| Date |
Text |
| 2020-03-26 12:07:26 | CASE NO. PB 1824, 1824A & 1824B |
| | GRACE FELLOWSHIP ANNEXATION |
| | 8350 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | APRIL 10, 2020, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE |
| | MAY 19, 2020 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MAY 26, 2020), THE CASE |
| | SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL |
| | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE ONLY FOR THE ANNEXATION AND THE |
| | INITIAL FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING ASSIGNMENTS. THE |
| | PLANNING STAFF WILL ADDRESS THE SITE, LANDSCAPE, ETC. |
| | PLANS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF THE |
| | SITE AT A FUTURE PPRC MEETING ONCE THE MAJOR PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION HAS BEEN DEEMED SUFFICIENT. |
| | |
| | ANNEXATION |
| | |
| | 1) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION REGARDING |
| | THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED: |
| | |
| | A. UPDATED COMMENT: TRACT 14, BLOCK 1 OF THE PALM BEACH |
| | FARMS CO. PLAT NO. 9 LISTS THE EAST DIMENSION LINE AS |
| | 1,195.6 FEET AND THE WEST DIMENSION LINES AS 1,221.2 |
| | FEET. THE SURVEY PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION SHOWS |
| | THE EAST DIMENSION LINE AS 1,203.13 FEET (1,133.13 + |
| | 70) AND THE WEST DIMENSION LINE AS 1,227.29 FEET |
| | (1157.29 + 70). PLEASE EXPLAIN THESE DISCREPANCIES SO |
| | THAT THE ACCURATE LAND CAN BE ANNEXED. ------ THE |
| | COMMENT RESPONSE STATED THAT THE MEASURED DIMENSION |
| | DIFFERS FROM THE PLATTED DIMENSION. THE CITY SURVEYOR |
| | STATED THAT THE SURVEY NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT |
| | BOTH THE PLATTED AND THE MEASURED DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| | B. UPDATED COMMENT: THE SURVEY SHOWS THAT TRACT 14, |
| | BLOCK 1 OF THE PALM BEACH FARMS CO. PLAT NO. 9 HAS 70 |
| | FEET FROM THE NORTH SIDE AND 40 FEET FROM THE EAST SIDE |
| | REMOVED; HOWEVER, THE LISTED ORB/PG FOR THIS AREA LIST |
| | THESE AREAS AS EASEMENTS AND NOT AS CONVEYED TITLE. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, PAPA SHOWS THESE AREAS AS PART OF TRACT |
| | 14. PLEASE EXPLAIN THESE DISCREPANCIES SINCE THE |
| | ACREAGE AS PART OF THE ANNEXATION WILL CHANGE. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, IF THESE AREAS HAVE BEEN CONVEYED TO LAKE |
| | WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT OWNERSHIP, THEN TRACT 14 IS NO |
| | LONGER CONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH. |
| | ------ PROVIDE AN OPINION OF TITLE FROM A TITLE |
| | ATTORNEY OR TITLE COMPANY, INCLUDING THE RECORDED BACK |
| | UP INSTRUMENTS, REGARDING THE AREAS SHOWN REMOVED FROM |
| | TRACT 14, BLOCK 1. THE 1985 DEED CONVEYED ?ALL OF TRACT |
| | 14, BLOCK 1?WEST OF THE CANAL ROW? TO BEREAN BAPTIST |
| | TEMPLE, WHICH INDICATES THAT THE NORTH 70 FEET IS STILL |
| | OWNED BY GRACE FELLOWSHIP. THE RESPONSE CITES THE |
| | RIGHTS IN RESERVATIONS DOCUMENT FROM 1972 AS CONVEYING |
| | THE CANAL AREAS AS RIGHT-OF-WAY, SO THERE IS A |
| | DISCREPANCY IN THE SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS THAT NEEDS TO BE |
| | CLEARED UP. |
| | |
| | C. UPDATED COMMENT: PAPA SHOWS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN |
| | THE TWO PARCELS PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION AS OWNED BY THE |
| | LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT. STAFF CANNOT FURTHER |
| | PROCESS THE ANNEXATION WITHOUT A CONCURRENT VOLUNTARY |
| | ANNEXATION APPLICATION BY THE LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE |
| | DISTRICT, WITH THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AND PREFERABLE A |
| | SEPARATE PARCEL DESIGNATION) OF THE LAND BETWEEN THE |
| | TWO GRACE FELLOWSHIP PARCELS. ----- THE OPINION OF |
| | TITLE MUST ALSO INCLUDE SPECIFICALLY INDICATE WHO OWNS |
| | THESE AREAS AND HOW THEY ARE OWNED ? IN FEE, |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY, ETC. SO STAFF CAN VERIFY THE CORRECT |
| | ANNEXATION PROCEDURE. |
| | |
| | FUTURE LAND USE |
| | |
| | 1) THANK YOU FOR AMENDING THE APPLICATION TO DESIGNATE |
| | THE APPROPRIATE FUTURE LAND USE (AND ZONING) BASED ON |
| | THE ACTUAL USE OF THE PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 2) NEW COMMENT: STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE RESTRICTION ON |
| | THE INTENSITY CONTAINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN |
| | AMENDMENT TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS. YOUR TEAM NEEDS TO |
| | DECIDE IF YOU WANT TO RESTRICT TO THE SPECIFIC |
| | USES/SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT IS LISTED IN THE TRAFFIC |
| | ANALYSIS OR IF THOSE USES/SQUARE FOOTAGES SHOULD BE |
| | CONVERTED TO A FIXED NUMBER OF TRIPS. PREVIOUS |
| | APPLICATIONS TYPICALLY USE THE TRIP METHOD SO THAT |
| | FUTURE DEVELOPMENT HAS MORE FLEXIBILITY. FOR EXAMPLE |
| | USING A 125 ROOM HOTEL WOULD REQUIRE AN ADDITIONAL FLU |
| | AMENDMENT IF THE HOTEL IS NOT VIABLE AND AN ALTERNATIVE |
| | COMMERCIAL USE IS DESIRED. HOWEVER, USING 940 TRIPS AS |
| | SHOWN IN THE PROVIDED GENERATION TABLE, WOULD NOT |
| | REQUIRE THE ADDED STEP OF A FLU AMENDMENT UNLESS MORE |
| | THAN 940 TRIPS ARE PROPOSED FOR THE ALTERNATIVE |
| | COMMERCIAL USE. |
| | |
| | 3) UPDATED COMMENT: THE LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS MUST |
| | BE PROVIDED IN A SUMMARY TABLE FORMAT (PAGE 29 OF THE |
| | CITY?S DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION HAS AN EXAMPLE OF THE |
| | LOS TABLE FORMAT). PLEASE NOTE THAT THE LOS ANALYSIS |
| | PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION MUST SHOW THE MAXIMUM |
| | SERVICE DEMAND UNDER THE EXISTING PALM BEACH COUNTY FLU |
| | DESIGNATIONS AND THEN THE MAXIMUM SERVICE DEMAND UNDER |
| | THE PROPOSED WEST PALM BEACH FLU DESIGNATIONS FOR THE |
| | SELF-IMPOSED MAXIMUM BUILDOUT (AS DETERMINED BY THE |
| | TRAFFIC ANALYSIS). PROVIDE LETTERS FROM THE APPLICABLE |
| | SERVICE PROVIDERS THAT THEY HAVE CAPACITY TO SERVE ANY |
| | INCREASE IN SERVICE DEMAND. |
| | |
| |
Print |
