PRESERVED ON SITE OR |
| | RELOCATED. SUBMIT THE REASON THE TWO EXISTING LIVE OAK |
| | TREES CANNOT BE RELOCATED OR USED IN THE PROPOSED |
| | STREETSCAPE. |
| | PLANNING STAFF HAS NOT REVIEWED OR APPROVED THE |
| | STREETSCAPE PLANS FOR THE AREAS ADJACENT TO THIS |
| | PROJECT. PROVIDE THE 100% PLANS FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | |
| | 5. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE |
| | AREAS SHOWN ON SHEET A0.05 MUST BE BROKEN DOWN TO SHOW |
| | THE REQUIRED VEGETATED AREA AND ANY TREE CANOPY |
| | REQUIREMENT FOR EACH AREA. PASSAGEWAY LESS THAN 7500 SQ |
| | FT REQUIRE ZERO ANY OF EITHER. TERRACE REQUIRES 20% |
| | MINIMUM VEGETATED AREA. ROOFTOP GARDEN REQUIRES 30% |
| | VEGETATED AREA AND 20% TREE CANOPY. TREE CANOPY VALUES |
| | CAN BE FOUND IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8. |
| | AREAS SHOWN MUST MEET THE DEFINITION FOR THE OPEN SPACE |
| | TYPE IF THEY ARE TO BE COUNTED TOWARD REQUIRED OPEN |
| | SPACE. ZONING COMMENTS WILL INCLUDE DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 6. SATISFIED. AREA LISTED AS POOL DECK ON LEVEL 3 IS |
| | NOT AN OPEN SPACE TYPE. CLASSIFY AS A PERMITTED PRIVATE |
| | OPEN SPACE TYPE (ROOFTOP GARDEN?) AND SHOW |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 7. SATISFIED. ADD COLUMNS FOR NATIVE PLANTS AND DROUGHT |
| | TOLERANCE/ WATER USAGE TO THE PLANT LIST SO THAT |
| | FLORIDA FRIENDLY POINTS CAN BE SUBSTANTIATED. |
| | |
| | 8. SATISFIED. TRA IS MISSING FROM THE PLANT LIST. |
| | |
| | 9. SATISFIED. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ANY ROOT BARRIERS |
| | REQUIRED TO PROTECT UTILITY LINES. |
| | BIOBARRIER IS NOT ACCEPTABLE AS ROOT BARRIER, MUST BE |
| | HARD PLASTIC ROOT BARRIER DEEP ROOT OR SIMILAR. |
| | SOME ROOT BARRIER LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE NOT APPROPRIATE, |
| | AS THEY SEPARATE THE ROOTS FROM REQUIRED SOIL AREAS. |
| | PROVIDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL. |
| | |
| | 10. SATISFIED. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-445 L. |
| | PLANT SPECIES. A MINIMUM OF 60 PERCENT OF PLANT |
| | MATERIAL ADDED SHALL BE FLORIDA NATIVE OR DROUGHT |
| | TOLERANT SPECIES SELECTED FROM THE CITY LIST OR THE |
| | LIST OF SPECIES IN THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF SOUTH |
| | FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WATERWISE SOUTH |
| | FLORIDA LANDSCAPES. |
| | PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGE OF DROUGHT TOLERANT AND |
| | NATIVE SPECIES ADDED BASED ON THE PROPOSED PLANT LIST. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/16/19: |
| | |
| | 11. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE 50 POINTS REQUIRED FROM THE |
| | FLORIDA FRIENDLY DESIGN OPTIONS FOUND IN SECTION |
| | 94-443(G). |
| | |
| | 12. SATISFIED. PER RESOLUTION NO. 304-18 UNDER 2. |
| | CITYPLACE CENTER B., FOUR FICUS TREES WITHIN THE PAVED |
| | AREAS NEED TO BE SHOWN WITH SUSPENDED PAVEMENT SYSTEM |
| | FOR THE ROOT ZONES OF THE TREES. PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS |
| | AND DETAIL FOR THE SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL |
| | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON |
| | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | |
| |
Print |
