| Date |
Text |
| 2019-04-10 11:14:07 | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. (PREVIOUS COMMENT) CLARIFY THE PROPOSED LAND USES. |
| | THE SITE PLAN (C4.1) INDICATES 52 RESIDENTIAL UNITS |
| | WITH 1,920 SF OF COMMERCIAL USES, WHILE THE TRAFFIC |
| | STUDY INDICATES 52 RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITH 1,000 SF OF |
| | RETAIL AND 1,000 SF OF SHARED WORK SPACE. |
| | 2. (PREVIOUS COMMENT) PARALLEL PARKING 27TH AND 28TH. |
| | PLACE TREE OPENING IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SPACE, NOT AT |
| | THE ENDS OF THE PARKING SPACE. PROVIDE A 16 TO 18 INCH |
| | WALKING BAND BETWEEN THE FACE OF CURB AND TREE PIT. THE |
| | WALKING BAND CAN INCLUDE THE TOP OF THE CURB. |
| | 3. COMMIT TO PROVIDE A TRANSIT SHELTER ONCE THE LANE |
| | ELIMINATION PROJECT ON BROADWAY IS APPROVED. |
| | 4. IF THE REQUIRED LOADING SPACE IS NOT PROVIDED PER |
| | CITY CODE 94-485, PLEASE INCLUDE A WAIVER REQUEST. |
| | 5. REDUCE THE TRAVEL LANES ON 27TH AND 28TH STREETS TO |
| | 10 FEET. THE EXTRA WIDTH CAN BE ADDED TO THE SIDEWALK. |
| | ALSO, PROVIDE CROSS-SECTIONS ON 27TH AND 28TH STREETS. |
| | 6. SOME OF THE PARKING AREA LIGHT POLES MAY BE IN |
| | CONFLICT WITH THE 2-FOOT PARKING OVERHANG ZONE. PLEASE |
| | REVISE. ALSO, VERIFY THE TREES PLANTED ON THE BUFFER |
| | ARE NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE 2-FOOT PARKING OVERHANG |
| | ZONE. |
| | 7. VERIFY THE TREES AT THE DRIVEWAY ON 27TH STREET AND |
| | 28TH STREET WOULD NOT OBSTRUCT VISIBILITY OF EGRESS |
| | VEHICLES. |
| | 8. SHOW THE SIGHT DISTANCE FOR EASTBOUND ON |
| | BROADWAY/27TH STREET AND BROADWAY/28TH STREET PER FDOT |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | 9. BROADWAY IS ON THE EAST COAST GREENWAY. SHIFT |
| | BUILDING H TOWARDS THE WEST TO PROVIDE AN UNOBSTRUCTED |
| | PATH OF 10 FEET ON BROADWAY. |
| | 10. COORDINATE WITH FDOT ON A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR |
| | THE LANDSCAPE WITHIN FDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY. (THIS COMMENT |
| | WILL BE PART OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL) |
| | |
| | TRAFFIC STUDY COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 11. (PREVIOUS COMMENT) PROVIDE COUNTY TPS LETTER. |
| | 12. (PREVIOUS COMMENT) PAGE 3, METHODOLOGY, CORRECT THE |
| | TYPO OF "CITY OF PALM BEACH" AND "WEST PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY" TO "CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH" AND "PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY". |
| | 13. TABLES 2 AND 5, SOME OF THE OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS |
| | RESULTS DO NOT MATCH THE RESULTS IN THE SYNCHRO |
| | OUTPUTS. PLEASE REVISE. |
| | |
| | |
| | SHING TSOI |
| | CITY IN-HOUSE TRAFFIC CONSULTANT |
| | 561-494-1141 |
| | [email protected] |
| | (IN-HOUSE ON TUESDAYS AND WEDNESDAYS) |
| |
Print |
