| Date |
Text |
| 2018-10-24 15:49:14 | CASE NO. PB 950GGGGG - 1ST RESUBMITTAL |
| | CITYPLACE PLAZA - NORTH AND WEST |
| | 620 SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR |
| | (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY OCTOBER 7, 2018), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: CLEARLY DELINEATE THE LIMITS OF WORK |
| | THAT ARE SUBJECT TO THIS MINOR AMENDMENT APPLICATION ON |
| | THE HARDSCAPE PLANS. THE SUBMITTED PLANS ARE A |
| | COMBINATION OF THE ON-SITE (MINOR AMENDMENT) AND |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS. THE ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS |
| | WILL BE PERMITTED SEPARATELY FROM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY |
| | IMPROVEMENTS, SO STAFF NEEDS TO CLEARLY BE ABLE TO |
| | DETERMINE WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED AS PART OF THE ON-SITE |
| | PORTION OF THE PROJECT. FOR EXAMPLE, ON SHEET L3.01, |
| | ONLY BICYCLE RACK A APPEARS TO BE OUTSIDE OF THE |
| | RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE IS HARD TO FOLLOW |
| | IN SOME AREAS, SO IT NEEDS TO BE MORE CLEARLY DEFINED. |
| | ADDITIONALLY, STAFF IS CONFUSED AS TO HOW FAR THE WORK |
| | COVERED BY THE MINOR AMENDMENT IS TO GO? THE PLANS |
| | INCLUDED SHOW THE LIMITS OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING |
| | ON-SITE AND RIGHT-OF-WAY, EXTENDING FROM OKEECHOBEE |
| | BOULEVARD TO HYBISCUS STREET, YET THE MINOR AMENDMENT |
| | APPLICATION IMPLIES THAT THE ONLY ON-SITE WORK IS |
| | IMMEDIATELY AROUND THE PLAZA. THIS NEEDS TO BE CLEAR. |
| | |
| | 2) REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE THE |
| | BICYCLE PARKING INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | A. BICYCLE RACK LOCATION A ON SHEET L3.01 SHOWS THE |
| | INSTALLATION OF THREE BICYCLE RACKS. THE CURRENT |
| | ON-SITE CONDITIONS DO NOT PERMIT THREE RACKS TO BE |
| | INSTALLED AT THAT LOCATION DUE TO AN EXISTING VENDING |
| | MACHINE AND THE EXISTING PLANTER AREA. IF THE VENDING |
| | MACHINE IS TO REMAIN, THE DETAIL NEEDS TO BE ADJUSTED |
| | ACCORDINGLY TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE. IF THREE BICYCLE |
| | RACKS ARE NOT ABLE TO BE INSTALLED, YOU WILL NEED TO |
| | ENSURE THAT THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF REQUIRED BICYCLE |
| | PARKING SPACES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DMP REQUIREMENTS |
| | IS STILL PROVIDED. |
| | B. THE FULL DEPTH DIMENSIONS FOR BICYCLE RACK LOCATION |
| | B WERE NOT INCLUDED, SPECIFICALLY THE DEPTH TO THE |
| | PHASE LINE SIDE. IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS A LIGHT POLE |
| | THAT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN ON THE BICYCLE RACK BLOWUP |
| | DETAIL, WHICH WOULD RENDER ONE RACK UNUSABLE. IF THERE |
| | ARE NO OBSTRUCTIONS (LIGHT POLE BEING REMOVED), PLEASE |
| | CONSIDER MOVING THE BICYCLE RACKS FURTHER TO THE EAST, |
| | SO THAT THE FULL DEPTH OF A PARKED BICYCLE IS IN LINE |
| | WITH THE EIGHT (8) FOOT DEEP PLANTER. THIS WAY THERE IS |
| | NO PARKED BICYCLE OVERHANG INTO THE NEW WALKWAY ALONG |
| | SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE. |
| | |
| | 3) SIGNS MUST BE INSTALLED AT THE TWO PUBLIC SPEECH |
| | LOCATIONS TO PROVIDE A POTENTIAL USER WITH A CONTACT |
| | WHO HAS INFORMATION ON WHAT IS PERMITTED AND HOW TO |
| | "RESERVE" THE AREA. |
| | |
| |
Print |
