| Date |
Text |
| 2018-08-07 11:16:09 | CASE NO. PB 950GGGGG |
| | CITYPLACE PLAZA - NORTH AND WEST |
| | 620 SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE |
| | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY OCTOBER 7, 2018), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | 1) THE CHANGE TO THE GRADING OF THE SITE REQUIRED A |
| | REVIEW BY THE CITY'S STORMWATER ENGINEER; THEREFORE, |
| | YOU WILL NEED TO SUBMIT AN ENGINEERING REVIEW FEE IN |
| | THE AMOUNT OF $212. |
| | |
| | 2) PROVIDE FULL SIZED COPIES OF SHEET S-7 OF THE RECENT |
| | SURVEY THAT WAS COMPLETED FOR CITYPLACE. |
| | |
| | 3) CLEARLY DELINEATE THE LIMITS OF WORK THAT ARE |
| | SUBJECT TO THIS APPLICATION ON THE HARDSCAPE PLANS. |
| | FIGURE 1 OF THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND THE |
| | HARDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT SHOW THE SAME LIMITS OF WORK. |
| | |
| | 4) THE DIMENSIONS OF THE BICYCLE PARKING LOCATIONS MUST |
| | BE SHOWN ON THE HARDSCAPE PLAN. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE |
| | SOUTHERNMOST SET OF RACKS DO NOT APPEAR TO MEET THE |
| | CITY BICYCLE PARKING STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | 5) THE BICYCLE RACK DETAIL ON SHEET L3.13 NEEDS TO SHOW |
| | THE SPECIFIC BICYCLE RACKS THAT ARE PROPOSED, INCLUDING |
| | THE EXACT NUMBER AND THE DIMENSIONS BASED ON THE NUMBER |
| | AND TYPE USED. |
| | |
| | 6) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF THE PEDESTRIAN AREAS ON THE |
| | PLANS FROM THE FACE OF BUILDING TO THE SEAT WALLS ALONG |
| | ROSEMARY AND TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ALONG HIBISCUS. |
| | |
| | 7) PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS OF THE PROPOSED CHANGES ALONG |
| | ROSEMARY AVENUE - ONE AT EACH END OF THE NEW LOWER |
| | WALK. |
| | |
| | 8) ADD ELEVATION TAGS ON THE PLAZA AREAS. |
| | |
| | 9) STAFF RECOMMENDS DESIGNING THE BENCHES WITH |
| | ANTI-SKATE BOARD FEATURES. |
| | |
| | 10) THE PLANS SHOW THE REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING BICYCLE |
| | RACKS WITHIN THE HIBISCUS STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT |
| | TO PANERA. IF THESE WILL NOT BE IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, |
| | THEY NEED TO BE SHOWN INSTALLED ON THE PLAZA OR ON THE |
| | LEASE PARCEL WHERE PANERA IS SITUATED. THESE BICYCLE |
| | PARKING SPACES WERE ORIGINALLY LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE |
| | HIMMEL THEATER. |
| | |
| | 11) THE PLANS DO NOT CLEARLY DESIGNATE WHAT IS |
| | HAPPENING TO THE EXISTING STREET LIGHTS. ON SHEET L3.01 |
| | IT APPEARS THAT THEY ARE BEING PUT INTO THE LANDSCAPE |
| | ISLANDS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THE TREES. SHEET L3.12 |
| | DOES NOT SHOW ANY LIGHTS AT ALL. |
| | |
| | 12) SHEET L3.12 LABELS WHAT SHOULD BE THE LANDSCAPE |
| | AREA AROUND THE EXISTING TREES AS PAVERS. PLEASE |
| | EXPLAIN. |
| | |
| | 13) COMMENT REQUIRING FURTHER VERIFICATION - STAFF IS |
| | RESEARCHING THE POSSIBLE REQUIREMENT FOR A PUBLIC |
| | SPEECH LOCATION THAT WAS REQUIRED ADJACENT TO THE |
| | HIMMEL THEATER WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY?S OFFICE. |
| | |
| |
Print |
