| Date |
Text |
| 2018-11-09 14:42:10 | COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) EXISTING PILINGS ARE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE MIDDLE |
| | ONE-THIRD OF THE LOT. THE PILINGS MUST EITHER BE |
| | REMOVED, OR ADDITIONAL WAIVER(S) MUST BE REQUESTED. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO |
| | PROVIDE COMPELLING EVIDENCE AND JUSTIFICATION TO WHY |
| | THE PILINGS SHOULD REMAIN IF THE INTENT IS TO REQUEST |
| | ADDITIONAL WAIVER(S). [ZLDR S.94-313(A)(3)(H)] |
| | |
| | 2.) THE PROPOSED DOCK PLAN ALSO SEEMS TO EXCEED THE |
| | NUMBER OF MOORING SLIPS ALLOWED BY ZLDR |
| | S.94-313(A)(3)(G), BASED ON THE LOCATION OF THE |
| | EXISTING PILINGS TO BE KEPT. PLEASE NOTE THAT A MAXIMUM |
| | OF TWO (2) MOORING SLIPS WOULD BE PERMITTED FOR THE |
| | DOCK (INCLUDES ANY PILINGS THAT WOULD ALLOW THE |
| | PROPERTY OWNER TO TIE/DOCK A BOAT AND VESSEL/PERSONAL |
| | WATERCRAFT LIFT(S). |
| | |
| | 3.) ADD DIMENSION TO THE WIDEST SECTION OF THE PROPOSED |
| | DOCK STRUCTURE IN THE DOCK AND SEA WALL PLAN (SHEET 1 |
| | OF 4). THE DIMENSION IS NECESSARY TO DEMONSTRATE |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR S.94-313(A)(3)J. |
| | |
| | 4.) ALL DIMENSIONS AND ILLUSTRATIONS PROVIDED IN THE |
| | PLAN SET SHALL BE CONSISTENT. THERE SEEMS TO BE |
| | DISCREPANCIES WITH THE ILLUSTRATIONS AND DIMENSIONS |
| | PROVIDED IN THE DOCK AND SEAWALL PLAN (SHEET 1 OF 4), |
| | THE TYPICAL DOCK PROFILE (SHEET 2 OF 4) AND THE TYPICAL |
| | 8 - WIDE DOCK SECTION DETAIL (SHEET 3 OF 4). PLEASE |
| | CORRECT FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 5.) THE FOLLOWING NOTES SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE PLANS: |
| | A) A LADDER EXTENDING FROM THE DOCK SURFACE TO TWO FEET |
| | BELOW THE MEAN PROPERTY LINE WILL BE PROVIDED; B) THE |
| | DOCK SHALL HAVE WATER-RESISTANT REFLECTIVE NUMERALS |
| | CORRESPONDING TO THE STREET ADDRESS OF THE UPLAND |
| | PROPERTY AND SHALL BE VISIBLE FROM THE WATERWAY; C) |
| | ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING MAY BE INSTALLED ON THE DOCK FOR |
| | SECURITY OR SAFETY BUT SHALL NOT LIGHT SURROUNDING |
| | PROPERTIES. BLINKING OR INTERMITTENT LIGHTS ARE |
| | PROHIBITED. |
| | |
| | 6.) IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO PROVIDE AN ILLUSTRATION THAT |
| | SUPERIMPOSES THE PROPOSED DOCK IN AN AERIAL IMAGE TO |
| | DEMONSTRATE HOW THE PROPOSED NEW DOCK RELATES TO |
| | EXISTING DOCK STRUCTURES IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. |
| | |
| | 7.) LETTERS OF SUPPORT FOR THE PROPOSED DOCK FROM THE |
| | ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS IMMEDIATELY TO THE NORTH AND |
| | SOUTH ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED. |
| | |
| | 8.) AN ADDRESS LIST AND A RADIUS MAP OF ALL PROPERTY |
| | OWNERS WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED TO PLANNING STAFF. ALSO REQUIRED IS THE SIGNED |
| | AND NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT ON PAGE 20 OF THE 2018 |
| | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF |
| | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5 |
| | INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 |
| | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE |
| | NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT |
| | IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
