| Date |
Text |
| 2018-09-24 15:04:06 | CASE NO. PB 891GG |
| | PALM BEACH OUTLETS BUILDING D ATM |
| | 1820 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY NOVEMBER 24, 2018), |
| | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER |
| | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | 1) IT VISUALLY APPEARS THAT THERE IS MORE IMPERVIOUS |
| | SURFACE ON THE NEW PLAN DUE TO THE ADDITION OF THE ATM |
| | ACCESS DRIVE REPLACING AN AREA THAT PREVIOUSLY HAD |
| | LANDSCAPE. THE NEW DRIVEWAY BEHIND BUILDING A ALSO ADDS |
| | IMPERVIOUS AREA. THE DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA TABLE DID NOT |
| | CHANGE FOR IMPERVIOUS AREA OR LANDSCAPE PERCENTAGE. THE |
| | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES THAT THERE IS NO CHANGE |
| | TO THE PERCENTAGES. IS THIS DUE TO THE SMALL AMOUNT OF |
| | CHANGE VS THE OVERALL SITE? ARE YOU KEEPING TRACK OF |
| | THE CUMULATIVE CHANGES? NOTE THAT THE SITE IS GETTING |
| | CLOSE TO THE 85/15% BALANCE POINT. |
| | |
| | 2) PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE PBA #4 PARKING SF FOR CURRENT |
| | APPLICATION IS ONLY 10 SF MORE THAN WHAT WAS APPROVED |
| | AS PART OF PB 891FF (CFA AND TOO JAY'S MINOR) WHEN THE |
| | NEW BUILDING D IS 17 SF FEET LARGER THAN THE PREVIOUS |
| | ONE. THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES IS NOT |
| | AFFECTED. |
| | |
| | 3) THERE IS A STRIPED AREA IN THE RECONFIGURED PARKING |
| | WEST OF BUILDING D. WHY IS THIS NOT USED TO EXPAND THE |
| | ADJACENT TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND OR TO SHIFT THE |
| | ENTIRE PARKING ROW SOUTH AND THEN EXPAND THE TERMINAL |
| | LANDSCAPE ISLAND ON THE OTHER END OF THE PARKING ROW? |
| | |
| | 4) THE ELEVATIONS ON SHEET A.100 ARE MISLABELED WHEN |
| | COMPARED TO THE FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A.200. |
| | |
| | 5) THE PALM BEACH LAKES ELEVATION MUST BE CLEARLY |
| | LABELED ON SHEET A.100. |
| | |
| | 6) PLEASE PROVIDE ONE ADDITIONAL COPY OF THE MASTER |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | |
| |
Print |
