| Date |
Text |
| 2020-08-02 21:52:06 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE FROM THE REVIEW OF THE |
| | 4/21/2020 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE: |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1. THE TWO CATCH BASINS AT THE WEST END OF THE SIDE BY |
| | SIDE EXFILTRATION TRENCH APPEAR TO FALL WITHIN THE AREA |
| | LABELED "LUGGAGE 100 SF" ON THE CONTEXT SITE PLAN |
| | SHEET. |
| | |
| | 2. PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS FROM EXISTING BACK OF CURB TO |
| | BUILDING FACE FOR WEST, SOUTH AND EAST SIDES OF |
| | BUILDING AND FROM NORTH R/W OF ALLEY TO BUILDING FACE |
| | FOR THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. DIMENSION LANDSCAPE |
| | AREAS, SIDEWALK WIDTHS, PAVEMENT WIDTHS, PROPERTY |
| | LINES, CURBS, ETC. AND SHOW HOW EACH SLOPES. |
| | |
| | 3. WHEN ESTIMATING THE CAPACITY OF THE SIDE BY SIDE |
| | EXFILTRATION TRENCHES, FLOW OUT OF THE COMMON SIDE |
| | SHOULD NOT BE BE INCLUDED. |
| | |
| | 4. INSUFFICIENT FLOW ARROWS PROVIDED TO SHOW HOW THE |
| | ALLEY IS TO DRAIN. IT APPEARS THE STORMWATER RUNOFF |
| | FROM THE ALLEY IS BEING ROUTED THROUGH THE ONSITE |
| | DRAINAGE SYSTEM. THIS MAY NEED TO BE MEMORALIZED WITH A |
| | DRAINAGE EASEMENT OR OTHER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. |
| | |
| | 5. NO PIPE INVERTS WERE PROVIDED TO CHECK FOR CONFLICTS |
| | BETWEEN UTILITIES. |
| | |
| | 6. LIST THE TOP AND BOTTOM ELEVATIONS FOR THE |
| | EXFILTRATION TRENCH ON THE EXFILTRATION DETAIL. THIS |
| | CAN BE PROVIDED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 7. SHOW AND LABEL MILL AND RESURFACE LIMITS ON THE |
| | CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN. CURB RAMPS NEXT TO AREAS |
| | THAT ARE RESURFACED ARE TO BE RECONSTRUCTED TO CURRENT |
| | ADA STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 8. THERE APPEARS TO BE A TRENCH DRAIN ACROSS THE |
| | DRIVEWAY TO GARDENIA ST. AND THE DRIVEWAY IS SHOWN |
| | SLOPED TO DRAIN TOWARD THE INTERIOR CATCH BASIN. |
| | |
| | 9. THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT |
| | APPEAR TO MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE CONCEPTUAL |
| | ENGINEERING PLAN. |
| |
Print |
