| Date |
Text |
| 2019-05-07 16:24:14 | 1. THE SUBMITTED SURVEY IS INACCURATE. PLEASE SUBMIT AN |
| | UPDATED SURVEY FROM WITHIN ONE YEAR OF SUBMITTAL. |
| | 2. PLEASE SUBMIT AN EXISTING CONDITION AND PROPOSED |
| | DEMOLITION SITE PLAN. |
| | 3. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE CURRENT PD BOUNDARIES ON ALL |
| | PLANS. |
| | 4. UPDATE PARKING BASED ON SURVEY AND CURRENT |
| | INFORMATION, AND INCLUDE PARKING LOT THAT WILL BE ADDED |
| | WITH PD EXPANSION. |
| | 5. THE EXPANSION OF PDS IS NOT CURRENTLY PERMITTED |
| | WITHIN DMP AREA. THE PROPERTY AT THE CORNER OF OLIVE |
| | AVENUE AND 8TH STREET IS CURRENTLY ZONED LD-5 AND NOT |
| | WITHIN THE PD BOUNDARY. THE APPLICANT SHALL APPLY FOR A |
| | CODE AMENDMENT. STAFF WILL FOLLOW UP WITH APPLICANT ON |
| | THE CODE LANGUAGE THAT MAY BE PERMITTED. |
| | 6. AS PART OF THE MAJOR PD AMENDMENT, PLEASE PROVIDE A |
| | FULL LANDSCAPE PLAN COMBINING PAST MINOR AMENDMENT |
| | APPROVALS (SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENT). LANDSCAPE MAY NEED |
| | TO BE ADJUSTED TO MEET PAST APPROVALS. |
| | 7. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO PRESERVE THE EXISTING CANOPY |
| | TREE LOCATED NORTH OF THE PROPOSED WESTERN BASKETBALL |
| | COURT. CAN THE PROPOSED BASKETBALL COURTS BE SHIFTED |
| | SOUTH TO PRESERVE THIS TREE? PLEASE RELOCATE TREE IF |
| | IT?S NECESSARY TO MOVE. |
| | 8. THE EXISTING SURFACE PARKING LOT AT THE PROJECTS |
| | NORTHWEST CORNER SHALL BE STRIPED AND LANDSCAPED TO |
| | MEET CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE ON |
| | SITE PLAN. |
| | 9. THERE ARE FPL BOXES LOCATED NORTH OF THE EXISTING |
| | RUNNING TRACK. ARE THESE REMAINING OR MOVING? PLEASE |
| | INDICATE ON SITE PLAN. IF REMAINING, PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | LANDSCAPE SCREENING FROM ROW. |
| | 10. IS A NEW PLAYGROUND BEING PROPOSED? PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | DETAIL. |
| | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL OF THE PROPOSED SHADE |
| | STRUCTURE. PLEASE NOTE, A SEPARATE WILL BE REQUIRED |
| | SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH BUILDING CODE. |
| | 12. PLEASE EXPLAIN TRAFFIC CIRCULATION AND UTILIZATION |
| | OF EXISTING PARKING LOT AT PROJECT?S NORTHWEST CORNER. |
| | STAFF WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE FIRST CURB CUT ENTRANCE |
| | REMOVED TO ENHANCE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND LANDSCAPE |
| | BUFFERING. |
| | 13. PLEASE SUBMIT GENERAL RESPONSES OR ILLUSTRATE |
| | DETAILS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ARTIFICIAL TURF AS |
| | OUTLINED IN SECTION 94-451 INCLUDING MATERIAL STANDARDS |
| | AND INSTALLATION DETAILS. ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT IS THE |
| | FOCUS ON IMPERVIOUS AREA (SECTION 94-451(C)). |
| | 14. PLEASE ADJUST THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED FENCE ALONG |
| | 8TH STREET TO ALIGN WITH THE GYMNASIUM BUILDING AND |
| | INSTALL A LANDSCAPE BUFFER TO MATCH THE EXISTING BUFFER |
| | ALONG THE NORTH BUILDING FA?ADE. |
| | 15. THERE APPEARS TO BE A 10-FOOT FENCE THAT EXTENDS UP |
| | THE SIDE OF THE ADRIAN DOMINICAN SISTERS BUILDING UP TO |
| | THE EDGE OF THE EXISTING PARKING LOT. WILL THE NEW |
| | FENCE EXTEND OFF THIS EXISTING FENCE OR RUN PARALLEL TO |
| | THIS FENCE? THIS MAY CREATE A SAFETY CONCERN TO HAVE |
| | TWO FENCES RUNNING PARALLEL TO EACH OTHER IN SUCH |
| | PROXIMITY. |
| | 16. WILL THE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE ADJACENT TO THE |
| | SIDEWALK/ROAD ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE EXISTING TENNIS |
| | COURT REMAIN? PLEASE ADDRESS ON SITE PLAN. |
| | 17. THE AERIAL VIEW SHOWS PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF |
| | THE MARY ALICE FORTIN BUILDING. WAS THIS PERMITTED? IF |
| | SO, THIS WILL NEED TO BE ILLUSTRATED ON SITE PLAN. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE PERMIT NUMBER. |
| | 18. THERE IS A PAVED WALKWAY LEADING FROM THE GATE ON |
| | EUCALYPTUS STREET TO THE EXISTING RUNNING TRACK. WILL |
| | THIS BE MODIFIED? PLEASE ILLUSTRATE. |
| | 19. IS A SIDEWALK PROPOSED FROM THE GYMNASIUM TO THE |
| | PROPOSED BASKETBALL AND PICKLEBALL COURTS? PLEASE |
| | ILLUSTRATE. |
| | 20. PLEASE ADJUST THE SIZE OF THE APRON LEADING TO THE |
| | GATE ON 8TH STREET TO MATCH THE GATE SIZE OR REMOVE THE |
| | APRON. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS GATE ACCESS, CAN |
| | ACCESS BE PROVIDED FROM EUCALYPTUS STREET? |
| | 21. STARTING AT THE JUNE MEETINGS (DAC, PB, ETC.), |
| | APPLICANTS SHALL PREPARE TO PRESENT BEFORE STAFF?S |
| | PRESENTATION ON THE PROJECT. THE APPLICANT SHALL |
| | PROVIDE THE PREPARED PRESENTATION TO STAFF THE FRIDAY |
| | PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED MEETING. |
| | 22. APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT STAMPED AND ADDRESSED |
| | ENVELOPES, WITH THE CITY?S RETURN ADDRESS, FOR |
| | PROPERTIES WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE. SUBMIT |
| | ONE COPY OF THE LIST OF THE SAME PROPERTY OWNER?S |
| | ADDRESSES AND A RADIUS MAP ILLUSTRATING THE PROPERTIES |
| | WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LINE. |
| | 23. STAFF HAS BEEN ANALYZING PDS WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN |
| | MASTER PLAN AREA AND HAS STARTED AN EFFORT TO CLEAN UP |
| | THE ZONING. THE ROSARIAN ACADEMY PROPERTY WAS REZONED |
| | FROM COMMUNITY SERVICE (CS) AND PUBLIC SEMI-PUBLIC |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO CSPD IN 1997 AS AN EFFORT TO |
| | BRING THE PROPERTY INTO COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT ZONING |
| | REGULATIONS. IN A SIMILAR EFFORT, STAFF IS NOW REZONING |
| | PDS TO HAVE AN UNDERLYING ZONING OF DMP ZONING |
| | DISTRICTS. AS THE ZONING DISTRICT OF CS IS NO LONGER |
| | USED IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA, STAFF WOULD LIKE TO PROCESS |
| | A REZONING APPLICATION CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS PD |
| | AMENDMENT APPLICATION TO REZONE FROM COMMUNITY SERVICE |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPSD) AND CS TO CPSD AND LD-R TO |
| | REFLECT THE DMP REGULATIONS. THE CPSD WOULD REMAIN. |
| | CONDITION OF APPROVAL: |
| | 1. SITE SHALL NEED TO BE REPLATTED. |
| | |
| |
Print |
