| Date |
Text |
| 2018-11-07 09:54:39 | CASE NOS. PB 1799 & 1799A |
| | PROJECT NAME: 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER ? 2ND RESUBMITTAL |
| | 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON MONDAY, |
| | NOVEMBER 5, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR |
| | THE NOVEMBER 28, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | PRIOR TO PB: |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO ACACIA |
| | ROAD NEED TO MEET THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION |
| | REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE CASE BEFORE THE |
| | PLANNING BOARD. |
| | |
| | A. THE CITY SURVEYOR HAS PROVIDED COMMENTS THAT THE FPL |
| | TRANSFORMERS MAY NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN ACACIA ROAD |
| | SINCE THEY WILL INTERFERE WITH THE UTILITIES LOCATED |
| | WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE APPLICANT RESPONSE WAS |
| | THAT THIS IS ?ACKNOWLEDGED?. THE FPL TRANSFORMERS NEED |
| | TO BE SHOWN OUT OF ACACIA COURT AND AT THEIR FINAL |
| | LOCATION. ANY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE SITE, LANDSCAPE AND |
| | CIVIL PLANS BASED ON THE NEW FPL TRANSFORMER LOCATIONS |
| | NEED TO BE COMPLETED SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT ALL |
| | CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE STILL MET. |
| | B. PROVIDE THE SIZE REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH TRANSFORMER |
| | PAD AS WELL AS THE DIMENSIONS, INCLUDING HEIGHT OF THE |
| | TRANSFORMERS. THE E-MAIL THAT WAS PROVIDED FROM BRENNA |
| | HOLLAWAY AT FPL INDICATES THAT A 7 FOOT BY 7 FOOT AREA |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE PAD, WITH ADDITIONAL CLEARANCE ON EACH |
| | SIDE. THIS DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ACCURATELY REFLECTED |
| | ON THE SITE PLAN AS THE TRANSFORMERS LOOK TOO SMALL. |
| | THE APPLICATION IS USING THE IMPROVEMENT OF ACACIA |
| | COURT AS A PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY AS PART OF THE INNOVATIVE |
| | PLANNING TO JUSTIFY THE WAIVER REQUESTS. THE |
| | INSTALLATION OF LARGE, UNSCREENED TRANSFORMER BOXES |
| | BLOCKING A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS |
| | NOT ACCEPTABLE. PLEASE NOTE THAT A REVIEW OF THE FPL |
| | TRANSFORMER PLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS LIST SETBACKS FROM |
| | LANDSCAPE AND SETBACKS FROM RESIDENTIAL WINDOWS. THE |
| | PLACEMENT OF THE TRANSFORMERS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO |
| | THE PROPERTY LINE OF 1301 SOUTH FLAGLER WOULD PROHIBIT |
| | THAT PROPERTY FROM REDEVELOPING IN CODE COMPLIANCE |
| | SINCE THE TRANSFORMER SETBACK PROHIBITS THE |
| | INSTALLATION OF THE CODE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER. THE |
| | FPL REQUIREMENTS ALSO LIST A 15 FOOT SETBACK TO |
| | WINDOWS, WHICH THE PLACEMENT OF THESE TRANSFORMERS DO |
| | NOT SEEM TO COMPLY WITH. |
| | C. PROVIDE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SWITCH BOXES |
| | SHOWN ON THE PLANS, TO INCLUDE HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | 2) THE PLANTER BOXES ON ACACIA AVENUE NEED TO HAVE |
| | MULTIPLE TRUNK PALMS TO ACHIEVE THE DESIRED EFFECT OF |
| | CREATING AN ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN AREA THAT CAN BE USED |
| | INNOVATIVE DESIGN FOR THE RPD REQUEST. |
| | |
| | 3) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE PLANTER BOXES PROPOSED FOR |
| | ACACIA ROAD. |
| | |
| | A. HOW ARE THEY AFFIXED TO THE GROUND? IF NOT AFFIXED, |
| | HOW ARE THEY MOVED IN THE EVENT THAT CITY MAINTENANCE |
| | IS REQUIRED? NOTE: THIS WOULD BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF |
| | THE HOA. |
| | B. HOW ARE THEY IRRIGATED? WHERE WILL THE IRRIGATION |
| | LINES BE INSTALLED? NOTE: THIS WOULD BE THE |
| | RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOA. |
| | C. HOW ARE THE PLANTERS DRAINED? |
| | |
| | 4) RENDERINGS OF THE PATH ARE NOT ACCURATE. |
| | |
| | A. THE CONTAINER MATERIAL AND SIZE. |
| | B. THE PLANTS SHOWN BOTH TREES AND PALMS. |
| | C. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN NEEDS TO BE MARKED TO SHOW TAGS |
| | WHERE THE RENDERINGS ARE TAKEN FROM. |
| | |
| | 5) PROVIDE DETAILS ON WHAT THE GARAGE SUPPLY AND |
| | RETURNS LOOK LIKE ABOVE GRADE, TO INCLUDE THE HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | 6) WHAT DOES THE PRIVACY FENCE ON SOUTH PROPERTY LINE |
| | LOOK LIKE? |
| | |
| | PRIOR TO CC CONDITIONS: |
| | |
| | 7) CONTINUE THE WIDENED SIDEWALK THE FULL LENGTH OF THE |
| | PROPERTY FRONTAGE AND ALONG THE ARCACIA ROAD AND |
| | FLAGLER DRIVE INTERSECTION FRONTAGE. |
| | |
| | 8) THE WALL AND FENCE AROUND THE GENERATOR SERVICE YARD |
| | ARE SHOWN AT A HEIGHT OF SEVEN (7) FEET (SHEET L9.01). |
| | THE PERMITTED HEIGHT WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK ALONG |
| | CURRIE CRESCENT IS FOUR (4) FEET. STAFF IS WILLING TO |
| | SUPPORT A FENCE HEIGHT WAIVER, FROM GRADE, OF SIX (6) |
| | FEET SURROUNDING THE GENERATOR AREA AND THE MECHANICAL |
| | EQUIPMENT AREA. BY CODE, THE HEDGE MAY GROW TO 10 FEET |
| | IN HEIGHT, SO NO WAIVER IS REQUIRED FOR IT. |
| | |
| | 9) BICYCLE FACILITIES. |
| | |
| | A. STAFF ACCEPTS THE SPECIFIED BICYCLE RACK AS MEETING |
| | CITY BICYCLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE A BLOW UP OF |
| | THE BICYCLE STORAGE ROOM WITH THE PROPOSED RACK AND |
| | DIMENSIONS SO THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THAT THERE IS |
| | SUFFICIENT SPACE FOR THE SEVEN BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. |
| | WHEN COMPARING THE VARIOUS PAGES AND DETAILS, IT |
| | APPEARS THERE IS ADEQUATE ROOM, BUT IT NEEDS TO BE |
| | CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS. |
| | B. THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT VERIFY THAT THE PROVIDED |
| | EMPLOYEE BICYCLE PARKING COMPLIES WITH CITY CODE. |
| | PROVIDE A DETAIL THAT SPECIFICALLY SHOWS HOW THE |
| | BICYCLE RACK WITH THE TWO BICYCLES WILL FUNCTION WHERE |
| | IT IS SHOWN AGAINST THE WALL. INCLUDE DIMENSIONS TO |
| | SHOW THAT THE EGRESS PATH IS NOT BLOCKED. WHEN |
| | COMPARING THE VARIOUS PAGES AND DETAILS, IT APPEARS |
| | THERE IS ADEQUATE ROOM, BUT IT NEEDS TO BE CLEARLY |
| | SHOWN ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| |
Print |
