Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z18070013
Project Number Z18070013
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2018-08-08 11:09:05PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 08.08.2018
 PROJECT NO.: Z18070013
 CASE NO.: PB 791GG
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. ALL OUTSTANDING UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 2. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY APPROVAL SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM
 PALM BEACH COUNTY.
  
 3. SCHOOL CAPACITY AVAILABILITY DETERMINATION (SCAD)
 SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH
 COUNTY.
  
 4. APPROVAL FROM THE CENTREPARK ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
 COMMITTEE SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 5. UPDATED WARRANTY DEED SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 6. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE
 CENTREPARK AFFORDABLE AND WORKFORCE HOUSING POLICY THAT
 WAS APPROVED WITH THE ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 98-17.
 AS REQUIRED BY THE POLICY, THE APPLICATION SHALL
 PROVIDE A WRITTEN CERTIFICATION AS PART OF THE SITE
 PLAN APPLICATION IDENTIFYING WHICH UNITS WILL BE
 OFFERED AS WORKFORCE HOUSING UNITS. PLEASE REFER TO THE
 POLICY FOR ALL UNIT RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE REQUIRED.
  
 7. PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 98-17,
 UPON OBTAINING SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT SHALL
 CONTRIBUTE $150/UNIT TO THE WORKFORCE HOUSING TRUST
 FUND, UNLESS THE CITY CHOOSES TO USE IT TOWARD THE
 DEVELOPMENT OF A TRANSIT PLAN TO PROVIDE CONNECTIVITY
 BETWEEN DOWNTOWN AND CENTREPARK. IF THIS OPTION IS
 CHOSEN, THEN THE APPLICANT SHALL WORK WITH THE CITY ON
 THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PLAN.
  
 8. PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 5, CONDITION
 #11 OF RESOLUTION NO. 97-17, ALL IRRIGATION SHALL BE
 PROVIDED UTILIZING THE LAKES (NO POTABLE WATER SHALL BE
 UTILIZED). PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLANS
 INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH PROVISION.
  
 9. PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 5, CONDITION
 #13 OF RESOLUTION NO. 97-17, WATER-SAVING PLUMBING
 FIXTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT.
 PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE ON THE PLANS INDICATING
 COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH PROVISION.
  
 10. ACCORDING TO THE CIVIL PLANS, THE PROPOSED PAVILION
 BY THE POOL WILL BE LOCATED IN THE RELOCATED DRAINAGE
 EASEMENT. PLEASE CLARIFY AND ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.
  
 11. PLEASE PROVIDE A TURNING RADIUS ANALYSIS FOR THE
 UTILIZATION OF THE LOADING AREA AND DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR.
  
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS/INFORMATION REGARDING WHAT
 APPEARS TO BE GATES/FENCES IN FRONT OF THE RESIDENTIAL
 UNITS ALONG CENTREPARK BOULEVARD. ALL FENCING SHALL BE
 CLEARLY DETAILED AND/OR LABELED WITH APPLICABLE
 HEIGHTS, ETC.
  
 13. PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 97-17, THE SETBACK ALONG
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 20 FEET; THE
 PROPOSED SITE PLAN INDICATES ON 19 FEET BEING PROVIDED.
  
 14. CONSIDER REDUCING THE WIDTH OF THE ENTRANCE/EXIT
 DRIVE FROM THE GARAGE TO 20 FEET. AS SUCH, THE OPENING
 IN THE BUILDING CAN BE REDUCED AS WELL.
  
 15. THE DESIGN OF THE GROUNDFLOOR UNITS SHOULD BE
 MODIFIED SUCH THAT THEY HAVE A WALK-UP ENTRANCE WITH
 FRONT DOOR FACING THE STREET, ETC. THE CURRENT DESIGN
 IS SUCH THAT IT APPEARS TO BE ONLY A SIDEWALK LEADING
 TO A BACK PATIO/SLIDING DOOR.
  
 16. THERE ARE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS SHOWN WITHIN THE
 REQUIRED SETBACK, SPECIFICALLY AT THE SOUTH END OF THE
 BUILDING. ONLY ROOF OVERHANGS, BALCONIES, ETC. MAY
 ENCROACH INTO A REQUIRED SETBACK.
  
 17. AS THE BUILDING IS LOCATED AT THE PROPERTY LINE AND
 THERE APPEAR TO BE BALCONIES AND ROOF OVERHANGS
 ENCROACHING INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACK, PLEASE ENSURE
 THAT ALL PLANS CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE ENCROACHMENTS AND
 ARE DIMENSIONED ACCORDINGLY. THE ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO
 SHOW OVERHANGS ON THE UPPER FLOOR THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON
 THE ROOF PLAN AND/OR FLOOR PLANS. ENSURE THAT OVERHANGS
 DO NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 3 FEET INTO THE REQUIRED
 SETBACK.
  
 18. THE ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE ON THE ELEVATIONS DOES
 NOT APPEAR TO MATCH THAT WHICH IS SHOWN ON THE
 SITE/FLOOR PLAN. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE
 CONSISTENT.
  
 19. A DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE PROPOSED BIKE
 RACKS.
  
 20. FOR THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ALONG CENTREPARK BOULEVARD,
 CONSIDER HAVING IT AS A STRAIGHT WALK, AS OPPOSED TO
 CONTOURING IT WITH THE CURB LINE. IN THOSE AREAS WHERE
 THERE IS NO ON-STREET PARKING, THIS WOULD ALLOW
 LANDSCAPING/TREES TO BE PLACE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE WALK
 AND ALONG THE STREET. THIS SHOULD PROBABLY BE DISCUSSED
 IN A BIGGER CONTEXT WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER?S
 ASSOCIATION/ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AS THE
 EXISTING PALMS ARE PART OF AN OVERALL EXISTING THEME
 ALONG THE ROADWAY.
  
 21. THE APPLICANT SHOULD WORK WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER?S
 ASSOCIATION REGARDING ENHANCEMENT OF THE CENTREPARK
 ENTRANCE (AT THE CORNER OF AUSTRALIAN AVENUE AND
 CENTREPARK BOULEVARD) AS THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL BE
 REMOVING THE EXISTING ENTRANCE WALL, ROYAL PALMS, ETC.
  
 22. ALL POOLS SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A FENCE OR SIMILAR
 STRUCTURE THAT IS AT LEAST 4 FEET IN HEIGHT. ACCESS TO
 THE POOL MUST BE THROUGH A BUILDING OR THROUGH A
 SELF-CLOSING AND SELF-LATCHING GATE WITH LATCHES AT
 LEAST 54 INCHES ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE GATE.
  
 23. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THE ARCHIECTURAL DESIGN
 OF THE BUILDING, SPECIFICALLY THE TREATMENT OF THE
 PROMINENT CORNER OF THE BUILDING NEAR THE INTERSECTION
 OF AUSTRALIAN AVENUE AND CENTREPARK BOULEVARD. PLEASE
 NOTE, COLOR RENDERINGS WOULD PROVIDE USEFUL IN THE
 EVALUATION OF THESE ASPECTS OF THE BUILDING.
 ___________________________________________
  
 NOTE, STAFF IS CONTINUING TO DISCUSS THE PROPOSED TEXT
 AMENDMENT PERTAINING TO THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND
 WILL FOLLOW UP SOON IN THAT REGARD TO DISCUSS THE
 SPECIFIC LANGUAGE, AS WELL AS ANY POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO
 THE PROJECT (IF ANY).
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE OCTOBER 16, 2018,
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN AUGUST 24, 2018. NOTE
 THAT THE DATE OF THE OCTOBER PLANNING BOARD MEETING MAY
 CHANGE AS A RESULT OF WORK OCCURRING IN THE CITY
 COMMISSION CHAMBERS.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE OCTOBER 16, 2018, PLANNING BOARD
 AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER
 THAN OCTOBER 1, 2018. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE
 INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN
 THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED
 AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED
 ABOVE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved