| Date |
Text |
| 2019-12-11 12:45:35 | CASE NO. PB 1824, 1824A & 1824B |
| | GRACE FELLOWSHIP ANNEXATION |
| | 8350 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | DECEMBER 27, 2019, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR |
| | THE FEBRUARY 18, 2020 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY FEBRUARY 11, |
| | 2020), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY |
| | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | THE COMMENTS BELOW ARE ONLY FOR THE ANNEXATION AND THE |
| | INITIAL FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING ASSIGNMENTS. THE |
| | PLANNING STAFF WILL ADDRESS THE SITE, LANDSCAPE, ETC. |
| | PLANS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF THE |
| | SITE AT A FUTURE PPRC MEETING ONCE THE MAJOR PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION HAS BEEN DEEMED SUFFICIENT. |
| | |
| | ANNEXATION |
| | |
| | 1) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION REGARDING |
| | THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED: |
| | |
| | A. TRACT 14, BLOCK 1 OF THE PALM BEACH FARMS CO. PLAT |
| | NO. 9 LISTS THE EAST DIMENSION LINE AS 1,195.6 FEET AND |
| | THE WEST DIMENSION LINES AS 1,221.2 FEET. THE SURVEY |
| | PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION SHOWS THE EAST DIMENSION |
| | LINE AS 1,203.13 FEET (1,133.13 + 70) AND THE WEST |
| | DIMENSION LINE AS 1,227.29 FEET (1157.29 + 70). PLEASE |
| | EXPLAIN THESE DISCREPANCIES SO THAT THE ACCURATE LAND |
| | CAN BE ANNEXED. |
| | |
| | B. THE SURVEY SHOWS THAT TRACT 14, BLOCK 1 OF THE PALM |
| | BEACH FARMS CO. PLAT NO. 9 HAS 70 FEET FROM THE NORTH |
| | SIDE AND 40 FEET FROM THE EAST SIDE REMOVED; HOWEVER, |
| | THE LISTED ORB/PG FOR THIS AREA LIST THESE AREAS AS |
| | EASEMENTS AND NOT AS CONVEYED TITLE. ADDITIONALLY, PAPA |
| | SHOWS THESE AREAS AS PART OF TRACT 14. PLEASE EXPLAIN |
| | THESE DISCREPANCIES SINCE THE ACREAGE AS PART OF THE |
| | ANNEXATION WILL CHANGE. ADDITIONALLY, IF THESE AREAS |
| | HAVE BEEN CONVEYED TO LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT |
| | OWNERSHIP, THEN TRACT 1 IS NO LONGER CONTIGUOUS TO THE |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH. |
| | |
| | C. PAPA SHOWS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN THE TWO PARCELS |
| | PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION AS OWNED BY THE LAKE WORTH |
| | DRAINAGE DISTRICT. STAFF CANNOT FURTHER PROCESS THE |
| | ANNEXATION WITHOUT A CONCURRENT VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION |
| | APPLICATION BY THE LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT, WITH |
| | THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AND PREFERABLE A SEPARATE PARCEL |
| | DESIGNATION) OF THE LAND BETWEEN THE TWO GRACE |
| | FELLOWSHIP PARCELS. |
| | |
| | FUTURE LAND USE |
| | |
| | 1) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE REQUEST TO ASSIGN A |
| | COMMERCIAL (C) FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION TO THE |
| | ENTIRETY OF THE ANNEXED PARCELS. THE APPROPRIATE FUTURE |
| | LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE EXISTING CHURCH AND SCHOOL |
| | AND THE ATHLETIC FIELD EXPANSION IS COMMUNITY SERVICE |
| | (CS). THE FUTURE HOTEL SITE CAN BE ASSIGNED A C FUTURE |
| | LAND USE. |
| | |
| | 2) PROVIDE A SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | PORTION OF THE SITE THAT WOULD HAVE THE C DESIGNATION. |
| | PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMERCIAL PORTION OF THE |
| | SITE (OR AS PART OF A FURTHER REZONING TO A COMMERCIAL |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT), THE COMMERCIAL PORTION WILL NEED |
| | TO BE SUBDIVIDED FROM THE BALANCE OF THE GRACE |
| | FELLOWSHIP PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 3) THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS STATES THAT |
| | THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN INCLUDES A 62,676 SQUARE |
| | FOOT CHURCH WHILE THE LATEST SITE PLAN LISTS THE CHURCH |
| | AS HAVING 65,226 SQUARE FEET. THE TOTAL DEVELOPMENT |
| | MUST BE CONSISTENT ON ALL DOCUMENTS, ESPECIALLY SINCE |
| | THE PROPOSAL IS TO LIMIT THE DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY. |
| | |
| | 4) REVIEW THE LEVEL OF SERVICE INFORMATION TO SEE IF |
| | ANY CHANGES ARE NEEDED BASED ON THE ENTIRE SITE NOT |
| | HAVING A C FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION. |
| | |
| | 5) THE LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS MUST BE PROVIDED IN A |
| | SUMMARY TABLE FORMAT. |
| | |
| | 6) THE FUTURE LAND USE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT MENTIONS |
| | A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT IN THE COMMERCIAL PORTION OF THE |
| | SITE, YET THIS IS NOT SHOWN IN ANY OF THE LEVEL OF |
| | SERVICE ANALYSIS. PLEASE EXPLAIN. |
| | |
| | ZONING |
| | |
| | 1) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE REQUEST TO ASSIGN A |
| | GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) ZONING DESIGNATION TO THE |
| | ENTIRETY OF THE ANNEXED PARCELS. THE APPROPRIATE ZONING |
| | DESIGNATION FOR THE EXISTING CHURCH AND SCHOOL AND THE |
| | ATHLETIC FIELD EXPANSION IS COMMUNITY SERVICE (CS). THE |
| | FUTURE HOTEL SITE CAN BE ASSIGNED A GC FUTURE LAND USE. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
