| Date |
Text |
| 2019-01-31 09:58:48 | THE RESUBMITTAL DID NOT INCLUDE THE OVERALL SITE PLAN |
| | FOR THE EXISTING CSPD BOUNDARY WITH THE ER EXPANSION |
| | INCLUDED. THIS PLAN WOULD ALSO SHOW THE ACREAGE, |
| | BUILDING SQUARE FEET AND PARKING COUNT WITHIN THE CSPD |
| | BOUNDARY. THE SUBMITTED SITE PLAN CONTINUES TO ONLY BE |
| | FOR THE LIMITS OF WORK, WHICH IS NOT SUFFICIENT FOR THE |
| | MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT LEGISLATION THAT I |
| | NEED TO PREPARE FOR THE CITY COMMISSION. THE MAILERS TO |
| | BE ON THE MARCH 11 CITY COMMISSION DATE NEED TO BE SENT |
| | OUT BY YOUR TEAM WITH A POSTMARK DATE OF FEBRUARY 6, |
| | 2019. IN ORDER FOR ME TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN TO SEE |
| | THAT IT CONTAINS ACCURATE INFORMATION, I NEED IT |
| | SUBMITTED TO ME BY 5 PM, FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2019. THIS |
| | WILL ALLOW ME TO REVIEW THE PLANS ON MONDAY, FEBRUARY |
| | 4, 2019, AND SEND YOU A MAILER IF EVERYTHING IS |
| | ACCEPTABLE BY FEBRUARY 5, 2019. THE PLANS AND RESPONSES |
| | DID NOT ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING CONDITION FROM THE PB |
| | REPORT: |
| | |
| | B. PROVIDE DIRECTIONAL (WAYFINDING) SIGN LOCATIONS TO |
| | DIRECT VEHICLES TO GET FROM THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE |
| | CAMPUS TO THE NORTH SIDE VIA THE INTERNAL RING ROAD. |
| | |
| | THIS WOULD EITHER BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN, OR YOU |
| | WOULD ACKNOWLEDGE IN WRITING THAT PRIOR TO THE FINAL |
| | INSPECTION TO ALLOW OCCUPANCY OF THE EXPANDED ED, THE |
| | WAYFINDING SIGNS WILL BE INSTALLED SUBJECT TO THE PLANS |
| | APPROVED AS PART OF A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT |
| | AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| |
Print |
