| Date |
Text |
| 2018-12-10 18:12:36 | PB 891HH |
| | ZAXBY'S @ PALM BEACH OUTLETS |
| | 1801 PALM BEACH LAKES |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE |
| | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY FEBRUARY 12, |
| | 2019), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY |
| | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT |
| | APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300). |
| | |
| | 1) ADD CASE NO. PB 891HH TO THE LINE ON THE MASTER |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | 2) THE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY TO CONGRESS AVENUE SHOULD |
| | TURN TO THE NORTH WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER SINCE THE |
| | PEDESTRIAN CROSSING POINT FOR CONGRESS AVENUE IS THE |
| | LIGHT AT THE OUTLETS ENTRY DRIVE. |
| | |
| | 3) PROVIDE A PARKING DETAIL FOR THE ANGLED PARKING |
| | SPACES. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE THREE PARKING SPACES AT |
| | THE END OF EACH PARKING ROW DOES NOT SCALE THE MINIMUM |
| | REQUIRED 18 FEET IN DEPTH. |
| | |
| | 4) PLEASE CONSIDER HAVING THE FRONT OF THE PARKING |
| | SPACES BE OVERHUNG BY THE CARS AND NOT USE A WHEEL STOP |
| | AND A CURB. |
| | |
| | 5) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT REFERENCES A PODOCARPUS |
| | HEDGE TO SCREEN THE MENU BOARD. THERE IS NOT PODOCARPUS |
| | PROVIDED BY THE MENU BOARD. |
| | |
| | 6) DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. |
| | |
| | A. THE ENCLOSURE DOES NOT MEET CITY MINIMUM DEPTH OR |
| | WIDTH REQUIREMENTS FOR TWO CONTAINERS. |
| | B. THE ENCLOSURE DETAIL ON SHEET A-1 DOES NOT MATCH THE |
| | DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON C-400 AND FSP-3.2. |
| | |
| | 7) WHY IS THERE NO LOADING SPACE PROVIDED ON THE PLANS? |
| | |
| | 8) WHY CAN THE STORAGE BUILDING NOT BE BUILT AS PART OF |
| | THE MAIN BUILDING? |
| | |
| | 9) IT SEEMS COUNTER INTUITIVE TO HAVE THE SEATING BE ON |
| | THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING THAT IS CIRCLED BY THE DRIVE |
| | THROUGH LANE. THE BACK OF HOUSE SHOULD HAVE THE DRIVE |
| | THROUGH LANES WRAP AROUND IT. |
| | |
| | 10) THE PATIO AREA IS DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE DRIVE |
| | THROUGH LANE STACKING. CONSIDER INSTALLING A PLANTED |
| | BUFFER HERE. |
| | |
| | 11) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE EXAMPLE PHOTO ON SHEET A-01 |
| | HAS MUCH MORE GLAZING THAN THE PROPOSED BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 12) THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REQUIRE |
| | THAT ALL UTILITES IN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BE INSTALLED |
| | UNDERGROUND. THE SURVEY SHOWS THAT THE OVERHEAD |
| | ELECTRIC LINE PARALLELING CONGRESS AVENUE IS LOCATED |
| | WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; |
| | THEREFORE IT NEEDS TO BE BURIED UNDERGROUND AS PART OF |
| | THE DEVELOPMENT OF PAD M. |
| | |
| |
Print |
