| Date |
Text |
| 2019-02-21 13:42:14 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | (RESUBMITTAL) |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 02.21.2019 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z18110016 |
| | CASE NO.: ISPR 18-13 |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS WHICH WERE ISSUED PREVIOUSLY, AND HAVE |
| | NOT BEEN FULLY SATISFIED: |
| | |
| | 2. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - AN APPROVAL LETTER SHALL |
| | BE PROVIDED FROM THE PALM BEACH COUNTY ENGINEERING |
| | DEPARTMENT - TRAFFIC DIVISION, INDICATING THAT THE |
| | PROPOSED EXPANSION COMPLIES WITH THE PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. - THE 2/11/19 |
| | RESUBMITTAL INCLUDED A TRAFFIC STATEMENT INDICATING |
| | THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WERE DIMINIMUS, THIS |
| | REPORT WAS SENT TO PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR THEIR RECORDS; |
| | WAS ANY RESPONSE RECEIVED? CITY STAFF WOULD LIKE TO |
| | HAVE A RESPONSE FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY INDICATING |
| | WHETHER OR NOT THEY CONCUR WITH THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT. |
| | |
| | 9. [ PARTIALLY SATISFIED ] - THE PROPOSED STORAGE |
| | BUILDINGS DO NOT APPEAR TO MEET THE MINIMUM BUILDING |
| | SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS (25 FEET). PLEASE DIMENSION |
| | BETWEEN ALL EXISTING AND NEW BUILDINGS. - VARIANCE |
| | APPLICATION WAS RECEIVED ON 2/11/19 AND IS BEING |
| | PROCESSED. IF APPROVED BY THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS |
| | (ZBA), THEN THIS COMMENT WILL BE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 10. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE |
| | PROPOSED BUILDINGS ON THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THAT |
| | WHICH IS CONTAINED IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. |
| | ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS/DOCUMENTS ARE CONSISTENT AND |
| | ACCURATE. - THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STILL DOESN'T |
| | APPEAR TO MATCH THE SITE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 12. [ NOT SATISFIED ] - ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED FOR THE PHASE II STORAGE BUILDING. - IF NOT |
| | BEING PROVIDED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THIS |
| | COMMENT WILL BECOME A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS WHICH ARE NEW: |
| | |
| | 1. DISTANCES SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM BETWEEN ALL |
| | STRUCTURES TO SHOW THE BUILDING SEPARATIONS. |
| | |
| | 2. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS MISSING FROM THE |
| | VARIANCE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL: A) ADDRESS LIST; B) |
| | ENVELOPES; AND C) LABELS. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 6 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
