Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Project Z18060025
Project Number Z18060025
Review Stop Z
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2018-08-27 13:53:02CASE NO. PB 983H
 PEGGY ADAMS ADOPTION CENTER
 3200 N. MILITARY TRAIL
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 SEPTEMBER 28, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR
 THE NOVEMBER 20, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY OCTOBER 27,
 2018), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
 FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROVIDED TRAFFIC IMPACT
 EVALUATION CONCLUDES THAT THERE IS NO SIGNIFICANT
 IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THIS HAS PERMITTED
 THE PLANS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE PPRC; HOWEVER, THE CASE
 WILL NOT BE SCHEDULED FOR THE PLANNING BOARD UNTIL THE
 PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS LETTER
 APPROVING THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS SUBMITTED TO THE
 PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 2) REVISED COMMENT: THE FDOT PREDETERMINATION LETTER
 REQUIRES THAT THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY BE A MAXIMUM OF 16
 FEET WIDE AND A FOUR FOOT YELLOW STRIPPING SHOULDER.
 PLEASE SHOW THESE DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS. PLEASE
 EXPLAIN WHY THE DRIVEWAY AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH
 MILITARY TRAIL IS 40 FEET WIDE (INCLUDING THE
 STRIPPING).
  
 3) NEW COMMENT: PROVIDE A DIMENSION LINE TO VERIFY THAT
 THE GATE FOR THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY MEETS THE MINIMUM 80
 FOOT SETBACK STATED IN THE FDOT PREDETERMINATION
 LETTER. NOTE: THIS GATE SHOULD SWING IN TO THE
 PROPERTY, NOT OUT TOWARD THE INCOMING VEHICLES.
  
 4) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE PAVING, GRADING AND
 DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING THE FINAL CONDITIONS WHEN THE
 TRAILERS ARE REMOVED.
  
 5) REVISED COMMENT: PLEASE CONTACT THE NEIGHBORING
 CONDO TO THE NORTH REGARDING THE WAIVER TO THE REQUIRED
 SCREEN WALL. A LETTER SUPPORTING THIS WOULD BE
 BENEFICIAL.
  
 6) NEW COMMENT: PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE ?BALL STYLE
 POST TOP? FOR THE FENCE. THIS DECORATIVE ELEMENT MAY BE
 A MAXIMUM OF 10 PERCENT ABOVE THE SIX FOOT FENCE
 HEIGHT.
  
 7) REVISED COMMENT: THE RESPONSE NOTES THAT THERE IS A
 SIGN PROGRAM BEING REQUESTED FOR THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS.
 PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS ON
 THE SITE PLAN AND PROVIDE THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE
 SIGNS AS WELL AS THE HEIGHT AND WIDTH OF THE TEXT AREA.
 STAFF IS UNABLE TO TELL IF ALL OF THE SIGNS ARE THE
 SAME SIZE (W3 APPEARS TO HAVE AN ADDED PANEL AFTER THE
 SIGN WAS ORIGINALLY INSTALLED). FOR FUTURE PERMITTING,
 THERE SHOULD BE A CONSISTENT SIGN SIZE AND POSSIBLY
 FUTURE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. ALTERNATIVELY,
 FUTURE SIGN LOCATIONS COULD BE APPROVED AS MINOR PD
 AMENDMENT.
  
 8) REVISED COMMENT: STAFF CANNOT MAKE AN ACCURATE
 DETERMINATION OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
  
 A. REVISED COMMENT: THE DOMES ARE A TWO STORY BUILDING,
 YET ONLY THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE FIRST FLOOR IS
 SHOWN.
  
 B. REVISED COMMENT: STAFF NEEDS CLARIFICATION FOR 1750
 CATS & WORK AREA. ADDITIONALLY THERE ARE AREAS IN THE
 NEW ADOPTION CENTER SHOWN IN WHITE. THE SQUARE FOOTAGE
 IN THESE AREAS NEEDS TO BE FULLY COUNTED AS TO THE USE
 TYPE.
  
 9) REPEAT COMMENT: THERE NEEDS TO BE A CONSTRUCTION
 PARKING PLAN TO SHOW THAT SUFFICIENT PARKING WILL BE
 AVAILABLE DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND
 RENOVATION. STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT THIS REQUIRES A
 FOLLOW-UP MEETING.
  
 10) REVISED COMMENT: THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE BUS
 SHELTER EASEMENT. PLEASE NOTE THAT PALMTRAN DOES
 INSTALL BUS SHELTERS WITHIN MUNICIPAL LIMITS.
  
 11) STAFF REALIZES THAT THERE WILL BE CHANGES TO THE
 SITE PLAN BASED ON THE ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES THAT
 MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE 2ND FLOOR OF THE DOME SQUARE
 FOOTAGE, SO ADDITIONAL COMMENT MAY BE FORTHCOMING WHEN
 REVISED PLANS ARE SUBMITTED.
  
  
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved