| Date |
Text |
| 2019-03-01 15:17:12 | PB 1223I - FIRST RESUBMITTAL REVIEW |
| | JFK NORTH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH EXPANSION |
| | 2201 45TH STREET |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | MARCH 29, 2019 TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE |
| | MAY 21, 2019 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MAY 1, 2019), THE CASE |
| | SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL |
| | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS WERE NOT |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, SO THE APPLICANTION IS ASSESSED |
| | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE IS 20% OF THE ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | TRAFFIC APPROVAL LETTER. |
| | |
| | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SURVEY PROVIDED WITH THE |
| | APPLICATION DOES NOT REFLECT THE BOUNDARY OF THE WEST |
| | PALM BEACH HOSPITAL COMMUNITY SERVICE PLANNED |
| | DEVELOPMENT AS DESCRIBED IN ORDINANCE NO. 4503-14. |
| | |
| | 3) REVISED COMMENT: SHEET C002 |
| | |
| | A. THE OVERALL SITE PLAN THAT WAS PROVIDED FAILS TO |
| | PROVIDE ANY DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION, SUCH AS SETBACKS, |
| | LANDSCAPE AREAS, BUFFER WIDTHS, WALK WAY AND DRIVE |
| | AISLE WIDTHS, PARKING STALL WIDTH AND DEPTH, AND |
| | BUILDING DIMENSIONS (IF THE PLANS NEED TO BE ON |
| | MULTIPLE SHEETS FOR THE INFORMATION TO BE LEGIBLE, THIS |
| | MUST BE DONE). ADDITIONALLY, THE LOCATIONS OF |
| | FREESTANDING SIGNS, INTERNAL DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, |
| | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, FENCES/WALLS, GAZEBOS AND OTHER |
| | SITE FEATURES NEED TO BE SHOWN AND LABELED. |
| | |
| | B. THE APPLICATION IS BEING REVISED TO EXPAND THE CSPD |
| | BOUNDARY, BASED ON THE STATED DESIRE TO SELL PORTIONS |
| | OF THE PROPERTY. THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT IS |
| | REQUESTING WAIVERS TO ALLOW THE REMOVAL OF THE UNITY OF |
| | TITLE AND THEN THE FUTURE SALE OF PROPERTY WITHOUT THE |
| | NEED FOR A FUTURE MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. |
| | IN ORDER TO INCORPORATE THE WAIVERS IN THE CURRENT |
| | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE A |
| | TABLE SHOWING ALL OF THE ZONING INFORMATION ON THE |
| | PLANS SO THAT STAFF CAN DETERMINE WHAT WAIVERS ARE |
| | REQUIRED. THIS INCLUDES WHERE THE PROPOSED PROPERTY |
| | LINES WILL BE (A SUBDIVISION MAY BE REQUIRED), SETBACKS |
| | TO NEW INTERNAL PROPERTY LINES, FUTURE PARCEL SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE, FAR, LANDSCAPE COVERAGE, PERVIOUS SURFACE, |
| | ETC. |
| | |
| | C. YOU WILL NEED TO CLARIFY HOW PARKING WILL FUNCTION |
| | AMONG THE PROPOSED PARCELS - EX. STAND ALONE OR SHARED. |
| | |
| | D. THE SETBACK TABLE IS FOR THE ENTIRE CSPD, NOT THE |
| | PROPOSED BUILDINGS. |
| | |
| | 4) REQUIRES SURVEY TO VERIFY: THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE ACCURATE CSPD BOUNDARIES AND |
| | THIS NEEDS TO BE REFLECTED ON THE SITE DATA TABLES FOR |
| | BOTH THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 5) REPEAT COMMENT: EACH BUILDING ON SHEET C002 NEEDS TO |
| | BE LABELED. THE SITE DATA TABLE ON SHEET C002 NEEDS TO |
| | LIST THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR EACH BUILDING AND ITS USE. |
| | IF A BUILDING CONTAINS BEDS, THE NUMBER OF BEDS WITHIN |
| | THE BUILDING NEEDS TO BE LISTED AS WELL. THE TWO |
| | MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS WILL NEED TO PROVIDE THE TOTAL |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDINGS. |
| | |
| | 6) PARKING TABLE: |
| | |
| | A. REPEAT COMMENT: THE PARKING COUNT IS INCORRECT FOR |
| | THE ENTIRE SITE (PROPOSED CSPD). STAFF HAS COUNTED 783 |
| | REGULAR AND 34 ADA PARKING SPACES FOR THE ENTIRE SITE. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS NUMBER WILL BE REDUCED WHEN THE |
| | PARKING ROW WITH 12 PARKING SPACES IS CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | B. REPEAT COMMENT: THE PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO LIST ONLY |
| | THE PARKING COUNTS AFTER THE PROJECT IS COMPLETED. THE |
| | EXISTING CONDITIONS NEED TO BE STATED IN THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. ---- DO NOT INCLUDE THE |
| | EXISTING PARKING COUNTS ON THE PARKING TABLE. |
| | |
| | C. NEW COMMENT: ALL OF THE PARKING SPACES SHOWN ON |
| | SHEET C002 NEED TO BE STRIPED AND COUNTED. THERE ARE |
| | THREE PARKING BAYS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE THAT DO |
| | NOT SHOW THE REQUIRED STRIPING AND THERE IS A PARKING |
| | BAY THAT DOES NOT LABEL THE TWO EXISTING PARKING |
| | SPACES. THERE ARE PARKING SPACES IN THE PARKING AREAS |
| | AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE THAT DO NOT SHOW |
| | THE REQUIRED STRIPING. |
| | |
| | 7) SHEET C300 - REVISED COMMENT: I SPOKE WITH THE |
| | SAMANTHA HILL IN THE BUILDING DIVISION REGARDING ADA |
| | PARKING SPACES IN THE PARKING FIELD TO THE NORTH OF |
| | THIS PROPOSED BUILDING. YOU NEED TO SHOW THE LOCATIONS |
| | OF THE ENTRANCES TO THE BUILDING FOR BOTH PUBLIC AND |
| | EMPLOYEES AND THE ROUTE OF TRAVEL TO THE ENTRANCES. THE |
| | CLOSEST PARKING SPACES ALONG THE ROUTE NEED TO BE THE |
| | ADA PARKING SPACES. |
| | |
| | 8) SHEET C301 |
| | |
| | A. REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING DIMENSION |
| | LINES FOR ALL THE NEWLY STRIPED PARKING ROWS, BOTH |
| | WIDTH AND DEPTH; HOWEVER, THERE ARE INSTANCES WHERE THE |
| | DIMENSION TAG DOES NOT GO FROM CURB FACE TO CURB FACE |
| | TO SHOW THE PROPER BAY DIMENSION. |
| | |
| | B. REPEAT COMMENT: ONE OF THE RE-STRIPED PARKING ROWS |
| | SHOWS A PARKING STALL DEPTH DIMENSION OF ONLY 15 FEET. |
| | THIS NEEDS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 18 FEET. ---- THE |
| | COMMENTS STATE THAT DIMENSION LINES WERE ADDED FOR THIS |
| | PARKING BAY, BUT THEY WERE NOT. |
| | |
| | C. NEW COMMENT: THE REVISED PARKING FIELD SHOWS A ROW |
| | WITH 12 PARKING SPACES (EXCEEDS THE 10 IN A ROW |
| | PERMITTED BY THE ZLDR) AND A ROW THAT HAS 8 PARKING |
| | SPACES, YET IS LABELED AS 7 PARKING SPACES. BOTH OF |
| | THESE NEED TO BE CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | D. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: DO NOT USE BOTH WHEEL STOPS |
| | AND CURBS AT THE HEAD OF A PARKING SPACE. FOR SPACES |
| | THAT HAVE CURBS, THE CURB SHOULD BE MOVED TO CREATE A |
| | TWO (2) FOOT OVERHANG (REPLACE THE WHEEL STOP WITH THE |
| | CURB AND THE CAR HANGS OVER TWO FEET OF WIDENED |
| | SIDEWALK OR LANDSCAPE). |
| | |
| | E. REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE 22 FOOT |
| | WIDE AISLE WIDTH DIMENSION IN THE WESTERN PARKING FIELD |
| | THAT IS BEING RECONSTRUCTED AND RE-STRIPED. THIS |
| | DIMENSION DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIRED MINIMUM 24 |
| | FOOT AISLE WIDTH FOR PARKING LOTS THAT HAVE 90 DEGREE |
| | PARKING, SO IT MUST BE CORRECTED. |
| | |
| | F. REVISED COMMENT: I SPOKE WITH THE SAMANTHA HILL IN |
| | THE BUILDING DIVISION REGARDING ADA PARKING SPACES FOR |
| | THE REVISED PARKING FIELD. YOU NEED TO SHOW THE |
| | LOCATIONS OF THE ENTRANCES TO THE BUILDING FOR BOTH |
| | PUBLIC AND EMPLOYEES AND THE ROUTE OF TRAVEL TO THE |
| | ENTRANCES. THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACES ALONG THE ROUTE |
| | NEED TO BE THE ADA PARKING SPACES. THIS MIRRORS HOW TO |
| | VERIFY THE SIMILAR BUILDING DIVISION COMMENT FROM PPRC |
| | . |
| | |
| | 9) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE PLANS SHOW THAT THE SITE IS |
| | DEFICIENT IN BICYCLE PARKING SO CODE COMPLIANT BICYCLE |
| | PARKING MUST BE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE CAMPUS AND THE |
| | DATA TABLES AND SITE DETAILS UPDATED ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | A. THE DATA TABLES WERE NOT UPDATED TO REFLECT THE |
| | REQUIRED OR PROVIDED BICYCLE PARKING COUNTS. NO BICYCLE |
| | PARKING IS SHOWN FOR THE TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS. |
| | EXISTING OR ADDING BICYCLE PARKING TO THESE TWO |
| | LOCATIONS WILL INCREASE THE "PROVIDED" COUNTS. |
| | |
| | B. THE PROPOSED 8 SPACE BICYCLE RACK NEEDS TO HAVE THE |
| | DIMENSIONS INCLUDED ON THE SITE PLAN AS WELL AS A |
| | BICYCLE RACK DETAIL. THE ZLDR REQUIRE THAT BICYCLE |
| | PARKING BE LOCATED AS NEAR THE PRINCIPAL ENTRANCE OF |
| | THE BUILDING AS PRACTICABLE, SO STAFF WILL USE THE |
| | ENTRANCE PLANS REQUIRED BY COMMENTS 7 AND 8F TO |
| | EVALUATE THE LOCATION OF THIS PROPOSED BICYCLE RACK. |
| | |
| | 10) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE UTILITY RELEASE |
| | LETTERS. |
| | |
| | 11) REPEAT COMMENT: SHEET C101 STATES THAT THERE IS |
| | STRIPING BEING REMOVED FROM THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE |
| | PARKING AREA, YET SHEET C301 DOES NOT CALL OUT THAT |
| | THIS AREA IS BEING RE-STRIPED (INDICATES THAT THE |
| | STRIPING IS EXISTING). THE COMMENT RESPONSE STATES THAT |
| | THERE IS NO CURRENT STRIPING IN THIS PARKING AREA, |
| | WHICH MEANS THAT SHEET C301 DEFINITELY NEEDS TO SHOW |
| | NEW, CODE COMPLIANT STRIPING WITH DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
