| Date |
Text |
| 2019-04-30 11:35:19 | PB 1223I - FIRST RESUBMITTAL REVIEW |
| | JFK NORTH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH EXPANSION |
| | 2201 45TH STREET |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | MAY 24, 2019 TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE |
| | JULY 16, 2019 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY JUNE 30, 2019), THE CASE |
| | SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL |
| | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS WERE NOT |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, SO THE APPLICATION IS ASSESSED |
| | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE IS 20% OF THE ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC APPROVAL LETTER; HOWEVER, THE |
| | FOLLOWING ITEMS NEED TO BE EXPLAINED/CORRECTED: |
| | |
| | A. THE LETTER (AND THE TRAFFIC STUDY THAT WAS |
| | SUBMITTED) INCLUDES THE SQUARE FOOTAGE/VEHICLE TRIPS |
| | FOR PCN 74434306000001070, WHICH IS NOT PART OF THE JFK |
| | NORTH CAMPUS CSPD. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THIS PARCEL WAS |
| | INCLUDED IN THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT AND THUS THE TRAFFIC |
| | APPROVAL LETTER FOR THE JFK NORTH CAMPUS CSPD. THIS |
| | ADDS TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 36,750 |
| | SQUARE FEET (PAPA) TO THE TRAFFIC IMPACT OF THE JFK |
| | NORTH CSPD. |
| | B. THE TRAFFIC STUDY AND THE TRAFFIC LETTER LIST THE |
| | EXISTING HOSPITAL AS HAVING 124,817 SQUARE FEET, WHICH |
| | IS SHOWN BY PAPA AS THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF BUILDING 1 OF |
| | THE JFK NORTH CAMPUS CSPD. PAPA SHOWS MULTIPLE HOSPITAL |
| | BUILDINGS TOTALING 194,630 SQUARE FEET. THE BUILDING |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE LISTED ON SHEET C002 TOTALS 206,703 |
| | SQUARE FEET OF EXISTING HOSPITAL. YOU NEED TO RECTIFY |
| | THE EXISTING HOSPITAL SQUARE FOOTAGE ON ALL PLANS AND |
| | DOCUMENTS. THEN THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT AND THE |
| | CORRESPONDING TRAFFIC LETTER NEED TO BE UPDATED TO SHOW |
| | ACCURATE CONDITIONS. CURRENTLY, THE EXISTING HOSPITAL |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE TRAFFIC IMPACT IS SIGNIFICANTLY LESS |
| | THAN ACTUAL CONDITIONS ACCORDING TO THE TRAFFIC |
| | STATEMENT. |
| | |
| | 2) NEW COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION |
| | FOR THE ENTIRE NEW JFK NORTH CAMPUS CSPD BOUNDARY IN |
| | WORD. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE LEGAL |
| | DESCRIPTION PROVIDED FOR THE UNITY OF TITLE (WHICH |
| | COVERS THE ENTIRE AREA FOR THE EXPANDED JFK NORTH |
| | CAMPUS CSPD) LISTS THE ENTIRE PARCEL AS HAVING 26.82 |
| | ACRES, YET THE NEW SURVEY LISTS THE ENTIRE PARCEL AS |
| | HAVING ONLY 25.39 ACRES. THE ACREAGE AND LEGAL |
| | DESCRIPTIONS ON THE UNITY OF TITLE AND THE SURVEY NEED |
| | TO DESCRIBE THE SAME PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 3) NEW COMMENT: ALL OF THE SITE FEATURES NEED TO HAVE A |
| | UNIFORMLY DARK LINE WIDTH SO THAT THEY ARE LEGIBLE ON |
| | THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 4) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE SETBACK DIMENSION TO THE |
| | EXISTING FREE STANDING MONUMENT SIGNS. PLEASE NOTE THAT |
| | THE SURVEY SHOWS THE TWO SIGNS ALONG 45TH STREET IN THE |
| | FPL EASEMENT WHICH IS NOT WHERE THEY WERE APPROVED ON |
| | THE BUILDING PERMIT. THE ACTUAL SIGN SETBACKS NEED TO |
| | BE VERIFIED. |
| | |
| | 5) REVISED COMMENT: THE MARCH 22, 2019 JUSTIFICATION |
| | STATEMENT DOES NOT ADDRESS THE FUTURE SUBDIVISION OF |
| | THE PROPERTY. AT SUCH TIME AS JFK NORTH APPLIES TO |
| | SUBDIVIDE THE PROPERTY, A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO ADDRESS |
| | ALL OF THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND ANY ASSOCIATED |
| | WAIVERS WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE NOTE THAT MITIGATION |
| | FOR NEWLY CREATED WAIVERS MAY BE REQUIRED WITH THE |
| | FUTURE MAJOR AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | 6) REVISED COMMENT: SINCE THERE IS NO SUBDIVISION, NO |
| | CLARIFICATION ON PARKING USE IS REQUIRED WITH THIS |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | 7) REVISED COMMENT: THE DATA TABLES ON THE SITE AND |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANS NEED TO BASE THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | CALCULATIONS ON THE ACCURATE PARCEL ACREAGE. THE SITE |
| | AND LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT LIST THE IDENTICAL AMOUNT OF |
| | ACREAGE, NOR DOES EITHER ONE OF THESE MATCH THE ACREAGE |
| | LISTED ON EITHER OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS REFERENCED |
| | IN COMMENT #2. |
| | |
| | 8) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE DATA TABLE ON SHEETS C002 |
| | AND C003 NEEDS TO LIST THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR EACH |
| | BUILDING AND ITS USE. IF A BUILDING CONTAINS BEDS, THE |
| | NUMBER OF BEDS WITHIN THE BUILDING NEEDS TO BE LISTED |
| | AS WELL. THE TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS WILL NEED TO |
| | PROVIDE THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDINGS. |
| | ----- THE DATA TABLES ON THE REVISED PLANS DO NOT |
| | ACCURATELY REFLECT THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE TWO STORY |
| | MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS, BUT RATHER IS ONLY PROVIDED |
| | AS IF THEY ARE ONE STORY BUILDINGS. SEE COMMENT #1 FOR |
| | ADDITIONAL DISCREPANCIES WHICH NEED TO BE RECTIFIED. |
| | THE NUMBER OF BEDS IN EACH BUILDING WAS NOT PROVIDED SO |
| | THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE REQUIRED PARKING COUNTS. |
| | |
| | 9) PARKING TABLE: |
| | |
| | A. REVISED COMMENT: STAFF HAS COUNTED 793 REGULAR |
| | PARKING SPACES FOR THE ENTIRE SITE, NOT 792 AS LISTED. |
| | PLEASE VERIFY THE COUNTS. |
| | |
| | B. NEW COMMENT: THE PARKING REQUIREMENT FOR THE TWO |
| | MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS WAS NOT PROVIDED ON THE |
| | PARKING TABLE. MEDICAL OFFICE REQUIRES 1 PARKING SPACE |
| | PER 200 SQUARE FEET. PROVIDE A LINE ITEM AND UPDATE THE |
| | TOTAL REQUIRED. STAFF'S INITIAL CALCULATION SHOWS THAT |
| | YOU REQUIRE 846 PARKING SPACES (EXCLUDES THE AMBULANCE |
| | SPACES), WHILE THE PARKING TABLE ONLY SHOWS THAT THE |
| | PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROVIDES 826 PARKING SPACES. AN |
| | ADDITIONAL 20 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 10) SHEET C300 - REVISED COMMENT: I SPOKE WITH THE |
| | SAMANTHA HILL IN THE BUILDING DIVISION REGARDING ADA |
| | PARKING SPACES IN THE PARKING FIELD TO THE NORTH OF |
| | THIS PROPOSED BUILDING. YOU NEED TO SHOW THE LOCATIONS |
| | OF THE ENTRANCES TO THE BUILDING FOR BOTH PUBLIC AND |
| | EMPLOYEES AND THE ROUTE OF TRAVEL TO THE ENTRANCES. THE |
| | CLOSEST PARKING SPACES ALONG THE ROUTE NEED TO BE THE |
| | ADA PARKING SPACES. ---- THE REVISED SITE PLAN SHOWS A |
| | DOOR ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING AS |
| | "RESTRICTED ENTRY". WHO USES THIS ENTRANCE? IF |
| | EMPLOYEES USE THE ENTRANCE, IT STILL REQUIRES ADA |
| | PARKING SPACES IN THE NEARBY PARKING FIELD AND AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE PARKING AREA TO THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 11) SHEET C301 |
| | |
| | A. REVISE COMMENT: THE NORTHERN OF THE TWO NEW WESTERN |
| | PARKING FIELDS STILL HAS A 22 FOOT WIDE AISLE WIDTH |
| | DIMENSION (SHOWN CLEARLY ON SHEET C003) AND ONE OF THE |
| | AISLES SHOWS 24 FEET ON SHEET C301 YET ONLY 22 FEET ON |
| | SHEET C003. ALL PLANS NEED TO SHOW SAME, CORRECT 24 |
| | FOOT CONDITION. |
| | |
| | B. REVISED COMMENT: I SPOKE WITH THE SAMANTHA HILL IN |
| | THE BUILDING DIVISION REGARDING ADA PARKING SPACES FOR |
| | THE REVISED PARKING FIELD. YOU NEED TO SHOW THE |
| | LOCATIONS OF THE ENTRANCES TO THE BUILDING FOR BOTH |
| | PUBLIC AND EMPLOYEES AND THE ROUTE OF TRAVEL TO THE |
| | ENTRANCES. THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACES ALONG THE ROUTE |
| | NEED TO BE THE ADA PARKING SPACES. THIS MIRRORS HOW TO |
| | VERIFY THE SIMILAR BUILDING DIVISION COMMENT FROM PPRC. |
| | ------- NO ENTRANCES ARE SHOWN NEAR THESES PARKING |
| | SPACES. WHO DO THEY SERVE? YOU HAVE FAILED TO LABEL |
| | WHAT APPEAR TO BE DOORS IN THIS AREA. THEY NEED TO BE |
| | LABELED. IF THERE ARE MULTIPLE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES, |
| | THEN THE SPACES NEED TO BE DISTRIBUTED TO SERVICE THEM. |
| | CONVERSELY, DEPENDING ON WHAT THESE DOORS ARE USED OR, |
| | YOU MAY NOT NEED THE ADA PARKING SPACES AT THIS |
| | LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 12) BICYCLE PARKING REVISED COMMENTS |
| | |
| | A. THE DATA TABLE FOR THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED BICYCLE |
| | PARKING SPACES NEEDS TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT THE |
| | ACTUAL NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FROM COMMENT |
| | #9B. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CITY ONLY REQUIRES ONE |
| | PARKING SPACE PER 20 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES, SO YOU |
| | WILL REQUIRE LESS BICYCLE PARKING SPACES THAN THE 55 |
| | LISTED. |
| | |
| | B. EVERY PRINCIPAL ENTRANCE MUST HAVE BICYCLE PARKING |
| | TO COMPLY WITH THE CODE. GROUPING THE MAJORITY OF THE |
| | BICYCLE PARKING SPACES AS SHOWN ON SHEET C301 IS NOT |
| | ACCEPTABLE AS NO BUILDING ENTRANCES WERE LISTED AS |
| | BEING AT THIS LOCATION. |
| | |
| | C. ALL NEW AND ENLARGED BICYCLE RACKS MUST INCLUDE THE |
| | DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS (SHEETS C002 AND C003). |
| | |
| | D. MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 1 REQUIRES BICYCLE PARKING |
| | AT THE ENTRANCE. |
| | |
| | E. MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING 2 HAS A WAVE STYLE BICYCLE |
| | RACK THAT IS NOT CALLED OUT ON THE PLANS. PROVIDE THE |
| | DIMENSIONS OF THE RACK AND HOW IT SITS ON THE PAD SO |
| | THAT STAFF CAN DETERMINE HOW MANY BICYCLES IT CAN PARK. |
| | THIS WILL THEN BE REFLECTED ON THE NUMBER OF SPACES |
| | PROVIDED TABLE. |
| | |
| | 13) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE UTILITY RELEASE |
| | LETTERS. THERE ARE TREES AND MODIFIED PARKING BEING |
| | PROPOSED FOR THE FPL EASEMENT ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY |
| | LINE. THIS NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED IN THE RELEASE LETTER. |
| | |
| | 14) NEW COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW A LINE |
| | PATTERN THAT IS DESIGNATED AS THE "PROPERTY LINE"? AND |
| | A SEPARATE LINE PATTERN THAT IS DESIGNATED THE "LIMITS |
| | OF THE WEST PALM HOSPITAL CSPD". THESE TWO LINES MUST |
| | BE THE SAME. |
| | |
| | 15) NEW COMMENT: THERE ARE AREAS ALONG THE CSPD |
| | BOUNDARY THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FIVE |
| | FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. PROVIDE A FIVE FOOT OFFSET |
| | LINE TO SHOW THE REQUIRED BUFFER LOCATION ON THE |
| | LANDSCAPE PLAN. WHERE THE BUFFER IS NOT MET, PROVIDE |
| | THE ACTUAL DIMENSION OF THE BUFFER. STAFF NEEDS THESE |
| | DIMENSIONS TO ADDRESS THE EXISTING NON-CONFORMITIES IN |
| | THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 16) NEW COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FAILS TO CLEARLY |
| | SHOW THE 12 FOOT WIDE FPL EASEMENT ON THE NORTH, SOUTH |
| | AND WEST PROPERTY LINES. |
| | |
| | 17) NEW COMMENT: SHEET C003 SHOWS PARKING STALLS HAVING |
| | A 17 FOOT DEPTH WITH A LANDSCAPE DIVIDER MEDIAN IN |
| | FRONT OF THEM. SOME OF THESE HAVE A 25 FOOT AND SOME |
| | HAVE A 24 FOOT DRIVE AISLE BEHIND THEM (SOME SHARE A 25 |
| | FOOT DRIVE AISLE). THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS PERMIT AN OVERHANG INTO THE DIVIDER MEDIAN; |
| | HOWEVER, THE TOTAL SPACE DEPTH PLUS A TWO FOOT OVERHANG |
| | MUST TOTAL 18 FEET. FIELD VERIFY THE DIMENSIONS OF THE |
| | SPACES, INCLUDING THE WHEEL STOP LOCATION AND PROVIDE A |
| | DETAIL OF EACH OF THE ROWS SHOWING 17 FOOT DEEP PARKING |
| | SPACES. STAFF NEEDS THESE DIMENSIONS TO ADDRESS ANY |
| | EXISTING NON-CONFORMITIES IN THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 18) NO LANDSCAPE SHEET WAS PROVIDED FOR THE NORTHWEST |
| | QUADRANT OF THE SITE. THIS NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED AND |
| | CORRECTLY REFLECTED ON ALL THE LANDSCAPE DATA TABLES. |
| | |
| | 19) WAIVERS REQUIRED BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS |
| | IDENTIFIED BY STAFF: |
| | |
| | A. INSTANCES OF PARKING ROWS WITH MORE THAN 10 SPACES. |
| | B. AREAS WHERE THE MINIMUM FIVE FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER |
| | IS NOT PROVIDED. |
| | C. THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER MATERIAL IS NOT |
| | PROVIDED ALONG THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES |
| | WHERE THE FPL EASEMENT IS LOCATED. |
| | D. THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER MATERIAL OR WIDTH |
| | PROVIDED ALONG PORTIONS OF THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| |
Print |
