| Date |
Text |
| 2018-09-26 16:14:08 | CASE NO. PB 1799 & 1799A |
| | PROJECT NAME: 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER -1ST RESUBMITTAL |
| | 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN |
| | (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | OCTOBER 5, 2018, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE |
| | NOVEMBER 20, 2018 PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY NOVEMBER 26, 2018), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT SINCE PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS |
| | WERE NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT IS |
| | ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE IS BE 20% OF THE |
| | ORIGINAL RPD APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION |
| | 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS. |
| | |
| | 1) REVISED COMMENT: THE BASE MEASURE POINT REQUIRES |
| | FURTHER DISCUSSION BASED ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS. |
| | |
| | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO ACACIA |
| | ROAD NEED TO MEET THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION |
| | REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE CASE BEFORE THE |
| | PLANNING BOARD. ** THE RESPONSE THAT THIS IS TO BE |
| | SHOWN ON A SEPARATE RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS NOT |
| | ACCEPTABLE. THE ACACIA ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ARE BEING USED |
| | AS AN INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT |
| | TECHNIQUE TO CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE |
| | DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO RELAX THE HEIGHT/SETBACK |
| | REQUIREMENTS; THEREFORE, YOU NEED TO PROVIDE A DESIGN |
| | THAT MEETS ALL THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION |
| | CRITERIA PRIOR TO STAFF MAKING A RECOMMENDATION ON IF |
| | IT IS APPROPRIATE AS A MITIGATION MEASURE. FOR EXAMPLE, |
| | IF THE EXISTING UTILITIES, BELOW AND ABOVE GROUND, DO |
| | NOT PERMIT THE INSTALLATION OF TREES, THEN THE ACACIA |
| | ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROVIDE A MINIMAL AMOUNT TO THE |
| | ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | A. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION AND MORE DETAILS OF THE |
| | PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THE CURRENT ELEVATION OF ACACIA |
| | ROAD IS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY SLOPING FROM APPROXIMATELY |
| | SIX (6) FEET TO 10 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY |
| | BOUNDARY OF THE 1309 S. FLAGLER DEVELOPMENT SITE. THE |
| | SAME LOCATION IS SHOWN HAVING AN ALMOST CONSISTENT 10 |
| | FOOT ELEVATION. HOW IS THIS FOUR (4) FOOT GRADE CHANGE |
| | BEING INTEGRATED WITH THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND |
| | SOUTH OF THE SITE AS WELL AS TOWARD FLAGLER DRIVE. ** |
| | NOT PROVIDED. |
| | B. PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PEDESTRIAN PERMEABLE PAVING |
| | AND THE BENCHES THAT ARE PROPOSED. ** NOT PROVIDED -THE |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION MUST AGREE WITH THE |
| | PROPOSED PAVERS. |
| | C. PROVIDE DETAILS ON ADA ACCESSIBILITY. ** THIS NEEDS |
| | TO BE PROVIDED ON THE PLANS. NOT ONLY SLOPE, BUT ADA |
| | COMPLIANT MATERIALS. |
| | D. THE SKY BIKE CONTRACT IS WITH THE DDA AND DOES NOT |
| | EXTEND OUTSIDE OF DOWNTOWN. ALL OF THE BICYCLE SHARE |
| | FACILITIES NEED TO BE LOCATED ON THE 1309 S. FLAGLER |
| | PROPERTY. PLEASE NOTE THAT NO ADVERTISING FACILITIES |
| | WILL BE PERMITTED. SINCE THE BICYCLE SHARE IS BEING |
| | USED AS AN INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT |
| | TECHNIQUE TO CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE |
| | DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO RELAX THE HEIGHT/SETBACK |
| | REQUIREMENTS, THEN YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE |
| | DOCUMENTATION FROM SKY BIKE THAT THIS LOCATION IS |
| | ACCEPTABLE TO THEM (WITHOUT ADVERTISING), TO INCLUDE A |
| | PRELIMINARY AGREEMENT TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES OFF |
| | CURRIE CRESCENT PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE CASE BEFORE THE |
| | PLANNING BOARD. ** NO WRITTEN RESPONSE PROVIDED. |
| | E. THE 1309 SOUTH FLAGLER HOMEOWNER' ASSOCIATION WILL |
| | NEED TO MAINTAIN ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE ACACIA |
| | ROAD ROW AS WELL AS PROVIDE THE ELECTRICITY FOR THE |
| | LIGHTING. ** CONDITION |
| | |
| | 3) REVISED COMMENT: THE SURVEY SHOWS A SIX (6) FOOT |
| | WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. |
| | THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT PERMITTED TO BE PLANTED |
| | WITHIN THIS EASEMENT. ** THE COMMENT RESPONSE STATES |
| | THAT THE EASEMENT WILL BE VACATED AND THE UTILITIES |
| | RELOCATED. PLEASE PROVIDE A PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FROM |
| | FPL, THE EASEMENT HOLDER, THAT THEY DO NOT OBJECT TO |
| | THE PROPOSED VACATION AND RELOCATION. |
| | |
| | 4) REPEAT COMMENT: IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN THE OPEN |
| | CHARACTER OF SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE, THE RECENT |
| | REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS (LA CLARE AND BRISTOL) HAVE BEEN |
| | REQUIRED TO PROVIDE OPEN SPACE THAT IS PUBLICLY |
| | ACCESSIBLE AND THAT DOES NOT HAVE BARRIERS SUCH AS |
| | WALLS OR FENCES ALONG THEIR FLAGLER DRIVE FRONTAGES. ** |
| | STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE REVISED PLAN AS IT DOES NOT |
| | PROVIDE FOR THE EXPECTATION OF OPEN SPACE ALONG FLAGLER |
| | DRIVE. |
| | |
| | 5) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE 40 FOOT |
| | DRIVEWAY OPENING ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE. THIS CREATES AN |
| | UNNECESSARILY WIDE CROSSING POINT FOR PEDESTRIANS, |
| | WHICH DOES NOT PROMOTE SAFETY. ADDITIONALLY, USING MORE |
| | THAN A THIRD OF THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE FOR VEHICULAR |
| | ACCESS DOES NOT PROMOTE THE CITY'S AESTHETIC VISION FOR |
| | FLAGLER DRIVE. |
| | |
| | 6) PARKING |
| | |
| | A. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT VERIFICATION THAT |
| | THE PROVISION OF PARKING SPACES AT THIS LOCATION DOES |
| | NOT REQUIRE THE PROVISION OF ADA SPACES AS WELL. ** |
| | CONDITION - SIGNED "VALET ONLY" SO NO ADA REQUIRED. |
| | B. REPEAT COMMENT: INCLUDE PARKING SPACE WIDTH |
| | DIMENSIONS ON THE SITE PLAN FOR GARAGE PARKING. ** NOT |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | C. REVISED COMMENT: THE PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO BE |
| | UPDATED TO REMOVE THE TWO TOWN CAR SPACES FROM THE |
| | "REQUIRED" COLUMN. |
| | D. REPEAT COMMENT: THE PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO HAVE LINE |
| | ITEMS FOR THE NUMBER OF ADA SPACES REQUIRED AND |
| | PROVIDED. |
| | E. NEW COMMENT: WHAT ARE THE "3 CAR GARAGE SPACES"? |
| | F. NEW COMMENT: PROVIDE THE DEPTH OF COMPACT SPACE NO. |
| | 9 ON BASEMENT 2. IT APPEARS SHORT. |
| | G. NEW COMMENT: HOW WILL THE RESIDENT PARKING SPACES BE |
| | ASSIGNED? STAFF HAS CONCERNS ABOUT THE VEHICLE CHARGING |
| | STATION ASSIGNMENT. IF RESIDENTS ARE BUYING SPECIFIC |
| | INDIVIDUAL SPACES, IT MAY BE BETTER TO PRE-WIRE THE |
| | ENTIRE GARAGE AND THEN THE RESIDENTS CAN PAY FOR A |
| | CHARGING INSTALL IF THEY HAVE AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE. |
| | |
| | 7) REVISED COMMENT: THE B1 VENTILATION MAY NOT BE IN |
| | THE REQUIRED TURN AROUND SPACE AS THIS WILL MAKE THE |
| | SPACE NONE FUNCTIONING TO USE FOR TURN AROUND. |
| | |
| | 8) BICYCLE FACILITIES. |
| | |
| | A. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE BICYCLE |
| | STORAGE ROOM SO THAT STAFF CAN EVALUATE IF THE TYPE OF |
| | RACKS THAT ARE PROVIDED ARE APPROPRIATE FOR THE NUMBER |
| | OF SPACES. ** INADEQUATE DETAIL PROVIDED. |
| | B. REVISED COMMENT - PROVIDE A CITY COMPLIANT BICYCLE |
| | RACK DETAIL. ** THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT VERIFY THAT THE |
| | PROVIDED EMPLOYEE BICYCLE PARKING COMPLIES WITH CITY |
| | CODE. PROVIDE A DETAIL THAT SPECIFICALLY SHOWS HOW THE |
| | BICYCLE RACK WITH THE TWO BICYCLES WILL FUNCTION WHERE |
| | IT IS SHOWN AGAINST THE WALL. INCLUDE DIMENSIONS TO |
| | SHOW THAT THE EGRESS PATH IS NOT BLOCKED. |
| | |
| | 9) WHAT ARE THE AREAS LABELED SUITE 1 AND 2? CONDITION |
| | - NO KITCHEN FACILITIES. |
| | |
| | 10) SHEET A3-02 SHOWS THE GENERATOR BELOW THE HEIGHT OF |
| | THE SCREENING. PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE GENERATOR NEEDS |
| | TO BE SCREENED FOR ITS FULL HEIGHT, SO ENSURE THAT THE |
| | GENERATOR THAT IS USED IS NOT TOO LARGE TO AVOID ISSUES |
| | AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING. CONDITION - GENERATOR |
| | COMPLETE HEIGHT SCREENED. |
| | |
| | 11) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE ANY OUTSTANDING UTILITY |
| | LETTERS. |
| | |
| | 12) PROVIDE DETAILS ON HOW THE GARBAGE/RECYCLING |
| | PICK-UP WILL WORK. CONDITION - GARBAGE RECEPTACLES MUST |
| | BE READY BEHIND THE GATE A HALF HOUR PRIOR TO THE |
| | SCHEDULED PICK-UP TIME. GARBAGE RECEPTACLES ARE THEN |
| | ROLLED OUT BY BUILDING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL ONCE THE |
| | TRUCK ARRIVES. THE GARBAGE RECEPTACLES NEED TO BE MOVED |
| | BACK BEHIND THE GATE WITHIN A HALF HOUR OF PICK-UP BY |
| | BUILDING MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL. |
| | |
| | 13) NEW COMMENT: PROVIDE ELEVATION DRAWINGS OF THE |
| | PROPOSED FENCES/WALLS WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK. |
| | |
| | 14) NEW COMMENT: PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT IS OCCURRING ON |
| | THE PENTHOUSE ROOF DECK. THERE SEEMS TO BE A |
| | DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS AND THE |
| | "OPEN TO THE SKY" MECHANICAL AREAS. |
| | |
| | REQUIRED WAIVERS |
| | |
| | 1) CURRIE CRESCENT SB |
| | |
| | 2) WALL HEIGHTS: |
| | |
| | RETAINING WALL WEST OF NASSER IS 15 FOOT ABOVE HIS |
| | GRADE AT HIGHEST POINT |
| | ACACIA COURT RETAINING WALL + SAFETY RAIL IS 10+ FEET |
| | TALL IN SETBACK |
| | COLUMNS FOR FLAGLER DRIVE - 8 FEET --- STAFF DOES NOT |
| | SUPPORT |
| | WALLS ALONG CURRIE CRESCENT |
| | |
| | 3) CURRIE CRESCENT ACCESS |
| | A. NUMBER |
| | B. SEPARATION |
| | C. ON-SITE MANEUVERING |
| | |
| | 4) LANDSCAPE |
| | A. REQUIRED TREES |
| | B. BUFFER INTERRUPTION ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE. |
| | |
| |
Print |
