Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z18080018
Project Number Z18080018
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2018-09-18 10:13:34GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) A COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TPS) REVIEW
 LETTER, INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE
 TPS OF THE COUNTY SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO STAFF AS A
 PREREQUISITE FOR MOVING FORWARD TO A PUBLIC HEARING.
  
 2.) TWO (2) SETS OF ADDRESSED LABELS AFFIXED TO SIZE
 #10 STAMPED ENVELOPES SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH
 PROPERTY OWNER WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 SHALL HAVE THE CITY'S ADDRESS AS THE RETURN LABEL. THE
 SETS OF ENVELOPES WERE NOT SUBMITTED WITH THE
 APPLICATION PACKET.
  
 3.) THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS MISSING FROM THE
 APPLICATION PACKET. THE MASTER PLAN REQUIRES AN UPDATE
 AS PART OF THIS AMENDMENT.
  
 4.) CALCULATIONS IN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH
 THE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED IN THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE
 ENSURE THE CALCULATIONS ARE CORRECT FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 5.) PLEASE REVISE THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT TO
 ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: A.) REVISE THE LANGUAGE TO STATE
 THAT "MOTOR VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE USE" IS A
 PERMITTED USE BY RIGHT IN THE PALMS GATEWAY CPD.
 CURRENT LANGUAGE SUGGESTS THAT THE REQUEST ALSO INCLUDE
 AN AMENDMENT TO ADD THE USE TO THE LIST OF PERMITTED
 USES. B.) PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION TO WHY THE MASTER SIGN
 PROGRAM REQUIRES AN AMENDMENT. DOES THE PROPOSED
 MONUMENT SIGN MEET CURRENT SIGN CODE STANDARDS? DOES
 THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE REQUIRE A WAIVER?
  
 6.) PER ZLDR S.94-207(A)(1), THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 MUST DEMONSTRATE INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND
 DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES TO CREATE A MORE DESIRABLE AND
 ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT. PLEASE EXPLAIN IN THE
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT TO HOW THIS STANDARD HAS BEEN
 ADDRESSED IN THE PROPOSED PROJECT. STAFF BELIEVES THAT
 THE PROJECT CAN BE IMPROVED THROUGH THE INCORPORATION
 OF ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING AND OTHER PEDESTRIAN FEATURES
 TO INTERCONNECT THE PROJECT TO THE ADJACENT PARCELS.
  
 7.) THE "NOTE" IN THE SITE PLAN INDICATES THAT THE BASE
 INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A SURVEY DATED 3/19/2018;
 HOWEVER, THE SURVEY SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION HAS
 A REVISION DATED 4/4/18. PLEASE ENSURE ALL INFORMATION
 PROVIDED IN THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH
 THE REVISED SURVEY. AN UPDATED SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY
 MAY BE NECESSARY WITH THE RESUBMITTAL.
  
 8.) PLEASE ENSURE ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT (I.E.
 REVISIONS TO THE DIGITAL LAYERS, ETC.)
  
  
 SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.)PER THE LANDSCAPE PLAN (NOT DEPICTED IN THE SITE
 PLAN), THE (RELOCATED) LIFT STATION IS LOCATED OUTSIDE
 OF THE PBC UTILITY EASEMENT AND DOES NOT CONNECT TO
 TRACT #1 (DEL TACO RESTAURANT) AND TRACT #2
 (SELF-STORAGE FACILITY), AS SHOWN IN PREVIOUSLY
 APPROVED PLANS. THE LOCATION OF THE LIFT STATION/SEWER
 LINE CONNECTION IS ALSO INCONSISTENT WITH THE DEPICTION
 OF THE SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM FOR THE OVERALL PD
 SPECIFIED IN THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS
 AND RESTRICTIONS AND RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT (ORB
 29483, PG 1743). PLEASE ADDRESS AND SHOW LOCATION OF
 THE LIFT STATION IN THE SITE PLAN.
  
 2.) PER THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND
 RESTRICTIONS AND RECIPROCAL EASEMENT AGREEMENT (ORB BK
 29483, PG 1743), THE DRAINAGE SWALE AREA FOR PARCEL #3
 IS 5,374 SQ. FT. ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN, THE
 DRAINAGE AREA IS 4,534 SQ. FT. PLEASE ADDRESS THIS
 DISCREPANCY.
  
 3.) THE PROPOSED SITE CIRCULATION PATTERN IS
 INCONSISTENT WITH THE CIRCULATION PATTERN ADOPTED BY
 THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN (SHOWS ONCE ACCESS POINT
 INTO THE PARCEL, NOT TWO). PLEASE ADDRESS FOR
 CONSISTENCY.
  
 4.) WORK WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT TO ADDRESS A.D.A.
 COMPLIANCE AND ACCESSIBILITY TO THE SITE FROM
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE.
  
 5.) THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTH END OF THE PARCEL
 SHALL BE EXTENDED ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE SITE
 TO PROVIDE INTERCONNECTIVITY WITH THE OTHER PARCELS IN
 THE CPD.
  
 6.) THE PLAN MUST SHOW HOW THE PROPOSED PARKING SPACES
 ON-SITE WILL BE ALLOCATED (I.E. CUSTOMER/EMPLOYEE
 PARKING, INVENTORY, ETC.)
  
 7.) THE PROPOSED SECURITY GATES AT THE ACCESS POINTS
 INTO TRACT #3 IS LOCATED WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLES. PLEASE RELOCATE THE GATES OUTSIDE OF THE
 SIGHT TRIANGLES. [ZLDR S.94-305(E)]
  
 8.) A DETAIL OF THE SECURITY GATE (I.E. HEIGHT AND
 DESIGN) SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PLAN SET. PLEASE NOTE
 THAT THE HEIGHT OF THE SECURITY GATE CANNOT EXCEED 8
 FT. IN HEIGHT. [ZLDR S.94-302(C)]
  
 9.) THERE ARE SEVERAL STRUCTURES LOCATED WITHIN THE
 PALM BEACH COUNTY UTILITY EASEMENT (I.E. SECURITY
 GATES, LIGHT FIXTURES, PARKING AREA AND SIDEWALK). AN
 EASEMENT CONSENT/RELEASE FROM THE COUNTY SHALL BE
 PROVIDED FOR THESE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS.
  
 10.) LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE SETBACK AT LEAST 5 FT.
 FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE ADDRESS. [ZLDR
 S.94-145(2)]
  
 11.) ALL FREESTANDING SIGNS (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) ON
 THE PROPERTY SHALL COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS IN ZLDR S.
 94-408(D). PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON
 DISTANCE SEPARATION AND SIGN AREA CALCULATIONS TO
 DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.
  
 12.) WHAT IS THE SETBACK DISTANCE OF THE PROPOSED
 MONUMENT SIGN FROM AUSTRALIAN AVENUE (SHOW SETBACK
 DIMENSION IN THE PLAN)?
  
 13.) ALL DIMENSIONS PROVIDED IN THE SIGN DETAIL HAVE
 NOT BEEN PROVIDED ON SHEET SP-2 (I.E. WIDTH OF THE
 PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN). PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 14.) PLEASE DIMENSION OUT ALL TERMINAL ISLANDS IN THE
 PARKING AREA. ALL TERMINAL ISLANDS SHALL BE A MINIMUM
 OF 8 FT. (MEASURED FROM THE INSIDE CURB) AND NOT LESS
 THAN THE LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING STALL. [ZLDR
 S.94-443(C)(3)]
  
 15.) ONE (1) INTERIOR ISLAND SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR
 EVERY TEN (10) PARKING SPACES IN A ROW. THERE ARE
 SEVERAL ROWS OF PARKING THAT EXCEED THE NUMBER OF
 PARKING SPACES WITHOUT AN INTERIOR ISLAND. [ZLDR
 S.94-443(C)(3)]
  
 16.) SHOW DIMENSION FOR ALL WALKWAYS. A MINIMUM 7 FT.
 WIDE SIDEWALK IS REQUIRED WHERE THERE IS VEHICULAR
 OVERHANG. [ZLDR S.94-443, FIGURE XIV-2]
  
 17.) A MINIMUM OF ONE 10 FT. X 25 FT. LOADING ZONE IS
 REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATION OF
 THE LOADING ZONE. ADDITIONALLY, THE LOADING ZONE SHALL
 BE LOCATED ON THE SAME PROPERTY WHICH THE USE/STRUCTURE
 EXISTS. [ZLDR S.94-485]
  
 18.) INFORMATION IS REQUIRED ON WHERE THE VEHICULAR
 INVENTORY WILL BE UNLOADED/LOADED ON-SITE.
  
 19.) BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE LOCATED NEAR THE
 PRINCIPAL ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDING. [ZLDR S.94-485(Q)]
  
 20.) THE NOTATED RETAINING WALLS TO THE EAST AND WEST
 SIDE OF THE PROPERTY IS NOT CLEARLY SHOWN IN THE PLAN.
 PLEASE SHOW.
  
 21.) HOW TALL ARE THE RETAINING WALLS? INCLUDE
 DIMENSION IN THE PLAN/DETAIL. [ZLDR S.94-302(C)]
  
 22.) WHAT IS THE HATCHING ALONG THE PERIMETER OF THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING? THERE IS NO LEGEND THAT IDENTIFIES
 THE HATCHING, NOR IS IT CONSISTENT WITH THE DETAILS IN
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 23.) DIMENSIONS/SHAPE OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE IN
 SHEET SP-1 DOES NOT MATCH THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL
 PROVIDED IN SHEET SP-2. PLEASE ADDRESS FOR CONSISTENCY.
  
 24.) WHAT IS THE AREA OF THE "LOOSE STONES" AT THE
 NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY?
  
 25.) THE "ACCESS EASEMENT" SEEMS TO BE EXCLUDED IN MOST
 CALCULATIONS IN THE SITE DATA AND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS TABLES. THE ACCESS EASEMENT IS WITHIN THE
 PROPERTY LINE OF THE PROJECT AND THEREFORE, MUST BE
 INCLUDED IN ALL CALCULATIONS. PLEASE CORRECT THE
 CALCULATIONS TO INCLUDE THE ACCESS EASEMENT.
  
 26.) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS: A.)
 FLAG POLE STRUCTURE, B.) SECURITY GATES, C.) VEHICULAR
 DISPLAY AREA (I.E. IS IT ELEVATED?), D.) PARKING STALL
 DETAIL FOR SMALLER PARKING STALLS AND FOR STALLS WITH A
 CURB OVERHANG.
  
 27.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA
 TABULAR: A.) PROJECT NUMBER IS PB 1670J/Z18080018, B.)
 INCLUDE BUILDING HEIGHT INFORMATION, C.) PARKING
 CALCULATIONS SEEM TO BE INCORRECT; ALSO INCLUDE THE
 TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE
 PROJECT/PARKING ALLOCATION FOR SPECIFIC USES (I.E.
 INVENTORY, CUSTOMER, ETC.), D.) BICYCLE PARKING
 CALCULATION MISSING, E.) LOADING ZONING CALCULATION
 MISSING
  
 28.) PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS IN THE
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TABLE: A.) ZONING DISTRICT IS
 CPD (NOT PCD), B.) CHECK PERCENT CALCULATION FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE PROVIDED.
  
  
 LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 1.) LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
 COULD BE WIDENED BY ELIMINATING THE WHEEL STOPS AND
 SHORTENING THE PARKING STALLS TO A DEPTH OF 16 FT.
 (CURRENTLY DIMENSIONED AT 18 FT.).
  
 2.) LANDSCAPED AREA SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM VEHICULAR
 USE AREAS BY NON-MOUNTABLE, CONCRETE CURBING OF THE
 TYPE CHARACTERIZED AS "TYPE D". THERE SEEMS TO BE
 SEVERAL AREAS IN THE SITE PLAN MISSING THE
 NON-MOUNTABLE CURB, ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPED AREAS.
 PLEASE MODIFY PLAN TO SHOW CURBING. [ZLDR
 S.94-443(C)(3)]
  
 3.) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY'S
 LANDSCAPE PLANNER, RAY CARANCI (561) 822-1462.
  
  
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS:
  
 1.) STRUCTURAL OVERHANGS SHALL NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 3
 FT. INTO ANY SETBACK. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE BY
 PROVIDING DIMENSIONS IN THE ELEVATION PLANS. [ZLDR
 S.94-305(B)(2)]
  
 2.) THERE SEEMS TO BE A STRUCTURAL ELEMENT THAT
 PROJECTS BEYOND THE PARAPET AT THE SOUTH ELEVATION.
 PLEASE IDENTIFY THIS ELEMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW BY THE
 PARAPET.
  
 3.) WHAT IS THE SECOND STORY BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE?
  
 4.) PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS.
  
  
 LIGHTING (PHOTOMETRIC) PLAN:
  
 1.) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE SITE
 AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. PLEASE ENSURE USE OF THE SAME CAD
 FILE/LAYERS FOR ALL PLANS.
  
 2.) LIGHT POLE FIXTURES SHALL BE SETBACK AT LEAST 5 FT.
 FROM THE PROPERTY LINES. PLEASE ADDRESS IN BOTH THE
 SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR
 CONSISTENCY. [ZLDR S.94-145(2)]
  
 3.) LIGHT FIXTURES ARE WITHIN THE PBC UTILITY EASEMENT
 LOCATED AT THE NORTH END OF THE PROPERTY. RELOCATE THE
 LIGHT FIXTURES OUT OF THE UTILITY EASEMENT OR PROVIDE A
 UTILITY EASEMENT CONSENT/RELEASE FROM THE COUNTY FOR
 ALL STRUCTURES WITHIN THE EASEMENT.
  
 4.) ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE SHIELDED TO REDUCE
 GLARE AND SHALL BE ARRANGED TO REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE
 AWAY FROM PUBLIC THOROUGHFARES. [ZLDR S.94-309(A)]
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5
 INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17
 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 * ANY CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT ($600.00) OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved