| Date |
Text |
| 2018-11-07 09:39:35 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) A COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW |
| | LETTER, INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE |
| | TPS OF THE COUNTY SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO STAFF AS A |
| | PREREQUISITE FOR MOVING FORWARD TO A PUBLIC HEARING. |
| | [9/18/18 REPEAT COMMENT ? STAFF IS STILL WAITING ON THE |
| | TPS APPROVAL LETTER FROM THE COUNTY.] |
| | |
| | |
| | MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SHEET MP-1) COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1.) CORRECT THE FOLLOWING LAND USE AND ZONING: A) |
| | PARCEL IMMEDIATELY WEST OF THE PALMS GATEWAY CPD HAS A |
| | LAND USE: C AND ZONING: CPD (NOT LAND USE: CS AND |
| | ZONING: CS), B.) THE PARCEL LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST |
| | CORNER OF BELVEDERE ROAD AND AUSTRALIAN AVENUE HAS A |
| | LAND USE: C AND ZONING: CPD (NOT LAND USE: CS AND |
| | ZONING: CPD). |
| | |
| | 2.) FOR THE LAND USE AND ZONING INFORMATION AND NOTES |
| | TABLES FOR TRACTS #2 AND #4, PLEASE CORRECT "PROPOSED |
| | USE" TO "APPROVED USE" AS THE SITE PLANS FOR THESE |
| | TRACTS HAVE ALREADY BEEN APPROVED. |
| | |
| | 3.) FOR THE LAND USE AND ZONING INFORMATION AND NOTES |
| | FOR TRACT #3: A) THE CORRECT FAR FOR THE OVERALL CPD IS |
| | 0.04 (NOT 0.03), B) PLEASE INCLUDE "TOTAL BUILDING |
| | SIZE" INFORMATION, C) CHECK AREA CALCULATIONS. THE OPEN |
| | SPACE, PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS DO |
| | NOT ADD UP (DIFFERENCE OF 2,280 SQ. FT.). ALSO CHECK |
| | THE PERCENTAGES. [NOTE: INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE |
| | CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN CONFIRMED WITH THE CITY'S |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANNER], D) ACCORDING TO THE ELEVATION |
| | DRAWINGS, THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING |
| | IS 30 FT. (NOT 29 FT. AS NOTED). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY, E) BUILDING FOOTPRINT CALCULATION DOES NOT |
| | MATCH THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT CALCULATION PROVIDED IN |
| | THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 4.) THE FAR FOR TRACT #3 FOR THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT IS |
| | 0.04 (NOT 0.03). PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 5.) THE OVERALL FAR FOR THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT IS 0.37 |
| | (NOT 0.36). PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | SITE PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) SHOW SETBACK DISTANCE FROM THE LIGHT FIXTURE TO THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE. SETBACK DIMENSIONS SEEM TO BE MISSING |
| | FOR THE FIXTURES PROVIDED ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FIXTURES SHALL BE PLACED AT LEAST |
| | 5 FT. FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. [ZLDR S.94-145(2)] |
| | |
| | 2.) CORRECT THE FUTURE LAND USE AND ZONING FOR THE |
| | PARCEL ON THE WEST SIDE OF AUSTRALIAN AVENUE. THE |
| | CORRECT FUTURE LAND USE IS COMMERCIAL (C) AND THE |
| | CORRECT ZONING IS COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD). |
| | |
| | 3.) PARKING CALCULATIONS INCORRECT. CALCULATION FOR |
| | OUTDOOR STORAGE SHOULD INCLUDE ALL DISPLAY AREAS WITHIN |
| | THE PROJECT. PLEASE REVISE CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 4.) BICYCLE PARKING CALCULATIONS SHALL BE REVISED TO |
| | REFLECT CORRECT CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 5.) BICYCLE RACK DETAIL IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE |
| | ILLUSTRATION IN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 6.) ALL SECURITY GATES SHALL BE LABELED IN THE SITE |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | 7.) WHERE IS THE ACCESS INTO THE LIFT STATION? PLEASE |
| | ILLUSTRATE. IS THERE A PROPOSED FENCE AROUND THE LIFT |
| | STATION? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION (I.E. |
| | HEIGHT, MATERIAL, ETC.) |
| | |
| | 8.) WHY IS THERE ONLY A PARTIAL RETAINING WALL ALONG |
| | THE SOUTH AND EAST PROPERTY LINES? PLEASE PROVIDE AN |
| | EXPLANATION. |
| | |
| | 9.) THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE FLAGPOLE MAY BE IN |
| | CONFLICT WITH THE LANDSCAPING FOR THE PROJECT. PLEASE |
| | VERIFY WITH THE CITY?S LANDSCAPE PLANNER, RAY CARANCI @ |
| | 561-822-1462. |
| | |
| | 10.) INCONSISTENCIES DETECTED IN THE LOT MEASUREMENTS |
| | PROVIDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TABLE WHEN |
| | COMPARED TO THE SURVEY/SITE PLAN OF THE SUBJECT |
| | PROPERTY AND IN THE SETBACKS (I.E. LOT FRONTAGE IS |
| | AUSTRALIAN AVENUE, ETC.). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 11.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS IN THE SITE |
| | DATA TABULAR (SHEET SP-1): A) THE NAME OF THE CPD IS |
| | "PALMS GATEWAY" (NOT "BW AUSTRALIAN AND BELVEDERE"), B) |
| | "PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT" SHOULD BE ELIMINATED, SINCE |
| | THE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY IS NOT CHANGING, C) CHECK |
| | THE CALCULATION FOR OPEN SPACE. THERE SEEMS TO BE A |
| | DISCREPANCY WITH STAFF?S CALCULATION FOR OPEN SPACE, D) |
| | ACCORDING TO THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION, THE MAXIMUM |
| | HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING IS 30 FT. (NOT 29 FT. AS NOTED). |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY, E) CALCULATIONS FOR THE |
| | TOTAL PROPOSED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES SHALL ALSO BE |
| | PROVIDED IN THE DATA TABULAR, F) PER ZLDRS, ONE (1) 10 |
| | FT. X 25 FT. LOADING ZONE IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. |
| | PLEASE CORRECT IN THE TABLE. |
| | |
| | 12.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE REGULATING |
| | PLAN (SHEET SP-2): A) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS (I.E. HEIGHT) |
| | FOR THE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL, B) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS |
| | (I.E. HEIGHT) FOR THE PROPOSED RAILING. |
| | |
| | |
| | MASTER SIGN PLAN: |
| | |
| | 1.) THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THERE IS AN |
| | APPROVED FREESTANDING MASTER SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE PALMS |
| | GATEWAY CPD. ANY PROPOSED CHANGE SHOULD BE REFLECTED IN |
| | THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT (INCLUDE DETAILS AND |
| | JUSTIFICATION FOR THE PROPOSED NEW MONUMENT SIGN, ETC.) |
| | AND IN THE APPROVED FREESTANDING MASTER SIGN PROGRAM. |
| | |
| | 2.) WHAT IS THE WIDTH OF THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN. |
| | |
| | 3.) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA |
| | (BOTH SIDES OF THE SIGN STRUCTURE) IS 222.46 SQ. FT. |
| | THE PROPOSED SIGN AREA (194 SQ. FT. PER SIGN FACE) |
| | SEEMS TO EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA. |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS: |
| | |
| | 1.) FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS IN THE FLOOR PLANS DO NOT |
| | MATCH THE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE MASTER/SITE |
| | PLAN. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | 2.) LABEL GENERATOR ON THE NORTH ELEVATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL: |
| | |
| | * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF |
| | FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8 .5 |
| | INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17 |
| | INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY |
| | RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
