| Date |
Text |
| 2018-10-31 10:09:40 | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 10.31.2018 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z18070013 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 791GG |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. ALL OUTSTANDING UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED. - |
| | STILL AWAITING FPL LETTER. |
| | |
| | 2. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY APPROVAL SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM |
| | PALM BEACH COUNTY. - THE ONLY LETTER THAT HAS BEEN |
| | RECEIVED IS DATED 09/10/2018, WHICH INDICATES THAT THE |
| | PROJECT DOES NOT MEET THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS |
| | OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. |
| | |
| | 4. APPROVAL FROM THE CENTREPARK ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW |
| | COMMITTEE SHALL BE PROVIDED. - LETTER OF CONSENT WAS |
| | RECEIVED, BUT WHAT IS BEING DONE ABOUT THE COMMENTS OR |
| | AREAS OF CONCERN THAT WERE NEEDING FURTHER |
| | DISCUSSION/REVIEW? |
| | |
| | 8. PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 5, CONDITION |
| | #11 OF RESOLUTION NO. 97-17, ALL IRRIGATION SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED UTILIZING THE LAKES (NO POTABLE WATER SHALL BE |
| | UTILIZED). PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLANS |
| | INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH PROVISION. - RESPONSE |
| | INDICATES THAT THIS NOTE WAS ADDED ON THE LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANS...PLEASE PROVIDE A SHEET # AS I WAS UNABLE TO |
| | FIND IT. |
| | |
| | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE A TURNING RADIUS ANALYSIS FOR THE |
| | UTILIZATION OF THE LOADING AREA AND DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR. |
| | - THE TURNING RADIUS ANALYSIS INDICATES THAT THE |
| | MANEUVERING OF THE VEHICLES REQUIRES ENCROACHMENT ONTO |
| | THE ADJACENT PROPERTY, OUTSIDE OF THE EXISTING ACCESS |
| | EASEMENT. AN ADDITIONAL EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED, OR |
| | THE CIRCULATION MODIFIED SO AS NOT TO EXTEND OUTSIDE OF |
| | THE EXISTING EASEMENT. IF AN ADDITIONAL EASEMENT IS |
| | PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN AGREEMENT FROM THE |
| | ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER. |
| | |
| | 15. THE DESIGN OF THE GROUNDFLOOR UNITS SHOULD BE |
| | MODIFIED SUCH THAT THEY HAVE A WALK-UP ENTRANCE WITH |
| | FRONT DOOR FACING THE STREET, ETC. THE CURRENT DESIGN |
| | IS SUCH THAT IT APPEARS TO BE ONLY A SIDEWALK LEADING |
| | TO A BACK PATIO/SLIDING DOOR. - IS THERE ANY WAY TO |
| | HAVE THE DOORS FACING THE STREET? |
| | |
| | 17. AS THE BUILDING IS LOCATED AT THE PROPERTY LINE AND |
| | THERE APPEAR TO BE BALCONIES AND ROOF OVERHANGS |
| | ENCROACHING INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACK, PLEASE ENSURE |
| | THAT ALL PLANS CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE ENCROACHMENTS AND |
| | ARE DIMENSIONED ACCORDINGLY. THE ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO |
| | SHOW OVERHANGS ON THE UPPER FLOOR THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON |
| | THE ROOF PLAN AND/OR FLOOR PLANS. ENSURE THAT OVERHANGS |
| | DO NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO THE REQUIRED |
| | SETBACK. - - SOME OF THE FRONT STOOPS ARE ENCROACHING |
| | INTO THE SETBACK, WHICH IS PERMITTED SO LONG AS THEY DO |
| | NOT EXCEED THREE (3) FEET IN HEIGHT; PLEASE PROVIDE |
| | DETAILS INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH. |
| | |
| | 24. (NEW COMMENT) - THE SITE DESIGN SHOWN ON SHEET A2.1 |
| | DIFFERS FROM THAT WHICH IS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED SITE |
| | PLAN. SHEET A2.1 STILL INDICATES THE ON-STREET PARKING, |
| | ETC. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | NOTE, STAFF IS CONTINUING TO DISCUSS THE PROPOSED TEXT |
| | AMENDMENT PERTAINING TO THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND |
| | WILL FOLLOW UP SOON IN THAT REGARD TO DISCUSS THE |
| | SPECIFIC LANGUAGE, AS WELL AS ANY POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO |
| | THE PROJECT (IF ANY). |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | P: 561.822.1448 |
| | F: 561.822.1460 |
| | |
| | E: [email protected] |
| | |
| | W: WPB.ORG |
| | |
| |
Print |
