Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z18080018
Project Number Z18080018
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2018-12-18 16:13:54GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) A COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW
 LETTER, INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE
 TPS OF THE COUNTY SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO STAFF AS A
 PREREQUISITE FOR MOVING FORWARD TO A PUBLIC HEARING.
 [9/18/18 REPEAT COMMENT - STAFF IS STILL WAITING ON THE
 TPS APPROVAL LETTER FROM THE COUNTY.]
  
 2.) ANY CHANGES TO A PLAN SHALL BE REFLECTED IN ALL
 PLANS IN THE APPLICATION PACKET FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SHEET MP-1) COMMENTS:
  
 1.) ONLY THE INTERNAL CROSS ACCESS WITHIN THE CPD
 SHOULD BE DEPICTED IN THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
 PLEASE REMOVE THE ACCESS POINT (NEW ARROW) INTO TRACT
 #3, AS IT IS REDUNDANT INFORMATION TO THE MASTER
 DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
  
 2.) THE INFORMATION FOR TRACT #3 IN THE MASTER
 DEVELOPMENT PLAN (NOT TABLE) HAS NOT BEEN CHANGED.
 STAFF HAD REQUESTED THE INFORMATION BE CHANGED FROM
 "USES PERMITTED IN THIS CPD SHALL INCLUDE ALL USES
 PERMITTED BY-RIGHT WITHIN THE GC ZONING DISTRICT AND
 ADDITIONAL USES AS APPROVED PER ORDINANCE NO. 4572-15"
 TO "UP TO 14,683 SF - GFA AND ASSOCIATED PARKING."
  
 3.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS IN THE
 OVERALL DEVELOPMENT SITE DATA: THE FAR FOR MOTOR
 VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE HAS YET TO BE CHANGED TO
 0.04.
  
 4.) FOR THE LAND USE AND ZONING INFORMATION AND NOTES
 FOR TRACT #3: A.) THE USE FOR MOTOR VEHICLE SALES AND
 SERVICE IS ?PROPOSED? (NOT APPROVED). B.) THE BUILDING
 SETBACKS ARE LABELED INCORRECTLY: NORTH IS THE CORNER
 SIDE (NOT FRONT), SOUTH IS THE SIDE (NOT REAR), EAST IS
 THE REAR (NOT SIDE), AND WEST IS THE FRONT (NOT SIDE).
 C.) THERE ARE STILL DISCREPANCIES IN THE CALCULATIONS
 FOR OPEN SPACE AND PERVIOUS AREA. D.) FIGURES FOR:
 IMPERVIOUS AREA, BUILDING FOOTPRINT, PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK,
 OPEN SPACE AND PERVIOUS SURFACE DOES NOT MATCH THE
 INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1).
 PLEASE ADDRESS. E.) CHECK MINIMUM OPEN SPACE
 PERCENTAGE. IT DOES NOT MATCH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED
 IN THE SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1).
  
 SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1):
  
 1.) FOR THE USE INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR THE PARCEL
 IMMEDIATELY NORTH: ZONING = COMMERCIAL PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT (CPD) (NOT GC), AND THE USE = C-STORE W/GAS
 SALES (NOT FAST FOOD W/DRIVE-THRU/OFFICE) AS THE PARCEL
 IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF PARCEL #3 IS WITHIN THE PALMS
 GATEWAY CPD (NOT OUTSIDE).
  
 2.) FOR THE USE INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR THE PARCEL
 IMMEDIATELY EAST: ZONING = COMMERCIAL PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT (CPD) (NOT GC), AND THE USE = SELF-STORAGE
 FACILITY (NOT MOTOR VEHICLE SALES) AS THE PARCEL
 IMMEDIATELY EAST OF PARCEL #3 IS WITHIN THE PALMS
 GATEWAY CPD (NOT OUTSIDE).
  
 3.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA
 TABULAR: A.) ACCORDING TO THE TABLE, 1,442 SQ. FT. OF
 CANOPY AREA WILL BE PROVIDED; HOWEVER, THIS FIGURE DOES
 NOT ADD UP IN SHEET A-102. B.) PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION
 TO HOW THE 10% BUILDING COVERAGE WAS CALCULATED. C.)
  PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION TO HOW THE 80% (13,285 SQ. FT.)
 IMPERVIOUS AREA FOR BUILDINGS WAS CALCULATED. D.) CHECK
 PARKING CALCULATIONS. OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA TOTAL DOES
 NOT ADD UP TO 30,590 SQ. FT. PARKING CALCULATIONS MAY
 NEED TO BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 4.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS TABLE: A.) THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIRED IS
 5,000 SQ. FT. (NOT 5 ACRES). B.) DIMENSIONS PROVIDED
 FOR THE WIDTH AND FRONTAGE ARE INCORRECT. C.)
 INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR: MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE,
 MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS, MINIMUM OPEN SPACE, MINIMUM
 LANDSCAPING SHALL MATCH THE NUMBERS PROVIDED IN THE
 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SHEET MP-1) FOR CONSISTENCY.
 D.) SETBACK DIMENSIONS ARE INCORRECT, DUE TO THE
 LABELING OF THE SETBACKS IN THE PLANS.
  
 5.) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS TWO (2) ELECTRIC CAR CHARGE
 STATIONS COUNTED TOWARDS THE REQUIRED PARKING. SINCE
 THESE CHARGING STATIONS ARE MEANT FOR THE APPLICANT?S
 CUSTOMERS ONLY AND ARE NOT OPEN TO OTHER TENANTS WITHIN
 THE CPD (DEALERSHIP IS GATED FOR SECURITY), THESE
 CHARGING STALLS CANNOT BE COUNTED AS REQUIRED PARKING.
 PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLAN AND PARKING CALCULATIONS
 ACCORDINGLY.
  
 6.) IN THE REGULATING PLAN (SHEET SP-2), PLEASE ADDRESS
 THE FOLLOWING: A.) IDENTIFY WHERE IN THE SITE PLAN IS
 THE DETAIL FOR PARKING AND STRIPING W/OVERHANG. B.)
 BIKE RACK DETAIL MUST SHOW A 24-INCH CLEARANCE FROM THE
 EDGE OF THE PAD TO THE RACK ON ALL SIDES. PLEASE
 ILLUSTRATE TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. C.) SECTION B
 SHOWS A 30-INCH RAILING LOCATED WITHIN THE 2 FT. CURB
 OVERHANG FOR VEHICLES. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED. D.) ENTRY
 GATE DETAIL SHALL READ SECURITY GATE DETAIL TO MATCH
 LANGUAGE ON SHEET SP-1.
  
 7.) PROPOSED NEW MONUMENT SIGN SHALL BE SETBACK AT
 LEAST 24 FT. FROM THE LOT LINE OF ANOTHER LOT. SITE
 PLAN SHOWS A SETBACK DISTANCE OF 22 FT. FROM THE
 ADJACENT LOT TO THE SOUTH. [ZLDR S.94-408(D)((2)(E.)]
  
 MASTER SIGN PLAN:
  
 1.) THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THERE IS AN
 APPROVED FREESTANDING MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE PALMS
 GATEWAY CPD. ANY PROPOSED CHANGE SHOULD BE REFLECTED IN
 THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT (INCLUDE DETAILS AND
 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE PROPOSED NEW MONUMENT SIGN, ETC.)
 AND IN THE APPROVED FREESTANDING MASTER SIGN PROGRAM.
 STAFF IS STILL WAITING ON THE CHANGES TO THE
 FREESTANDING MASTER SIGN PROGRAM.
  
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS:
  
 1.) SHEET A-101 SHOULD SHOW THE AMOUNT OF SERVICE AREA
 IN SQUARE FEET.
  
 2.) WHY IS THERE ARE CAR PARKED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE
 DRIVE AISLE IN THE SERVICE AREA?
  
 3.) CANOPY AREA CALCULATION ON SHEET A-102 DOES NOT
 SEEM TO ADD UP TO THE FIGURE PROVIDE IN SHEET A-101 AND
 IN THE SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR
 CONSISTENCY.
  
 4.) TYPO FOR "SECOND FLOOR" ON SHEET A-101.
  
 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN:
  
 * PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE
 MAKE SURE THE LATEST LAYERS FOR THE SITE PLAN ARE BEING
 USED FOR THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN.
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8 ?
 INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17
 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY
 RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved